
Preparing Europe for the next cross-border health threats, COVID lessons unpacked
In 2022, the European Commission introduced a Regulation to develop a comprehensive prevention, preparedness and response plan at the EU and member state levels. And in a major step forward, WHO Member States recently took measures to strengthen global collaboration on prevention, preparedness and response to future pandemic threats.
Acknowledging that pandemics and epidemics remain significant threats to global public health, Shionogi, together with Euractiv, held a panel discussion on how to tackle the question of preparing Europe for emerging cross-border health threats, in particular, the 'slow pandemic' of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
AMR occurs when germs no longer respond to antimicrobial treatments, and experts argue that further cooperation, transparency and improved procedures are needed to combat the deep-rooted problem.
Serious cross-border threats
Kicking off the discussion, Antonio Parenti, Director, Public Health, Cancer and Health Security, DG SANTE, European Commission, emphasised the critical role of the Regulation on serious cross-border threats to health (EU 2022/2371) which strengthens EU coordination and collaboration, prevention and preparedness, as well as beefing up different monitoring and surveillance mechanisms, serving as the backbone for future health security preparedness and cross-border health responses
He explained that DG SANTE is intensifying collaboration with the relevant internal and external stakeholders through simulation exercises and is intensively working on improving the EU's rapid reaction capabilities, and is addressing the growing threat of AMR with unprecedented co-financing through the EU4Health Programme.
Embedding health in the EU's Preparedness Strategy, where health is a vital societal function under the Union Preparedness Strategy, is essential, said Parenti 'Ensuring its resilience means boosting citizen readiness and strengthening civil-military health cooperation. A new Technical Working Group on civil-military collaboration under the Health Security Committee is paving the way for interoperable responses to crises, from pandemics to armed aggression and CBRN threats,' he added.
Fragmented approaches
Rohit Malpani, Senior Policy Advisor at the Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership (GARDP), called on the European Union to take a more proactive and integrated stance in addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), warning that current fragmented approaches may fall short in the face of future health crises.
Malpani argued that 'The EU should introduce an end-to-end model for which the EU coordinates funding across research, clinical development, manufacturing and access.'
He stressed that such a model would help avoid the pitfalls experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, including shortages of medical technologies and counterproductive competition between member states.
'Instead of setting out incentives and hoping that the private sector will respond with what is required, it is critical that the EU and other countries take an active role in defining its needs and ensuring that those needs are met,' he added.
Malpani also emphasised the need for adaptable funding and research models.
'Responding to AMR requires flexible funding, models, and R&D approaches: No single push funding or pull incentive will address all needs,' he said.
Drawing on GARDP's experience, he advocated for a diversified strategy that includes developing new antibiotics, repurposing existing treatments, and testing combinations of older generics. He noted that the EU's Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) is well-positioned to support such a tailored response.
Malpani urged the EU to maintain a global perspective.
'While it is critical for the EU to ensure that it can develop and ensure access to key medical technologies to address viral threats and bacterial pathogens of concern, it is also important that it is prioritising threats globally, including against AMR, and for underserved populations such as children and babies,' he said, underscoring the importance of ensuring that new technologies are tested and supported by robust data to effectively curb AMR both within Europe and globally.
Strategic and operational coordination
Laurent Muschel, Deputy Head of HERA, European Commission, agreed that the EU must adopt a toolbox to cross-border health threats - strengthening strategic and operational coordination through HERA and ensuring readiness via early warning systems, advanced research, stockpiles, and joint procurement. He explained that the upcoming MCM Strategy will focus on innovation, supply chain resilience, and equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
Muschel also addressed concerns about AMR.
'AMR is treated with the same urgency as pandemics. HERA is investing in novel solutions like bacteriophage therapies and new classes of antibiotics and supporting SMEs through HERA Invest. I believe the EU must reduce dependency on global supply chains by investing in onshore manufacturing and modernising distribution mechanisms to ensure rapid and equitable access to medical countermeasures,' he said.
Tomislav Sokol, MEP and member of the European Parliament's SANT Committee, has called for a comprehensive overhaul of the EU's approach to health innovation and preparedness, urging policymakers to focus on research, industrial resilience, and strategic autonomy.
Sokol stressed the importance of stimulating funding for basic research and incentivising pharmaceutical innovation, while also ensuring that companies developing new medical products remain anchored in Europe.
He welcomed recent EU initiatives, including the General Pharmaceutical Legislation (GPL) and the Critical Medicines Alliance (CMA), which he said are 'giving preferential treatment to production in Europe.' He also praised the establishment of the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) and its coordination efforts.
However, he argued that further steps are needed. 'I think we have to do some additional things like stronger or mandatory coordination of stockpiling,' he said. Concluding on an optimistic note, Sokol stated: 'If we understand that healthcare and public health should be one of the priority sectors now in the EU, we can really make a difference, and that Europe can be much better prepared for future health crisis and also much less dependent on imports than it is now.'
Central role of funding
Emmanuel André, Co-Chair of the European Commission's Advisory Committee on Public Health Emergencies (ACPHE) and Professor of Clinical Microbiology at KU Leuven, underscored the central role of funding in Europe's ability to respond to future health threats.
'Funding is the key. If you want to get new medical countermeasures, antibiotics or therapeutics or vaccines, it is, as we say in French, 'nerf de la guerre.' It's really the key,' André said.
He called for health to be prioritised in the EU's next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), urging the European Parliament, Council, and member states to ensure adequate budgetary support.
'We count on the European Parliament to help us on the Council and member states to make sure that we have sufficient budget to do what we're supposed to do,' he added.
However, André warned that Europe cannot shoulder the burden alone.
'Europe should not fund everything. I call for all of the funders to come into the game. It's always the same players – the Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust are always there. But it's always the same,' he said. Pointing to recent international engagement, he questioned the financial follow-through.
"Saudi Arabia held a nice ministerial meeting on AMR in Jeddah last November. Where is the money from Saudi Arabia? Where is the funding?' he asked.
Framing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a global challenge, André concluded: 'This is a global issue, and we are not the only ones who have high GDP per capita. There are some others. So it's really a global, worldwide issue, and others also need to play their game.'
Robust policy framework needed
Huw Tippett, CEO of Shionogi Europe and board member since 2019, has urged policymakers to elevate health on the political agenda and implement robust frameworks to support antimicrobial innovation. Speaking on the pharmaceutical industry's role in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), Tippett highlighted the economic and structural challenges that hinder progress.
'We need a robust policy framework, including the right funding mechanisms, as sometimes the business case doesn't add up for pharma companies. We need equity in terms of access. All in all, health needs to be higher up the political agenda,' he said.
Founded nearly 150 years ago in Osaka, Shionogi is one of the few major pharmaceutical firms maintaining a long-standing commitment to anti-infective research, with over six decades of experience in antimicrobial development.
Tippett pointed to the '100 Day Mission' as a strategic model for future preparedness. 'I think that's an excellent strategic framework. There's a lot that has to be done in it. We've said it already today, we need excellent R&D pipelines through funding and investment, attracting more people back to the space,' he noted.
He also stressed the importance of collaboration, particularly with organisations like the Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership (GARDP).
'Great funding mechanisms, working together, working as partners and getting to places in the world that you might not be able to get to yourself through great partnerships, such as Shionogi with GARDP. We're experts in the developed world, but GARDP are experts in the low and middle income world,' Tippett said, 'access to medicines is key.'
[Edited By Brian Maguire | Euractiv's Advocacy Lab ]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
2 days ago
- Euractiv
Mounting pressure on Sweden over Gaza medevac refusals
The Swedish government is facing increased pressure to admit wounded Palestinian patients, having consistently refused to assist with medical evacuation from the Gaza Strip. The centre-right coalition government, composed of Moderates, Liberals, and Christian Democrats, is arguing that Sweden already supports Egyptian healthcare with medical equipment and also supports UN bodies, such as UNICEF and UNFPA, by providing healthcare and humanitarian support on the ground. "The government does not rule out, as other countries do, accepting patients for care in Sweden as a complement to on-site assistance. In each case, consideration must be given to the circumstances, what solutions will provide the fastest help to those in need, and also how we can best help as many people as possible. In the current context, it is crucial to ensure that people receive immediate help where they are," Acko Ankarberg Johansson, the Christian Democrat Health Minister, told Euractiv. Agency on standby Magdalena Tham Lindell, head of humanitarian operations at the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), told Euractiv that the agency has so far had to turn down 37 requests from the EU Civil Protection Mechanism for the medical evacuation of trauma patients from Gaza since the conflict between Hamas and Israel began. "We do not have any mission from the Swedish government to carry out such a task," she added. However, Tham Lindell also said that the Civil Contingencies Agency is ready to carry out medical transport of patients from Gaza to Sweden. "Yes, we are well prepared to do this if we receive such a mission," she said. As early as 2023, the acting EU Commissioners, Stella Kyriakides and Janez Lenarčič, urged member states to provide care to patients from Gaza. The UN and the WHO have also been calling for assistance and support. Pressure on Sweden Despite an EU-wide slow reaction, 14 EU countries, including Italy, Romania, and Spain, are currently assisting with medical evacuations from Gaza, according to the EU mechanism. With the situation deteriorating into a worst-case scenario involving widespread hospital destruction, starvation and the killing of civilians by the Israeli side, calls for the evacuation of wounded children and adults have grown louder and more frequent in Sweden. Stakeholders, including the Swedish Association of Health Professionals (the union representing nurses and midwives), doctors, hospitals, and private care providers, have requested that ministers revise their position. The Hospital Doctors Association has recently reiterated its request to allow Gaza patients admission into Sweden in an open letter to the government. "We are dismayed that despite the readiness of healthcare providers, the Swedish government is refusing to accept patients from Gaza," the association's board wrote. Parliamentary pressure Daniel Helldén, one of the Swedish Green Party's two spokespersons, also formally asked Ulf Kristersson, the Swedish Prime Minister, what would make the government change its mind on the issue. "We have individual regions, hospitals and doctors who want to help. Many other countries have helped. Doctors who have been on the ground say that their resources are not enough while the killing continues. I can't for the life of me understand why the government is saying no to this," he told Dagens Nyheter. Fredrik Lundh Sammeli, Health Spokesperson and a Parliamentarian for the Social Democrats, the Swedish main opposition party, recently asked on Facebook: "How long will the government stand by while children die?" If the Swedish Parliament had been open, he wrote, he would already have called the Minister for Health to the Social Affairs Committee to answer: "Why does Sweden refuse to accept injured children from Gaza, when other European countries do?" Passive stance Lundh Sammeli also told Euractiv that the party considers that the government has taken a far too passive position on the Gaza issue. "This is sad. Sweden should be committed to assisting people in need during humanitarian disasters and conflicts. We have received seriously injured people from Ukraine and should have the same attitude to the Gaza war as part of the coordinated European effort." He insisted that on-the-spot help and transporting seriously injured people to Swedish hospitals are not mutually exclusive. Sweden has so far received and treated 237 patients from Ukraine since the Russian full-scale invasion in 2022, Johan Köhler, Programme Manager at the National and Civil Protection Operations Section of the MSB, told Euractiv. According to the BBC and the Sunday Times, the UK government now plans to evacuate up to 300 seriously ill or wounded children from Gaza. The plan could be set into action within weeks. A private initiative has already brought Palestinian children from Gaza to the UK. [Edited by Vasiliki Angouridi]


Euractiv
6 days ago
- Euractiv
EU approves ‘miracle' HIV injectable, but experts say AIDS fight not over
The EU has approved lenacapavir, a twice-yearly HIV prevention shot that could replace daily pills, but experts say access still hangs in the balance


Euractiv
6 days ago
- Euractiv
Tobacco tax: How much more cigarettes will cost in the EU
Smokers across the EU could soon face steep price hikes of up to €2 per pack under a proposed EU-wide tobacco tax reform – a public health measure that's sparking political pushback in some member states. The stakes are particularly high in light of the European executive's recent proposal to include tobacco taxes as a new own resource in the 2028–2034 EU budget, which is expected to generate €11.2 billion annually. At least 15 member states agree with the Commission that revising the Tobacco Excise Duty Directive (TED) is necessary in order to reduce the attractiveness of smoking, given that tobacco consumption is responsible for around 700,000 deaths each year in the EU. However, the revised TED requires unanimous approval, and some member states – including Italy, Luxembourg and Greece – have expressed reservations. In its proposal, the Commission recently supported a 139% increase in cigarette taxes – from the current €90 per 1,000 units to €215 per 1,000 units. Tobacco tax in EU budget: What if Europe goes smoke-free? Europe's long-term budget has a smoking problem. Euractiv obtained data illustrating what the new proposal would mean for cigarette prices across the bloc. Out of the 27 member states, only Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands, and Ireland would not be affected by the Commission's plans, as they have already imposed tobacco taxes above the current EU average. In other member states, price increases would range from €1 to €2 per pack of cigarettes. The highest increase would occur in Bulgaria (59.9%), which has the highest smoking rate in the EU. In practice, a smoker who consumes a pack of cigarettes a day in Bulgaria would face an additional annual cost of €645 if the proposed tax hikes are implemented. In Greece, the annual increase would be around €540, and in Italy around €415.