logo
Can China turn off India's tap, hit land formation?

Can China turn off India's tap, hit land formation?

India Today4 hours ago

It's impossible that anyone who has taken a train to Guwahati and crossed the Saraighat Bridge hasn't been left amazed by the width of the Brahmaputra. It looks like a sea. Just to imagine that the mighty Brahmaputra gushes as a stream, called Yarlung Tsangpo, in Tibet is unimaginable for millions of Indians. But that's the fact and the visual answer to the question -- can China turn the Brahmaputra tap off for India?advertisementThe idea that China, being the upper riparian country, might be capable of controlling the flow of the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra river system was brought up by Pakistan after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).That scare-mongering was promptly addressed by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. But what do research data and experts suggest? Can China block or divert the flow of Yarlung Tsangpo and hit India's water supply?
Diverting the flow of a high-sediment river like the Brahmaputra won't be just about the water, it would also hit soil formation downstream."If India does something like this that they stop the flow [of rivers] to Pakistan, then China can also do the same thing," Rana Ihsaan Afzal, a senior aide to Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, told Geo News on May 23.advertisementHis remarks caused some consternation given the fact that China is constructing the 60,000-MW Medong Dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo at the Great Bend, near the India-China border.Experts rule out any possibility of China blocking or diverting water, and say a bigger worry should be that the massive dam -- one of the biggest in the world -- is coming up in a calamity-prone area in China-controlled Tibet.Economist Nilanjan Ghosh, who has studied the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra River System for close to two decades, says that it has never been China's position to block the flow of the Brahmaputra, albeit it aims to build run-of-the-river dams."Any attempt to divert the flow would be counterproductive as it would result in upstream floods because of sediment accumulation," Ghosh, Vice President, Development Studies at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), tells India Today Digital.The expert says China won't be able to "turn off the tap" as the Brahmaputra is primarily a rain- and tributary-fed river, and the Yarlung Tsangpo contributes just 10-15% of the entire volume of the Brahmaputra's water."The Brahmaputra gets fatter and fatter as it moves downstream," says Ghosh.
China contributes only a small portion of the Brahmaputra's total water. As the river flows through India, its volume increases more than six times due to several tributaries joining in. (Image: Arun Uniyal/India Today)
In January this year, Ghosh and fellow researcher, Sayanangshu Modak, published a research paper in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Water Resources Development where they used hydrological data to junk the rhetoric around China being capable of turning the Brahmaputra tap off.Data collated over the years show that the discharge of the Yarlung Tsangpo, measured at Nuxia in Tibet, to be at 31.2 billion cubic meters (BCM) annually, which then swells to an estimated 78.1 BCM as it passes through the Great Bend and exits China.At the measuring station at Pandu in Guwahati, the Brahmaputra's annual discharge is 526 BCM, showing a six-fold volume increase. At Bahadurabad, in Bangladesh, which is just across the border with India, the annual discharge is 606 BCM.This shows that since the river's entry into India, the Brahmaputra has been fed by its tributaries to grow massively.The Brahmaputra has shaped Assam for centuries by carving out banks and creating shape-shifting islands. It has caused flooding woes, but has also left behind life-sustaining fertile soil.advertisementThe Majuli island on the Brahmaputra is the world's biggest riverine island, and has been at the heart of neo-Vaishnavism, spearheaded by Srimanta Sankaradeva. The Vaishnavite satras (monastries) in Majuli have been centres of cultural and art for centuries.Like the one-horned rhino, the twin-leaf tea buds and the xorai and gamusa, the Brahmaputra has become a marker for Assam's civilisational identity."Mahabahu Brahmaputra" is how legendary Assamese singer Bhupen Hazarika refers to the mighty river in one of his ever-popular songs, which tells the story of the land it feeds.WHAT BRAHMAPUTRA FLOODS SUGGESTOriginating in the Angsi Glacier in western Tibet, the Yarlung Tsangpo travels 1,625 km in the China-controlled territory of Tibet and enters India after the Great Bend near the Namcha Barwa peak. Then, as the Brahmaputra, it flows for 918 km within India and another 337 km in Bangladesh, where it is called Jamuna, and empties into the Bay of Bengal.The length of the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra system in Tibet gives the perception that it is a major river with a huge water volume in China.advertisementGhosh agrees with Himanta Biswa Sarma's analysis of the Brahmaputra but calculates the Tsangpo's water contribution to the Brahmaputra at much lower than the 30-35% pegged by the Assam chief minister.The expert says though the river system completes 56% of its run in China, it contributes just 15% of the water in its boundary."That is why some literature suggests the Yarlung Tsangpo to be a tributary of the Brahmaputra," Ghosh tells India Today Digital.It is believed that the Brahmaputra was actually formed at Sadia in eastern Assam after the merger of three rivers -- the Dihang (Siang), Lohit and Dibang."So, I don't think that, given these hydrological facts, there will be any substantial impact on India, even if China blocks the flow of Tsangpo," says Ghosh.
The Brahmaputra in Assam gains significant volume of water as it flows parallel to the Himalayan foothills and is fed by many snowmelt tributaries such as the Subansiri, Kameng, and Kameng rivers.(Image: Arun Uniyal/India Today)
advertisementDerek J Grossman, a national security and Indo-Pacific analyst with Rand Corporation, says Pakistan cannot count on China to turn off the tap as monsoons feed the Brahmaputra."China has little control over the water flow of the Brahmaputra River, according to Indian government officials. One reason is that monsoons are the primary source of water. Another is that Beijing can only halt roughly 30 percent of the flow. Pakistan can't count on China," says Grossman.Tibet, one should remember, is a cold desert with very little precipitation. It is the glaciers that give birth to the rivers there.In India, the Brahmaputra has been linked with devastating annual floods, which are a result of the water drained into it by over two dozen tributaries in the monsoon months.Sadia – the town where experts argue that the Brahmaputra is formed – is the town where Bhupen Hazarika was born, and a good part of it was engulfed by the Brahmaputra as it changed course after the earthquake in 1950.Hazarika rebukes the Brahmaputra, referring to it as Burha Luit, in one of his songs, for flowing silently, deaf to the wails of the numerous people on its banks. "...Burha Luit tumi boa kiyo (Why do you flow)," he asks.CHINA'S BLOCKING OF BRAHMAPUTRA FLOW WON'T HIT SOIL FORMATIONExperts have suggested that the Brahmaputra is an antecedent river that is older than the Himalayas.While the Brahmaputra, in its age-old wisdom, flows silently, taking away land, like in Sadia, the sediment it carries is crucial to soil formation.Even from the perspective of soil formation and fertility, China's blocking of the Yarlung-Tsangpo wouldn't impact India.According to the 2016 book -- River morphodynamics and stream ecology of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau -- by Chinese experts, the annual suspended sediment load of the Yarlung-Tsangpo near Nuxia in Tibet is around 30 million metric tonnes (mmt), much lower than the 735 mmt of sediment load at Bahadurabad in Bangladesh.The stream-like Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet cannot carry the sediment load, and it is the powerful Brahmaputra that does the heavy-lifting of the sediment load not just in India but to form the fertile Jamuna floodplain in Bangladesh.The average width of the Brahmaputra is 5.46 km, according to the Assam Water Resources website. In areas where it forms a braided system due to sediment deposition, the width extends to up to 18 km.
Satellite images show the Yarlung Tsangpo (top) in Tibet as a narrow, fast-flowing river cutting through the plateau, while in the Assam plains the Brahmaputra (bottom) spreads out and swells into braided channels, often accommodating islands as large as Majuli and the one with the Dibru-Saikhowa National Park.Note: The scale of the two images is not uniform, and they are presented only for visual comparison, not to exact proportions. (Image: Google Maps)
INDUS WATERS TREATY SUSPENSION AND CHINA'S DAMSThe Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) that India kept in abeyance after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack is very different from the treaty that India has with China on the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra system.While the IWT is a water-sharing treaty under which India gave the rights to water use of the western rivers of the Indus Rivers System to India, the pact with China on Yarlung-Brahmaputra is just for sharing of information, and not water.What China could do worst is stop sharing hydrological data with India, but even that won't matter much, according to Ghosh."India has an MoU with China for hydrological data from three stations [in China]. Even if China stops sharing data, it won't matter because the information isn't helping much anyway due to the wrong choice of stations [agreed on] by the Indian government at the beginning of the millennia," he tells India Today Digital.Ghosh says no one should draw parallels between the Indus Water System and the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra River System because of the difference in the nature of the two."The Indus System is largely fed by glacial and ice melt. It has around 45% to 55% normalised melting index (NMI). While the contribution of glacial and ice melt of the Brahmaputra is barely 10-12%," says Ghosh.What this means is that the bulk of the water in the Indus River System is added upstream, which isn't true in the case of the Yarlung-Brahmaputra. While India has the advantage of being the upper riparian state in the case of the Indus system, China doesn't enjoy that in the case of the Brahmaputra.While Pakistan, an agrarian economy, is completely dependent on the Indus River System for its agriculture and power generation, India, according to Ghosh, barely taps 25% of the renewable water flow of the Brahmaputra.Therefore, while Pakistan might love to believe that its "all-weather friend" China might be able to turn the tap off on India and hurt it, this isn't true going by the hydrological and meteorological data.The Brahmaputra has historically been associated with Assam's resilience. The Saraighat rail bridge that one uses to travel to Guwahati is a reminder of that.It was the crucial Battle of Saraighat, led by legendary Ahom general Lachit Borphukan, on the Brahmaputra that led to the defeat of the Mughal forces and the end of the siege of Guwahati.Mahabahu Brahmaputra nurtures Assam. It is formed in Sadia and China cannot weaponise its waters against India.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan gets law to arrest Baloch citizens for 90 days only on suspicion
Pakistan gets law to arrest Baloch citizens for 90 days only on suspicion

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Pakistan gets law to arrest Baloch citizens for 90 days only on suspicion

The Pakistani-administered Balochistan Assembly passed a law that allows security forces to detain Baloch civilians for 90 days without any judicial recourse. Activists compare it to laws in Nazi Germany. read more Earlier this week, the Balochistan Assembly passed the Counter-Terrorism (Balochistan Amendment) Act 2025, prompting a widespread alarm among human rights groups and Baloch civil society . What makes the law controversial is the fact that it allows Pakistan's military and intelligence agencies to detain individuals, especially Baloch civilians, for up to 90 days without charge. The authorities are allowed to detain them solely on suspicion. Shortly after the law was passed in the Balochistan Assembly, legal experts and human rights activists warned that the legislation bypasses judicial safeguards and effectively legalises the atrocities and practices already being committed by the Pakistani security forces in the shadows. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under the Act, Pakistan's Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) can now operate with expanded powers. They can issue detention orders and conduct ideological profiling of the suspects. Not only this, but military officials will now be sitting on the oversight panel, eroding civilians' control over law enforcement. Why is it concerning? Apart from this, law enforcement agencies are also granted increased authority to search, arrest and seize property without any form of prior judicial approval. With these provisions, activists are now arguing that the law paves the way for widespread abuse and mass surveillance. It is pertinent to note that enforced disappearances have been a persistent issue in Balochistan, where families have waited for decades to get any information about their loved ones. The Baloch activists insisted that the new law effectively codifies these practices, placing entire communities under constant fear of state violence. 'This Act transforms Balochistan into a legalised detention zone,' the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) said in a statement after the legislation passed. The group condemned the legislation, calling it a step towards full militarisation of civilian lives. Not only this, the group compared the tactics authorised by the Act to those used in Nazi Germany and the modern-day Xinjiang region . What makes it more concerning is the fact that the law violates Article 10 of Pakistan's Constitution, as well as Pakistan's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). In its statement, BYC called on the United Nations, international human rights organisations, and global civil society to intervene and pressure Islamabad to repeal the law. 'Silence now is complicity,' the group averred. With inputs from ANI.

'11 years and no press conference': Congress slams PM Modi; claims 'his term coming to an end'
'11 years and no press conference': Congress slams PM Modi; claims 'his term coming to an end'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

'11 years and no press conference': Congress slams PM Modi; claims 'his term coming to an end'

Pawan Khera and PM Modi (R) NEW DELHI: Congress leader Pawan Khera on Sunday launched a sharp attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi , suggesting that his tenure is nearing its end while criticising his governance and international standing. In a post on X, Khera wrote: Eleven years and no Press Conference….. His term coming to an end. His politics globally exposed. His governance is in tatters. His policies have boomeranged. This Prime Minister is a joke. The remarks came a day after the Congress party accused the Modi government of failing to isolate Pakistan on the world stage following the recent terror attack in Pahalgam. Khera termed it a "criminal betrayal" of Indian soldiers and citizens. He alleged that instead of punitive measures, Pakistan continues to benefit diplomatically and militarily. "After the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, we expected strong actions and global isolation of Pakistan, but what has actually happened?" Khera said. "China is arming Pakistan with 40 fifth-generation stealth J-35A fighter jets armed with cutting-edge PL-17 missiles. Azerbaijan is investing $2 billion in purchasing 40 Pakistani JF-17 fighter jets," he mentioned. He further added, "The World Bank has pledged $40 billion for Pakistan's development. The IMF approved $1 billion bailout to Pakistan. Russia has signed a $2.6 billion agreement to rebuild a steel plant in Karachi." Khera also pointed out that Pakistan was appointed Vice-Chair of the UN Security Council 's Anti-Terrorism Committee just days after the attack, calling it a serious diplomatic failure.

The irony of the UN: From peacekeeper to harbinger of terror?
The irony of the UN: From peacekeeper to harbinger of terror?

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

The irony of the UN: From peacekeeper to harbinger of terror?

Those who once stood in the dock accused in the 'War on Terror' declared by George W Bush are now in the UN coffee room, and officially, there is no terrorism at all anymore. Times do change, but rarely does it stand on its head read more Hardly anyone expects anything at all from the United Nations, especially given its irrelevance in Ukraine or Gaza or anywhere else. But this week it outdid itself in its utter mediocrity. Recently, Pakistan was chosen to chair not just the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee of the UN but will also co-chair the 1373 Counter Terrorism Committee. Though this is far less than Pakistan demanded, it asked to lead four committees and got a single chairmanship of only one. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consider the irony that the UN was set up after the Second World War to maintain a semblance of peace after the utter failure of its predecessor, the League of Nations, formed after the First War. The UN seems to be headed the same way, as wars break out in all forms and levels of violence. Pakistan Gets a Chair Pakistan was elected last year as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council for a period of two years, that is, till it ends its term in 2026. Earlier, it received a comfortable mandate to be part of the Security Council, polling 182 of 193 seats. That's not a surprise, since the voting in the General Assembly is usually by blocs, with the OIC (Organisation of Islamic States) dominating the Council, while it is also part of the Asia-Pacific Regional Group and the G-77. Pakistan replaced Japan, who contributed some 8 per cent of the UN budget. Pakistan contributes less than one per cent and is a country with some of the highest concentrations of terrorist groups, with 12 of 15 designated by the US. That tells you much more about what the 'contribution' of Pakistan is. Meanwhile, Pakistan is among the top contributors to UN peacekeeping, serving in 46 missions in 29 countries. That means a hefty amount in foreign exchange. No details are available for that figure, which is vital to the Pakistani economy. Pakistan in the Driver's Seat Election to chair any UN SC committee naturally requires the assent of all permanent members of the Council, and as of date, no one has been rejected. Neither does the Council have the power to override the General Assembly in its selection of non-permanent members. So while it's not a ' foreign policy collapse', as the Opposition would have it, it's certainly a matter of concern, not only to India but to other countries in the crosshairs of Pakistani terrorism. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the ultimate irony, Pakistan – which has waged war on Afghanistan for more than thirty years – is now in the driver's seat on the 1988 Taliban sanctions committee which is mandated to an assets freeze, a travel ban, and an arms embargo on individuals, groups, undertakings, and entities associated with the Taliban. In other words, a country that devastated Afghanistan for more than three decades is now in the driver's seat. The Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and Baloch Groups will Take a Beating That would mean trouble for the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which Pakistan has for long been accusing Kabul of supporting. Now expect that the activities of TTP will be highlighted in this and other reports that are produced by the UN Counter Terrorism Committee. Islamabad has already been busy. Look at the March Resolution S/RES/2777 (2025) of the Security Council on Afghanistan. It expresses concern about terrorist groups in the country 'condemning in the strongest terms all terrorist activity and all terrorist attacks… that the territory of Afghanistan should not be used to threaten or attack any country, to plan or finance terrorist acts, or to shelter and train terrorists, and that no Afghan group or individual should support terrorists operating on the territory of any country…' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It reads like a Pakistani diplomatic memo, especially since earlier UN reports had noted that the Taliban was steadily pursuing nasty groups like the Islamic State to the best of its ability. Then there are Baloch groups who are understood to be sheltering in Afghanistan. Groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army are, for reasons unknown, listed as 'terrorist' by the United States. Even as Kabul accuses Pakistan of faulting it for its own terrible internal policies, relations between the two are being smoothed over by the proverbial 'foreign hand'. China Lends a Hand An 'informal' meeting – as in unscheduled – and therefore convened in a hurry for various reasons – was held of the 'Trilateral' between Pakistan, Afghanistan, and China. May 21, where Beijing called for seven points for cooperation that included restoring diplomatic relations – which Pakistan promptly announced a week later – promoting the extension of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to Afghanistan, and strengthening the building of regional connectivity networks; both China and Pakistan would expand trade and support Kabul's reconstruction; cooperating on terrorism across the board; and most interestingly, advising that all three 'stay vigilant against external interference in the internal affairs of regional countries'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Expect a crackdown soon on the poor Baloch, with Beijing seriously concerned after a spate of attacks virtually paralysed Gwadar port, caused containers to pile up, and trucks carrying material for the project were set ablaze, even as India-Pakistan tensions climbed. The Baloch declaration of independence was hardly noticed in India, but it was all over Chinese chats. While there is irritation at Islamabad at not being able to do anything for the Baloch, there is also concern that Beijing's plans for the Belt and Road Initiative are being thwarted. Sharing a Chair on a Core Committee Pakistan is also part of the UN's Counter Terrorism Committee, in which capacity it is now co-chair of the 1373 committee, which is the basic resolution that established the whole UN counter-terror architecture after the 9/11 attack. A key aspect of the resolution is the 'decision' (which in UN language means its legal), which bars any financial assistance to terrorist groups, and also that 'all States shall refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists.' For one, Pakistan enabled legislation to criminalise terrorist finance only recently, and that too after pressure from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and for the second, it's self-evident. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As of now, Pakistan is in violation of all four UN Conventions on terrorism and all UN Resolutions on the subject, including 1267 (freezing assets and banning travel of terror-linked individuals like Dawood Ibrahim), Resolution 1373, which is quoted above, Resolution 1269, which requires states to deny safe havens to terrorists, and all the other resolutions linked to these. And it is this country which is chairing a nodal instrument of the UN, which in turn produces reports that were once regarded as completely reliable. Now no more. The newest has no mention of the Lashkar-e-Taiba or the Jaish-e-Mohammad; indeed, attempts to get the LeT-proxy Terrorist Resistance Front by Delhi were frustrated by committee members – but it does mention the Baloch Liberation Army. In sum, the UN system has become a travesty of its original mandate and no longer has any relevance at all. True, its many goof-ups are not linked only to Pakistan but also include its posture on the origins of Covid-19, for instance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In sum, it might be time to wind up a body that is governed by those most inimical to its original intentions. From the time that Jawahar Lal Nehru went to the UN with the Kashmir question searching for justice, the UN has only shown the duplicity of international politics. But nations are after all made up of people, and what is most worrisome is the total collapse of values, where terrorists turn into administrators and, like in Syria, suddenly turn 'respectable' ; so it was with the Taliban, and so it is with Pakistan. Terrorists rule. Those who once stood in the dock accused in the 'War on Terror' declared by George W Bush are now in the UN coffee room, and officially, there is no terrorism at all anymore. Times do change, but rarely does it stand on its head. Time to end this. The author is Director (R&A) at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. She tweets @kartha_tara. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store