How Uranium Enrichment Can Help Iran Build Nuclear Weapons
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The ongoing standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment program has emerged as the defining obstacle in stalled nuclear negotiations. At the core of the dispute is Tehran's insistence on continuing enrichment activities—a stance the United States says brings Iran close to acquiring the capability to build a nuclear weapon.
Tehran says its nuclear activities are peaceful and lawful, while the United States and its allies demand strict rollbacks and intrusive inspections. This impasse over uranium enrichment not only complicates negotiations but also heightens fears of a nuclear arms race in the volatile Middle East.
Why It Matters
Uranium enrichment lies at the core of the dispute because it holds the key to Iran's potential nuclear weapons capability.
While low-level enrichment can fuel civilian nuclear reactors, higher levels can quickly lead to weapons-grade uranium. The inability of negotiators to agree on Iran's enrichment levels risks derailing talks designed to prevent Tehran from crossing the nuclear threshold. This deadlock threatens regional stability and tests the durability of global nonproliferation regimes.
This photo released Nov. 5, 2019, by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, shows centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran.
This photo released Nov. 5, 2019, by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, shows centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran.
Atomic Energy Organization of Iran/AP Photo
What to Know
Uranium enrichment increases the concentration of uranium-235, the isotope needed for nuclear energy or weapons. Reactor fuel typically requires enrichment to 3–5 percent, while weapons-grade uranium exceeds 90 percent. The process involves spinning uranium hexafluoride gas in centrifuges to separate isotopes by weight.
Enrichment Levels
Since the U.S. exited the 2015 nuclear deal under President Donald Trump, Iran has steadily increased its enrichment beyond the previously agreed cap of 3.67 percent.
Tehran now enriches uranium up to 60 percent purity—much closer to weapons-grade. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently emphasized the higher levels of enrichment to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He described Iran's pursuit of enrichment as both a "matter of national pride" and a strategic move to become a "threshold nuclear power," deterring potential adversaries by making itself "untouchable."
Iran's uranium stockpile approaches pre-JCPOA levels.
Iran's uranium stockpile approaches pre-JCPOA levels.
statista
Mixed Messages
Iran has accused the U.S. of sending mixed signals regarding uranium enrichment, complicating ongoing nuclear negotiations. Iranian officials point to Special Envoy Steve Witkoff's shifting positions: initially suggesting the U.S. might accept limited enrichment under strict oversight, then later demanding the complete dismantlement of Iran's enrichment and weaponization programs. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi criticized these contradictory statements, stating that such inconsistencies undermine trust and hinder progress toward a clear, enforceable agreement.
Nuclear Talks in Limbo
Meanwhile on Wednesday, Araghchi said that Tehran is still reviewing whether to join the fifth round of nuclear talks with the United States, dismissing Washington's conditions on enrichment as "unrealistic." His remarks came a day after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei questioned the value of continued negotiations. While a proposal for new talks—possibly this weekend in Rome—has been made, Iran has not yet confirmed its participation.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies before the Senate Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing to review the Fiscal Year 2026 budget request for the U.S. Department of State on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May...
Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies before the Senate Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing to review the Fiscal Year 2026 budget request for the U.S. Department of State on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 20, 2025. More
Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo
What People Are Saying
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated: "They claim that enrichment is a matter of national pride. It is our view that they want enrichment as a deterrent... to become untouchable."
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, wrote on X: "Enrichment in Iran, however, will continue with or without a deal."
What Happens Next
The uranium enrichment impasse threatens to collapse diplomatic efforts. As Iran continues advancing its nuclear capabilities, the timeline for Tehran to potentially develop a nuclear weapon shortens. The international community watches closely to see if negotiations can bridge the gap or if the standoff will spiral toward a new regional crisis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Xi Bets Trump Detente Will Lead to Future Wins on Chips, Tariffs
In the early hours of Wednesday, Donald Trump declared that Xi Jinping was 'VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Some 36 hours later, the US leader said he got what he wanted: A commitment to restore the flow of rare earth magnets. It's less clear what Xi got in return, apart from putting a lid on further punitive US measures. One of the few clear takeaways appeared to be an assurance for the US to welcome Chinese students, a major issue in China but also not one that would explain why Xi got on the phone after making Trump wait for months.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Just Became the World's Most Valuable Company. Here's What May Happen Next.
Nvidia, with a market value of $3.444 trillion, topped software giant Microsoft. This happened a week after Nvidia's report of double-digit revenue growth and strong demand for its artificial intelligence chips. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) might be the company everyone's talking about thanks to its dominance in the high-growth area of artificial intelligence (AI), but it remained behind one other tech player, Microsoft, in terms of market value. Until this week. On June 3, Nvidia roared past the software giant to become the world's most valuable company with a market value of $3.444 trillion. Microsoft's market value totaled $3.441 trillion at the close of trading. This happened a week after Nvidia's fiscal 2026 first-quarter earnings report, one that maintained the company's track record of surpassing analysts' estimates and delivering double-digit revenue growth. And even though investors questioned the strength of AI demand and spending in recent months, Nvidia's words -- and comments from its biggest customers -- showed business still is booming. All of this is great news, but can this AI chip powerhouse maintain this position in the market cap top spot? It's important to note that this isn't the first time Nvidia has claimed the title of the world's most valuable company. In fact, just a few months ago, in January, Nvidia's market value surpassed those of Microsoft and smartphone giant Apple. But concerns about technology spending weighed heavily on Nvidia shares in recent months, and that pushed market value lower once again. Now, though, two elements clearly are driving this rebound in the AI giant. First, market sentiment and stock performance have improved in recent weeks on optimism that President Donald Trump's import tariffs won't result in extreme headwinds for corporate earnings. The U.S. struck an initial trade deal with China at lower-than-expected tariff levels and is working on a permanent arrangement. Lower tariffs suggest less strain on companies' budgets and on the consumer's wallet. Second, as mentioned, Nvidia reported strong demand for its latest release, the Blackwell architecture and chip, and noted that customers are rushing to the company for inferencing power. Nvidia's chips -- graphics processing units (GPUs) -- fuel this process that allows large language models to think through problems and generate answers. All of this helped Nvidia report a 69% increase in revenue to $44 billion in the quarter and deliver strong profitability on sales. Even including a charge Nvidia took for canceled sales to China following U.S. export controls, Nvidia's gross margin came in at more than 60%. And excluding the impact of the charge, Nvidia met its forecast of gross margin in the low-70% range. On top of this, forecasts showing the AI market will increase from hundreds of billions of dollars today to trillions of dollars by early next decade suggest there's room for Nvidia and other AI leaders to grow. So, will Nvidia keep its title as the world's biggest company? One potential risk to Nvidia's share price performance -- and market value gains -- is the situation concerning the export of AI chips to China. Today, U.S. restrictions prevent Nvidia from selling its H20 chip -- one that it designed specifically for the Chinese market -- to that country. If Nvidia remains completely blocked from the Chinese market, revenue growth and stock performance could suffer, at least in the short term. But any progress in that area, even small, could act as a catalyst for share gains. Considering all of these elements, the positive and the negative, I think Nvidia may once again remain neck and neck with Microsoft and Apple when it comes to market cap in the months and quarters to come. We might see each of these companies periodically take the top spot. If tariff issues and the China export situation are completely resolved, though, Nvidia could have the advantage. Nvidia's leadership and innovation in the high-growth AI market as well as its double-digit revenue increases quarter after quarter could eventually push it ahead, making it the world's biggest company for the long term. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Adria Cimino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia Just Became the World's Most Valuable Company. Here's What May Happen Next. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me.
Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. | Opinion The Trump administration does not care about what is medically necessary to save someone's life. They care about controlling women. Why would anybody want to have a child under that way of thinking? Show Caption Hide Caption Trump rescinds Biden-era emergency abortion care guidance The Trump administration rescinded guidance clarifying that hospitals in abortion-ban states must treat pregnant patients during medical emergencies. unbranded - Newsworthy Despite declarations that something needs to be done about the declining birth rate in the United States, neither President Donald Trump nor the Republican Party has the desire to protect pregnant people. If they did, the Trump administration wouldn't have made its latest move to restrict abortion nationwide. On Tuesday, June 3, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rescinded a Biden-era policy that directed hospitals to provide emergency abortions if it was needed to stabilize a pregnant patient. The guidance and communications on it apparently 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' I, like many people who support abortion rights, know what this will lead to. It means more pregnant people will die. Does that reflect the policy of the administration? Having a baby in America is dangerous. Republicans aren't helping. The Biden policy was implemented in 2022, following the fall of Roe v. Wade, and argued that hospitals receiving Medicare funding had to comply with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The former administration argued that this included providing emergency abortions when they were needed to stabilize a patient, even in states that had severe abortion restrictions. Opinion: A brain dead pregnant Georgia woman is a horror story. It's Republicans' fault. This wasn't entirely a surprise. In 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could ban virtually all abortions in the state, including abortions that would have occurred under the old EMTALA guidelines. Still, it's terrifying to see this crucial policy eliminated. It's already dangerous to be pregnant in the United States. Our maternal mortality rate is much higher than in other wealthy countries. Same with our infant mortality rate. This will only exacerbate these tragedies. In states with abortion bans, the risks are even greater. A study from the Gender Equity Policy Institute found that people living in states with abortion bans were twice as likely to die during or shortly after childbirth. This is also backed by anecdotal evidence, including the 2022 deaths of two women in Georgia after the state passed a six-week ban. A different study found that infant mortality rates increased in states with severe restrictions on abortion, including an increase in deaths due to congenital anomalies. The Trump administration does not care about what is medically necessary to save someone's life. They don't care about whether the children supposedly saved by rescinding this policy will grow up without their mother. They care about their perceived moral superiority. They care about controlling women. Why would anybody want to have a child under that Republican way of thinking? Opinion: We're worrying about the wrong thing. Low birth rate isn't the crisis: Child care is. None of this is surprising from Republicans. It's just sad. I want to say I'm surprised that the Trump administration would allow women in need of emergency care to die. Yet this is clearly aligned with the Republican stance on abortion, just like it's aligned with the actions that the party has taken to make it harder for women to access necessary care. Whether you like it or not, abortion is a necessary part of health care. It saves lives. Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, laid it out plainly. 'Women have died because they couldn't get the lifesaving abortion care they needed,' she said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is willing to let pregnant people die, and that is exactly what we can expect." Again, this is the administration that wants young women like me to have children and improve the country's birth rate. This is an administration that claims to care about women and children. I know I wouldn't want to have a child while Trump continues to make it unsafe to be pregnant and give birth. I hate that this is the reality. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno
