Cambodian farmers risk lives for rice as US freezes demining aid
Parts of the kingdom are still littered with unexploded ordnance from decades of conflict, but US President Donald Trump's decision to freeze virtually all American aid has forced many long-running projects to clear the deadly debris to grind a halt.
Villagers now fear for themselves and their children unless a way is found to keep removing the leftover landmines, mortars and other lethal munitions scattered across the countryside.
Yeat Saly was herding his cows outside his village in Tboung Khmum province on February 5 when he found a metal object by a rubber tree.
"I thought it was just a piece of metal. I threw it, then it exploded into a ball of flame," he told AFP from a hospital bed.
"A piece of shrapnel is still in here," he said, touching his forehead.
He is receiving treatment for injuries to both his legs and body at a hospital in Tboung Khmum.
"I was so frightened, my ears could not hear anything. Blood was spraying from my forehead, and I rode a motorbike (back home) with one hand blocking the blood," he said.
- Deadly US legacy -
Much of Cambodia's unexploded ordnance is a legacy of US operations during the Vietnam War.
Then-president Richard Nixon ordered a clandestine bombing campaign over swathes of Laos and Cambodia, which helped fuel the rise of the Khmer Rouge.
After more than 30 years of civil war ended in 1998, Cambodia was left as one of the most heavily mined countries in the world.
Injuries and deaths from war remnants are still common, with around 65,000 casualties, including 20,000 people killed, since 1979.
The annual additions to that count have fallen dramatically in recent years thanks to clearance programs, but more than 1,600 square kilometres (620 square miles) of contaminated land still need to be demined.
In recognition of American responsibility for causing the problem, Washington has been a key partner in Cambodia's mine clearance, providing around $10 million a year in funding.
But Trump's 90-day freeze on virtually all foreign aid has forced many demining operations in Cambodia to stop, according to officials.
Deminers in eastern Cambodia have suspended work to clear UXOs and cluster bombs, even as requests for removals have grown.
"We have received a pile of requests, and we could not respond to them. We are so upset," Moch Sokheang, who has been a deminer for 16 years.
"We worry that when villagers go into the forests, dig land to grow their crops, they may trigger explosions or children may play with them when they go herding cows," the 36-year-old added.
Cambodian demining authorities say more than 1,000 deminers and experts have been affected by the aid freeze.
Days after Trump's announcement, China -- Cambodia's close ally -- pledged $4.4 million to fund mine clearance activities.
But the Cambodian Mine Action Centre (CMAC) said that aid was "not a substitute" for US funding.
- 'So worried' -
Farmers in eastern Svay Reing province told AFP they must keep working their fields despite the risks.
Mao Saroeun said he was "unhappy" that deminers had been forced to suspend a search in his rice field where many US bombs fell.
"I know (about UXOs) but our livelihood is poor so we keep farming rice in UXO fields," Mao Saroeun said.
Cambodia had aimed to be mine-free by 2025, but the government pushed the deadline back by five years because of funding challenges and new landmine fields found along the Thai border.
The loss of US funding is a further setback.
"The aid freeze will cause more accidents... A lot of UXOs are still littered around," Keo Sarath, manager of the Cambodian Mine Action Centre's demining unit 5 headquarters, told AFP.
In Banteay Kraing village in Svay Rieng province, AFP journalists saw a rusty mortar left between tree trunks with police tape around the site to warn people away.
Villager Som Khatna told AFP that her husband unearthed the bomb last month when he dug a pit to lay the foundation for a house.
"I am so worried that children would come and play with it," said the 59-year-old grandmother.
suy/pdw/lb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin, crypto stocks rally ahead of Trump order opening 401(k)'s to alternative assets
Major cryptocurrencies and crypto-related stock were rallying early Thursday ahead of President Trump's expected signing of an executive order that would allow alternative assets like cryptocurrencies and private equity into the retirement amounts of millions of Americans. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) rose more than 2% near 9:00 a.m. ET trading on Thursday, while ether (ETH-USD) and XRP (XRP-USD) were both up more than 4%. Shares of Coinbase (COIN), the biggest publicly-traded crypto exchange, were up as much as 3%. Robinhood and Strategy shares each rose more than 1.5%. President Trump's executive order, expected to be signed around 12:00 p.m. ET on Thursday according to Reuters, will direct the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to facilitate the use of alternative assets in 401(k)s and other retirement accounts. The order would mark a major shift in retirement investments, opening up the traditionally staid industry to more speculative and, sometimes illiquid, investments. Typically, most 401(k) participants are offered a mix of stock or bond funds or index products in which to invest. Large-scale alternatives assets firms, including BlackRock and KKR, have expressed support for the move, which would open up the multi-trillion dollar retirement account industry to a broader mix of the alternative assets these firms manage. "Private assets like real estate and infrastructure can lift returns and protect investors during market downturns," BlackRock chairman Larry Fink wrote in his latest annual investor letter. "We need to make it clear: Private assets are legal in retirement accounts. They're beneficial. And they're becoming increasingly transparent." The executive order builds on recent crypto momentum in Washington coming off Congress' "Crypto Week" in July, where the two chambers worked to get the CLARITY, GENIUS and Anti-CBDC Acts past their respective votes. The GENIUS Act, signed into law by President Trump on July 18, establishes a regulatory framework for the use of stablecoins like Tether. The CLARITY Act, which seeks to define regulatory oversight of cryptocurrencies, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block the Federal Reserve from establishing central bank cryptocurrencies, have both passed in the House of Representatives and are now awaiting votes in the Senate. Jake Conley is a breaking news reporter covering US equities for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X at @byjakeconley or email him at Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
FBI will help locate Texas Democrats who fled the state, Cornyn says
The FBI has agreed to cooperate with Texas state law enforcement to locate the 50 Democratic legislators who left the state to avoid a vote on redistricting, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said on Thursday. The big picture: For days, Texas Republicans have been threatening the state legislators with "legal consequences" for breaking the quorum, a sentiment that President Trump also echoed.
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom, Walz and Pritzker are scapegoating immigrants, cutting their health care
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Tim Walz of Minnesota have been floated as potential 2028 Democratic presidential contenders. But in June, all three governors took a page out of President Trump's playbook by cutting or freezing health care coverage for undocumented immigrants in their states. Their moves aren't just cowardly — they're anti-immigrant, anti-poor and anti-public health. And they should be noted, in permanent ink, as moral and economic failures. These governors may be known for their sharp anti-Trump rhetoric, but their recent policy choices echo the very worst aspects of his administration: using immigrants — particularly those without the right to vote — as economic scapegoats. The idea is simple and cynical: Balance the books by cutting benefits to some of the most vulnerable residents, knowing they can't fight back at the ballot box. In Minnesota, as many as 15,000 people will lose their health insurance by the end of this year because Walz approved changes to state coverage for undocumented residents. In California, Newsom will prohibit new enrollment of undocumented immigrants in Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program, beginning in January. Californian adults ages 19 to 59 who are already enrolled will have to pay a new $30 monthly premium starting in 2027. Dental coverage will be eliminated for undocumented adults and other noncitizens by next July. And to make matters worse, Newsom slashed funding for nonprofit community health centers to serve immigrant families, leaving them nowhere to access health care. Meanwhile, Illinois has already shuttered a program that provided publicly funded health care to more than 30,000 non-U.S. citizens. These cuts are not just cruel — they are economically shortsighted. Public health officials and economists have shown for years that expanding health care access to undocumented immigrants isn't a burden — it's a boon. An ongoing University of Chicago study found that state-run programs extending health care coverage to noncitizens provided significant financial benefits for Illinois hospitals. When people can access primary and preventive care, they avoid costlier emergency room visits. When hospitals are reimbursed, they're less likely to shut down. When immigrants are healthy, they're more likely to keep working, paying taxes and contributing to their communities. So why did these governors do it? The answer is as cynical as it is familiar: political optics and budget math. Rather than face down the powerful interests who block progressive tax reform — such as raising corporate tax rates, enacting inheritance or wealth taxes or levying vacancy taxes on landlords who keep properties empty — these governors went after the lowest-hanging fruit. Instead of leading with moral clarity and economic foresight, they balanced their budgets on the backs of people who already face a daily onslaught of threats: Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, exploitation in the workplace, housing discrimination and hate-fueled violence. These governors acted against the interests, and wishes, of their own constituents. In California, over 120 organizations signed an open letter condemning Newsom's Medi-Cal cuts, calling them even more devastating than the health care changes in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill. In Minnesota, residents across the state organized protests denouncing Walz's decision. In Illinois, advocates rallied for 'health care for all,' arguing that these programs served as a lifeline for immigrant families. Let's be clear: There's a world of difference between the tone of these Democrats and that of Trump. But tone is not policy. We cannot let ourselves be distracted by surface-level distinctions while immigrants lose their health care — and potentially their lives — under supposedly progressive leadership. The consequences of stripping coverage aren't theoretical. They are real, measurable and deadly. Undocumented immigrants are taxpayers, workers and caregivers. Many live in mixed-status households. Many pay into public systems from which they receive little or no benefit. When they get sick or injured and can't get care, they lose jobs, homes and security — which ripples out into the broader economy. And when safety net providers like community health centers or rural hospitals lose revenue because fewer people are covered, entire communities suffer. At a moment when Trump's threat to civil rights grows more tangible by the day, we need Democratic governors to do more than be not-Trump at the surface level. We need them to lead. That means collaborative solutions that don't throw whole communities under the bus. It means raising revenue in bold and creative ways. It means centering human rights over political convenience. Newsom, Pritzker and Walz have proven they are willing to sacrifice the health and dignity of immigrants for short-term political gain. But it is not too late to reverse course. These governors can still choose to restore funding for immigrant health programs. They can propose tax reforms that ask more from corporations and the ultra-wealthy. They can govern with the moral clarity their speeches so often invoke. We need leaders who will fight to expand care — not slash it. We need leaders who will defend the undocumented — not discard them. Most of all, we need leaders with the courage to act on the values they claim to hold. The eyes of the nation are watching. We won't forget who showed up, and who sold us out.
