
Did you know that human beings are born with these two innate fears?
This one's especially for them, the ones who wear 'fearless' t-shirts a tad bit too proudly!
Human beings, as it turns out, aren't entirely fearless. However, they are rather minimalist when it comes to innate fears.
These aren't gamma‑ray phobias or existential dread—they're simpler, more down‑to‑earth.
Believe it or not, we're born wired with just two primal
fears
—and those are the fear of falling and the fear of loud noises. Everything else? Learned through our interactions with the world. Intrigued?
Let's take a quick ride through your first two fears and explore why the rest are mostly social souvenirs.
The fear of falling (the 'visual cliff awakening)
Picture this: you're six months old, crawling on a platform.
Ahead of you—plummeting to the floor below—is nothing but clear plexiglass. A trusted figure is calling, 'Come on, sweetie!' But you hesitate. Most infants don't cross that transparent glass. Turns out, we detect the drop and recoil instinctively. That hesitation isn't learned—it's built-in. This experiment, known as the 'visual cliff' (1960) – where infants aged 6–14 months refused to crawl out over what looked like a sheer drop‑off – shows that newborns' fear of heights and drops emerges early.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
This innate caution isn't a cultural quirk—it's wired into our very genes to help us survive. Tiny humans without depth perception would likely bump their heads (and worse!) far too often.
Neuroscientists call it an evolutionary safety net: the fear of heights and falling prevents young adventurers from testing the very limits of gravity before they're ready. The reflex is so built‑in that even some animals—kittens, chicks, puppies—display similar hesitancy.
But hold on, here's the kicker: crawling actually triggers that fear to bloom. Babies who haven't yet learned to crawl often don't mind inching across the edge—but once they can crawl? A mix of experience, awareness, and motor coordination teaches them that gravity can be unforgiving. From there emerges caution—a primal, adaptive filter in the chip of our survival software.
The fear of loud noises (the 'startle reflex')
Did you ever jump at the sudden clang of a dropped pot or a car backfiring? That's your acoustic startle reflex in action.
From day one, our nervous systems are tuned to flinch and duck at sharp, loud sounds.
Newborns don't stroll through a carnival and casually shrug at fireworks—they flinch. That sudden jolt? It's our built‑in acoustic startle reflex, triggered by a noise loud enough to hint at danger: a thunderclap, a crash, a gunshot.
Neuroscientist Seth Norrholm at Emory University explained to
CNN
that this startle response is hardwired as a danger signal—an instinctive 'something's wrong here!'—built into our primitive brain circuits, saying, 'If a sound is loud enough, you're going to duck… Loud noises typically mean startling.
That circuitry is innate.'
Even infants react: a pressure‑cooker whistle can reduce a newborn to tears and frantic alarm, while a blender whirr still makes toddlers flinch. This isn't just cute baby behavior or drama—it's survival code.
What about the other fears? (Spiders, snakes, or public speaking?)
Well, this is where it gets fun: none of these are inborn. They're learned. It's all nurture after nature's handshake.
Take the classic Little Albert experiment: baby Albert was neutral around a white rat—but after pairing the rat with a loud noise, he started fearing it.
The rat became a cue for fear. That's classical conditioning in action—wired reflex meets learned association.
Spiders and snakes?
Infants may show heightened attention to images of snakes or spiders, but they don't exhibit fear—just alertness. The leap to panic requires learning, and babies only have a predisposition to notice them faster—learning later fills in the rest.
Darkness? A toddler afraid of the dark? It's likely tangled in imagination and stories—not wiring.
Public speaking, social rejection, or the fear of failure? Purely human-made constructs—taught, absorbed, amplified through culture, life experience, and sometimes trauma. The modern aphorism, 'We are born with only two fears…' often pops up in self‑help, lifestyle, and pop smarty circles to empower people: if those big, paralyzing fears aren't innate, you can unlearn them.
Nature vs nurture: The endless loop
The two built-in fears fit our bodies like mission-critical apps. All others are downloadable: we install them throughout life based on experiences, culture, imagination, parental caution, news media… You name it!
In fact, some experts emphasize it's not just that learned fear crops up—it's how easily we learn certain things.
Babies are primed to quickly associate certain threats (like heights or loud noises), while other sounds—say, the blender or the pressure cooker—get conditioned slowly. A child might hate the sound of a blender, not because of wiring, but because mom took a decade to cook with it near her ears.
As the saying goes, 'the only fear we're born with is the fear of falling. Everything else is learned…' and yes, many therapists encourage remembering that—because if we can learn fear, we can also unlearn it.
That realization carries a sense of comfort. If those two fears are innate—and every other one isn't—then we shape our fears. We also reshape them, too. No wonder therapy, exposure techniques, and heartfelt conversations can melt the chill of fear over time.
So next time you're jittery before a speech or tense over some unknown, remind yourself that fear wasn't in your genetic blueprint. You downloaded it somewhere—and you can delete it, one step at a time.
Did you know Shah Rukh Khan rejected David Dhawan's two films for this reason?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
They survived ice ages and hunted mammoths; so why did the Neanderthals suddenly disappear? Now a physicist blames something in the sky
Neanderthals have long puzzled scientists. These ancient relatives of modern humans thrived across Europe and parts of Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. But around 40,000 years ago, they disappeared, just as Homo sapiens spread across the same regions. What really caused their extinction remains one of human evolution's biggest mysteries. Now, a new and unusual theory suggests that space weather, not climate, competition, or disease, may have played a decisive role. A recent study by Dr. Agnit Mukhopadhyay, a space physicist from the University of Michigan , proposes that a powerful cosmic event known as the Laschamp excursion might have played a part in the Neanderthals' decline. The findings were published in the journal Science Advances. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo The Laschamp event occurred about 41,000 years ago, when the Earth's magnetic poles temporarily flipped. During this brief reversal, the planet's magnetic field, which normally protects us from cosmic radiation, dramatically weakened for several centuries. Mukhopadhyay argues that this weakening may have exposed the Earth's surface to much higher levels of ultraviolet (UV) and cosmic radiation, particularly in some parts of the world. Live Events Radiation as a Hidden Killer? The core of the hypothesis is that Neanderthals, already living in small, isolated populations, may have been more vulnerable to this radiation than Homo sapiens. The study claims that Homo sapiens had tighter clothing, used red ochre as UV protection, and took shelter in caves helping them survive the radiation. Neanderthals, in contrast, might have lacked these protections. Computer simulations in the study even show that auroras, a sign of increased solar activity, might have been visible across much of the world during this time, proof, the author argues, of the heightened radiation environment. While the theory is bold and imaginative, many experts are skeptical. Researchers José-Miguel Tejero and Montserrat Sanz Borràs, writing for The Conversation, point out that the idea rests on shaky archaeological evidence. For example, it assumes that Neanderthals didn't wear fitted clothing. While it's true that no sewing needles have been found at Neanderthal sites, there is clear evidence that they processed animal hides and likely wore functional garments using other techniques, such as tying hides with leather cords or splinters. In fact, genetic studies of lice suggest that humans, possibly including Neanderthals, were already wearing clothes over 200,000 years ago. The absence of needles doesn't prove the absence of clothes. The study also claims that Homo sapiens used red ochre as sunblock. While experiments show that ochre can somewhat block UV rays, this claim is also disputed. Ochre was widely used by both Neanderthals and modern humans, often for symbolic or cosmetic reasons. There is no solid evidence that either group used it primarily for sun protection. Neanderthals are known to have used ochre for over 100,000 years. In one example, a painted scallop shell found in a Neanderthal cave in Spain shows their symbolic use of pigments long before Homo sapiens arrived in Europe. Most scientists believe that multiple factors caused the Neanderthals' disappearance. These include, interbreeding with Homo sapiens (evident in modern DNA), smaller populations that were more vulnerable to decline, limited long-range hunting tools, unlike the projectile weapons used by sapiens, Changing climate, and possibly, competition for resources. In this broader context, Mukhopadhyay's theory appears too narrow. Critics note that there is no archaeological evidence of a sudden, global collapse of Neanderthal populations tied to the Laschamp event. If radiation were such a major factor, it would have also harmed Homo sapiens populations living outside caves in sunny Africa, which doesn't seem to have happened. A Caution Against Oversimplification The Neanderthal story is complex. These early humans were not primitive brutes. They developed tools, built shelters, made symbolic objects, and survived in extreme climates for hundreds of thousands of years. They even lived through earlier magnetic reversals, such as the Blake event 120,000 years ago. Mukhopadhyay's theory adds an intriguing piece to the puzzle, but it's far from conclusive. So, did a shift in Earth's magnetic field doom the Neanderthals? Probably not. While the Laschamp event may have had some environmental impact, there's no strong evidence that it caused Neanderthal extinction . The theory suggests that the disappearance of Neanderthals was likely due to a mix of climate, biology, and human interaction.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
VNIT and JNARDDC host two-day workshop on ‘aluminium metallurgy'
1 2 3 Nagpur: In a unique confluence of hands-on experience, scientific insight, and cutting-edge technology, a two-day workshop titled 'Aluminium – Metallurgy and Advanced Techniques in Casting and Heat Treatment (AL-MATCH)' was jointly organised by JNARDDC and VNIT on June 21-22. Held at the VNIT and JNARDDC campuses, the workshop was a rare blend of the foundry man's instinct, the scientist's precision, and technology's potential. The inaugural session was graced by Dr Prem Lal Patel, director of VNIT Nagpur, as chief guest, accompanied by Dr Anupam Agnihotri, director of JNARDDC; Dr DR Peshwe, head of the department, metallurgical & materials engineering, VNIT; and RN Chouhan, head, recycling promotion division, JNARDDC. With over 75 enthusiastic participants representing aluminium recyclers, utensil manufacturers, foundry experts, extrusion houses, and young research scholars, the workshop became a melting pot of knowledge and practice. Through live demonstrations, technical sessions, and immersive lab work, participants gained insights into casting science, heat treatment processes, defect analysis, and alloy performance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The highlight of the second day was a guided exposure to the poly aluminium chloride (PAC) dross facility at JNARDDC by Dr Upendra Singh, followed by a deep-dive discussion on the Bureau of Indian Standards' quality control orders, compliance in secondary aluminium production, and the path towards sustainability in recycling. The AL-MATCH workshop was not just another training event — it was a celebration of collaboration between industry veterans, academic leaders, and R&D innovators, creating a platform where experience meets evidence, and knowledge translates into practice. Given the overwhelming response and demand, JNARDDC has announced a second edition of AL-MATCH, planned on a PAN-India scale in partnership with IIT Hyderabad.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Scientific workshop at PGIMER brings alive complex surgical procedures
Chandigarh: Blending the worlds of science and art, PGIMER's general surgery department conducted a first-of-its-kind scientific illustration workshop Saturday, drawing enthusiastic participation from surgical residents and newly inducted trainees. The workshop was steered by Shivali Angurala, guest lecturer of medical animation and audio-visual creation, alongside Brij Lal, in-charge of the photography department, PGIMER, who participated as guest faculty. Together, they provided a comprehensive introduction to the art and science of medical illustration, highlighting its growing relevance in surgical education and communication. The daylong session explored various themes, including surgical storytelling through illustrations, fundamentals of drawing, colour theory, digital rendering techniques, and principles of visual communication. A highlight was the hands-on live drawing session, where participants attempted to translate complex surgical procedures into clear, educational visuals. Brij Lal offered insights into the nuances of medical photography and its vital role in clinical documentation and illustration, while Dr Utkarsh conducted a demonstration on video editing techniques, showcasing how multimedia tools can enhance teaching methodologies in surgery. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 年最紓壓的農場遊戲!無需安裝 東加:島嶼農場 立即播放 Undo Adding a competitive spirit to the session, Dr Arun organised a timed illustration contest, encouraging participants to think creatively under pressure. The event concluded with Dr Swapnesh Kumar Sahu's session on the use of ChatGPT in thesis writing and academic research — a segment that introduced young surgeons to the potential of AI in medical academia.