logo
Construction on US President Donald Trump's $200 million White House ballroom to begin in September

Construction on US President Donald Trump's $200 million White House ballroom to begin in September

7NEWSa day ago
US President Donald Trump has been envisioning a new ballroom on the White House campus for a decade and a half.
His dream is about to become a reality.
Construction will begin in September on a $US 200 million ($A311 million), 90,000-square-foot ballroom, his press secretary announced on Thursday.
Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today
It fulfils a 15-year ambition by the president to construct an event space on the White House grounds that expands the building's entertaining capacity — but also resembles the gilded spaces of his private clubs.
Renderings provided by the White House depict a vast space with gold and crystal chandeliers, gilded Corinthian columns, a coffered ceiling with gold inlays, gold floor lamps and a checkered marble floor.
Three walls of arched windows look out over the White House's south grounds — including a massive new flagpole that was another of Trump's additions to the historic compound.
'I always said I was going to do something about the ballroom, because they should have one,' Trump told reporters on Thursday.
'It'll be a great legacy project, and I think it'll be special.'
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the new 'state ballroom' would occupy space currently housing the East Wing of the executive mansion, where first ladies have traditionally maintained offices. Staff working from the location now will be 'temporarily relocated'.
The renderings show the exterior of the ballroom jutting onto the South Lawn, with a colonnade running along one wall. A Palladian facade with columns and a pediment sits on the eastern wall.
The gold-and-white style closely mimics the Louis XIV-style main event room at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's estate in Palm Beach.
Trump has not shied away from drawing inspiration from his clubs.
'No president knew how to build a ballroom,' Trump said last weekend, meeting the European Commission president in another of his crystal-draped ballrooms, this one at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland.
'I could take this one, drop it right down there, and it would be beautiful.'
The new ballroom — which will maintain the 'theme and architectural heritage' of the neoclassical executive mansion, the White House said — will have a seated capacity of 650 people, more than three times the space in the East Room, currently the largest event space in the White House.
'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement.
'The President and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organisations to preserving the special history of the White House while building a beautiful ballroom that can be enjoyed by future Administrations and generations of Americans to come.'
Leavitt characterised the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors — as a necessary addition after previous White Houses were forced to host major events in a temporary tent constructed on the South Lawn, which she called 'unsightly'.
'For 150 years, presidents, administrations and White House staff have longed for a large event space on the White House complex that can hold substantially more guests than currently allowed,' she said.
'President Trump has expressed his commitment to solving this problem on behalf of future administrations and the American people.'
Trump, she said, had convened meetings recently with officials from the National Park Service, the White House Military Office and the US Secret Service to 'discuss design features and planning'.
An architect known for 'classical architectural design', McCrery Architects, was selected to spearhead the project.
'I am honoured that President Trump has entrusted me to help bring this beautiful and necessary renovation to The People's House, while preserving the elegance of its classical design and historical importance,' the firm's CEO Jim McCrery said in a statement.
The vision of a new White House ballroom floated in Trump's mind dating back at least to 2010, when he called Barack Obama's White House offering to build one.
His offer was rebuffed.
'It was going to cost about $100 million,' Trump said during his first term. 'I offered to do it, and I never heard back.'
Stream free on
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In dark times, hope is the sunshine
In dark times, hope is the sunshine

The Age

time29 minutes ago

  • The Age

In dark times, hope is the sunshine

Unseen, uncaring? Many correspondents have emphasised we must act to stop the killing and hunger in Gaza because we are seeing this unravel before our eyes through pictures and video. This poses a question: If we don't see vision of other catastrophic wars in the world, should we care? I am distressed at what is happening in Gaza, but I am also disturbed by the starvation and killing of hundreds of thousands people in countries such as Sudan. The BBC has reported that 13 children have died of starvation in a displacement camp in East Darfur. And, last year UNICEF reported harrowing accounts of armed men in Sudan raping and sexually assaulting children. But Australia's media rarely reports and shows pictures of what is happening in other war-torn countries. We don't even get stories about the effect of what is happening in Sudan on our Sudanese community in Victoria. If we did read and see pictures about killing and hunger in other parts of the world, would we call for this to stop? Would the weekly CBD protests call for an end to all catastrophic wars? Erica Cervini, Prahran The Trump remedy Donald Trump firing the statistician who reports poor jobs data reminds me of his proposed remedy when faced with steeply increasing COVID cases: stop testing. Soon on the agenda: stop voting. Ralph Böhmer, St Kilda West A Tigers fan softens Thanks for the apology Bob Murphy (″⁣ I owe the Tigers an apology ″⁣, 1/8). As a lifetime Tiger supporter, I was one of many Tiger fans extremely disappointed in his pre-season prediction of a winless Tigers 2025 season. Today I'm still that little boy from the 1960s who wore Bill Brown's No. 40 on my Richmond jumper and that little boy was shattered by his statement. While always believing in his ability on the playing field, my assessment of his performance as a 774 radio host was tempered by his ill-advised prediction. I, too, witnessed the great deeds of Matthew Knights in the 1995 final comeback victory against the Bombers and was also at his fourth game when all hell broke loose between the Doggies and Tigers. Fortunately I have become the grandfather of two young passionate Doggie supporters and while they tell me they hate the Tigers, I now have a very big soft spot for their Doggies and I have been able to let go of my feelings from that day. My assessment of his performance on the airwaves is now unencumbered by his poor Tigers 2025 prediction So Bob, I forgive you. Paul Gooley, Ringwood East Do the maths Your correspondent (Letters, 31/7) took me back to my 1980s sixth grade at Brunswick North West Primary School. Before curriculum and assessment design became a political plaything, teachers were provided with the freedom to adopt models from a range of expert mathematics educators. For eight months, my students treated numbers and their patterns like fun manipulative toys. Along the way they became experts at automatic response. Today's content driven/test proven/NAPLAN-backed regime would have straightjacketed my teaching. My students loved mathematics, declaring it the easiest subject. Would they say this today? Sadly, I doubt it. Ian Whitehead, Traralgon Profit v care Why on earth, 40 years after Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan tried to persuade us that all public services should be privatised, are we still surprised at the shocking revelations coming out of the ″⁣childcare industry″⁣? The two underlying motivations are completely divergent and at odds: private childcare to maximise private profit (largely supported by government subsidies), and public services to care for children. Keep it simple. Tony Adami, Caulfield South When new is the norm Reading Scott Farquhar's comments about AI reminds me of Alexis de Tocqueville's observations about capitalists in 19th-century America (″⁣ Tech boss calls for boost to AI as 150 jobs cut ″⁣, 31/7). He observed, ″⁣The idea of newness is closely linked with that of improvement. Nowhere in his mind does he see any limit placed by nature to human endeavour.″⁣ On the question of AI, we are encouraged to exalt what is new, to exploit it, remaining indifferent to the destruction of the old ways. There will, of course, be radical social change, high unemployment and entire industries erased, but those entranced by newness will have moved on by then. Anders Ross, Heidelberg Reward the teachers It's a significant achievement that Victorian primary schoolchildren have scored highly in NAPLAN tests (″⁣ Victorian kids are the brightest sparks ″⁣, 30/7). It's also heartening that Education Minister Ben Carroll acknowledges the reasons for these improvements and recognises teachers play a pivotal role in this progress. As a parent of one I hope this will translate into tangible outcomes for our hard-working and undervalued teachers.

US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests
US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

Perth Now

time29 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc". The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.

US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests
US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

West Australian

time29 minutes ago

  • West Australian

US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc". The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store