logo
Additional 800 children to be tested for STIs as police investigate accused Melbourne childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown

Additional 800 children to be tested for STIs as police investigate accused Melbourne childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown

The Guardian15-07-2025
More than 800 additional children are being recommended for testing for sexually transmitted infections after four more childcare centres were added to a list of known workplaces of alleged paedophile Joshua Dale Brown.
Additional dates have been added for 10 other childcare centres, with police citing incomplete records from the providers for the discrepancies.
Earlier this month police revealed the 26-year-old childcare worker had been charged with more than 70 offences relating to eight alleged victims, aged between five months and two years old.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Along with the health department, they released a list of 20 childcare centres where Brown worked between January 2017 and May 2025 and his known employment dates.
Approximately 2,600 families with children who attended the centres were contacted, with 1,200 advised to undergo screening for sexually transmitted infections.
Detectives from the sexual crimes squad on Tuesday confirmed four more centres had been added to Brown's work history. They are:
Kids Academy Waratah Estate in Mickleham on 29 August 2024
Milestones Early Learning Tarneit on 10 September 2024 and 13 September 2024
Milestones Early Learning Braybrook on 4 December 2024 and 6 December 2024
Milestones Early Learning Greensborough on 5 December 2024, 31 January 2025 and 27 February 2025
Ten of the 20 centres already identified have also been updated based on new information provided to police, while Papilio Early Learning in Hoppers Crossing has been removed from the list after further investigation determined the information was incorrect.
Police now believe Brown worked at 23 childcare centres between January 2017 and May 2025.
In their statement, police said establishing Brown's complete work history had been 'extremely complex' as childcare providers do not have centralised records. It meant detectives had to 'execute search warrants to obtain handwritten records, shift rosters and other critical information.'
Police also had to interview witnesses to verify details and provide an accurate account of Brown's employment history, as well as asses more than 270 Crimestoppers reports.
'We are working through a large amount of information that has been provided to us,' Acting Cmdr Janet Stevenson said.
'Each piece of information has to be individually assessed and verified before it can be used as part of the investigation or released to the public.
'I understand there are people who will be frustrated and I want to reinforce that this is a continually evolving and changing situation. What hasn't changed is that this investigation remains the highest priority for Victoria police.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The health department said it was contacting 830 additional families as a result of the new information, with 800 children recommended for testing.
'This is obviously a highly distressing situation, and I want to reassure all families being contacted that the potential exposure risk to an infectious disease for their child remains low,' the Victorian chief health officer, Dr Christian McGrath, said.
'Our recommendation for testing is a precaution and the test results we've received to date as part of this investigation reaffirms that the risk is low.'
Families will be contacted initially via SMS and then with a phone call. The department urged families to check the updated list of childcare centres and employment dates before calling its advice line.
In a statement, Affinity Education Group, which operates many of the listed centres, apologised to affected families.
'We are deeply sorry for the distress this is causing our families – no family should have to go through this. We are committed to supporting every family impacted whilst continuing to cooperate fully with the authorities as the investigation continues,' a spokesperson said.
'We share the urgency in ensuring that affected families receive accurate and timely information. Affinity has a zero-tolerance approach to any form of abuse or misconduct involving children. The safety and wellbeing of every child in our care is – and always will be – our highest priority.'
The group provided police with updated employment records for Brown on 3 July.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shamed Labour councillor who was paid £42k while on bail for sexually abusing girl jailed for 27 months
Shamed Labour councillor who was paid £42k while on bail for sexually abusing girl jailed for 27 months

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Shamed Labour councillor who was paid £42k while on bail for sexually abusing girl jailed for 27 months

A shamed Labour councillor has been jailed after grooming and sexually abusing a schoolgirl. David Graham, 43, was yesterday handed a 27-month prison term after being found guilty of having sex with the 15-year-old girl. A crowd gathered outside Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court in Fife as the paedophile, who has earned more than £42,000 while on bail, was led out by guards into a waiting prison van amid tight security. Graham, who was suspended by Labour two years ago, denied the charge against him but was found guilty after a trial. Once a senior local politician, he was Fife Council's spokesman for health and social care and was also a member of the NHS Fife board. But despite his outwardly respectable appearance, over the course of more than six months he was having sexual activity with the girl in his home, office and car. Security camera footage showed Graham kissing the girl in Kirkcaldy town centre after meeting for hot chocolate. The disgraced councillor, who represented Buckhaven, Methil, and Wemyss Villages, would buy the girl gifts and they spent hours phoning and texting each other. Last month he was found guilty of engaging in sexual activity with a child on various occasions between February and August 2023 at locations in Fife and Edinburgh and also in his car. Scores of locals took to the streets outside his home after his conviction to demand he leave the area. It sparked a major police response, with officers equipped with riot shields leading him out of the property to safety. His parents' home has also been targeted. The conviction means Graham will now be disqualified from serving as a councillor. He faced criticism for not resigning earlier after it emerged he had earned more than £42,000 while sitting as an independent since being charged. Graham has not taken part in any full Fife Council meetings since his arrest in August 2023 but is said to have appeared at several area committees. However, it was reported his webcam was switched off and he was not involved in discussions. Graham accepted his full salary in 2023-24 and 2024-25, and with expenses earned £42,410.71. The crime came to light after a witness saw Graham stroking the girl's leg under the table. In a subsequent police search of his office in the Fife Renewables Innovation Centre in August 2023, officers found vital evidence containing Graham's DNA. The girl, now 17, said the first sexual contact was in his car not long after she had turned 15. His victim said she would meet him in St Andrews, Fife, they would go to Greggs for lunch and he stopped his car on country roads where he would assault her. Workers at a Kirkcaldy café saw them holding hands across a table, and security camera footage from various locations showed them walking hand-in-hand, embracing and kissing. Defence lawyer Chris Sneddon said his client still denied the offences but 'understands the impact the type of behaviour can have'. He acknowledged there was a 'potential for community reprisal', but urged the court to impose a non-custodial sentence. But jailing Graham, Sheriff Robert More said the offences showed an 'escalating and brazen course of sexual behaviour' and that he had 'undermined the trust' placed in him by the community. The sheriff, who said Graham's crime was of 'higher culpability', told the offender: 'The conduct took place at a variety of locations including the home you shared with your then partner. 'You were aware of how old the girl was and had been warned by her family to stay away from her. 'Laws are intended to protect children from those who would exploit their vulnerability.' Sheriff More put Graham on the sex offenders register for 10 years. David Ross, leader of Fife Council, said: 'David Graham should have resigned as soon as he was convicted if not before.'

Australia news live: federal court to hear Bruce Lehrmann appeal; Labor to tweak pension and welfare calculations
Australia news live: federal court to hear Bruce Lehrmann appeal; Labor to tweak pension and welfare calculations

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Australia news live: federal court to hear Bruce Lehrmann appeal; Labor to tweak pension and welfare calculations

Update: Date: 2025-08-19T20:37:32.000Z Title: Federal court to hear Bruce Lehrmann appeal Content: Bruce Lehrmann's appeal against the federal court ruling that he was not defamed by Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson is due to be heard today. In April last year, Justice Michael Lee found that on the balance of probabilities Lehrmann raped former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins in Parliament House in Canberra in 2019, and that Lehrmann was therefore not defamed when Wilkinson interviewed Higgins about the case on The Project. Lehrmann is appealing on grounds including that the sexual assault described by Lee was 'substantially inconsistent' with the violent rape portrayed on The Project, according to submissions to the appeal filed with the court in March. Lehrmann's legal team say he was denied procedural fairness because the case which was found to be true was not put to him in cross-examination. The appeal against that finding will be heard over three days in Sydney before the full court of justices – Michael Wigney, Craig Colvin, and Wendy Abraham. The hearing starts at 10.15am and we will be blogging updates here. Read more about the appeal here: Update: Date: 2025-08-19T20:34:35.000Z Title: Welcome Content: Good morning and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Martin Farrer with the best of the overnight stories and then Nick Visser will take the wheel. The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, has accused Anthony Albanese of 'mismanaging' Australia's relationship with Israel after Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out overnight, calling him a 'weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews'. More in a moment. Labor will end the Morrison-era freeze on deeming rates in a move that will see people claiming Centrelink payments pay more in tax on their financial assets. Social services minister, Tanya Plibersek, said incremental rises would take place from next month. More shortly. A man was shot dead in western Sydney last night in the latest shooting to hit the city. Witnesses told police the man was targeted while in a car in Winston Hills. It follows an attack in Forest Lodge on Sunday in which one man was killed and another injured. More details coming up. And today sees the start of Bruce Lehrmann's appeal against last year's loss in his defamation case against Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson. We'll bring you lots more on that during the day, once it gets going.

WA lawyer referred to regulator after preparing documents with AI-generated citations for nonexistent cases
WA lawyer referred to regulator after preparing documents with AI-generated citations for nonexistent cases

The Guardian

time8 hours ago

  • The Guardian

WA lawyer referred to regulator after preparing documents with AI-generated citations for nonexistent cases

A lawyer has been referred to Western Australia's legal regulator after using artificial intelligence in preparing court documents for an immigration case. The documents contained AI-generated case citations for cases that did not exist. It is one of more than 20 cases so far in Australia in which AI use has resulted in fake citations or other errors in court submissions, with warnings from judges across the country to be wary of using the technology in the legal profession. In a federal court judgment published this week, the anonymised lawyer was referred to the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia for consideration and ordered to pay the federal government's costs of $8,371.30 after submissions to an immigration case were found by the representative for the immigration minister to include four case citations that did not exist. Justice Arran Gerrard said the incident 'demonstrates the inherent dangers associated with practitioners solely relying on the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of court documents and the way in which that interacts with a practitioner's duty to the court'. The lawyer told the court in an affidavit that he had relied on Anthropic's Claude AI 'as a research tool to identify potentially relevant authorities and to improve my legal arguments and position', and then used Microsoft Copilot to validate the submissions. The lawyer said he had 'developed an overconfidence in relying on AI tools and failed to adequately verify the generated results'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I had an incorrect assumption that content generated by AI tools would be inherently reliable, which led me to neglect independently verifying all citations through established legal databases,' the lawyer said in the affidavit. The lawyer unreservedly apologised to the court and the minister's solicitors for the errors. Gerrard said the court 'does not adopt a luddite approach' to the use of generative AI, and understood why the complexity of migration law might make using an AI tool attractive. But he warned there was now a 'concerning number' of cases where AI had led to citation of fictitious cases. Gerrard said it risked 'a good case to be undermined by rank incompetence' and the prevalence of such cases 'significantly wastes the time and resources of opposing parties and the court'. He said it also risked damage to the legal profession. Gerrard said the lawyer did 'not fully comprehend what was required of him' and it was not sufficient to merely check that the cases cited were not fake, but to review those cases thoroughly. 'Legal principles are not simply slogans which can be affixed to submissions without context or analysis.' There have been at least 20 cases of AI hallucinations reported in Australian courts since generative AI tools exploded in popularity in 2023. Last week, a Victorian supreme court judge criticised lawyers acting for a boy accused of murder for filing misleading information with the courts after failing to check documents created using AI. The documents included references to nonexistent case citations and inaccurate quotes from a parliamentary speech. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion There have also been similar cases involving lawyers in New South Wales and Victoria in the past year, who were referred to their state's regulatory bodies. However, the spate of cases is not just limited to qualified lawyers. In a NSW supreme court decision this month, a self-represented litigant in a trusts case admitted to the chief justice, Andrew Bell, to have used AI to prepare her speech for the appeal hearing. Bell said in his judgment that he was not criticising the person, who he said was doing her best to represent herself. But he said problems with using AI in preparing submissions were exacerbated when the technology was used by unrepresented litigants 'who are not subject to the professional and ethical responsibilities of legal practitioners'. He said the use of generative AI tools 'may introduce added costs and complexity' to proceedings and 'add to the burden of other parties and the court in responding to it'. 'Notwithstanding the fact that generative AI may contribute to improved access to justice, which is itself an obviously laudable goal, the present case illustrates the need for judicial vigilance in its use, especially but not only, by unrepresented litigants.' The Law Council of Australia's president, Juliana Warner, said sophisticated AI tools offered unique opportunities to support the legal profession in administrative tasks, but reliance on AI tools did not diminish the professional judgment a legal practitioner was expected to bring to a client's matter. 'Where these tools are utilised by lawyers, this must be done with extreme care,' she said. 'Lawyers must always keep front of mind their professional and ethical obligations to the court and to their clients.' Warner said courts were regarding cases where AI had generated fake citations as a 'serious concern', but added that given the widespread use of generative AI, a broadly framed prohibition on its use in legal proceedings would be 'neither practical nor proportionate, and risks hindering innovation and access to justice'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store