
How Iran is using the war with Israel to ramp up repression by arresting ‘spies'
Since then, such announcements have become a daily occurrence. At least 223 people have been arrested since the start of the conflict between Israel and Iran according media reports collated by The NGO Iran Rights Watch. It expects the real figure is significantly higher.
Norwegian NGO the Hengaw Organization for Human Rights puts the total number of arrests at 530, with detentions occurring in 27 of Iran's 30 provinces.
The Revolutionary Guards said Tuesday that a European who entered Iran as a tourist was accused of spying on "sensitive and military" sites and arrested in the country's southern Hormozgan province.
Throughout Iran, observers have reported a massive deployment of security services – namely members of the Basij paramilitary volunteer branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – carrying out arrests, often for vague reasons such as causing fires or acting suspiciously in proximity to military bases.
The common denominator among the accused is the claim that they have links to Mossad, the Israeli intelligence organisation responsible for covert activity overseas.
As the Iranian regime pursues 'spies' it claims have helped Israel with renewed vigour, those who have been arrested face swift and harsh sentencing.
Since Israeli strikes began, Iran has executed three prisoners on spying charges. On Monday Mohammad Amin Mahdavi-Shayesteh, who had been in prison since 2023, was hung at dawn for "intelligence cooperation' with Israel, Iran Wire reported.
Two other prisoners, Majid Mosayebi and Ismail Fakri, were executed on similar accusations the previous week.
The head of Iran's judiciary, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, on Saturday called for cases of 'collaborators' with Israel to be expedited so they could face sentencing 'as soon as possible'.
'If the treacherous actions of these defendants are proven, they will immediately face severe punishment, and there will be no leniency or appeasement in this matter,' he said.
Israeli infiltration
Iran's suspicions of espionage are not unfounded. Prior to launching 'Rising Lion', Israeli agents infiltrated the upper echelons of Iran's leadership.
The massive strikes launched on June 13 that killed several of Iran's military leaders and nuclear scientists were the result of years of intelligence work.
As well as smuggling weapons into Iran, Israel also ' identified and tracked the movements of the key scientists and military officials who were assassinated', the New York Times reported, citing security sources.
In the months prior to the attack, Israeli agents set up a clandestine military base in Iran where drones were stockpiled, a senior Israeli security source told Israeli media outlet Haaretz.
Iranians working for Israel were enlisted to build the base, with 'Iranians opposed to the regime mak[ing] for a ready recruiting pool' for Mossad, a former Israeli intelligence official said to The Atlantic
Israel's overseas intelligence service had previously demonstrated its ability to act on Iranian soil with the assassination in Tehran of former Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, in July 2024.
The cumulation of these successful Israeli intelligence operations is a 'certain paranoia among the Iranian authorities,' said Jonathan Piron, a historian specialising in Iran for the Etopia research centre in Brussels.
A crackdown
Prior to the war with Israel, Iran regularly announced the arrest and execution of suspected agents allegedly working for overseas intelligence services, often Israeli.
Now in the midst of conflict, 'the regime plays off this paranoia and is using the current situation to crackdown on anyone it qualifies as an opponent in the name of defending the country', Piron said.
As well as arrests in the street, authorities are expanding a crackdown on the internet. Some 206 people have been arrested for suspicious online activity or content published online, according to the NGO, Hrana.
Iran's ministry for communications has explained regular internet backouts since the start of the conflict as a measure to block Israeli cyberattacks, but they are also a tool of repression, preventing the population from sharing information.
Pion said it is 'impossible to verify' whether the regime's sweeping arrests in the past two weeks are based on 'concrete' suspicions of espionage or not.
But NGOs that monitor Iran have been sounding the alarm. Iran Human Rights warned on Thursday of the potential for 'an intensification of repression and executions in the coming days'.
'Official calls for expediated trials and executions of those arrested for alleged collaboration with Israel show how the Iranian authorities weaponize the death penalty to assert control and instil fear among the people of Iran,' Amnesty International 's Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa Hussein Baoumi said on June 20.
'The authorities must ensure all those detained are protected from enforced disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment, and afforded fair trials at all times, including during armed conflict,' he added.
Iran is the country that carries out the second most executions in the world after China, according to the two NGOs. In 2024, at least 975 people were executed in Iran – a record high since monitoring began in 2008.
Fear of resistance
Despite talks of Israeli strikes weakening Iran's regime or even destroying it altogether, an internal wave of resistance against Iran's leadership does not seem to be on the horizon, for now.
'Since the start of the strikes, demonstrations against the regime have stopped completely,' Piron said.
There have been public statements from high-profile opposition figures such as Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, calling for greater openness from the government, and 'some student movements that are very critical of the government have tried to mobilise protests, but they haven't taken off', he added.
'Iranians are still against the regime but, for the moment, they are focused on security,' Piron said.
While resistance is at a low ebb, Iran's leaders are seizing their moment to maintain the status quo. 'There is a certain fear for the regime – that knows it is weakened – of seeing protests emerge at some point,' Piron said. 'Their show of force should nip any protests movements in the bud.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska: A high-stakes summit for a ceasefire in Ukraine
United States President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday, August 15, in a high-stakes, high-risk summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine. Putin will step onto Western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and on which Russia has not relented, making rapid gains just before the summit. Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since been defensive and warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Putin does not compromise. Trump has called the summit a "feel-out meeting" to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019. "If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future," Trump said Thursday. He gave the summit a one-in-four chance of failure. Trump's latest shift Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war and vowed before his return to the White House in January to bring peace within 24 hours. Yet despite repeated calls to Putin, and a stunning February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise. Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned of "very severe consequences" if he does not accept a ceasefire – but also agreed to see him in Alaska. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called for security guarantees for Ukraine – an idea downplayed by Trump at the start of his latest term. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) on Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War base for surveillance of the former Soviet Union. Adding to the historical significance, the United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia – a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps. The Kremlin said it expected Putin and Trump to meet alone with interpreters before a working lunch with aides. Neither leader is expected to step off the base into Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where protesters have put up signs of solidarity with Ukraine. Closely watched abroad Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has publicly refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Zelensky said on Tuesday that the Alaska summit was a "personal victory" for Putin. With the trip, Putin "is coming out of isolation" and he has "somehow postponed sanctions," which Trump had vowed to impose on Russia without progress. Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to "divvy up" territory. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, meanwhile, responded to a question from Russian state TV by saying that Moscow would not make guesses on the outcome of the meeting. "We never make any predictions ahead of time," Lavrov said after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with "USSR" written across it in Cyrillic script. "Our position is clear and unambiguous. We will present it," he said. Sanctions eased The summit marks a sharp shift from the approach of Western European leaders and Biden, who vowed no discussion with Russia on Ukraine's future unless Ukraine was also at the table. Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, leading him to curtail travel sharply since the war began. However, the United States is not a party to the Hague tribunal, and Trump's Treasury Department temporarily eased sanctions on top Russian officials to allow them to travel and use bank cards in Alaska. Exiled Russian opposition figure Yulia Navalnaya – whose husband Alexei Navalny died in prison last year – urged the two leaders to strike a deal to "release Russian political activists and journalists, Ukrainian civilians, [and] those who were imprisoned for anti-war statements and posts on social media."


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Fact check: Are most refugees in Europe of Muslim background?
ADVERTISEMENT A politician from the far-right Portuguese Chega party, which is known for its anti-immigration policies, alleged in a post shared on X that "85% of refugees are Muslim" on 1 August. Chega has previously faced accusations of Islamophobia, with the party's leader André Ventura having called for the "drastic reduction of the Islamic presence in the European Union.' Chega party's lawmaker Pedro Frazão also claimed that "instead of seeking asylum" in other Muslim countries, these individuals "choose to flee to the West." Both claims are difficult to back with data, as there is a lack of precise and up-to-date data cataloguing refugees' religious affiliation. However, it is evident that wars, economic crises and natural disasters impact the makeup of the global refugee population. While the United Nations produces a vast amount of data on refugees and forcibly displaced people worldwide, it is heavily reliant on government data. While some countries provide information on refugees' religious affiliations, others do not. Where did refugees come from in 2024? According to the UN refugee agency UNHCR, the global refugee population, including people in need of international protection, reached nearly 42.7 million in 2024. In addition, there were 73.5 million people displaced within the borders of their own countries (IDPs) and 8.4 million asylum-seekers. Within Europe, Germany was the European country which hosted the most refugees in 2024 — which has been the case since 2015. Research conducted by the German government published in 2021 revealed that between 2013 and 2019, 69.7% of the refugees it hosted were Muslim faithful. However, these figures predate Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, when millions of Ukrainians were forced to leave the country at war. The latest data from the UNHCR showed that in 2024, nearly seven out of 10 of all refugees and people in need of international protection originated from Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Venezuela and Ukraine. The main religion in Syria, Afghanistan and South Sudan is Islam, but in Ukraine and Venezuela, different branches of Christianity are the predominant belief. Given that Ukrainians and Venezuelans made up nearly one-third of all refugees and other people in need of international protection in 2024, it is "unlikely" that 85% of refugees are Muslim, a UN spokesperson told EuroVerify. Although a country may have a Muslim-majority population, this does not mean that all refugees who originate from there are Muslim, and vice versa. In addition, those who nominally belong to an ethnic group associated with Islam might not be actual believers. Muslim-majority nations top the list of host countries Contrary to the claim that refugees of Muslim background predominantly seek refuge in the West, Germany is the only European country which features among the seven countries which have hosted the most asylum seekers since 2015. Iran and Turkey are the two top countries where the most refugees sought asylum between 2015 and 2024. Meanwhile, four out of the seven nations which hosted the most asylum seekers in this period — Iran, Turkey, Chad and Pakistan — were Muslim-majority countries, which debunks the claim that refugees who identify as Muslim only seek refuge in the West.


Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Hezbollah refuses to hand over its weapons to Lebanese government
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem threatened open confrontation on Friday if Lebanon's government proceeds with plans to disarm the militant group, calling the cabinet decision an implementation of "US-Israeli orders." The Lebanese Council of Ministers approved a decision last week requiring the army to urgently develop a disarmament plan and implement it before year-end, marking the most severe challenge to Hezbollah since the civil war ended in 1990. "The decision is dangerous and exposes the country to a major crisis," Qassem said during a televised speech in Baalbek. "It strips the resistance and Lebanon of defensive weapons during aggression." Qassem vowed Hezbollah would not surrender its weapons and warned of armed conflict, if not outright war. "The party will fight a (historic) battle if necessary in the face of this Israeli-US project, whatever the cost," he said. "There will be no life in Lebanon if the government tries to confront the party." The Hezbollah secretary-general laid the blame on the government in Beirut, saying it "bears full responsibility for any internal explosion and any destruction of Lebanon." Qassem rejected the idea of protests at this time "because there is room for dialogue with the government," but warned demonstrations could escalate if deemed necessary. "This is our land together, our homeland together, we live together, or there is no life for Lebanon," he said in a direct warning to authorities. Qassem also thanked Iran for supporting Hezbollah "with money, weapons, capabilities, and media and political positions." The Tehran-backed militant group remains the only faction that retained its military arsenal after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war. However, it has been significantly weakened as a consequence of its most recent conflict with Israel. Hezbollah first struck Israel in October 2023 after the breakout of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, leading to Israeli airstrikes across southern Lebanon and Beirut's suburbs and a limited ground incursion. The fighting intensified last September after Israel remotely detonated thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah members and killing Qassem's predecessor Hassan Nasrallah in an airstrike. Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire in November 2024, mediated by the US and France.