logo
Social Media Influencer Marketing: Managing Risks

Social Media Influencer Marketing: Managing Risks

Reuters03-03-2025

Advertisers are allocating increasing amounts of their budget to influencer marketing given its cost-effective digital content and high engagement and conversion rates. Influencer marketing, however, is not without risks. Influencer activities can expose advertisers to false and deceptive advertising claims and lead to reputational damage. The FTC actively enforces its guidance that influencers must disclose their connections to advertisers clearly and conspicuously in their posts.
(For more on social media advertising, including influencer endorsements, see Advertising and Promotions on Social Media in the April 2024 issue of Practical Law The Journal.)
Legal Framework
Influencer marketing in the US is governed and guided primarily by:
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act), which prohibits misleading, deceptive, and unfair advertising (15 U.S.C. § 45).
The FTC's Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (Endorsement Guides) (16 C.F.R. §§ 255.0 to 255.6), which provide guidance on how to avoid misleading and deceptive advertising when using endorsements (with special attention to endorsements posted on social media). The FTC released an updated version of the Endorsement Guides on June 29, 2023.
The FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking (Endorsement Guides FAQs), a set of frequently asked questions that provides detailed examples on how the FTC applies the Endorsement Guides to social media influencer endorsements. The FTC released an updated version of the Endorsement Guides FAQs on June 29, 2023.
The FTC's guidance, Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers, directed specifically to influencers to help them comply with the Endorsement Guides.
Other relevant FTC guidance, such as:
The FTC's enforcement activities also provide guidance on keeping influencer marketing legally compliant. To date, the FTC's enforcement activities have primarily focused on the companies that engage influencers. FTC settlements have mapped out the FTC's expectations for companies using influencer marketing. When the FTC updated the Endorsement Guides in 2023, it clarified that not only can advertisers and influencers be held liable for deceptive endorsements, but also intermediaries, like advertising agencies and public relations firms, can be held liable for their role in creating deceptive endorsements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alimentation Couche-Tard must divest 35 gas stations to advance Giant Eagle deal, FTC says
Alimentation Couche-Tard must divest 35 gas stations to advance Giant Eagle deal, FTC says

Reuters

time2 days ago

  • Reuters

Alimentation Couche-Tard must divest 35 gas stations to advance Giant Eagle deal, FTC says

TORONTO, June 26 (Reuters) - Canadian retailer Alimentation Couche-Tard ( opens new tab will be required to divest 35 gas stations in order to move forward with its proposed $1.57 billion acquisition of 270 retail fuel outlets from grocery store chain Giant Eagle, the Federal Trade Commission said on Thursday. The proposed consent order would settle FTC charges that the deal was anticompetitive and would have likely led to higher fuel costs for consumers across Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the commission said in a statement.

US FTC says Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal is not anticompetitive
US FTC says Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal is not anticompetitive

Reuters

time3 days ago

  • Reuters

US FTC says Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal is not anticompetitive

June 25 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission said on Wednesday that candy giant Mars' proposed $36 billion takeover of Pringles maker Kellanova (K.N), opens new tab did not meet the standard for an anticompetitive merger and that the regulator was ending its review of the deal. "Our job is to determine whether there is a violation of American law that we can prove in court. And once we've concluded there is not, our job is to get out of the way," Bureau of Competition Director Daniel Guarnera said in an FTC statement announcing the early termination of the investigation.

Media Matters sues to block FTC probe over Musk's X boycott claims
Media Matters sues to block FTC probe over Musk's X boycott claims

Reuters

time5 days ago

  • Reuters

Media Matters sues to block FTC probe over Musk's X boycott claims

June 23 (Reuters) - Media Matters asked a court on Monday to block the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's probe into whether media watchdogs coordinated advertising boycotts, calling it retaliation for the group's criticism of Elon Musk, a major donor to Donald Trump's presidential campaign. The FTC demanded Media Matters hand over communications with other groups that evaluate misinformation and hate speech and documents related to lawsuits where Musk's social media platform, X, has accused some groups of orchestrating advertiser boycotts. Media Matters, a Washington, D.C.-based liberal advocacy group, said there is no basis to accuse it of coordinating a boycott, and that the FTC's demands have chilled its ability to publish articles on the agency and Musk. "The Court should put an end to the latest effort by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk's government allies to punish, intimidate, and harass Media Matters for publishing reporting they do not like," the group said. The FTC probe, first reported by Reuters on May 22, marked an escalation in U.S. government scrutiny into whether groups like Media Matters helped advertisers coordinate to pull ad dollars from X after Musk bought the social media site formerly known as Twitter in 2022. Media Matters said in its lawsuit on Monday that the court should block the request, as it did similar investigations by Republican attorneys general in Texas and Missouri. X sued Media Matters in 2023, accusing the organization of defaming it in an article that said ads for major brands had appeared next to posts on X that touted far-right extremist content. Media Matters has denied the allegations, and sued X earlier this year, accusing it of abusive, costly and meritless lawsuits to punish the group for its reporting on advertising on X after Musk purchased the site. The Media Matters said it found advertisements by IBM, Apple, Oracle and Comcast's Xfinity placed alongside posts touting Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party. "X initiated a vendetta-driven campaign of libel tourism, spanning three jurisdictions in three countries, all arising from the same conduct: Media Matters' use of X's platform in accordance with X's Terms of Service and its truthful reporting on the results," the complaint said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store