Japan's core inflation climbs to 3.5%, highest in more than 2 years
Global Economy May 23, 2025
TOPSHOT – Customers enter an electronics shop in the Akihabara district of Tokyo on January 12, 2024.
Richard A. Brooks | Afp | Getty Images
Japan's core inflation accelerated to 3.5% in April, government data showed Friday, bolstered in part by surging rice prices, as the central bank considers pausing its rate hike posture to assess the impact of U.S. tariffs.
The core inflation figure, which strips out prices for fresh food, was higher than expectations of 3.4%, according to economists polled by Reuters, rising from 3.2% in the previous month and marking the highest level since January 2023.
Headline inflation climbed 3.6% from a year ago, steady from the prior month and staying above the Bank of Japan's 2% target for more than three years.
Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda has signaled his stance on intending to raise rates given price trends, while also citing the need to monitor closely the effects of U.S. tariffs.
Rice prices in Japan have doubled over the year. The average price in 1,000 supermarkets across the country reportedly continued to hit record highs, with prices for a 5-kilogram bag of rice hiking by 54 yen from the previous week to 4,268 yen ($29.63) as of May 11.
The country's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, has reportedly pledged to lower rice prices to below 4,000 yen ($28) per 5-kilogram bag, staking his job on the line.
The core inflation is expected to ease in the coming months due to lower crude oil prices and the yen's appreciation, said Masato Koike, economist at Sompo Institute Plus.
As seen during Trump's first administration, an oversupply of food stemming from the U.S. tariffs could lead to lower food prices, said Koike, adding that the resumption of government subsidies for electricity and gas bills in the summer will also create downward pressure on inflation.
The Japanese yen strengthened 0.15% to 143.80 against the U.S. dollar following the release, while the benchmark Nikkei 225 rose modestly.
Marcel Thieliant, head of Asia-Pacific at Capital Economics, anticipates the persistent strength in inflation will convince the BOJ to hike interest rates again in October.
Japan currently faces a 10% baseline tariff that U.S. President Donald Trump imposed on most trade partners, alongside a 24% 'reciprocal' tariff, which is set to come into effect in July, unless the country manages to strike a deal with the U.S.
The country is also one of the hardest hit by Trump's 25% levy on auto, steel and aluminum products.
The bilateral negotiation, however, appears to be in a standoff. Japanese senior officials have requested that Washington remove all tariffs on Tokyo, emphasizing that the country will not rush into any deal that puts the country's interests at risk.
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
27 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
What happens in Washington decidedly does not stay in Washington, with practically every action taken by the richest and most powerful country in the world having a near-immediate global reaction—on tariffs, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, global health, and more. Sometimes those reactions aren't even confined to the planet—as the recent social-media smackdown between President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk illustrated. On June 5, as the feud between the two erstwhile besties escalated, Trump posted on his Truth Social Platform, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Just over 90 minutes later, in a post on X, Musk clapped back: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Not long after that post went wide, Musk quietly deleted it. Later that evening, an X user posted to Trump and Musk, 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days.' Minutes later, Musk responded, 'Good advice. OK, we won't decommission Dragon.' That defused the immediate emergency, but the threat and counterthreat raised questions about just how dependent America's space efforts are on the whims of two sometimes mercurial billionaires. Could a mere word from Musk ground the nation? Could a stroke of a Trump Sharpie similarly hobble SpaceX? The short answer in both cases is maybe, but not likely. There's no overstating just how central SpaceX has become in the space sector in the 23 years since it was founded as the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation. Since the inaugural flight of the company's Falcon 9 in 2010, the rocket has become the world's workhorse vehicle for rides to orbit, with 485 completed missions, including 440 acrobatic landings of its reusable first stage. The rocket and its Dragon spacecraft provide regular service to the International Space Station (ISS), carrying crews up and down, and ferrying cargo and supplies aboard uncrewed Dragons. In 2024, the company's larger Falcon Heavy launched NASA's Europa Clipper spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa. It is set to launch the ambitious Nancy Grace Roman Telescope in May 2027. The working relationship between SpaceX and the government is by no means limited to NASA. In April, as Ars Technica reports, the U.S. Space Force awarded the company a $5.9 billion contract, making SpaceX the leading provider of launch services for Pentagon satellites. The military is also a major customer of SpaceX's Starlink satellite constellation, with 50 military commands now using the orbiting Internet service, according to Defense News. 'We have $22 billion in government contracts,' said Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president and COO, in a live streamed public panel last year. 'We earned that. We bid it, we were the lowest price, best bidder, we won and we execute.' If anything, the company is going to have the opportunity to execute still more, reinforcing the ties between SpaceX and the government. In 2021, NASA selected SpaceX's still-in-development Starship rocket to serve as the lander that is planned to carry American astronauts down from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon sometime before the end of the decade. In 2024, the space agency tapped SpaceX to build the vehicle that will nudge the ISS out of orbit when the program ends in 2030. And in May, Trump's so-called skinny budget called for NASA to cancel its over-budget and behind-schedule Space Launch System, the 21st century answer to the 1960s' Saturn V moon rocket, leaving Starship as the likeliest successor. Meantime, while Boeing's Starliner spacecraft was supposed to be joining Dragon in providing rides to the ISS—taking a share of the launch business revenue from SpaceX—Starliner famously failed in its inaugural flight last year. This left astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams stranded aboard the station for 8 months, on a mission that was supposed to last merely eight days. Similarly, Blue Origin, the rocket company founded by Musk's fellow mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos, was expected to provide some launch-service competition for SpaceX, but the company has managed just one, only partially successful orbital launch of its New Glenn rocket, in January 2025, and has limited most of its activity to flying popgun suborbital missions for wealthy space tourists. 'It's not a planned monopoly,' said Shotwell in the live stream. 'If our competitors could get it together…' All of this leaves SpaceX and the government mutually interdependent, with Washington counting on the company to provide services no one else currently can, and the company happy for the paying work. That's not to say neither one could foul the joint nest. Trump's nomination of private astronaut and Musk friend Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator was widely seen as a sign of Musk's influence on the president—and Trump's decision on May 31 to pull the nomination was similarly seen as the first sign of the rift between Musk and Trump. But the president has made no other moves against Musk-world, and Musk's decision to delete his provocative post on X may have cooled tempers on both sides. SpaceX investors and other customers may serve as a brake on Musk's worst tendencies, and lawmakers from space-heavy states including California, Texas, and Florida may similarly restrain Trump. None of this says that neither man is beyond acting against his own—and his government's or his company's—best interests. The scorpion in the venerable fable famously stung the frog that was its only ride across the river—explaining before they both sank and drowned that 'it's in my nature.' Trump's and Musk's natures have always been impulsive. The space and defense sectors can only hope the two men show some restraint now.
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
The 'Halftime' Investment Committee weigh in on Trump vs. Musk impact on Tesla's stock
CNBC's Megan Cassella joins 'Halftime Report' to discuss the latest news on the public spat between President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The Investment Committee debate what it means for Tesla.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How could President Trump-Elon Musk clash impact space industry at Cape Canaveral, Florida?
With President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk exchanging barbs during a June 5 social media spat, potential space-industry threats emerged — cancellation of Musk's federal contracts and decommissioning SpaceX Dragon spacecraft — that could pack profound impacts for Florida's Space Coast. That said, Don Platt, director of the Florida Institute of Technology's Spaceport Education Center in Titusville, believes it is best to "take it all with a grain of salt." He noted that SpaceX and the U.S. government depend heavily on each other. "Honestly, I think this is mostly bluster," Platt said. "I see Musk has backed down on his statement now about decommissioning the Dragon modules. I think he was more pointing out the fact that, indeed, the government is very much reliant on all sorts of SpaceX's technology right now," he said. Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral Musk — who spent more than $277 million helping Trump and other Republicans campaign for last fall's election — led Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, which reportedly slashed about $160 billion in federal spending and spearheaded mass layoffs and job buyouts. Musk left his DOGE post on May 30 to focus on his companies, which were earmarked $3 billion in almost 100 contracts with 17 federal agencies in 2024, the New York Times reported. SpaceX accounted for the bulk of these contracts. The next day, Trump dropped Jared Isaacman — the Polaris Program mission commander who partnered with SpaceX on two orbital flights — as his choice to become NASA's next administrator. Then Musk ramped up criticism of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" tax-policy legislation, labeling it "a disgusting abomination." The Trump-Musk social media battle intensified with a 2:37 p.m. June 5 Trump post on Truth Social: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Musk responded in a 4:09 p.m. tweet: "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." A little more than five hours later, Musk backed off his threat to decommission Dragon in another tweet. In the coming months on the Space Coast, SpaceX plans to invest more than $1.8 billion bringing Starship rockets and Super Heavy boosters — the most powerful rocket system in history — to the Space Coast, creating an estimated 600 full-time jobs by 2030. The company also seeks Federal Aviation Administration permission to increase annual Falcon 9 rocket launches from 50 to 120 from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Stakes are high for Florida's Space Coast because of SpaceX's dominance of the launch industry. Last year, SpaceX launched 88 of the record-breaking 93 orbital rockets that rose from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's adjacent Kennedy Space Center. United Launch Alliance accounted for the other five. Thus far this year, SpaceX has launched 45 of the 47 rockets from Florida, ranging from batches of Starlink satellites to NASA's Crew-10 astronauts, an International Space Station resupply mission, national security missions, communications satellites and moon landers. Blue Origin's New Glenn liftoff on Jan. 16 and ULA's first Project Kuiper mission on April 28 were the lone non-SpaceX launches. NASA contracts with SpaceX to ferry astronauts and cargo to and from the ISS aboard Dragon spacecraft. With Boeing's Starliner unable to successfully return astronauts after its ill-fated maiden crewed flight last year, the Dragon remains the only viable American ride to space. Laura Forczyk, founder and executive director of the Palm Bay space consulting firm Astralytical, said it would be "extremely difficult" for the federal government to completely cut off its contracts with SpaceX. "The United States government relies on SpaceX to launch its payloads, observatories, astronauts and cargo resupply missions to the International Space Station. So that includes NASA. That also includes the Department of Defense, the Space Force, NOAA with weather satellites," Forczyk said. "Every single U.S. entity that launches in space largely relies on SpaceX. There is no other U.S. vehicle that can launch humans to space other than Falcon 9-Dragon at this point," she said. Looking to the future, Forczyk said a question for NASA is "whether or not President Trump will continue to push for a Mars exploration (and) agenda without Elon Musk's encouragement and influence." Landing humans on Mars has long been a top goal for Musk, who says his ultimate aim is to make humans a multiplanetary species. He hopes to launch the first uncrewed Starship to Mars next year, and Trump's proposed budget includes $1 billion for future Mars exploration. Ken Kremer is a Titusville research chemist and managing editor of On May 31, he attended retired NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson's U.S. Astronaut Hall of Fame induction ceremony at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex. Whitson is now commanding Axiom Space's fourth crewed mission to the ISS, in partnership with SpaceX. On Tuesday, June 10, a Dragon is scheduled to carry her and three fellow astronauts from India, Poland and Hungary into low-Earth orbit aboard a Falcon 9. Liftoff is scheduled for 8:22 a.m. from KSC. 'It's absolutely amazing. Elon Musk is totally irresponsible to threaten to decommission the Dragon immediately. That's just awful," Kremer said. "The future of the ISS is dependent, as you know, on the Dragon. It must fly,' he said. Kremer said Musk is threatening the success of his own business, particularly given the accelerating cadence of liftoffs from the Cape. 'He is imperiling his own launches for Starlink, commercial companies, military satellites. And it's just kind of, like, mind-boggling that he would threaten to do something like that. It's self-destructive," he said. Coming up tonight, SpaceX will launch a geostationary satellite for SiriusXM on a Falcon 9 during a four-hour window that opens at 11:19 p.m. from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter. Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@ Twitter/X: @RickNeale1 Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Will Trump-Musk conflict hamper SpaceX launches from Cape Canaveral?
