US State Department says planned layoffs to begin soon
Donald Trump
's administration moves ahead with its plans to overhaul the U.S. diplomatic corps and cut jobs.
"Soon, the Department will be communicating to individuals affected by the reduction in force," Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources Michael Rigas said in a statement.
"Once notifications have taken place, the Department will enter the final stage of its reorganization and focus its attention on delivering results-driven diplomacy," Rigas said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Меките и удобни обувки улесняват ходенето
ZAROTRAVEL®
КУПИ СЕГА
Undo
The move is the first step of a restructuring that Trump has sought to ensure U.S. foreign policy is aligned with his "America First" agenda. It will likely result in hundreds of job cuts including members of the elite foreign service who advocate for U.S. interests in the face of growing assertiveness from adversaries such as China and Russia.
No State Department official publicly said when the first notices for the planned layoffs would be sent, but the widespread expectation is for the terminations to start as soon as Friday.
Live Events
The Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to pursue the job cuts and the sweeping downsizing of numerous agencies, a decision that could lead to tens of thousands of layoffs while dramatically reshaping the federal bureaucracy.
Trump in February issued an executive order directing Secretary of State Marco Rubio to revamp the foreign service to ensure that the Republican president's foreign policy is "faithfully" implemented. He has also repeatedly pledged to "clean out the deep state" by firing bureaucrats that he deems disloyal.
Neither Rigas nor any other State Department official specified how many people would be fired but in its plans to Congress sent in May, the Department had proposed laying off nearly 1,900 employees of the 18,000 estimated domestic workforce. Another 1,575 were estimated to have taken deferred resignations.
The plans to Congress did not specify how many of these people would be civil service and how many from the foreign service but said that more than 300 of the department's 734 bureaus and offices will be streamlined, merged or eliminated.
'TOO BUREAUCRATIC'
Last week, more than 130 retired diplomats and other former senior U.S. officials issued an open letter criticizing the planned overhaul.
One of the criticism has been directed at the firing of potentially several hundred U.S. foreign service officers who typically are evaluated based on years of experience, knowledge of particular areas and regions in the world and language skills.
The administration, as it vowed to bring back "merit", has dismantled many diversity and inclusion efforts. Most if not all of the DEI programs at State Department have been rescinded.
U.S. officials said the criteria for the layoffs have been based on the functions of the bureaus that the agency sees are redundant and overlapping in responsibilities and not based on the personnel that occupies those roles.
"The focus is on the org chart first. Functions of a more efficient, capable, fast and effective State Department," said a senior State Department official speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity.
"When something is too large to operate, too bureaucratic, to actually function, and to deliver projects, or action, it has to change," Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told a news briefing earlier.
As part of the reorganization, the role of a top official for civilian security, democracy, and human rights will be eliminated, along with the offices that monitored war crimes and conflicts around the world, according to the congressional notification the Department sent to Congress.
A new Senate-confirmed role of under secretary for foreign assistance and humanitarian affairs will oversee the new Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, which is to be reorganized to "ground the Department's values-based diplomacy in traditional Western conceptions of core freedoms" and headed by a deputy assistant secretary for "Democracy and Western Values."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump unveils modified reciprocal tariffs hours before August 1 deadline
Hours before the clock hit the midnight August 1 deadline, US President Donald Trump signed a new executive order that introduces modified tariffs on countries around the world. Here's a full list of countries that have been affected. read more President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order during an event to announce new tariffs in the Rose Garden of the White House on April 2. File image/AP US President Donald Trump stirred yet another storm on Thursday as he signed an executive order that set new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners. The White House announced that these high duties would go into effect on August 7, which will mark the next test for the global economy and the sturdiness of the American alliances. The order was issued shortly after 7 pm (local time) on Thursday evening and came amid a flurry of tariff warnings from Trump in the last several days. The White House argued that these tariffs are being built up on a later date for the rate schedule to be harmonised. The new set of tariffs from the Trump administration also came hours before the midnight deadline. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the announcement, the White House said that the 'universal' tariff will remain at 10 per cent, the same level implemented on April 2. This will be for countries with which the US has a trade surplus, which is most of them. Nations with which the US has a trade deficit face a 15 per cent baseline tariff floor. In addition to this, Trump also announced that he is raising tariffs on Canada from 25 to 35 per cent, effective tomorrow. Meanwhile, Goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement would not be subject to that higher rate, the White House said, which would blunt the impact. List of countries whose tariffs have been modified It was on April 2 when Trump declared a US economic emergency and announced tariffs of at least 10 per cent across all countries, with duties even higher for over 60 nations and trading blocs. He argued that the measures were taken to deal with the American trade deficit with other nations and called it ' Liberation Day'. On Thursday, right before the clock struck midnight, the president announced adjustments to some of those reciprocal tariffs ahead of his August 1 deadline. These changes are as follows: Countries that are worse hit by tariffs In the Thursday night statement, Trump said that some countries have agreed to or are on the verge of agreeing to, meaningful trade and security commitments with the United States,' while others he said did not engage in negotiations with the US, or 'have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters.' The following is a list of countries that have been hit the worst by the highest adjusted reciprocal tariffs that the White House announced: Syria: 41% Laos, Myanmar: 40% Switzerland: 39% Iraq, Serbia: 35% Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Libya, South Africa: 30% More than a dozen countries have tariff rates that are higher than 15 per cent either because they agreed to a trade framework with the United States or because Trump sent their leaders a letter dictating a higher tariff. 'President Trump is using tariffs as a necessary and powerful tool to put America First after many years of unsustainable trade deficits that threaten our economy and national security,' the White House said in a statement.
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
MyVoice: Views of our readers 1st Aug 2025
Maintain parliamentary decorum Apropos the edit 'Op Sindoor...'. There was nothing new about the debate in Parliament with each side only repeating what was said by them on umpteen earlier occasions. The Indian public is paying for the debates, and I wish there was a way for demanding our money back for these kinds of debates that are just noisy and lack substance. The fortuitous way the Pahalgam killers were liquidated is a little suspicious because there were constant demands from the opposition to arrest them. Which terrorist would carry their voter ID card from Pakistan if they were to indulge in terror attacks? The only notable thing about the entire debate came courtesy of Priyanka Gandhi, who gave names of the dead. Anthony Henriques, Mumbai Aghast at Trump's doublespeak It was a proud moment when ISRO successfully launched the earth observation satellite NISAR, which has been developed jointly by NASA and ISRO (THI, July 31). While USA and India with NASA and ISRO have collaborated, coordinated and cooperated on the highly expensive satellite indicates their great vibes as regards space technology. Against this backdrop, it is shocking that US President Donald Trump, despite ongoing deliberations with India, has announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the USA adding penalty for buying Russian crude oil at discounted price. One fails to understand Trump's doublespeak pertaining to 'friendship' and 'tariff'. In addition, Trump announced a deal with Pakistan on developing massive oil reserves and hoped that India would buy oil from Pakistan! The increase in tariff is bound to adversely impact both India and the United States. Hopefully, Trump will rethink his hasty announcement and reduce tariffs after which both nations stand to benefit. J P Reddy, Nalgonda-508001 Who will bell the cat? This has reference to the article on '80 years history of plastic chairs and futuristic environmental Villain'. It must be noted that since 1957, plastic has been promoted and sold in India, including used in everyday life. In fact, there are several colleges that offer diplomas to PG courses on plastic. Our country has around 50,000 plastic processing units, which provide thousands of jobs. Moreover, without government support, such progress cannot happen. So far no one has found any equivalent material that can effectively replace plastic (despite the 'ill-effects') across all applications. Gudipati Shanti Priya, Secunderabad-11 GHMC chief must follow Lucknow example I wish to appeal to the Commissioner, GHMC, to emulate the fine example set forth by the Lucknow civic body, which has successfully turned garbage hills into green parks and waste into fuel. The great transformation has seen Lucknow leapfrog from the 41st rank to an envious third in the Swacch- Survekshan ranking, 2024-25. This can be attributed to the diligence and determination of Indrajit Singh, Lucknow Municipal Commissioner, and his team. They successfully processed nearly 20 metric tonnes of solid waste into fuel and organic fertilizer. He not only provided 1200 EV vehicles to collect household waste but also JCB vehicles to clean up drainage canals. Making the initiative more effective, Singh ensured proper training to sanitation workers, who were all provided PPE kits and were subject to regular health check-up. By adopting such novel methods, he made Lucknow a greener and hygienic city. The GHMC chief can also take similar measures to transform Hyderabad. R. J. Janardhana Rao, Hyderabad-28
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
India should tweak trade and foreign policies to deal with Trump
The US' 25 per cent tariffs on goods imported from India, 'plus an unspecified penalty' for buying Russian oil and weapons, has not come as a big shock to New Delhi as this was almost evident from the relatively lukewarm response of the stock market which, though in the red, was almost flat in the early hours of Thursday. This, however, does not mean that there will be, or has been, no adverse effect of US President Donald Trump's decision on India. In April, he announced tariffs of up to 27 per cent on Indian goods, though these were later paused. With the latest deadline approaching this Friday, India waited with bated breath. This was because Trump has frequently criticised India's trade practices, labeling it a 'tariff king' and a 'big abuser' of trade ties. 'But now I'm in charge, and you just can't do that,' he said in a social media post. Delhi's response came from the Narendra Modi regime's pledge to attach 'utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs.' Also, it 'will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest.' Since April, both sides have been engaged in intense trade negotiations, with tone and expectations shifting over time. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said discussions with Indian officials have been constructive but acknowledged India's long-standing protectionist stance. Trump, he added, is determined to secure deals that significantly open foreign markets to US goods. Agriculture and dairy remain major sticking points. The US has long sought greater access to India's farm sector, viewing it as a lucrative market. But, India has resisted such moves, citing food security, livelihood concerns, and the welfare of its millions of small farmers. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal reaffirmed India's stance, calling agriculture a sensitive sector and pledging to protect farmers' interests. Bilateral trade between the two nations stood at $190 billion in 2024, with Trump and Modi aiming to raise this to $500 billion. India has already lowered tariffs on products like Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles, yet the US still runs a $45 billion trade deficit with India. Trump's recent announcement, however, must be seen in a broader perspective, one that includes geopolitics and diplomacy in general. The US President's annoyance with Delhi has more to do with its dalliance with nation groupings and policies he regards as inimical to Washington's interests. For instance, he intensely dislikes BRICS; he also doesn't seem to be fond of the rhetoric of the Global South. And, of course, he is not happy with India buying arms and oil from Russia. While India has long championed strategic autonomy in foreign affairs, some of its current geopolitical alignments warrant re-evaluation. Membership in BRICS, for example, has yielded no benefits on the critical issue of access to rare earth elements. If participation in such groupings only provokes major partners like the US without delivering economic or strategic advantages, its continuation is worse than pointless; it is harmful. Similarly, India's persistence in maintaining close ties with Moscow, despite significant shifts in the global order, has not resulted in meaningful gains. Russia is increasingly aligning with China, diminishing its value as a strategic counterweight for India. These realities suggest the need for a broader reassessment—not just of trade policy, but of foreign policy priorities as a whole.
