logo
Learning By Sharing: How GenAI Can Be The Giving Tree

Learning By Sharing: How GenAI Can Be The Giving Tree

Forbes12 hours ago

Nitin Rakesh is the CEO and Managing Director of Mphasis and coauthor of the award-winning book 'Transformation in Times of Crisis.'
Our world is witnessing a wave of advancements, from the emergence of automation to the implementation of artificial intelligence. For senior leaders, this acceleration presents opportunities and challenges. While striving to adopt cutting-edge technologies, they are also attempting to ensure these align with business objectives and ethical standards.
One of the most transformative yet polarizing of these technologies is generative AI (GenAI). While it promises new avenues for creativity, problem-solving and efficiency, it also raises apprehensions about its impact on typical decision making processes.
In this sense, GenAI remains a bit of a paradox for business leaders, as it is both a source of curiosity and a cause for concern. While executives see its immense potential as a transformative tool capable of boosting creativity, streamlining operations and generating efficiency gains across functions, there is an underlying wariness about how it can disrupt established workflows.
In the face of GenAI's dual nature, executives are navigating a critical challenge of how to integrate this powerful technology without losing the distinctiveness of human intuition.
Rather than framing GenAI as a disruptive force to be managed, a more productive perspective may be to see it as a collaborator—an enabler of shared growth and continuous learning. When viewed this way, I believe GenAI can become more of a partner in learning and development with whom leaders can foster a mutually beneficial relationship mirroring the spirit of mutual giving.
However, embracing this potential demands a shift in mindset. It invites leaders to move beyond passive adoption and toward active stewardship of the human-AI dynamic. This reframing introduces important questions: Are leaders thoughtfully measuring GenAI's contributions, not just in efficiency but in depth and relevance? Are they engaging with it in ways that reflect their own values and expertise—training it, shaping it and learning from it in return? And perhaps most importantly, is their ongoing interaction with GenAI expanding their capacity for insight and growth?
AI is not an autonomous force—it is a reflection of the data, intentions and perspectives we bring to it. Its development is inseparable from human input. The real opportunity lies not just in what AI can do for us, but in how the human-AI relationship can evolve into one of reciprocal enrichment.
Consider an iconic children's literature classic: The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein. In the story, the tree selflessly offers its apples, branches and eventually its entire trunk to the boy.
This tale invites us to reflect on the nature of giving, taking and the balance of relationships. In much the same way, GenAI can be seen as a tireless provider—offering its computational power, adaptability and insights to organizations. Yet unlike the tree, GenAI does not give from a place of emotion or altruism. It responds to the quality of its inputs, the clarity of its training and the intentionality of its use.
This analogy prompts a critical shift in how leaders approach AI. While it's tempting to focus solely on what GenAI can do for us—automating tasks, generating insights, fueling innovation—the more profound question is: What are we giving back? How are we shaping, stewarding and engaging with AI to ensure it grows in a direction aligned with human values and long-term impact?
If organizations treat AI merely as an extractive tool, they risk building unsustainable dependencies. But if leaders approach the technology as a partner in co-evolution—offering guidance, expertise and ethical oversight—then GenAI becomes more than a resource. It becomes a trusted collaborator, capable of growing alongside the organization.
Beyond GenAI's adoption, leaders must know its value, inspiring their teams to integrate AI into daily workflows. Evangelizing AI within the executive team is crucial to ensuring collective alignment, fostering a culture where AI is viewed as an augmentation of human expertise rather than a replacement. This requires a deep understanding of what GenAI can do, allowing leaders to define where it can have the most meaningful impact.
For GenAI to truly benefit organizations, leaders must anchor its application in clear, measurable business objectives. Identifying the right problems for GenAI to solve and aligning its deployment with strategic goals ensures its use remains practical and value-driven.
Governance is equally critical, ensuring that AI-driven decisions uphold ethical standards and comply with regulatory frameworks. Data quality, infrastructure readiness and an AI-savvy workforce further determine how effectively GenAI can be leveraged. The organizations that invest in these foundational aspects will be best positioned to turn AI into a long-term growth partner like the enduring relationship between the boy and the Giving Tree.
When leaders take ownership and adopt an interactive approach, they create an environment of collaboration. Talented individuals are also drawn to such leaders—not just for their effectiveness but for their generosity and team-focused mindset.
It is crucial that leaders actively coach GenAI so it evolves in tandem with organizational needs. By continuously refining and adapting its algorithms, leaders can make GenAI more iterative, refined, intelligent and thoughtful. Much like mentoring human employees, providing AI with feedback allows it to improve over time.
For instance, organizations have enhanced customer service chatbots by training them on real user interactions, enabling them to respond with greater empathy and accuracy. These iterations ensure that AI evolves to handle more complex queries, improving both customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
With each successive interaction, AI becomes better suited to the evolving needs of an organization. This illustrates the timeless relevance of Moore's Law, which predicts that computing power will double every two years. Just as computing capacity expands exponentially, so too can GenAI's ability to solve complex problems as long as it is actively coached.
As AI models become more advanced, the need for a growing network of skilled, human trainers becomes essential for their continued improvement. The constant feedback and refinement will fuel GenAI's exponential development—enhancing its capacity to transform businesses.
The key to thriving in this new era of AI is learning how to strike the right balance with thoughtful strategy. As organizations continue to work closely with GenAI, partnerships will evolve, leading to exciting outcomes. What will be crucial to keep in mind is that this exchange between human and machine fosters sustainable progress built on collaboration and just practice.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns
Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns

-- CoreWeave Inc (NASDAQ:CRWV) reported a strong debut earnings release as a public company, delivering better-than-expected revenue and robust guidance. Yet, shares fell by 5.4% in Thursday's trading, with investors focusing on the company's aggressive capital expenditure plans. Despite near-term pressure, analysts overwhelmingly reiterated bullish ratings and have significantly raised price targets. They cited rapid AI infrastructure demand and substantial new customer wins as the driving forces behind CoreWeave's long-term positioning. The AI-oriented cloud infrastructure firm delivered first-quarter revenue of $981.6 million, surpassing estimates by over $100 million and growing 420% year-over-year. CoreWeave expects Q2 revenue of $1.06 billion to $1.1 billion and full-year revenue between $4.9 billion and $5.1 billion, well ahead of consensus estimates. However, CapEx guidance of $3 to $3.5 billion for the second quarter, roughly three times expected revenue, led to concerns around free cash flow and dilution risk. Investors reacted negatively to the elevated spending levels despite the otherwise strong results. BofA analyst Brad Sills raised his price target to $76 from $42 while maintaining a Buy rating, calling CoreWeave's Q1 performance validation of its 'best-of-breed' position in the AI infrastructure market. Sills flagged better-than-expected return on net assets and strong contract signings, including a $12 billion OpenAI deal and $4 billion expansion with another large enterprise. While acknowledging CapEx came in above forecasts, he highlighted margin stability when adjusting for IPO-related costs. Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz lifted his price target to $70 from $46 and reiterated an Outperform rating. He noted that the company's top-line guidance is 'materially' ahead of already strong Street expectations. 'CRWV is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' Moskowitz wrote. He acknowledged near-term pressure on margins due to accelerated investment but said valuation remains reasonable. Jefferies analyst Brent Thill raised his price target to $80 from $51. He called CoreWeave a 'multi-year winner' based on customer growth and its ability to align CapEx with signed contractual deals. Thill cited new enterprise traction and the deal with OpenAI as evidence of momentum. He said the stock's premium to peers is justified by its unmatched growth profile in a rapidly scaling market. Not all analysts were bullish. Citi reiterated a Neutral rating and $43 target, pointing to mixed profitability and declining RPO. DA Davidson downgraded the stock to Underperform with a $36 target. The firm warned that investors 'may not want to scale this business,' drawing comparisons to the pitfalls of scaling WeWork (OTC:WEWKQ). Still, most analysts see CoreWeave as poised to capitalize on accelerating AI infrastructure demand. As Morgan Stanley's Keith Weiss wrote, 'Accruing large contracts from the most demanding GenAI users provides strong validation of CoreWeave's positioning.' Related articles Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns Constellation Brands jumps as Berkshire raises stake CrowdStrike CEO Kurtz said 'not riding off into sunset', remains large shareholder Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille

Two months after CoreWeave's IPO fizzled, the AI company has surged 250% and left doubters baffled
Two months after CoreWeave's IPO fizzled, the AI company has surged 250% and left doubters baffled

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Two months after CoreWeave's IPO fizzled, the AI company has surged 250% and left doubters baffled

On Monday, data center company Applied Digital announced two 15-year lease agreements with CoreWeave, an AI infrastructure company. The news sent CoreWeave's stock soaring by more than 40% over the next few days. Such double digit percentage gains have become par for the course during CoreWeave's brief life as a publicly traded stock. On May 27, the stock jumped over 20% after the company announced $2 billion in senior notes, and on May 16 it popped 22% on news that Nvidia infused it with a $900 million investment. The stock tumbled 17% on Thursday, but was back up 4% in midday trading on Friday. Even for a high beta stock, the overall trendline is overwhelmingly positive: Coreweave's stock is up a whopping 250% since its March IPO, with the company's market cap now roughly $70 billion. This has baffled many Wall Street analysts who believe the company is in a precarious financial situation despite the explosive revenue growth logged on its top line. 'Nothing from a fundamental perspective would support the magnitude of change that we've seen in the stock since the IPO,' says Nick Del Deo, a managing director at MoffettNathanson who covers CoreWeave and other tech companies. Of the 19 analysts who cover the company, just three had a 'buy' rating on the stock and four others had positive opinions while the consensus rating is firmly 'hold' as of June 6. The average price target among all analysts who cover the stock is $72.61, well below the $145 level Coreweave was trading at on Friday and the 52-week high of $166.63. Some analysts believe the demand for the stock is being driven by retail investors who, on average, engage in contrarian and momentum-driven trading and may be eager to invest in CoreWeave due to its multi-billion dollar contracts with Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft and other major companies propelling AI. It's worth noting that institutional investors like Coatue Management and Jane Street do hold CoreWeave positions worth over $1 billion each. Big announcements like the Applied Digital leases are one factor driving up shares of the stock. An even more fundamental dynamic is that investors are looking for ways to capitalize on the success of OpenAI, which is privately held, and see CoreWeave as one of the few vehicles for exposure in the public markets. OpenAI owns a percentage of CoreWeave and signed a multi-billion deal as its cloud infrastructure provider until April 2029. Plus, CoreWeave is a preferred partner of Nvidia, currently the most valuable company in the world by market cap, which is also an investor in CoreWeave. CoreWeave 'is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' wrote Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz, who has an 'outperform' rating on the stock, in a note after the company's released its quarterly earnings report in mid-May. In the first quarter, CoreWeave beat revenue estimates by over 10% and forecasted second-quarter above consensus predictions, too, per Yahoo Finance. Moskowitz and the other optimistic CoreWeave analysts did not respond to Fortune requests for comment. Coreweave posted revenue of $981.6 million in the first three months of the year, up a staggering 420% from the year-ago period. The meteoric growth reflects Coreweave's well-timed pivot to AI. Founded in 2017 by three commodity traders, Coreweave began as an ethereum mining company. In 2019 it pivoted to cloud infrastructure to enhance GPU capabilities, attracting investment and chips from Nvidia–beginning its journey to the upper echelons of AI computing. The company's public market debut was not auspicious. Coreweave reduced the price range of the offering, and the stock finished its first day trading just one penny above its $40 IPO price. For analysts skeptical about CoreWeave's value, their dim view is driven by the company's debt-saddled balance sheet, its ultra-dependence on Microsoft, and customers' development of proprietary technologies to replace contracts with the cloud computing company. The bullishness of day traders and bearishness of investment professionals may be creating a short squeeze situation similar to the GameStop one that rocked markets in 2021 by causing the stock to go from $17 to $483 over the course of a month. The volatility of the CoreWeave in this instance is amplified by its low float—meaning that only a small amount of shares are available for purchase. It would make sense that CoreWeave could be a short squeeze target: short interest is approximately 8.44% of its float, well above the 2% to 5% average across U.S. stocks, though still far below the 140% of GameStop near the onset of its famous squeeze. One Coreweave short seller experiencing the squeeze is Felix Wang, a managing director and partner at Hedgeye Risk Management. Yet, Wang maintains his short position despite facing potentially enormous losses. His argument is multifaceted but boils down to the company's net debt, lease liabilities and its dependence on Microsoft and a tiny handful of others for the bulk of its revenues. 'Investors should be more concerned about their operating and financial obligations,' he tells Fortune. This is because the company has a 387% debt-to-equity ratio, -38.7% profit margin and $11.9 billion debt with just $1.28 billion in cash. These fundamentals combined with the fact that Microsoft accounted for over 70% of CoreWeave's revenue last quarter leads Wang to compare CoreWeave to WeWork at the time of its failed 2019 IPO. Wang looks at CoreWeave's creditors Blackstone and Magnetar Financial. He says that these lenders are currently charging CoreWeave 10% to 15% interest on its debt and will have provisions to charge higher interest and accelerate the repayment schedule if CoreWeave's clients like Microsoft end or downgrade partnerships with the cloud provider. 'If your customers are the most highly-rated AAA clients in the world, other than OpenAI, then why are you paying 10% to 15% interest by yield on your debt agreements?' ask Wangs. CoreWeave's debt obligations have, in-part, led D.A. Davidson Head of Research Gil Luria to rate the stock as an underperformer. He explains that CoreWeave's debt obligations are so large that equity holders own a very little portion of the company. Plus, CoreWeave customers Microsoft and Google are building products to directly compete with it, he says. 'The only reason that they're using CoreWeave is that CoreWeave was able to build quickly enough while Microsoft and Google weren't getting enough chips from Nvidia,' leading them to ink three- or five-year deals with CoreWeave, he says. 'Their need for CoreWeave will go away within the life of the contract.' These incredulous analysts may be vindicated in September when the lockup period on the IPO expires in September and restricted shareholders can offload their CoreWeave holdings and the stock price will drop. But as CoreWeave's stock bounced back Friday after plunging 17% on Thursday, perhaps the only thing that's clear is that the AI company will continue to leave believers, and skeptics, scratching their heads. This story was originally featured on

This week in 5 numbers: Workers push back on AI
This week in 5 numbers: Workers push back on AI

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This week in 5 numbers: Workers push back on AI

This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. U.S. Supreme Court justices lamented the court's decision to dismiss a Black dancer's claim, and moms say their child care benefits don't stack up. Here's a look at those and some of the other numbers making headlines in the HR world. By the numbers 45% The percentage of CEOs who said most of their employees are resistant or even openly hostile to AI, according to a survey by Kyndryl, an enterprise technology services firm. 68% The percentage of moms who say the benefits offered by their employers aren't enough to meet their child care needs. 100+ The number of undocumented workers arrested during an ICE raid on May 29 at a Tallahassee, Florida, construction site, according to an agency news release. 2 The number of Supreme Court justices who opposed the court's decision not to take up a Black dancer's discrimination claim. 79% The percentage of U.S. job seekers who told Express Employment Professionals the 'skills gap' is less about a lack of ability and more about employers' unwillingness to train them. Recommended Reading Class action challenges PetSmart's use of voice recognition tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store