Book review: Pakistan's secret history, through a spy's eyes
The incident perfectly encapsulates how Brigadier Naseem Akhtar Khan often found himself on the front lines of some of the most pivotal moments of the twentieth century. He also recounted another president, Pervez Musharraf, as a close friend and mentor.
Imagine spending nearly thirty years as an invisible warrior for your country, constantly slipping into enemy territory to gather vital secrets, dodging bullets, and outsmarting those who want to harm your nation. This is essentially what you'll find in Brigadier Khan's book. It is the author's personal journey through decades of high-stakes counterintelligence.
If you think this is just a dry history lesson, you are wrong. All those intense details have been woven into a really absorbing look at South Asian military history, especially focusing on the security challenges Pakistan has faced since it came into existence.
The author firmly believes that a lot of what's said about international strategies in the region is actually made-up information spread by Pakistan's enemies to hurt its interests. That was his basic inspiration when he decided to write this book, using his own experiences as a reliable guide for anyone trying to understand the past, and predict what might happen next. At its heart, the book is about how he sees the power plays happening in South Asia between both regional and global players. Brig Khan thinks it'll be incredibly helpful for readers to get a more realistic grasp of our constantly changing world order.
There are a multitude of thrilling stories in the book, worthy of any Hollywood blockbuster, and it shouldn't be surprising, given how the backdrop of Brig Khan's life easily lends itself to such high-stake action.
From the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan to 9/11 and through conflicts against neighbouring India, the former intelligence and military officer got a first-hand view of history unfolding in real time in his 23-year career in ISI.
Brig Khan's story is like something out of fiction. The dashing soldier came from relatively humble beginnings in Kashmir, a warm family and proud ancestry fueling his own ambitions to 'Touch the sky', as he and his sister would cry as they played as children.
There are several unexpected turning points in his life. The first one put him on a high achieving academic path that lead to the Pakistan Military Academy. His military career took off in the Army in 1969, but when he was asked to report for ISI, he worried this might spike his rise up the regular ranks. Yet there was another unprecedented opportunity, in 1979, when the Soviets went into Afghanistan, and the support Pakistan was able to provide proved instrumental to CIA efforts to undermine their Cold War rivals.
The Brigadier would also see first-hand how Pakistan was betrayed by its allies in the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union. After 9/11, Pakistan was coerced by the US into supporting its own invasion of Afghanistan and this led to its own wave of terrorism.
It is these difficult times in his country's history where Brig Khan's vantage point and analysis are most instructive for events that unfolded in 2025, including how domestic politics continues to undermine national interests, while the US is underestimating their need for the country, as it elevates India to counter China.
The turbulent times Brig Khan navigated as a patriot and one of Pakistan's invisible warriors has helped him to acquire such important perspectives, so that in his retirement and in private-sector security work, he has now been able to share them in this fine book.
Despite first and foremost being primarily a family man, Khan nevertheless put his life on the line for his nation several times. Regardless of the personal risks, his priority would be to protect Pakistan's interests. Loyalty features large in his story, yet it is ironic that outsiders might feel loyalty has no place in the spy game.
He is unsparing in his assessment of the problems caused by the interplay between Pakistan's politicians and the army in civilian governance matters, leading to the failure, and painful loss of East Pakistan.
Khan's book also serves as a concise history of Pakistan and he is able to deftly explain to readers who might not be aware, how an elite group of 22 families, accumulated such wealth and gained political power at the start of its journey, and that this ruling class influences its future even today.
What Brig Khan delivers to the reader is a memoir packed with his real-life experiences, all told in a way that makes sense. He really dives into the people, groups, and the organisations that shaped his life, trying to pull you into his world so you can truly understand what it's like to be a Pakistani soldier.
Mustafa Alrawi is a leading journalist and Group Director Editorial Partnerships at IMI Media, Abu Dhabi, UAE
All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the writer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
INSTC should be active in tandem with BRI
In today's interconnected world and the new global order, trade corridors are essential highways of the global economy and strategic tools for geopolitical and geo-strategic influence. Global trade is being conducted in a turbo-charged manner. The threats of blockades of shipping routes such as the Suez Canal, Strait of Hormuz, or the Malacca Strait, keep buyers and sellers on edge. In such a situation, countries want to have alternatives. Shipping is the better mode of cost-effective transportation of goods, but the volatile and unpredictable ramifications of conflicts between nations disrupt trade. China took the pioneering initiative by establishing the Belt and Road Initiative in which China Pakistan Economic Corridor is the bedrock component. Cargo through corridors is increasingly being done through multimodal transportation network connecting rail, road, and maritime routes. However, conflicts and tensions among neighboring countries within the route of such corridors impede the success and critical mass of such corridors. Global trade has often been hostage to the arbitrary, pernicious, and harmful imposition of economic sanctions on countries or regions that do not comply with the diktat of economic and military behemoths. More often than not, the economic sanctions are routed through the United Nations, which is subservient to countries that provide substantial financial resources to the world body. Russia analyzed the situation and initiated its own corridor in association with selected countries. The International North-South Transport Corridor was established in 2000 by Russia, India and Iran with the objective of establishing a corridor as an alternative to transporting and facilitating goods via the Suez Canal as well as to reduce the time and cost of delivery of goods. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Oman, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Syria, Turkiye, and now Pakistan have joined the project. The INSTC should be active in tandem with BRI, and enable the South Asian, Central Asian, and West Asian nations to link with other Eurasian countries. Pakistan is now part of this new initiative because, for obvious political reasons, Pakistan has been excluded from BRICS, and was not one of the original members of INSTC. It is also crucial to promote formation of CAPRI as a sub-regional economic, political, and defense bloc as this would provide a geostrategic base for Pakistan in resolving issues with neighbors. CAPRI stands for China, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia, and Iran. CAPRI can be linked to INSTC and BRI. It is taken for granted that countries keep changing their alliances and policies as per the prevailing world scenario. The USA is dead set on a mission to curb Chinese influence on countries that are within the BRI outreach. Israeli guidance to Washington has enabled the USA and India to be strategic partners. This has led Russia to revisit its economic and defence ties with New Delhi. The INSTC would work superbly for Pakistan and Russia, and the first train to leave Karachi will be the harbinger of a grand alliance of the future. Pakistan will gain hugely if the policymakers and politicians do not play politics with INSTC as they purportedly did with CPEC. According to Indian defence analyst Pravin Sawhney, 'Pakistan joining the INSTC makes perfect sense since it is located on the route.' Despite the hype about Gwadar Port, it will take many years to achieve optimal operations and activities. INSTC and BRI can enable Gwadar to become a fully functional transit Port. Pakistan is well poised as a point of regional connectivity and as a facilitator of trade for many countries. However, there are big boulders on the highway, such as the reluctance of cooperation with Pakistan by India in this initiative, the Damocles Sword of US sanctions, the law and order situation in Balochistan, and the menace of terrorism. A few years ago, the then Prime Minister had gone to Moscow primarily to develop a favorable linkage that would have given leverage to Pakistan to protect export markets, raw material suppliers, avenues of development finance, and security shields in times of need. Russia-Ukraine War seriously impeded the expected momentum of a strong trade and investment relationship between Pakistan and Russia but President Putin is making a paradigm shift unlike his predecessors who were primarily fixated only on India. Putin has sensed the new geostrategic metrics, and it is a win-win situation for Russia and Pakistan to bond with China and other countries. Pakistan has been delicately playing all sides in the past by claiming that it adheres to an independent foreign policy. In fact, this has seldom been to the benefit of Islamabad because it never took advantage of this independent stance by promoting economic diplomacy. The victory over India and the Israeli-Iran conflict have shifted the pendulum for Pakistan. Other countries have maintained political diplomacy in conjunction with economic diplomacy and resultantly succeeded in many aspects. The difficulty in smooth success of INSTC depends formidably on the ecosystem in Iran. The Eurasian Development Bank forecasts that the INSTC will handle 30 million tons of goods annually by 2030, generating a couple of billion dollars in transit revenue for Iran. This could enable Iran in modernizing logistics infrastructure and expanding the economic potential. On the other hand, US economic sanctions on Iran pose a significant barrier to the participation of international companies in INSTC-related projects. This is Achilles' heel in the long-term success of INSTC. The BRICS countries have accelerated their plans of moving away from dollar-based international trade through monetary mechanisms, but the strongly-worded warning from President Donald Trump to those countries who are keen to join the emerging multilateral monetary agreements may, in the short term, discourage them from it. Stephen P. Groff of the Asian Development Bank, once stated about nations, such as Pakistan, that 'If countries succeed in building effective national road, energy and urban infrastructure systems which then feed into broader subregional infrastructure networks, the fruits of Asia's growth can be shared much more broadly across borders'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Humanisation of warfare
Listen to article Humanisation of warfare is an interesting subject, and it is in the context of the lack of development of international morality that this subject can be discussed and understood. Currently, conclusions about humanisation of warfare can be drawn from the two ongoing wars — the war in Ukraine and the war in the Middle East, more specifically, the war against the people of Palestine. I outright reject viewing the war in Gaza as a model to draw any conclusions because it is as inhuman as any war can get, and it is not even a war but a genocide and a deliberate extermination of unarmed and innocent people at a scale that the modern world has not seen before. History remembers the 16th and 17th century wars as religious wars; the 18th century wars as dynastic wars, and the 19th and 20th century wars as national wars. Following 9/11, Samuel P Huntington's theory of the clash of civilisations was validated, and if anything, the 21st century has been a century of civilisational wars. Today, the war is not about the unconditional surrender of a state but the death of all those who adhere to a different ideal, a different way of life, false and evil in the eyes of the West. Today's war is not about the territory; it is about the people. Understanding the world view of the other two great powers can help us understand these push-button wars being fought in the 21st century that continue to lead to dehumanising the world. In an anarchic international system where no two states can be certain about each other's intentions, there has to be a method to ensure that the relations between them remain peaceful and less anarchic. This can only be ensured by keeping promises, building trust, executing fair dealings, protecting minorities and condemning the use of the worst instrument of power in implementing a foreign policy. Military being used as an instrument of power to settle political questions, both in the case of Iran and Gaza, is a point of concern for the other two great powers. To answer the question of this ongoing process of dehumanising the world, the alternate perspective and the world view of both Russia and China, the other two great powers in a multipolar world, need to be clearly understood. Both Russia and China have repeatedly endorsed the idea of allowing each nation state to choose its destiny and future in line with the UN Charter, which guarantees the equality and sovereignty of the states. T he United States' democratic experiment failed in Afghanistan because it ignored the centuries-old customs, traditions and ways of life of that country. A civilisational war was imposed on Afghanistan, and the people of Afghanistan stood up to fight. As did many Muslim countries during the Arab Spring, to push back the American idea of democratising them, overruling their centuries-old traditions, and bringing about a societal change that could be viewed in the American image. Russia is persistent with its demand and insists that the Americans and their allies in Europe must first view the root causes of the conflict before deciding on any approach or initiative to address the Ukraine crisis. Russia's stated position is that the West is misguided when it accuses Russia of fighting the war for the acquisition of a territory. The war that Russia fights, it believes, is not for the territory but for the people. Territories are important only because the Russians live in them. President Zelensky, in an August 2021 television interview, explicitly addressed residents of the Donbas region, urging those who feel Russian and want Donbas to be part of Russia to voluntarily relocate to Russia. It was against the Ukrainian State-directed oppression against this minority that Russia initiated the special military operations in February 2022 to protect the lives of these people and to oppose the Ukrainian State tyranny unleashed against them. The Russian press reports that President Trump agreed with President Putin during a telephonic conversation that NATO's eastward expansion created an existential security threat for Russia. In the words of the foreign minister of Russia, Sergey Lavrov, the importance of Ukraine for Russian security is many times more than of Greenland for the United States' security. Russians believe that even if Trump wants an end to this war, the Europeans don't want it. Russia draws this conclusion from how the European countries warmly received President Zelensky after he was asked to leave the White House after his spat with President Trump in February this year. The employment of a European peacekeeping force in Ukraine is how the French President sees a step forward to end this war. Russia doesn't consider that any force or group that at the outset was part of aggression against Russia can keep peace in the region. Russia considers that at best, such a force can only protect the interests of President Zelensky and his regime, which Russia considers illegitimate, representing martial law and not the people of Ukraine. In the words of Sergey Lavrov, "the Chinese are never in a hurry, they always see over the horizon." In the 1990s the United States allowed China to become part of the international system under a policy of engagement. It allowed China to become powerful, hoping that as China hooked up to capitalism, it would become a responsible stakeholder in the international system. China's ideology of Confucianism and peaceful rise during the unipolar moment challenged the American dominance and control of the world. It created the classic security dilemma and generated Thucydides' propagated fears in the American mind. Today China, in the words of Professor Mearsheimer, has become a goose that lays the golden eggs and thus a security competition and a cold war between the United States and China persists with very few scholars imagining the future possibility of a hot war between them as the world cannot afford the death of a goose that lays golden eggs from which the entire world benefits. If wars fought in the 21st century are civilisational wars, then the world must treat the subject of morality also as not individual or national but as civilisational. All civilisations reflect humanity's shared progress. Russia and China represent two great civilisations, and in a multipolar world, they would continue to demand respect and be treated as competitors and not foes to be aggressed against.
Business Recorder
7 days ago
- Business Recorder
After US tariffs, jobs hang by a thread in Bangladesh's garments sector
ASHULIA: The fear of job losses is rippling through Bangladesh's garment hubs as US President Donald Trump's 35% tariff on the South Asian nation threatens orders from its main export market and crimps the country's biggest industry. The readymade garments sector accounts for more than 80% of Bangladesh's total export earnings, employing 4 million people and contributing roughly 10% to its annual GDP. Raimoni Bala, who operates an industrial sewing machine at a garments factory in Ashulia, a satellite town on the outskirts of Dhaka, says she fears losing her job every day. 'For the past few months, everyone is talking about cuts,' said Bala, 32. 'Whenever anyone visits the factory, my chest aches. I feel like they've come to tell me I've lost my job.' In a letter to Bangladesh Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus, Trump said a 35% levy will be imposed on Bangladeshi imports from August 1 - slightly lower than the 37% tariff he announced in April but more than double the previous average of around 15%. Trump has said he will impose a 20% tariff on major apparel exporter Vietnam while levies on India and Sri Lanka - also big American suppliers - are yet to be announced. Lower tariffs for these competitor nations will make apparel from Bangladesh costlier in comparison. Bangladesh and the US Trade Representative will kick off second round of negotiations on Wednesday to conclude a trade agreement, Dhaka said. While there was still time for Dhaka to reach a trade deal, the fear of disruption due to higher US tariffs is pervasive on factory floors. Reuters spoke to more than a dozen workers in the garments industry like Bala. All shared the same fear - that under the weight of higher tariffs, cancelled orders and factory closures, their livelihoods were under threat. Suppliers in Bangladesh's garments industry, which counts Gap Inc and Vans parent VF Corp as clients, told Reuters that many brands have adopted a 'wait-and-see' approach and are placing few new orders. 'The burden of this tariff hike will fall heavily on garment manufacturers and the millions of workers they employ, a majority of whom are women, raising the risks of slower growth, job losses and a rise in poverty,' said Selim Raihan, an economics professor at the University of Dhaka. Bala's story is similar to many of the workers in the teeming capital. She left her village in northern Bangladesh with the bare minimum, determined to give her sons - now 15 and 13 - a better future. Her husband's poor health only allows him to work sporadically as a day labourer, she said, making her job at the garments factory crucial to the family's survival. During the pandemic, Bala said her factory shut down. She said she continued to receive reduced wages under a government stimulus programme, but her family was forced to almost go hungry. Every rumour of new tariffs or reduced orders rekindles the fear of losing her job, she said. She said she clings to the hope that her job, though exhausting and low-paid, will keep her sons in school and provide food on the table. 'I have confidence in my work. I work with respect,' Bala said. 'As long as I have this job, my sons can dream. Without it, I don't know what will happen to us.'
