Blue Zones are meant to help you live longer – but are they real?
If you've come to be buried in Quirimán, chances are you've had a pretty good life. Of the 50 or so graves in this hillside village on the Nicoya peninsula, eastern Costa Rica, a significant number of residents surpass the 80 and 90 mark – proof, perhaps, that the area is part of a much-vaunted 'Blue Zone'.
The designation was given almost 20 years ago to a handful of places around the world where people live the longest, healthiest lives, making this, and parts of Italy, Greece, Japan and the US, globally famous. The idea – that people in these hubs are 10 times more likely to live to 100 than the average American – has spawned eight books, a Netflix series and, across Costa Rica, everything from tasting menus to yoga retreats, tours, breweries and branded souvenir shops.
Fifteen kilometres away in the centre of Nicoya, however, the longevity-boosting lifestyle being touted has shrunk from view. Here, waking with the sun, tending to the land all day and eating only what you grow – hailed as the secrets to Nicoyans' long lives – are nowhere to be seen. The town's main intersection houses a McDonald's on one side, a KFC and Burger King on another. On a sunny Tuesday lunchtime they are packed, dozens of families in each outpost jostling over their Happy Meals and buckets of 'mega alitas' (chicken wings). In less than half a generation, the creep of fast food, cars and touch-of-a-button digital dominance seems to have killed this longevity hotspot off stone dead. Although, according to Blue Zones' principal detractor, they never existed to begin with.
Saul Newman, a senior research fellow at the Centre for Longitudinal Studies at University College London, has spent the past five years as the chief thorn in Blue Zone architect Dan Buettner's side. In September, he won the Ig Nobel Prize (awarded to those who have made unusual contributions to science, the arts or humanities) for rubbishing the concept. The theory was originally born out of a 2004 paper on 'extreme longevity' in Sardinia and followed by a National Geographic article hailing the Italian island, Japan's Okinawa and Loma Linda in California as turning out the world's longest-living people (Nicoya was added in 2007, along with Ikaria, Greece, in 2009). But, according to Newman, it was built on 'junk data' – never more than a business idea crafted to shift magazine copies.
In a January 2025 essay for The New York Times, he wrote that Blue Zones becoming a global phenomenon over the past two decades has not led to mass take-up of these healthier, life-extending lifestyles, but rather made the science of extreme longevity 'an immense joke'.
Newman was no less strident when we spoke recently. 'None of it makes sense; absolutely none of it,' he told me of how the research was first carried out. 'And what's shocking to me is that it's been so obvious for so long.'
According to the Global Wellness Institute, the wellness tourism industry was set to more than double in value from $651 billion in 2022 to $1.3 trillion this year, helped along by openings hitching their wagon to the Blue Zones name. Last year saw the world's first-ever 'Blue Zone retreat' at a five-star hotel in Papagayo, a ritzy enclave two hours north of Nicoya, where prices began at $4,000 for the six-day stay; a further two took place in February, while Thailand will host its first in May.
In Newman's view, the Blue Zones theory has two key problems: fallible record-keeping – and Buettner. Buettner, 64, a three-time Guinness World Record-setting cyclist, first began developing the idea in 2000, going on to use a grant from National Geographic and the US National Institute of Aging to study census data from countries around the world. Through that, he identified where people were living longest, and visited (along with demographers and record-checkers) to interview residents about their lives.
What united these super-agers – natural movement, purpose, low stress, largely plant-based diets, moderate alcohol consumption, strong familial relationships – caught public attention in the way seemingly simple health promises tend to, making Buettner famous (and, presumably, fairly rich). The Netflix series – which Buettner co-produced – earned three Emmys.
In 2020, he sold the trademarked Blue Zone brand, which offers 'long-term, evidence-backed policies and interventions that optimise environments' to the likes of supermarkets, restaurants and schools, to Adventist Health LLC, part of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church, which reported revenue of $910 million in 2023, and has a $100 million office and health facility in Miami Beach.
What Newman sees as his smoking gun is that in 2008, according to an independent review of the Costa Rica census, almost half of over-99s 'were simply lying about their age. Error correction caused Costa Rica's old-age life expectancy to plummet from 'world leading', to 'near the bottom of the pack',' he says. He alleges that part of the problem is that elderly people are 'only alive on pension day' – ie their relatives turn up to collect their cheque, or they have somehow succeeded in falsifying official documents to cash in long before they're eligible. History is filled with evidence of erroneous age validation, he believes, pointing to famous cases of supercentenarians like Jeanne Calment, known as 'the world's oldest woman', who smoked for 100 of her alleged 122 years and burned many of her personal papers (which would have verified her age) before she died.
And then, there is Buettner. Buettner requested Newman's help in searching for the sixth Blue Zone via a 'funny email that said he liked my statistical prowess and wanted to pay me some money to come along and get on board'. Was he tempted? 'I told him to bugger off. I mean, I can't be bought for a holiday… science doesn't come out of the end of the cheque-book.'
Newman also alleges that other scientists were contacted by Buettner, requesting assistance 'to find a Blue Zone in regions with 'marketable' cuisines'. (Buettner tells me both allegations are 'false', though later retracts this in relation to the email he sent Newman, in which he praised his 'pluck', and promised, 'I have a decent budget so we could do a good job – we could actually travel there and do the age verification together,' and calls him a 'wacko' instead.)
Newman's belief that this was only ever a for-profit enterprise was further strengthened last year. Loma Linda – where residents' long life expectancies were, according to the original work, the result of its high proportion of non-drinking Seventh-Day Adventists – was 'kind of an outlier', Buettner appeared to admit in a 2024 New York Times article, and that it was added to the list because his editor decreed that America must feature on the roster. (Buettner calls this too 'false', then sends me a pre-written mailout of rebuttals to what are clearly common criticisms, saying that 'we wanted to include an area where Americans live the longest'.)
On Loma Linda, Newman says of the city 100km east of LA: 'There's nothing to write home about, it's a dusty suburb in California. There's nothing there; there's no special sauce.' It hasn't been delisted from any Blue Zones material, however. 'The problem is that all of the supposedly unfoolable people, all the scientists, went along with this for 20 years. So how do you then trust these people to spot problems when for 20 years they've been staring at something that was come up with because the editor told [Buettner] to? There's no careful scientific process at all,' adds Newman.
As you might expect Buettner, who has a reputation, A-list lifestyle and business to protect, has not taken Newman's public baiting well. 'Saul Newman is a plant scientist who masquerades as a demographer,' he tells me (early in his career, Newman worked as such for the Australian government). Asking for his views on demography 'is like calling your refrigerator repairman to get a quote on brain surgery,' Buettner adds. 'I've worked with real scientists. And we have this one, the academic equivalent of Krusty the Clown, who captures all these headlines.'
Buettner's dislike for his adversary (the feeling is clearly mutual) inevitably grows with every headline Newman accrues. On the day Newman's New York Times essay was published, I received multiple emails from Buettner – among many that had arrived following our prickly conversation – reeling off 'answers to my questions' that I had not, in fact, asked.
It is tempting to dismiss Buettner's outbursts as the ripostes of the scorned, but the matter is more complex than warring headlines between the two have made plain. He notes, importantly, that Newman's papers are preprints that have never been peer-reviewed – strange, perhaps, given the airtime heaped upon them. (Eight of Buettner's papers on the topic have.) One independent scientist described Newman's methods as 'unusual'; his data points often hinge on information from whole countries or regions, rather than the small geographical areas highlighted in the original work. Newman 'conveniently omits those in his zeal to criticise us, but obviously, his true interest isn't the truth, but self-aggrandisement,' says Buettner.
The accusations have cast a darkening cloud over Buettner, and the entire concept. On the Nicoya peninsula itself, though, the backlash has failed to filter through; being a Blue Zone remains a point of pride for some – and a serious draw for others.
It was reading about the longer lives of its residents that convinced Javier Ramirez, 58, to build a home in Quirimán eight years ago. Reading about the lifestyle and rich soil on the peninsula pushed the engineer to leave New York behind. His day-to-day now couldn't be more different than that he left, he says; Quirimán is a sleepy place where inhabitants grow corn and cows roam free. One of his neighbours is 103, while 'there's a man who's 96 years old, and he's bent over with a machete and he cuts grass – I've seen him with my own eyes. His son is 74 years old,' and performing the same intense manual labour, says Ramirez. To him, junk data or not, what he sees in Costa Rica's famed longevity capital is unequivocal proof of the Blue Zones concept.
For Luis Boltodano, a teacher from Santa Cruz, 25km north of central Nicoya, the boosted life expectancies along the peninsula come as no surprise. 'We Guanacastecos [from the Guanacaste region in the north of the Nicoya peninsula] have a saying that we are different people,' he explains. 'We are used to hanging out with family and friends, we are used to enjoying nature, we are used to enjoying life' – essential components of the Blue Zones theory. 'We don't kill ourselves thinking about what is going to happen.'
A look around the 42-year-old's neighbourhood is evidence enough of that effect. His neighbours, in their early 80s, still tend their farm; the man living next door is somewhere between 92 and 95. He shares a recent photo of one resident, Erlyn, looking decades younger than her years while posing beneath a glittering gold banner reading '100'.
Boltodano knows that his own generation, and that of his daughters, are unlikely to experience such fortune. The springing up of international fast food chains 'makes me sad', he says. 'In the last 10, 15 years, everything has changed in Nicoya,' with the lifestyle that made it famous 'fading away totally. Those elderly people, the ones that are living longer or are still alive, they didn't have what we have in this moment. They didn't know about fast food, they didn't know about technology, they didn't know what it was just to go to the supermarket and buy rice… they had to harvest everything, so they had to work, they had to be moving to eat.' Not even the healthiest of communities can remain immune from today's world, where 'we have everything just on the right side of our hand'.
That Blue Zones' colour is fading does not disprove his theory, Buettner believes – nor does it come as a surprise. The area 'has changed a ton since I was there', he says of Nicoya, its cluster of fast food joints a visible death knell. 'For me, that heralds the absolute end of that Blue Zone' – and not just in Costa Rica.
The problems have been creeping in for decades, he adds, since the 1940s. Gone are the days 'where the healthy choice is the easy choice and the most accessible; the cheapest foods were beans, corn tortillas and squash and whatever fruits that grew in their gardens'. The same is true in Okinawa, which has gone from the healthiest hub in Japan – per the theory, at least – to having one of its highest obesity rates; Buettner says it has been 'delisted', though the area still remains on the Blue Zones website.
'The corrosive effects of the standard American diet, automobiles as well as other mechanised conveniences as well as social media is destroying all Blue Zones. They're all succumbing to the disease of affluence – cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity.' Of the five zones that once were, only Sardinia and the Seventh-Day Adventists are 'still strong', he says. 'But, I suspect within a generation or so, they'll all be gone.'
Buettner says these major health changes happened after his research was carried out, therefore his theory still stands. But Newman takes a less forgiving view: 'The Okinawan, Sardinian and Costa Rican Blue Zones simply shifted or disappeared when the data and criticism arrived.'
Either way, the Blue Zones juggernaut refuses to stop rolling. Whether the data ever stacked up or not, the idea remains so alluring that businesses across the Nicoya peninsula continue to do a roaring trade, drawing in tourists who seemingly believe that a couple of weeks in which the words Blue Zones are tangentially attached can replicate the lifelong habits of native super-agers.
The Blue Zone tasting menu at a high-end restaurant in the tourist surfing haven of Nosara runs to a couple of hundred dollars per head; nearby is a brewery also using the concept's name, a helpful boost for dishing out craft pours. There is a branded store – or more accurately, four of them – selling products from hot sauce to hoodies; there are travel agencies and day-tours, yoga retreats, and cooking classes, none of which show signs of slowing.
Why are these businesses – which Buettner describes as 'horrible… It's all bunk; it's all taking advantage of something I have nothing to do with and something that I wouldn't get involved with' – booming? 'It's Shangri-La all over again,' Newman says. 'Of course it's compelling: no one wants to die. No one wants to go jogging. So when someone turns up and says, 'There's an exotic place far away where living for ever is very easy and you just need to do what they do,' it's extremely marketable.' To him, all the Blue Zones were and are is 'the fetishising of peasants', making megabucks out of the idea that a simple life is enough to transform anyone's health.
Worse to Newman is that it is not just companies profiting off the idea, but that it may actually be having a deleterious effect on public health in some of the world's poorest places. 'It's clearly making it worse because they've been recommending people drink every day [the Blue Zones website hails Sardinians' one or two glasses of red wine each day as central to their longer life expectancies]. I mean, if you were a doctor and you recommended this to your patients, you would just immediately be disbarred; there's no question. And for 20 years, that's been the advice from someone with no medical qualifications whatsoever.'
'More insidious' still is that acquiring cash for Blue Zone certification, which can run into the millions (or tens of millions), may be obscuring funding needs for older, ailing residents. 'All of that just completely gets ignored because of this; it's an excuse to leave these regions behind,' says Newman. 'Okinawa has twice the poverty rate of anywhere else in Japan. Twice. And the government now has an excuse to say, no, sorry, they're Blue Zones – we don't need to worry about everyone's health.'
That the Blue Zone badges are so costly does little to quieten Newman's cynicism. 'It's so expensive that the entire state of Iowa [which joined the Blue Zones project and then parted ways with it] could not afford it and opted out after three years, and all of that money would have gone to public health… We need to have a serious look at what is happening here, because it looks like a private company is capturing one of the few domains left in the public sphere, which is public health. And they're making billions.'
For Newman, the only way to stop the crusade is to introduce age-validation methods free of proven flawed record-keeping. He sees methylation – checking the ageing process of DNA genomes in the blood – as a superior means of ascertaining how old a person is, and one that couldn't fall victim to the same errors, or mistruths, its predecessor has.
Ditching paperwork completely 'is the only way out of the quagmire'; the only means of halting erroneous health claims, and the businesses that capitalise off the back of them, for good, he believes. 'Otherwise, yeah, it's all junk.'
Back at McDonald's Nicoya, it is clear that junk of another kind has already won; the smell of grease and stale air conditioning mingling over punters who, even a couple of decades ago, would have spent their afternoons labouring on their land, rather than over a Big Mac. Reverting to that lifestyle would be simple here, in a sense. But for as long as straightforward health advice has existed, so too has the failure to implement it – and Nicoyans, along with the rest of the world, are paying the price.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk trades threats with Trump: What it could mean for SpaceX launches in Florida
When President Donald Trump took office in January, he began offering plenty of signs that his goals for U.S. spaceflight aligned closely with those of billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk. Now those goals, which included making reaching Mars during Trump's second term a top priority, appear to be up in the air amid an increasingly volatile fallout between two of the world's most powerful men. As insults have turned to threats, Trump has suggested he'd hit Musk where it could hurt most: His wallet. Musk's SpaceX has spent years positioning itself at the center of American civil and military spaceflight – a profitable relationship that has made the company's CEO incredibly wealthy. In response, Musk has floated – and then retracted – the idea of decommissioning a SpaceX vehicle critical to NASA's spaceflight program. The vast majority of SpaceX's missions with NASA and the government launch from Cape Canaveral, either from the space agency's Kennedy Space Center or the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Serious threats, or empty words? That remains to be seen as Musk and Trump reportedly consider a détente. In the meantime, here's what to know about what's at stake if the U.S. government's relationship with SpaceX were to crumble: U.S. spaceflight: Trump looks to axe many NASA space missions that launched from Florida The feud between Trump and his former top advisory escalated in a dramatic fashion when the president threatened to cut off the taxpayer dollars that have fueled the growth of SpaceX, of which Musk is the CEO. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump said in a post on his social media platform. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" In all, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, a Washington Post analysis found. How the potential fallout between two of the world's most powerful men could affect U.S. spaceflight ambitions remains to be seen. NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in a post on social media site X that 'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space.' 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met,' Stevens wrote. Elon Musk, the world's richest man, founded Space Exploration Technologies Corp., more widely known as SpaceX, in 2002. The commercial spaceflight company is headquartered at Starbase in South Texas. The site, which is where SpaceX has been conducting routine flight tests of its 400-foot megarocket known as Starship, was recently voted by residents to become its own city. SpaceX benefits from billions of dollars in contracts from NASA and the Department of Defense, which use many of the company's spacecraft to help launch government missions. SpaceX also conducts many of its own rocket launches, most using the Falcon 9 rocket. That includes a regular cadence of deliveries of Starlink internet satellites into orbit from both California and Florida, and occasional privately-funded commercial crewed missions on the Dragon. SpaceX is also planning to bring its Starship operations to Florida by the end of 2025. The most recent of SpaceX's private human spaceflights, a mission known as Fram2, took place in April. SpaceX was also famously involved in funding and operating the headline-grabbing Polaris Dawn crewed commercial mission in September 2024. SpaceX provides launch services to the Pentagon, including the launch of classified satellites and other payloads. CEO Gwynne Shotwell has said the company has about $22 billion in government contracts, according to Reuters. The vast majority of that, about $15 billion, is derived from NASA. SpaceX's famous two-stage Falcon 9 rocket ‒ one of the world's most active ‒ is routinely the rocket of choice to get many NASA missions off the ground. For instance, the rocket is due in the days ahead to help propel a four-person crew of private astronauts to the International Space Station for a venture with NASA known as Axiom Mission 4. NASA also has plans to use SpaceX's Starship in its Artemis lunar missions to ferry astronauts aboard the Orion capsule from orbit to the moon's surface. The rocket, which is in development, has yet to reach orbit in any of its nine flight tests beginning in April 2023. SpaceX's Dragon capsule is also a famous vehicle that is widely used for a variety of spaceflights. The capsule, which sits atop the Falcon 9 for launches to orbit, is capable of transporting both NASA astronauts and cargo to the space station. Under NASA's commercial crew program, the U.S. space agency has been paying SpaceX for years to conduct routine spaceflights to the International Space Station using the company's own launch vehicles. The first of SpaceX's Crew missions ferrying astronauts to the orbital outpost on the Dragon began in 2020, with the tenth and most recent contingent reaching the station in March for about a six-month stay. Standing nearly 27 feet tall and about 13 feet wide, Dragon capsules can carry up to seven astronauts into orbit, though most of SpaceX's Crew missions feature a crew of four. The Dragon spacecraft also was the vehicle NASA selected to bring home the two NASA astronauts who rode the doomed Boeing Starliner capsule to the space station in June 2024. Certifying the Starliner capsule for operation would give NASA a second vehicle in addition to Dragon for regular spaceflights to orbit. Because Boeing is still developing its Starliner capsule, Dragon is the only U.S. vehicle capable of carrying astronauts to and from the space station. It's also one of four vehicles contracted to transport cargo and other supplies to the orbital laboratory. For that reason, Musk's threat Thursday, June 5 to decommission the Dragon "immediately" would be a severe blow to NASA if he were to follow through on it. Musk, though, appears to already be backing off on the suggestion, which he made in response to Trump's own threats. In response to a user who advised Musk to "Cool off and take a step back for a couple days," Musk replied: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Seven astronauts are aboard the International Space Station, including three Americans. Four of the astronauts rode a SpaceX Dragon to the station for a mission known as Crew-10, while the remaining three launched on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Josh Meyer, USA TODAY; Reuters Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@ This article originally appeared on Florida Today: SpaceX at center of Trump, Musk feud: What it could mean for Florida


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Don't let the Trump-Musk breakup harm ‘kids' NASA and SpaceX
Dead as the Trump-Musk bromance plainly is, neither man — nor the American people, heck even the world as a whole — would benefit from a disruption in federal contracts for at least two Musk companies: Starlink and, especially, SpaceX. It looked to be headed that way at one point in Thursday's post-war, with President Trump's Truth Social blast saying one way to save billions is 'to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' prompting a later Musk tweet about SpaceX 'decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Credit banker Bill Ackman for weighing in on X with a call for the two to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country. Advertisement 3 Tesla and SpaceX Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition in Washington, March 9, 2020. AP We are much stronger together than apart' — which brought a terse 'You're not wrong' reply from Musk, followed by general radio silence. Trump has also cooled down, pointedly shrugging off the feud as he chatted with Post reporters Friday. Advertisement Which suggests he won't be taking Steve Bannon's insane advice to try to deport Musk and have Uncle Sam seize SpaceX. The Crew Dragon is now the primary vehicle for US astronauts heading to orbit; the Cargo Dragon is now key to supplying the International Space Station. 3 President Donald Trump walks from the Oval Office before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, June 6, 2025, in Washington. AP 3 SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California, U.S., June 5, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement And SpaceX's reusable, super-heavy-lift Starship holds huge promise for both public- and private-sector ambitions in space. And no better alternatives are on the near horizon, though we certainly root for vigorous private-sector competition to keep cutting costs and extending humanity's off-planet footprint. As for Starlink, it's plainly the cheapest and best option for federal programs to provide broadband in remote, lower-income areas. Advertisement Musk, meanwhile, would only be stomping on his own dreams (and profits) if he quit his NASA work now. The breakup sure looks permanent, but some relationship is still mutually beneficial, and a boon to everyone except their still-shared enemies; anyone pushing either man to fight any more is just urging him to shoot himself in the foot.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
How RFK Jr. is quickly changing U.S. health agencies
WASHINGTON — In just a few short months, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has begun to transform U.S. health policy: shrinking staff at health agencies, restructuring the focus of some regulators and researchers, changing Covid vaccine regulations and reshaping the mission of his department to focus more on alternative medicine. The directives are all part of the same issue set that drove a slice of health-conscious, left-leaning Americans to eventually vote for a Republican president whose favorite meal is from McDonald's, Trump and Kennedy catered to a type of voter who has grown distrustful of America's health care establishment — but possibly fomented a new type of distrust in federal health policy along the way. Bernadine Francis, a lifelong Democrat who backed Joe Biden for president in 2020 before supporting Donald Trump in 2024, told NBC News in an interview that she approves of Kennedy's efforts so far, despite his 'hands being tied' by entrenched forces in the administration and in Congress. 'From what I have seen so far with what RFK has been trying to do,' she said, 'I am really, really proud of what he's doing.' Francis is among the voters who left the Democratic Party and voted for Trump because 'nothing else mattered' apart from public health, which they — like Kennedy — felt was going in the wrong direction. Concerns about chemicals in food and toxins in the environment, long championed by Democrats, has become a galvanizing issue to a key portion of Trump's Republican Party, complete with an oversaturation of information that in some cases hasn't been proven. It's wrapped up, as well, in concerns about the Covid vaccine, which was accelerated under Trump, administered under Biden and weaponized by anti-vaccine activists like Kennedy amid lockdowns and firings in the wake of the devastating pandemic. 'We knew in order to get RFK in there so he can help with the situation that we have in the health industry, we knew we had to do this,' said Francis, a retired Washington, D.C., public school administrator, who said she left her 'beloved' career because she had refused the vaccine. 'It seemed to me, as soon as [Biden] became president, the vaccine was mandated, and that was when I lost all hope in the Democrats,' Francis told NBC News, referring to vaccination mandates put in place by the Biden administration for a large portion of the federal workforce during the height of the pandemic. There are not currently any federal Covid vaccine mandates. There have been 1,228,393 confirmed Covid deaths in the United States since the start of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy's hand-picked commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and a John Hopkins scientist and researcher, told NBC News in an interview that he wants to transform the agency, which he said faced 'corruption' over influence from the pharmaceutical and food industries. 'I mean, you look at the food pyramid, it was not based on what's best for you, it was based on what companies wanted you to buy,' he said, referring to the 1992 and later iterations of official government nutritional guidance. He said there would be 'entirely new nutrition guidance' released later this year, as soon as this summer. He praised the FDA's mission of research and regulation, saying the agency is 'incredibly well-oiled, and we've got the trains running on time.' He also highlighted the 75-page 'Make America Healthy Again' commission report — which focused on ultraprocessed foods and toxins in the environment — as having set 'the agenda for research' at the FDA, HHS and agencies overseeing social safety net programs such as Medicare and food stamps moving forward. (The MAHA report initially cited some studies that didn't exist, a mistake that Kennedy adviser Calley Means said was a 'great disservice' to their mission.) 'I think there's a lot we're going to learn. For example, the microbiome, which gets attention in the MAHA report, needs to be on the map. We don't even talk about it in our medical circles,' Makary said. 'The microbiome, food is medicine, the immune response that happens when chemicals that don't appear in nature go down our GI tract.' Pressed on other areas of the administration, like the Environmental Protection Agency, making decisions that run counter to the pro-regulatory ideas presented in the MAHA report, Makary said he can 'only comment on the FDA' where they are 'committed to Secretary Kennedy's vision.' But Kennedy's public health agenda goes beyond looking at the food supply and chemicals. Recently, Kennedy said in a video posted on X last month that the Covid vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a change in CDC guidance that skipped the normal public review period. Days later, after critics questioned the decision and raised concerns over a lack of public data behind the move, the administration updated its guidance again, urging parents to consult with their doctors instead. Pressed about the confusion and whether Americans are now trading one side of public distrust in the health system for another, Makary defended Kennedy, who has been criticized for spreading misinformation. 'My experience with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy is that he listens. He listens to myself, he listens to Jay Bhattacharya, listens to Dr. Mehmet Oz, he listens to a host of scientists that are giving him guidance,' Makary argued, referring to the director of the National Institutes of Health and the administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively. 'So he may have big questions, but the questions he's asking are the questions most Americans are asking.' Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a breast cancer oncologist and integrative medicine doctor — a physician who combines conventional treatments with research-based alternative therapies — has tried to help her patients wade through medical misinformation they encounter online and in their social circles. Mussallem has an incredible story of personal survival: While in medical school, she was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer and, after conventional therapies like chemo saved her life, was diagnosed with heart failure. After undergoing a heart transplant, Mussallem ran a 26-mile marathon just one year later. 'I learned a lot in medical school, but nothing compared to what I learned being a patient,' said Mussallem, who dedicates, on average, 90 minutes each in one-on-one sessions with her patients. 'This is not about any one political choice. But we know lifestyle matters.' For example, a new study from the American Society of Clinical Oncology that finds eating food that lowers inflammation in the body may help people with advanced colon cancer survive longer. Mussallem's mission, along with her colleagues, is to elevate the modern medicine that saved her life, as well as encouraging her patients to live healthy lifestyles, including regular exercise, minimally processed foods, less screen time, more social connection and better sleep. But politics do get in the way for millions of Americans who are inundated daily with social media influencers and 'nonmedical experts,' as Mussallem puts it, who stoke fear in her patients. 'Patients come in with all these questions, fears,' she said. 'I've heard this many times from patients, that their nervous system is affected by what they're seeing happening in government.' Mussallem acknowledges that 'a lot of individuals out there' have questioned traditional medicine. For her, it isn't one or the other — it's both. 'We have to trust the conventional medicine,' she said. 'With the conventional care that marches right alongside more of an integrative modality to look at the root causes of disease, as well as to help to optimize with lifestyle, is where we need to be.' This article was originally published on