logo
This is where Meghan's As Ever products are really made

This is where Meghan's As Ever products are really made

Courier-Mail03-07-2025
Don't miss out on the headlines from Royals. Followed categories will be added to My News.
COMMENT
It's official.
Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex has added 'vigneron' to her ever-growing fleet of job titles that already includes jam seller, flower sprinkle proselytiser, tele producer, candle making instructor, apiarist, podcaster, handbag and vegan latte company investor, children's book author, former working HRH, calligrapher, actress and blogger, and designated cheerer upper-er of Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex.
X
SUBSCRIBER ONLY
On Tuesday, on what would have been her mother-in-law Diana, Princess of Wales' 64th birthday, the duchess finally got into the vino business, launching her As Ever lifestyle brand's first bottle of the good stuff, a rosé, which sold out in less than an hour.
But even when shelves are restocked again, I'm assuming by an overalls-wearing Harry supportively proudly working up some manly calluses on his hands, don't expect it to land in your local bottle-o near anytime soon.
To even try the drop would cost you AUD$167, hardly making it Friday drinks-quaffable stuff.
Meghan Markle's Rose wine in her As Ever range. Picture: Supplied
(The 'dry, and refreshing' blend was only sold with a minimum order of three bottles, reportedly due to shipping costs and for environmental reasons.)
That works out at about $45 a bottle for which you could also get 2.4 bottles of Kylie Minogue's rosé, 3.2 bottles of Snoop Dogg's, and 1.2 bottles of Daniel Riccardo's version.
Should the logistics of getting your hands on a taste of Meghan's wine be surmounted, don't expect it to have been produced anywhere near the Sussexes' Montecito home.
According to the Telegraph the tipple is produced by the Fairwinds Estate in Napa Valley, 630 km north and a six hour drive away.
The Napa Valley vineyard where Meghan sourced her rosé also reportedly makes wines for other starry wine labels, including those of Barry Manilow and John Wayne. (Who knew that Wayne, after ridin' his trusty steed into some fly-bitten frontier town, loved nothing more than moseying over to his the saloon for a big, bold grenache?)
This is believed to be the factory where Meghan's tea is made. Picture: Google Maps
In the last couple of weeks more details have emerged about where As Ever products are sourced from.
Sure, As Ever is a brand built on the image of shimmering, sun-kissed shots of Meghan picking apricots and flowers in her picturesque garden and her contentedly stirring a bubbling pot of jam in her kitchen, all very David Hockney-meets-Delia Smith.
However, so far the provenance of some As Ever lines appears to be far less hashtaggable and dreamy.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pictured at Beyoncé's LA concert. Picture: Instagram
The first scene of the duchess' With Love Meghan series showed her tending to her bees, whispering 'Look at how much honey we have' but Daily Mail has reported that As Ever's range of fruit spreads, herbal teas, flower sprinkles and honey are sourced from a company which has a factory 3,200 plus kilometres away in Illinois. (Their headquarters are 560 plus kilometres away in California.)
The firm, called The Republic of Tea, also makes Bridgerton and Downton Abbey-branded tea.
Meghan Markle sold out much of her As Ever product range in less than an hour. Picture: Instagram
Thanks to the Mail putting the calculator app to good use, The Republic of Tea's hibiscus tea bags work out at costing $0.48 per cup of tea while the As Ever ones are $1.52 each.
Let's be realistic here. The Duchess of Sussex might be a passionate home cook and her kitchen might have the same square meterage of a mid-size metro two-bedder but to commercially produce enough jam, sorry spread, was always going to require outside help.
Likewise her teabags. Did anyone really think that Harry was down the shed, neatly spooning dried hibiscus petals into little sachets and mulling his life choices?
Of her products, a source close to Meghan told the Mail, they 'started with the version Meghan makes at home and worked to develop a version of it that could be produced at scale.'
Fans clearly don't give a fig about where duchess' As Ever goodies are actually being cooked up with all three of the As Ever stock releases selling out in less than 60 minutes.
The range appears to be very popular. Picture: Instagram
Meghan Markle makes homemade jam with her daughter, Lilibet, in their kitchen for the 'As Ever' range. Picture: Instagram
(On June20, the second day the duchess' wares went on sale, the brand's website was visited half a million times, the Mail has reported.)
However, the As Ever roll out has not been all peachy.
The 43-year-old will give out free jars of her spread after a technical issue saw the site continue to take orders after overselling on the release of June's 'summer drop'.
Something similar happened with sales of As Ever honey in April with the site providing refunds and offering free products after they continued selling honey after stock had actually run out.
Depending on your Sussex stance, this either only reflects the high degree of public demand for Meghan's products and how hungry Americans are to buy into her charmed As Ever vision or says something about a business struggling to find its feet.
Meghan's As Ever product range. Picture: Supplied
As the Daily Beast's Tom Sykes pointed out ahead of the rosé's debut, As Ever's non- alcoholic products have only been available for purchase for less than two hours in the three months, which equates the As Ever's food 'shelves [having] been fully stocked for just 0.01 percent of the time' since launch.
What remains to be seen is whether this all only cultivates an air of exclusivity and rarity and whets shoppers' appetites or whether it will just frustrate them.
Also, does only having products on sale for less than an hour, every so often, make for a sustainable, profitable business concern?
Meghan Markle swings in a garden in a new post to promote her As Ever products. Picture: Instagram
In March the Telegraph reported that the Duchess of Sussex 'thinks she's going to be a billionaire' thanks to her growing portfolio of ventures and projects.
At least we know this, if Harry has been helping out behind the scenes, it might not have all been hard graft.
The production of Meghan's proprietary blend of rosé saw the duchess 'heavily involved' for 'many months,' per the Telegraph, which included 'roping in friends and colleagues to conduct multiple taste tests at her home.'
Hard work if you can get it.
Daniela Elser is a writer, editor and commentator with more than 15 years' experience working with a number of Australia's leading media titles.
Originally published as Fans shocked to discover where Meghan's products are really made
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AFL Caroline Wilson tells Craig Hutchy Hutchison to ‘grow up' in shock spray live on-air, Channel 7, The Agenda Setters
AFL Caroline Wilson tells Craig Hutchy Hutchison to ‘grow up' in shock spray live on-air, Channel 7, The Agenda Setters

Herald Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

AFL Caroline Wilson tells Craig Hutchy Hutchison to ‘grow up' in shock spray live on-air, Channel 7, The Agenda Setters

Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News. Caroline Wilson bluntly told Craig Hutchison to 'grow up' during a feisty spat live on Channel 7. Hutchison, Wilson, Kane Cornes and Nick Riewoldt front The Agenda Setters on the network and the two footy greats sat silently while the media identities got into a squabble over one of Hutchy's recent business moves. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1. The pre-planned segment, which Hutchison clearly did not know was going to happen, related to the media mogul's awkward appearance on radio network RSN last week after he announced a raft of sackings at the station. Earlier this month, the TV host's SEN group purchased RSN in a $3.25 million deal and immediately set about cutting costs, including giving popular hosts Daniel Harford and Michael Felgate the flick. Watch the Hutchy-Caro exchange in the video player above SEN owner Craig Hutchison didn't appreciate the line of questioning. Photo: Supplied Many long-time listeners of the station only learned the news when Hutchison fronted Felgate's Racing Pulse show last Thursday. So Wilson took the opportunity to make a cheeky plea over her own future on the Channel 7 show. Set up by Riewoldt in a section called The Spill, the former St Kilda captain put the vague question to Wilson: 'The hour on air of the Agenda Setters is the highest risk of all.' The long-time Age reporter replied: 'Well, certainly if you're on air with Craig Hutchison. 'This is no respect, disrespect I should say, to Michael Felgate or Daniel Harford for that matter. 'But if you're going to remove me from the show, can you please not do it with me on-air?' Daniel Harford (left) and Michael Felgate have been dumped from RSN. Wilson delivered the jab with a straight face and Hutchison did not take it well. 'This is not something to joke about,' he shot back. When Wilson said 'I'm not joking about it', Hutchy said: 'No, that's incredibly disrespectful and disappointing. That story is incorrect. It didn't happen.' Wilson, clearly surprised by Hutchison's reaction, stuck to her guns. 'Oh, don't. Craig, you walked into the studio, I know Michael Felgate already knew that his show would no longer be continuing,' she said. 'But if you're going to do it to me, I would rather it happen behind the scenes and not on air.' With Hutchison's production company directly involved in The Agenda Setters, perhaps Wilson just signed her own papers? Watch this space. But Hutchy wasn't taking the shot lying down. 'There was a press release the day before and there was a mature, two-way conversation on-air and you're making light of it, which is disappointing,' a seemingly hurt Hutchy replied. Wilson then had the last word, scoffing as she said: 'Oh, grow up.' Cornes and Riewoldt then did their best to keep the show moving, moving onto a story about Travis Boak and his habits in the bedroom the night before a game. Somehow, that topic was nowhere near as awkward as the exchange between the old journalists. In a bizarre segment last week, Felgate had the opportunity to grill Hutchison about why he was losing his job, with the latter doing his best to stress it wasn't a personal decision. Caroline Wilson, Craig Hutchison and Kane Cornes left Nine to join Channel 7. Picture: Channel 9 Felgate began the interview asking: 'I've got to start with the elephant in the room. An announcement yesterday which came out that there will be programming changes. 'Breakfast with Harf and this show, Racing Pulse, will no longer exist in the new regime. 'Just talk us through the reasoning. Why you don't want Breakfast with Harf and Racing Pulse on the new station?' Hutchison responded: 'First of all they're magnificent shows, so no disrespect at all to the quality of the programs and the identities involved, you in particular Michael and Daniel, who have been incredible servants of RSN. 'There's nothing personal about (cancelling) either of those programs … we need to invest, over time, into the racing product, it's a racing station. 'It's a different audience to the one that we have developed over on SEN Track, very different audience, very different experience, they don't really resemble each other after midday.' He went on to say: 'I know that won't be everyone's cup of tea on day one. 'You (Felgate) have got an enormous following, so does Daniel. The default position from many will be to have empathy for those programs and I respect that hugely. Hugely, because it's not about the quality of the shows.' Harford, who has been an icon of the network, said on his show last Thursday it had been 'a period of uncertainty' for those involved. 'So at the end of August this program will cease to exist,' he said. 'We'll be no longer required and there will be different programming on RSN which is very sad. Harford with David King. Photo: Supplied 'We've been doing this for a long time, which is very sad. We've had a lot of conversations about this internally for a little while. 'Certainly in the last couple of days when we found out what was going to be happening. 'So that's the reality of our situation.' The Hutchison-led group announced RSN will double dip from the Hutchison-backed SEN network and will broadcast SEN Breakfast. SEN's flagship breakfast slot, whish is shared between Cornes, David King, Tim Watson and Garry Lyon, will now be broadcast on two frequencies. Felgate's Racing Pulse will be replaced by Gareth Hall's Giddy Up. Those changes will be made from August 29. Originally published as Caroline Wilson tells Hutchy to 'grow up' in shock spray live on-air

Aussie star lands big role in The Devil Wears Prada 2: report
Aussie star lands big role in The Devil Wears Prada 2: report

Courier-Mail

time9 hours ago

  • Courier-Mail

Aussie star lands big role in The Devil Wears Prada 2: report

Don't miss out on the headlines from Movies. Followed categories will be added to My News. A popular Aussie star has reportedly joined the sequel to The Devil Wears Prada in a very significant role. Patrick Brammall, 49, best known as Gordon in Colin From Accounts, is set to play the love interest for Anne Hathaway's Andy Sachs. Entertainment Weekly broke the news earlier this week after previously reporting that Andy's boyfriend from the 2006 original, Nate (Adrien Grenier), would not be in the long-awaited sequel. Brammall is yet to confirm the news. In the almost 20 years since The Devil Wears Prada was released, Nate has become an increasingly controversial character, with many agreeing his attitude toward Andy's career made him the real villain of the story. Hathaway is reprising her role as Andy in the sequel. Brammall will reportedly play the leading man. Grenier has since addressed the backlash himself, telling EW he understood the negativity toward Nate. 'When that whole thing [about Nate being the 'real villain' of the film] first came out, I couldn't get my head around it. I didn't understand it. Perhaps it was because I wasn't mature as a man, just as Nate probably could've used a little growing up,' he said in June 2021. Nate, played by Adrien Grenier, was Andy's love interest in the original film. 'I was just as immature as him at the time, so I couldn't see his shortcomings, but, after taking time to reflect and much deliberation online, I can realise the truth in that perspective. Nate hadn't grown up, but Andy had … she needed more out of life, and she was achieving it. 'He couldn't support her like she needed because he was a fragile, wounded boy,' Grenier said of his controversial character. 'On behalf of all the Nates out there: Come on! Step it up.' Streep and Blunt are also returning for the sequel. In The Devil Wears Prada, Andy and Nate break up after repeatedly clashing over priorities as her career skyrockets, but later reconnect – seemingly as friends – when they meet up after she finally quits her job. Joining the cast along with Brammall is My Crazy Ex-Girlfriend's Rachel Bloom, Lucy Liu, Justin Theroux and B.J. Novak, although details of their roles have been kept quiet. Meanwhile, original stars Hathaway, Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt and Stanley Tucci were previously confirmed to reprise their roles. According to Variety, the sequel 'follows Priestly as she navigates her career amid the decline of traditional magazine publishing and as she faces off against Blunt's character, now a high-powered executive for a luxury group with advertising dollars that Priestly desperately needs.' The Devil Wears Prada 2 will hit theatres in May 2026. Originally published as Aussie star lands big role in The Devil Wears Prada 2: report

Shocking data reveals how many can't see what's AI and what isn't
Shocking data reveals how many can't see what's AI and what isn't

Courier-Mail

time9 hours ago

  • Courier-Mail

Shocking data reveals how many can't see what's AI and what isn't

Don't miss out on the headlines from Social. Followed categories will be added to My News. Influencer Mia Zelu's done it all. Courtside among the biggest names at Wimbledon? Yep. A Coldplay concert experience of a lifetime? Completed it. Sipping coffee in picturesque Italian streets? Piece of cake. Her Instagram page is filled with big bucket list stuff. Except it's not real. Not the typical social media personality, Zelu is actually an AI influencer, meaning she's just a generated picture on a screen. Nothing more. But she looks so real that most of her 167k Instagram followers wouldn't even know she doesn't actually exist. Don't tell those who keep up with her 'sister' Ana Zelu, who's fooled even more people with 267k followers who interact with her either unknowing or uncaring of the truth behind her account. With their photorealistic posts and human-like captions, the fake sisters are just a few of the increasing number of AI accounts that are fooling people into thinking they're real, despite (some of) their bios stating they aren't. Influencer Mia Zelu has racked up over 167k online followers, despite not even being real. Photo: Instagram. She even has an AI 'sister' Ana, who also isn't real. Photo: Instagram. Tech expert and editor of Trevor Long says the reason these accounts are having the same effect on people as real influencers is because AI has understood what people are drawn to and can feed into the same patterns without skipping a beat. For a technological tool designed to help people, having it understand what people want isn't a bad thing. The danger is not knowing what's real and what's not. 'Most of us don't know the influencer on the other side of [an] Instagram account that is real, so knowing that someone is real or artificial intelligence actually doesn't change much of the perception of content,' Mr Long told 'However, if that content is sculpted and created in such a way that it is truly targeted and you don't have the morals of a real human being deciding whether or not they will sit in that spot, take that photo, try that thing, go to that event, we start to really push the boundaries of where this influential culture might go.' Getty Images' Asia-Pacific head of creative Kate Roruke said they've conducted research that found that although 65 per cent of people could spot an AI photo, more than 95 per cent also mistook real images for AI. Zelu has gone from Wimbldon to Coldplay concerts to Italian streets living a life too good to be true and that followers enjoy through her. Photo: Instagram. EFTM editor Trevor Long says there is a danger in not knowing when something is real or not. Photo: Instagram. 'People are used to seeing curated, almost perfect images from human influencers, achieved through extensive editing, filters and professional photography. Zelu, being entirely AI-generated, naturally embodies this idealised flawless skin, perfect lighting and picture-perfect poses,' she said. But concerns then about the extreme uses of the tech then also create a problem, like deep fake pornographic material which has pushed the moral and ethical boundaries of AI. Numerous celebrities like Taylor Swift and face of the NRLW Jaime Chapman have already become victims. It comes as more confusion around AI than ever, with 95 per cent of people also mistaking real photos for the tech. Photo: Instagram. Companies are starting to place stringent measures on content produced with AI as a result. Photo: Instagram. The value of knowing if something is real has never been more important in an age when a tool not everyone yet understands is already out of control. Mr Long says it is incumbent on the big tech companies like Meta and TikTok to be able to give users validation on what is real and what isn't, and give precedence to the real people using their platforms. 'We talk so much about the algorithm. It should be the case that real people are prioritised so that we know that we can listen to and decide whether or not we trust that person, otherwise we're probably putting our trust in an AI fake individual,' he said. While easier said than done, companies like YouTube have taken steps towards creating better clarity and priority to real content, last week announcing they were demonetising accounts and channels that generate purely AI generated content. Her 'sister' Ana is even more popular with 267 followers on Instagram. Picture: Instagram/Ana Zelu 'There's some fun AI videos out there. It might be a kangaroo doing a vlog or silly things like that,' Mr Long said. 'But those things are obvious. What we need to worry about is the content that is not at all obvious to the basic human eye, and we need some controls around that.' Originally published as People online duped for thinking AI influencer Mia Zelu is real as deepfake accounts skyrocket across social media

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store