Man gets twin life sentence in double murder case
Kollam First Additional Sessions Judge P N Vinod, in his order, also imposed a fine of Rs one lakh each for the two murders on Sankar, the convict.
Though separate life sentences were awarded for the two murders, they will run concurrently as per the Supreme Court judgement in this regard, the order said.
Sankar had allegedly murdered another woman at Pooyappally in the district in 2021 and was out on bail when he committed the double murder. The trial for the crime is pending at the SC/ST special court in Kottarakkara.
The statements of two prime witnesses, including an eyewitness who was injured during the fatal attack on the two victims were considered by the court as credible evidence during the trial.
The case was investigated by a team led by Punalur station house officer T Rajesh Kumar. Kollam district public prosecutor Sicin G Mundakkal appeared for the prosecution. PTI MVG MVG ROH
view comments
First Published:
July 29, 2025, 20:45 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Bombay High Court grants bail to teacher convicted of sexually abusing student
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to a 60-year-old tuition teacher who was convicted earlier this year by a POCSO court for sexually assaulting a minor Sarang V Kotwal suggested that the victim might have been tutored as she had admitted in her cross-examination that her mother, a police constable, had told her how to respond to questions in the trial alleged incident happened on March 15, 2017, when the victim, then studying in Class 4, was attending tuition classes along with her elder sibling. A complaint was lodged by the girl's mother on March 19 that year. The girl claimed that the teacher called her to his room, asked her to read a book, and touched her breasts inappropriately. The girl got frightened and went to an adjacent room where the teacher's wife was also taking a the court noted that the girl's claim of attending the tuition class a day after the alleged incident, despite informing her mother, seemed IMPLICATED, CLAIMS TEACHERDuring the hearing, the teacher's lawyer, Satyavrat Joshi, argued that he had been falsely implicated due to a grudge harboured by the victim after being scolded for not attending also pointed out that the teacher's wife was present in the house during the alleged incident, making it improbable that any offence could have occurred. Joshi further alleged that the child had been tutored by her teacher was convicted under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Sections 354 and 354A of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to five years of rigorous was taken into custody on January 9, 2025, and had previously spent a short time in jail in prosecution and the lawyer representing the victim opposed the bail, stating that a 10-year-old girl would not fabricate such allegations against her teacher. They also noted that the alleged incident occurred in a separate GRANTS BAILHowever, the court said the evasive answers by the victim and inconsistencies in her statement suggest the alleged incident might not be true."She again attending the tuition class on March 16 after informing her mother seems rather difficult to believe. She has further answered that she did not remember whether she attended the tuition class on March 17. All these evasive answers support the submission of advocate Satyavrat Joshi that the incident may not be true. All these questions will have to be decided during the final hearing stage of the appeal," the court the teacher's age, lack of antecedents, and the likelihood of delay in the appeal's disposal, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs 25,000.- EndsTrending Reel
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC refuses to stay HC order: Tardeo high-rise residents told to vacate illegal upper floors
MUMBAI: In a setback to dozens of families living in South Mumbai's upscale Tardeo neighbourhood, the Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay a Bombay High Court order directing residents of the upper floors of Willingdon View Co-operative Housing Society, constructed by Satellite Holdings, to vacate their homes for lack of an occupancy certificate (OC). Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025: View of Willingdon Heights at Tardeo area in south Mumbai. Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/ HT Photo) (Raju Shinde) The residents, who have been living in flats from the 17th to 34th floor of the 34-storey building for over a decade, were earlier ordered by the Bombay High Court to vacate within two weeks. The court found the occupation illegal, citing grave violations of municipal and fire safety regulations. Rejecting the housing society's plea, the Supreme Court bench of justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan upheld the High Court's ruling. 'At the end of the day, the rule of law must prevail,' the judges said, calling the High Court's order 'very well considered, bold and lucid.' They also praised the court's 'courage and conviction' in tackling unauthorised constructions. Construction of the building commenced in 1990, and flat owners started occupying their respective premises from 2008. As of now, 50 of the 62 flats in the high-rise are occupied. The apex court observed that showing sympathy to such illegal occupants would be 'thoroughly misplaced' and stressed that legal norms must be respected to ensure public safety. The court dismissed the society's special leave petition and directed that the High Court's instructions be strictly followed. It also said appropriate legal action must be taken against any erring officials or wrongdoers. The Bombay High Court's order, passed on July 21 by justices G S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor, stemmed from a petition filed by Sunil B Zaveri, a resident of the same building. Zaveri flagged multiple irregularities in the construction, including the absence of a fire safety NOC and an OC for the upper floors. The court noted that the illegal flats pose a risk to human life and violate both the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act and the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. While some residents filed intervention pleas opposing the petition, the High Court held that such occupation was a 'brazen illegality'. 'Accepting such submissions would render the entire statutory regime meaningless,' the court said, warning that it would amount to legalising lawlessness in urban construction. The housing society had argued that it was taking steps to regularise not just the lower 16 floors — for which approvals are reportedly being pursued — but also the upper 18 floors. It urged the court to let the families continue staying on humanitarian grounds while applications for regularisation were processed. However, the High Court dismissed this plea, observing that residential occupancy without a valid OC cannot be justified, regardless of the number of years the flats have been in use. The court directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to initiate legal action if the residents failed to vacate within the stipulated time. The Supreme Court has allowed the society to approach the High Court to seek more time for vacating the flats. The High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the matter for August 6.
New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kochi professor placed under ‘virtual arrest', swindled out of Rs 1.19 crore
KOCHI: A 77-year-old retired college professor in Kochi lost Rs 1.19 crore to cyber fraudsters who impersonated Mumbai cyber cell officers. Based on the professor's complaint, the Elamakkara police have registered a case and launched an investigation. Police said after receiving Rs 60 lakh from the sale of a property last week, the victim was contacted by someone claiming to be from an international courier firm on July 21. The caller informed him that a parcel sent in his name from Mumbai to Bangkok had been intercepted with narcotic substances including MDMA. The call was then 'transferred' to someone claiming to be from the Mumbai cyber police. The person, who introduced himself as Cyber Cell Inspector Vijay Paul, told the professor that he had been virtually arrested and warned him not to disconnect the call or speak to anyone else. The caller began interrogating the professor, accusing him of using his bank account to launder drug money. Though the professor explained that the Rs 60 lakh was from a property sale, the fraudsters said they didn't believe his version.
