Columbus leaders troubled by federal funding threats
Why it matters: The directive could freeze or eliminate funding to many Central Ohio nonprofits and government programs.
Catch up quick: Trump's memo seeks to pause federal grant, loan and financial assistance programs, particularly those that involve "DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal."
It's created confusion across the country. A federal judge temporarily blocked the order with an administrative stay that expires next Monday.
Threat level: Hannah Halbert, executive director of progressive think tank Policy Matters Ohio, tells Axios the memo is a "debacle" that threatens programs that fund opioid recovery, unemployment and cancer patient support.
"The only thing certain about this memo is that it is causing a tremendous amount of uncertainty and panic."
Case in point: The nonprofit LifeCare Alliance runs Columbus' Meals-on-Wheels program. Its president and CEO, Charles Gehrig, tells us the organization was happy to hear the White House's clarification that Meals-on-Wheels won't be targeted.
However, he's still worried about funding for other LifeCare Alliance programs that support older adults and those with AIDS.
But, he emphasized: "Don't worry, your meal is coming tomorrow."
Behind the scenes: City Attorney Zach Klein's office is meeting to discuss next steps and begin identifying what may be at risk, per city spokesperson Melanie Crabill.
The city will flag any federal grant awards that could be affected, particularly those related to green and DEI initiatives.
What they're saying: Mayor Andrew Ginther, in his capacity as president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, released a statement saying "America's mayors are deeply concerned" about the "sweeping freeze."
Other Democrats are similarly uncertain.
Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Columbus) called the move "thoughtless" and a "deliberate attack on our nation's democracy" in a statement Tuesday.
What we're watching: A spokesperson for Klein tells Axios that "all options, including litigation, remain on the table as we navigate the impacts of this executive action."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage
We had to laugh when everyone present tried to spin this week's Brooklyn stop on Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour as a dramatic show of Democratic Party unity, when it was plainly nothing more than an alliance of convenience with the Kings County's most prominent Dems conspicuously absent. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams insisted that the media needed to 'understand what's going on right now, because I don't think this group of people agree about nothing' — yet they still don't. Williams and other radicals (including supposed reformers) were basking in the glow of fellow-traveler Mamdani's primary triumph, but the machine politicians like Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermalyne, the county Democratic boss, were just trying to make sure their bread will still be buttered. Bichotte Hermalyne and her allies had endorsed ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, obviously because he seemed the sure winner, but Andrew's political corpse wasn't even cold when she announced in a NY1 News interview her support for Mamdani in the general election. Beyond other patronage, she and her 'regular' Democrats are likely also hoping to cut some deal that nabs their faction the City Council speakership next year as a reward for jumping so quickly behind Mamdani. Not all pols are that squalid: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other notable Brooklyn Dems very much did not turn out for the 'unity' farce. Then again, Jeffries and Schumer are actually working ceaselessly to counter Trump, not just posturing about it so they can avoid addressing other issues. The point is that these politicians (like others across town) are 'uniting' behind Mamdani because it serves their factional interests, not because they think he'll be good for the city. The Democrats who truly care about New York are conspicuous by their silence.
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
All eyes on the Trump-Putin Alaska summit
The two world leaders met for about three hours alongside senior Russian and U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, and two Russian aides – shifting from a previously planned one-on-one summit between Trump and Putin. Afterward, they took to podiums in front of a blue backdrop that read 'Pursuing Peace,' speaking to reporters in a highly anticipated joint appearance. Putin began speaking first, in Russian, telling the audience that negotiations were held in a ' respectful, constructive and mutually respectful atmosphere,' and that he agrees that the security of Ukraine should be ensured. ' I agree with Trump that the security of Ukraine must be secured, and of course, we are ready to work on that,' he said, adding that he hopes that the agreement reached between Washington and Moscow 'will help us bring closer that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine.' Putin also proposed Moscow as the next location for any future meeting with Trump. 'That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one,' Trump replied. 'But I could see it possibly happening.' When it was his turn to speak, Trump spent a portion of his time lamenting that he has 'always had a fantastic relationship' with Putin, but that it was impeded by investigations during his first term into Russia's interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. 'We had many, many tough meetings, good meetings. We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. I've made it a little bit tougher to deal with, but he understood it,' Trump said. He also offered little as to whether anything was agreed to or not in the talks, noting that ' there's no deal until there's a deal.' 'I will say that I believe we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say, a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there. We've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' the president said. Ahead of the meeting, Trump said that he has a 'good idea' of what Ukraine would like to see from the summit. ' It's not for me to negotiate for Ukraine, but I think I have a pretty good idea what they'd like to see, and what's good and what's not good,' the president said during his interview with Fox News' 'Special Report' with host Bret Baier. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was excluded from the talks, said Russia has no intention to end the war soon. 'The war continues, and it is precisely because there is neither an order nor even a signal that Moscow is preparing to end this war. On the day of negotiations, they are killing as well. That speaks volumes,' he said in a video posted to X.
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends
At the conclusion of Friday's "productive" but inconclusive summit on Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin quipped to President Trump: "Next time in Moscow." The intrigue: Putin made the remark in English, a language he rarely speaks in public. The suggestion drew a surprised chuckle from Trump, who didn't rule it out but said he'd "get a little heat for that one." The big picture: If Trump were to travel to Russia, it would be the first time in over a decade that an American president set foot on Russian soil. Putin is angling for a more friendly relationship with the U.S. after being isolated on the world stage, and would likely consider such a visit a major coup. But there's no sign as of now that it's likely to happen. What they're saying: Putin's "next time in Moscow" quip came just at the end of Trump's televised remarks. "Oh, that's an interesting one," Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on the president's willingness to travel to the Russian capital. Catch up quick: In a joint press briefing, President Trump called the highly-anticipated peace talks "productive" but said that the two leaders "didn't get there" on a ceasefire or on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump said the two agreed on many issues but could not come to an agreement on "the biggest one." Putin said that it was very important for the two countries "to go back to cooperation," and that it was time for the superpowers to shift from "confrontation to dialogue." Neither Putin nor Trump offered any details of a potential agreement. Flashback: Barack Obama was the last U.S. president to visit Russia over a decade ago, according to the State Department.
