Climate group voices concern about fossil fuel industry representation on pension fund boards
A climate advocacy group says oil and gas representation on the boards of Canada's big public pensions raise concerns about conflicts of interest.
In a report out Thursday, Shift said that as of June 1, the boards of five of Canada's largest public sector funds had members who are also involved with fossil fuel companies.
The pension-focused group argues that funds have a legal responsibility to act in the long-term best interest of beneficiaries, and that the interests of fossil fuel companies could compete with efforts to manage climate-related risks and reduce emissions.
'It's easy to see how fossil fuel company directors could potentially find themselves with real or perceived conflicts, and how such conflicts, if not addressed, could undermine prudent pension governance,' said Shift executive director Adam Scott in a statement.
The report says CPP Investments, Canada's largest pension fund, has the second-highest representation with three in ten members of its board having ties to the industry.
Story continues below advertisement
The fund, which recently dropped its commitment to reach net-zero financed emissions by 2050, wholly rejected the concerns raised by Shift.
'The report is nonsense,' said Michel Leduc, global head of public affairs and communications at CPP Investments, in a statement.
0:57
CPP Investment Board head says he backs West's 'responsibly-produced conventional energy'
'We seek out the most seasoned professionals to undertake a complex role of overseeing the management of a global investment organization … The energy sector's total GDP contribution to Canadian economic activity is disproportionately significant and that's precisely where you find top governance experience in Canada with a view to the best interests of contributors and beneficiaries.'
Get weekly money news
Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Other funds the group found with cross-appointments include the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, Public Sector Pension Investment Board, Alberta Investment Management Corp. and Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System.
AIMCo, where the Alberta government dismissed the entire board last year and installed new members, had the highest industry representation at a third, or two of six members.
Story continues below advertisement
The pension fund's members are selected through a 'rigorous appointment process and are subject to AIMCo's Code of Conduct,' said spokeswoman Carolyn Quick in a statement.
Other funds did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Shift said that in total, nine current board members across the funds sit on the boards or executive teams of 12 oil and gas companies, or investment firms focused on the industry.
It notes, however, that the number of boards with fossil fuel representation has gone down from seven to five since its last report in 2022.
The boards of Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan, Investment Management Corporation of Ontario and CDPQ no longer have fossil fuel representation, it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Canadian steel firms say weak tariff response risks wider layoffs
A group of Canadian steel producers said the government's plan to restrict foreign steel imports isn't strong enough and warned that the industry is set to shed thousands more jobs because of U.S. tariffs. Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney's government introduced new tariff-rate quotas last week to limit imports of steel and said it may adjust tariffs on U.S. steel products on July 21, depending on the status of trade talks with the Trump administration. Article content Article content The U.S. has increased tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. So far, Canada has decided not to match that, keeping its retaliatory levies at 25%. Article content Article content 'We have significantly dropped shipments and have experienced close to 1,000 job losses to date and are preparing for thousands more,' Catherine Cobden, chief executive officer of the Canadian Steel Producers Association, said in a statement Thursday. 'We are concerned that the immediate measures fail to address the crisis we are in.' Article content The tariff-rate quotas apply to steel-exporting countries that Canada doesn't have a trade agreement with. They only kick in if those countries exceed the volumes of steel they shipped to Canada last year. That 'will do little to support our industry,' said the CSPA, which represents producers including Algoma Steel Group Inc. and ArcelorMittal SA. Article content Article content The United Steelworkers union also criticized the government's plan as 'too narrow,' saying it doesn't apply to two-thirds of imports to Canada, including from countries including South Korea and Vietnam, 'despite repeated dumping violations.' Article content Article content
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Competition Bureau warns Canadian landlords and property managers about illegal discussions on rents
The Competition Bureau issued a warning to Canadian property managers and landlords on Wednesday about engaging in illegal agreements with competitors. Article content The Bureau said it is aware that some landlords and property managers may be engaging with competitors, and while some of these discussions may be justified, others could be illegal. Article content Article content 'Agreements between landlords to 'make the most of the booming rental housing market' or 'find ways to ensure that all players benefit from the strong demand equally' raise concerns under the law and could be illegal,' the Bureau said in a press release. Article content The Bureau warned that engaging in illegal agreements with competitors, 'such as price-fixing, market allocation, restricting supply, or wage-fixing and no-poaching agreements,' is a criminal offence under the Competition Act, with potential prison sentences of up to 14 years and hefty fines. Article content It also noted that some landlords and property managers may be engaging with competitors through discussion groups on social media. Article content Geneviève Chassé, a Bureau spokesperson, told Financial Post in an email that the Bureau would not speculate on the prevalence of the social media groups but added that it wanted to send 'a clear message to the industry' that certain topics cannot be discussed between competitors. Article content Article content Dania Majid, a staff lawyer at the Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO), said ACTO first became aware of such groups on platforms such as Reddit and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic when tenants raised concerns about potential discussions concerning bad faith evictions amid eviction moratoriums. Article content Article content Majid said ACTO had come across chatter among landlords regarding lease terms and how to evict tenants during that time but added that she had not been active on these forums in a couple of years. Article content 'If you're on a forum, and everyone's saying they're pushing out their sitting tenants and this is how they do it … then that illegal activity … seems like standard business practice.'
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Parks Canada launches international design competition for a new visitor reception and community hub in Banff National Park
International design competition will result in a conceptual design for the 200-Block of Banff Avenue Redevelopment Project. June 26, 2025 Banff, Alberta Parks Canada Parks Canada is pleased to announce the launch of an international design competition, overseen by the Royal Architecture Institute of Canada (RAIC), to develop a new conceptual design for the iconic 200-Block of Banff Avenue in Banff National Park. Today, Parks Canada announced the beginning of the pre-qualification phase for the architectural design competition after which up to six respondents will be invited to submit conceptual design proposals. The competition will be undertaken in accordance with the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (RAIC) guidance for competitions in Canada. To be considered, the conceptual designs must incorporate extensive feedback received by Parks Canada through years-long Indigenous, public, and stakeholder engagement. This project presents a unique opportunity to modernize facilities and open spaces in downtown Banff to welcome national park visitors, encourage connection with the national park, foster a welcoming and vibrant community. Each successful design proposal will be evaluated by an independent jury composed of recognized design and architecture professionals. The jury will evaluate the proposals and feedback received in further public engagement sessions and then provide a recommendation to Parks Canada. There will be continued opportunity for the public to provide input on the redevelopment project. Public engagement sessions on the conceptual design proposals will help to inform jury deliberations. Information and updates will be posted on the Let's Talk Mountain Parks website as they become available. Concluding in Spring 2026, the design competition for the 200-Block Banff Avenue Redevelopment Project will follow established industry standards and protocols and bring professional expertise to the evaluation process to generate world-class conceptual designs for this unique and iconic Canadian landmark.
