logo
A $200 million endowment focused on Black Americans is taking shape

A $200 million endowment focused on Black Americans is taking shape

The Hill2 days ago
Started in 2020 as a five-year initiative inspired by the racial justice outcry following the police murder of George Floyd, the California Black Freedom Fund plans to expand to a $200 million endowment. The move is both rare in the world of philanthropy and politically bold, given the Trump administration's efforts to eliminate race-based grant making.
Originally a designated fund of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the fund spun off on July 1, renaming itself the Black Freedom Fund, to indicate its new national scope. Over the past five years, it has drawn more than $97 million in donations. Of that, it has directed $45 million to 206 nonprofits in California, largely working to increase the sway of nonprofits that serve Black people, with a portion of the remainder being reserved to start the endowment.
Marc Philpart, the fund's executive director, said the endowment will let the fund make grants of $10 million a year without cutting into its asset base, assuming historical rates of return on investments.
By establishing a durable institution with a sizable reservoir of cash, the fund can serve as a lasting beacon to smaller organizations serving Black communities in California, Philpart said.
'When a crisis occurs in the Black community, philanthropy parachutes in, there's a wave of support, and then as soon as the news cameras turn away, the support recedes,' he said. 'We need enduring institutions that are led by and committed to the Black community in ways that have a lasting impact.'
DEI targeted
Philpart's fundraising for the endowment comes as the Trump administration has characterized diversity, equity, and inclusion programs as illegal and has called for investigations of large foundations that support diversity programs.
Under Philpart's leadership, the California Black Freedom Fund started the Legal Education, Advocacy, and Defense for Racial Justice Initiative, which provides pro bono legal consulting and training for nonprofits. The program operates on the premise that there isn't anything illegal about racial justice funding.
But the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against considering race in college admissions, in a pair of cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, was viewed by some as an indication that private philanthropies could not legally engage in race-based grant making — and the issue is far from settled.
While Philpart's fundraising pitch might resonate with some donors, others are sure to be nervous, given the scrutiny placed on race-based grant making by the White House, said Dan Morenoff, executive director of the American Civil Rights Project, a litigation and advocacy nonprofit that has challenged affirmative action programs.
The White House has directed the Department of Justice to root out instances of race-based grantmaking, which it considers discriminatory.
'You don't want to be on their radar because they are fervently looking for people to make examples of at this point,' Morenoff said.
While some corporations and philanthropies, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, an early supporter of the California Black Freedom Fund, have retreated from supporting racial justice, Philpart is counting on securing support from donors who want to stay with the cause even as the issue is argued in various court cases stemming from Trump's anti-DEI executive orders.
The attacks from the administration, Philpart said, have been a 'clarifying moment' for many donors and have generated interest in the fund.
'People have rallied to us and really doubled down on their commitments to support Black freedom and Black power,' he said. 'That is the most telling thing coming out of this moment — that there is a critical mass of leaders throughout the country who care very deeply about the community.'
70 financial supporters
One grantmaker that has doubled down is the California Wellness Foundation. The foundation made an initial grant of $500,000 when the fund was first launched, then made a $200,000 commitment to a separate fund created by the California Black Freedom Fund in response to the January Los Angeles fires, and recently added $500,000 to support the spin-off.
Richard Tate, president of the California Wellness Fund, said the new fund is 'needed now more than ever' because of attempts by the administration to roll back equity efforts.
'The fact that we are talking about a Black Freedom Fund is an acknowledgment that not everyone has equal standing in the culture,' he said. 'Whatever headwinds that may exist because of this political moment, now is the time for us to continue to be explicit about our intentions of supporting a community.'
Philanthropy needs to act quickly by unleashing more money in grants to support areas like litigation, public advocacy, and the replacement of lost federal funds, said Glenn Harris, president of Race Forward, a nonprofit racial justice advocacy group. But, he said, lasting institutions that can respond to future challenges are also needed.
'There's a balancing act,' Harris said. 'It's really clear that struggles for liberation and justice are going to be with us for a minute.'
Among the two dozen grant makers that chipped in to start the fund are the Akonadi, Conrad Hilton and San Francisco foundations as well as the Emerson Collective, Crankstart, the Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr. Fund and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. The total of institutional funders to the effort since 2020 now exceeds 70.
Why endowments
Among the groups the fund has supported are the East Bay Permanent Real Estate Cooperative, a community-owned cooperative that 'removes land and housing from the speculative market and places it into permanent community stewardship,' according to the fund.
A late 2023 survey of nearly 300 foundations conducted by the Center for Effective Philanthropy found that more than two thirds of grantmakers did not offer endowment grants. Half of those that did so made them to arts organizations and museums.
Nonprofits led by Black people receive endowment grants even more rarely, according to a 2022 analysis of social change organizations by the Bridgespan Group, a philanthropy consultancy, which found that nonprofits led by Black people had endowments that were only a fourth as big as those led by white people.
Since then, some grant makers have stepped forward to support endowments at organizations serving members of Black communities, said Darren Isom, a partner at Bridgespan. For instance, in 2022 the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation made grants of $5 million each to three racial justice organizations led by people of color: UnidosUS, the NAACP, and Faith in Action.
'Endowments are transfer of power from philanthropic organizations to the organizations that are closest to the work,' he said. 'From an impact perspective, the work is more high impact, more beneficial, and more durable if it's owned by and led by those that are the closest to issues and closest to the communities.'
Philpart is confident that despite the blow-back against diversity and racial justice, the fund can raise enough money to meet its goal.
'We're drawing people out who want to prove we are greater than divisiveness, we are greater than bigotry, and we are a greater than racism,' he said. 'We are better than all the things that pull us apart and don't fundamentally improve anyone's well-being.'
______
Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rise 3.6% after report US could take stake in chipmaker
Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rise 3.6% after report US could take stake in chipmaker

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rise 3.6% after report US could take stake in chipmaker

LONDON (Reuters) -Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rose 3.6% on Friday, a day after Bloomberg News reported the Trump administration is in talks with the struggling chipmaker to have the U.S. government potentially take a stake in the company. Intel's U.S. shares surged more than 7% in regular trading Thursday and then another 2.6% after the bell. Intel on Thursday declined to comment on the report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Satellite Images Show How Ukraine Territory Has Changed During Russia War
Satellite Images Show How Ukraine Territory Has Changed During Russia War

Newsweek

time11 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Satellite Images Show How Ukraine Territory Has Changed During Russia War

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As U.S. President Donald Trump arrives in Alaska for the first summit of his second term with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the biggest question is what will happen to Ukraine's territory. The two leaders will meet at a major U.S. military base in Anchorage later on Friday, in part to discuss an end to more than three and a half years of full-scale war that have ravaged eastern Europe since Moscow invaded its neighbor in early 2022. Ukraine's leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, will not attend the talks, despite reports that the White House was weighing up the involvement of Ukrainian president. Russia has so far refused Ukraine's repeated calls for a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelensky. Trump told European leaders on Wednesday that he wouldn't negotiate with Russia on territorial issues at the summit, according to Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz. But the thorny issue hangs over the Alaska meeting, after Russia reiterated its position on land in Ukraine remained unchanged. 1 of 4 Kyiv and Moscow's positions on the chunks of Ukraine that Russia will control in any ceasefire agreement have always been far apart, and there is little hint that this has changed. Trump has said both sides will be expected to cede territory in negotiations. Kyiv says it is against its constitution to give away Ukrainian land to Russia and Moscow has been unbending during months of peace talks. How Much Land Does Russia Control? Currently, Moscow controls around one-fifth of territory that is internationally recognized as part of Ukraine. This includes Crimea, the peninsula to the south of mainland Ukraine, which was annex by Moscow in 2014. That year, Russia also backed separatist fighters in Ukraine's Donbas region, which historically has been Ukraine's industrial heartland, made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the east. Russia now controls much of Donetsk, as well as swathes of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts in the southeast. Russia claims it has captured all of Luhansk, although some Western assessments indicate Ukraine still controls a slither of the region. The Kremlin declared in fall 2022 it had annexed these four regions, although it did not—and still does not—have a grip on all the territory in these oblasts. In ceasefire negotiations, Russia has demanded Ukraine pulls out of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson—including from areas Ukraine still currently controls. Russia's other stipulations include limits on Ukraine's military, putting the Russian language on par with Ukrainian in official standings, and that Kyiv does not join NATO. Ukraine has repeatedly said that ceding Ukrainian territory to Russia is off the table. It goes against the country's constitution, Zelensky said again over the weekend. "No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to," Zelensky said in a post on the messaging app Telegram on Saturday. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." Ukraine has consistently said it needs security guarantees, and not to be bound by any limits on the size of its armed forces. Kyiv also does not want to be labeled a neutral state, but rather one firmly on the path to NATO and European Union membership. The Hot Spots As the conflict wore on and Moscow advanced, different cities became hot spots for fierce clashes between Russian and Ukrainian troops. Russia quickly became known for "meat grinder" assaults, sustaining high numbers of casualties in vicious battles in exchange for small but consistent territorial gains. Russia's progress is much slower in built-up, well-defended areas, like the cities it has thrown many resources, and soldiers, into capturing, according to analysts. Since the start of January to the end of April this year, Russia gained a total of 1,627 square kilometers, or 628 square miles, in Ukraine and in its own Kursk region, where it batted back Ukraine's cross-border incursion, the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in a report about the front lines in May. Russia sustained an average of 99 casualties for every square kilometer (0.38 square miles) of territory taken in those months, the ISW said. Pokrovsk Russian forces have spent roughly a year inching their way toward the Donetsk city of Pokrovsk, the city itself facing heavy bombardment. In recent months, Moscow has moved to encircle the settlement, a major logistics hub for Ukrainian troops. Popular Ukrainian war blog Deep State said earlier this week that Russian soldiers were "actively advancing" around Dobropillia, a town northwest of Pokrovsk. Dobropillia is connected to several so-called "fortress cities" critical to Ukraine's defense in Donetsk, namely Kostiantynivka, Druzhkivka and Kramatorsk. Deep State's analysis described the clashes as "chaotic," and that Russian troops had "found gaps in the defense." Drag slider compare photos Avdiivka East of Pokrovsk, perched on the shoulder of the Russian-controlled regional capital, Donetsk city, sits Avdiivka. The heavily fortified industrial town weathered a decade on the front lines, and Ukraine's defenses cemented ahead of Russia's offensive in October 2023. But Russian forces captured Avdiivka in February 2024, clinching a symbolic and strategic prize for the Kremlin that paved the way for further gains. Drag slider compare photos Bakhmut After months of bitter clashes since July 2022, the Donetsk city of Bakhmut, north of Avdiivka, fell to Russian forces in May 2023. There was "nothing" left of the city, Zelensky said at the time. "They destroyed everything." Drag slider compare photos Also staring down approaching Russian troops is Kupiansk, a major city in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv region. Kupiansk was quickly occupied by Russian forces that swept into the country in February 2022, but Ukrainian troops peeled back Russian control there as part of Kyiv's lightning counteroffensive in September the same year, a success it has not been able to replicate in the years since. But Kupiansk is once again brushing up against the front lines. A Ukrainian soldier fighting close to Kupiansk said on Wednesday that Russian forces were using small groups to find gaps in Ukrainian defenses, according to the ISW.

Oil maintains gains ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Oil maintains gains ahead of Trump-Putin summit

CNBC

time13 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Oil maintains gains ahead of Trump-Putin summit

Oil prices nudged higher on Friday to fresh one-week highs after U.S. President Donald Trump warned of "consequences" if Russia blocked a Ukraine peace deal, injecting concerns about supply. Sentiment was also boosted by strong economic data out of Japan, which is among the largest global crude importers. Brent crude futures gained 16 cents, or 0.2%, to $67.00 a barrel by (0017 GMT). U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 14 cents, also 0.2%, to $64.10. All eyes are on Friday's meeting of Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska where a ceasefire in the Ukraine war is at the top of the agenda. A continued conflict between Russia and Ukraine supports oil markets by limiting the supply of Russian oil. Trump, however, also said he believes Russia is prepared to end the war in Ukraine. Fresh Japanese government data released on Friday showed the economy expanded an annualized 1.0% in the April-June quarter, compared with a median market forecast for a 0.4% increase. The rise in gross domestic product (GDP) translated into a quarterly increase of 0.3%, compared with a median estimate of a 0.1% increase. Strong economic activity typically spurs oil consumption. Prospects of higher-for-longer U.S. interest rates, however, kept oil prices from rising further. Higher-than-expected inflation data and weak jobs numbers out of the U.S. raised concerns that the Federal Reserve would keep interest rates high, usually a dampener of oil consumption.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store