'Merit will never be compromised,' CJI Gavai vows transparency in judicial appointments
Show more
Show less
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Watch: Texas flash flood, Modi in BRICS & Himachal flash flood
From Texas flash flood to Modi's bilateral engagements with several world leaders to flash floods in Himachal Pradesh to Supreme Court's hearing of pleas challenging Special Intensive Revision in Bihar on July 10, here are the top headlines of the day.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Calcutta HC sets aside cancellation of Trinamool MP's medical practioner registration
In another ruling on Monday, the Calcutta High Court ordered that 'tainted or identified ineligible' candidates must be excluded from the recruitment process of more than 44,000 teachers and non-teaching staff in West Bengal government-run-and-aided schools. In his order Justice Saugata Bhattacharya said that if any 'tainted or identified ineligible' candidate has already applied, the application form should be rejected. The High Court clearly stated that the recruitment process should be completed in accordance with the Supreme Court's order. However, the court noted that the recruitment process can be continued keeping in mind the notification issued by the WBSSC on May 30. The court did not interfere with the rest of the notification. Earlier in this year, in a judgment the Supreme Court had annulled over 25,000 school jobs in West Bengal on the ground of illegalities in the 2016 recruitment process. Following orders of the apex court the WBSSC issued a new recruitment notification. But it was alleged that the WBSSC notification of 2025 was against the Supreme Court's order. A case was filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging that notification. The plaintiffs claim that the notification published for over 44,000 vacancies is not legal. The plaintiffs stated that as per the Supreme Court's order, the 2016 'selection' process should be done as per the 'rules' of that year. And there is an order to do so from among the job seekers of 2016. But in this case, it was not followed. They also claimed that the age relaxation issue was not followed as per the order. The plaintiffs further alleged that there was corruption in the 2016 recruitment process. Keeping that case in mind, the Supreme Court ordered that a fresh recruitment should be conducted. As a result, if a fresh selection process is conducted, it should be done as per the 2016 Recruitment Rules. The state and the WBSSC made their argument in the High Court on Monday. They claimed that the Supreme Court's order does not state anywhere that specifically identified 'ineligible' job seekers will not be able to join the recruitment process. However, the court was not satisfied with this argument.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘I am a concerned man… citadel is tottering': Dhankar for FIR into cash recovery at judge's residence
Vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday said he hoped an FIR will be registered with regard to the recovery of a large stash of cash at a judge's official residence in New Delhi in March this year. Addressing students at National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, Dhankhar said, 'I am a concerned man. Whether this is an incident in isolation or there are other similar incidents.'' Dhankhar said equality before law means every crime must be investigated. 'If the money is so huge in volume, we have to find out: is it tainted money? What is the source of this money? How was it stocked in the official residence of a judge? It belonged to whom?' 'Find out those who are culpable. Bring them to justice… So far, there has been no FIR. The government at the central level is handicapped because an FIR cannot be registered in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in the early '90s.'' Observing that several penal provisions are violated in the process, he said, 'I do hope an FIR will be registered. 'We must go to the root of the matter. Our judiciary, in which people's faith is unshakable, its very foundations have been shaken.'' Dhankhar's statement comes amid reports that Justice Yashwant Varma was facing an impeachment in Parliament after an unspecified amount of cash was found at his official residence following a fire in March this year. Justice Varma has denied all allegations and submitted responses to both the Delhi High Court Chief Justice and a Supreme Court-appointed panel. The Vice President likened the recovery of cash from the judge's residence to the 'Ides of March' — a reference to Shakespeare's famous play Julius Caesar and a symbol of looming misfortune. 'Our judiciary faced its own Ides of March on the night intervening March 14th and 15th… There was cash in large quantity at the residence of a judge. I say so because it is now in public domain, officially put up by the Supreme Court… Now the point is, if cash was found, the system should have moved immediately and the first process would have been to deal with it as a criminal act,'' said Dhankhar. He said the 'citadel is tottering' because of this incident and hence the issue must be examined. The Vice President, who said he was of the view that judges should be protected from frivolous litigations, also expressed his concern over the delay in revealing the recovery of the cash. 'Some things are worrisome… It was only after about seven days that we came to know about this ghastly crime.' Referring to judges taking up assignments after retirement, he said, 'Now we have post-retirement posts for judges. Not all can be accommodated…. There is pick and choose. When there is pick and choose, there is patronage. It is seriously impairing our judiciary.''
