Plans to Sell Millions of Acres of Federal Land Dropped

Newsweek

30-06-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Republican plan to sell millions of acres of federal land has been withdrawn from President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act after it drew significant opposition from both sides of the political aisle.
Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, preemptively pulled his provision from the tax and spending bill on Saturday. This means that efforts to mandate federal land sales for development and housing have been dropped from the bill.
The move followed days of backlash from the public and lawmakers as well as warnings of rule violations from the Senate parliamentarian.
Newsweek has contacted Lee for comment via email outside regular working hours.
Why It Matters
The U.S. government manages about 28 percent of the nation's land, much of which is concentrated in Western states. Those in support of the sale of federal land, including Trump, framed the provision as a means to generate revenue and ease the housing shortage.
However, conservation organizations, Republican lawmakers and residents argued that the plan risked environmental harm without solving affordability concerns. The rift showed the struggle within the GOP over balancing property rights, local control and land stewardship.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah speaking during a hearing of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on June 18.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah speaking during a hearing of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on June 18.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
What To Know
Lee's proposal would have allowed the sale of 2 million acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) over the next five years.
The goal, Lee previously said on social media, was to promote affordable housing development and give land back to American families. However, critics of the proposal raised concerns that the land could be sold to the highest bidder or to foreign governments rather than be given to local and rural communities.
After the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the provision violated regulations governing reconciliation bills, Lee revised the legislation so that fewer acres of BLM-managed land would be sold and no USFS-managed land would be sold.
Despite making these changes and others, he withdrew the proposal entirely over the weekend.
Lee said in a statement posted on X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday: "Over the past several weeks, I've spent a lot of time listening to members of the community, local leaders, and stakeholders across the country. While there has been a tremendous amount of misinformation—and in some cases, outright lies—about my bill, many people brought forward sincere concerns."
In a previous comment, he said he wanted the land to be sold to the American people, "not foreign governments, not the Chinese Communist Party, and not massive corporations looking to pad their portfolios."
He added in his statement on Saturday that the reason he withdrew the proposal from the bill was because of the "constraints of the budget reconciliation process," which meant that he was "unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families—not to China, not to BlackRock, and not to any foreign interests."
The proposal faced criticism from environmental groups and public land advocates, who warned it could open up as many as 250 million acres for eventual sale that would harm wildlife and recreation access.
A number of Republican senators also spoke out against the legislation, including Senators Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy of Montana and Jim Risch of Idaho.
What People Are Saying
Senator Mike Lee of Utah said in a statement posted on X: "I continue to believe the federal government owns far too much land—land it is mismanaging and in many cases ruining for the next generation. Under Democratic presidents, massive swaths of the West are being locked away from the people who live there, with no meaningful recourse. That has real consequences for Utahns—from raising taxes for schools and funding local search-and-rescue operations, to being able to build homes and sustain rural communities."
Senator Steve Daines of Montana wrote on X: "I always have and always will be against the sale of public lands. @TimSheehyMT & I worked together to block this provision from being included in the Senate reconciliation bill and I will always fight for our MT outdoor way of life."
Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana wrote on X: "The entire Montana delegation has been united on this since Day One: public lands belong in public hands."
Senator Jim Risch of Idaho wrote on X: "Senator Lee has withdrawn the sale of public lands provision. The people of Idaho have been clear—we do NOT support the sale of our public lands to the highest bidder. I am proud to help lead the effort to remove this provision from the One Big Beautiful Bill."
What Happens Next
Senate Republicans continue working to send Trump's legislative agenda to his desk ahead of the July 4 deadline. While the land sale proposal is off the table for now, Lee has indicated that he intends to advocate for changes in federal land management in future legislation.