Analysis-OPEC+ would struggle to cover major Iranian oil supply disruption
By Ahmad Ghaddar and Seher Dareen
LONDON (Reuters) -Oil market participants have switched to dreading a shortage in fuel from focusing on impending oversupply in just two days this week.
After Israel attacked Iran and Tehran pledged to retaliate, oil prices jumped as much as 13% to their highest since January as investors price in an increased probability of a major disruption in Middle East oil supplies.
Part of the reason for the rapid spike is that spare capacity among OPEC and allies to pump more oil to offset any disruption is roughly equivalent to Iran's output, according to analysts and OPEC watchers.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the only OPEC+ members capable of quickly boosting output and could pump around 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) more, analysts and industry sources said.
Iran's production stands at around 3.3 million bpd, and it exports over 2 million bpd of oil and fuel.
There has been no impact on output so far from Israel's attacks on Iran's oil and gas infrastructure, nor on exports from the region.
But fears that Israel may destroy Iranian oil facilities to deprive it of its main source of revenue have driven oil prices higher. The Brent benchmark last traded up nearly 7% at over $74 on Friday.
An attack with a significant impact on Iranian output that required other producers to pump more to plug the gap would leave very little spare capacity to deal with other disruptions - which can happen due to war, natural disasters or accidents.
And that with a caveat that Iran does not attack its neighbours in retaliation for Israeli strikes.
Iran has in the past threatened to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz if it is attacked. The Strait is the exit route from the Middle East Gulf for around 20% of the world's oil supply, including Saudi, UAE, Kuwaiti, Iraqi and Iranian exports.
Iran has also previously stated that it would attack other oil suppliers that filled any gap in supplies left due to sanctions or attacks on Iran.
"If Iran responds by disrupting oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, targeting regional oil infrastructure, or striking U.S. military assets, the market reaction could be much more severe, potentially pushing prices up by $20 per barrel or more," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official.
CHANGE IN CALCULUS
The abrupt change in calculus for oil investors this week comes after months in which output increases from OPEC and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, have led to investor concern about future oversupply and a potential price crash.
Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, has been the driving force behind an acceleration in the group's output increases, in part to punish allies that have pumped more oil than they were supposed to under OPEC+ agreements.
The increases have already strained the capacity of some members to produce more, causing them to fall short of their new targets.
Even after recent increases, the group still has output curbs in place of about 4.5 million bpd, which were agreed over the past five years to balance supply and demand.
But some of that spare oil capacity - the difference between actual output and notional production potential that can be brought online quickly and sustained - exists only on paper.
After years of production cuts and reduced oilfield investment following the COVID-19 pandemic, the oilfields and facilities may no longer be able to restart quickly, said analysts and OPEC watchers.
Western sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela have also led to decreases in oil investment in those countries.
"Following the July hike, most OPEC members, excluding Saudi Arabia, appear to be producing at or near maximum capacity," J.P. Morgan said in a note.
Outside of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, spare capacity was negligible, said a senior industry source who works with OPEC+ producers.
"Saudi are the only ones with real barrels, the rest is paper," the source said. He asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.
PAPER BARRELS
Saudi oil output is set to rise to above 9.5 million bpd in July, leaving the kingdom with the ability to raise output by another 2.5 million bpd if it decides to.
That capacity has been tested, however, only once in the last decade and only for one month in 2020 when Saudi Arabia and Russia fell out and pumped at will in a fight for market share.
Saudi Arabia has also stopped investing in expanding its spare capacity beyond 12 million bpd as the kingdom diverted resources to other projects.
Russia, the second largest producer inside OPEC+, claims it can pump above 12 million bpd.
JP Morgan estimates, however, that Moscow can only ramp up output by 250,000 bpd to 9.5 million bpd over the next three months and will struggle to raise output further due to sanctions.
The UAE says its maximum oil production capacity is 4.85 million bpd, and told OPEC that its production of crude alone in April stood at just over 2.9 million bpd, a figure largely endorsed by OPEC's secondary sources.
The International Energy Agency, however, estimated the country's crude production at about 3.3 million bpd in April, and says the UAE has the capacity to raise that by a further 1 million bpd. BNP Paribas sees UAE output even higher at 3.5-4.0 million bpd.
"I think spare capacity is significantly lower than what's often quoted," said BNP analyst Aldo Spanjer.
The difference in ability to raise production has already created tensions inside OPEC+.
Saudi Arabia favours unwinding cuts of about 800,000 bpd by the end of October, sources have told Reuters.
At their last meeting, Russia along with Oman and Algeria expressed support for pausing a hike for July.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
42 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Iran retaliates after Israeli strikes target its nuclear program and military
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes on Israel into Saturday morning, killing at least three people and wounding dozens, after a series of blistering Israeli attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and its armed forces. Israel's assault used warplanes — as well as drones smuggled into the country in advance, according to officials — to assault key facilities and kill top generals and scientists. Iran's U.N. ambassador said 78 people were killed and more than 320 wounded in the attacks. Israel asserted the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the U.S. government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon before the strikes. Iran retaliated by launching waves of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel, where explosions lit the night skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and shook the buildings below. The Israeli military urged civilians, already rattled by 20 months of war sparked by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack, to head to shelter for hours. Strikes could derail nuclear talks Israel's strikes also put further talks between the United States and Iran over a nuclear accord into doubt before they were set to meet Sunday in Oman. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman called further nuclear talks with the United States 'meaningless' after Israeli strikes on the country, state television said. 'The U.S. did a job that made the talks become meaningless,' Esmail Baghaei was quoted as saying. He added that Israel had passed all Iran's red lines by committing a 'criminal act' through its strikes. However, he stopped short of saying the talks were cancelled. The Mizan news agency, which is run by Iran's judiciary, quoted him as saying: 'It is still not clear what we decide about Sunday's talks.' Iranian missiles strike Israel Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a recorded message Friday: 'We will not allow them to escape safely from this great crime they committed.' Iran launched waves of missiles at Israel late Friday and early Saturday. Iranians awoke Saturday to state television airing repeated clips of strikes on Israel, as well as videos of people cheering and handing out sweets. Israel's military said more drones were intercepted near the Dead Sea early Saturday. A hospital in Tel Aviv treated seven people wounded in the second Iranian barrage; all but one of them had light injuries. Israel's Fire and Rescue Services said they were wounded when a projectile hit a building in the city. A spokesperson for Beilinson Hospital said one woman was killed. Hours later, an Iranian missile struck near homes in the central Israeli city of Rishon Lezion, killing two more people and wounding 19, according to Israel's paramedic service Magen David Adom. Israel's Fire and Rescue service said four homes were severely damaged. Meanwhile, the sound of explosions and Iranian air defense systems firing at targets echoed across central Tehran shortly after midnight on Saturday. An Associated Press journalist could hear air raid sirens near their home. Iran's semiofficial Tasnim news agency reported a fire at Tehran's Mehrabad International Airport. A video posted on X showed a column of smoke and flames rising from what the outlet said was the airport. The Israeli military said it carried out overnight strikes on dozens of targets, including air defenses, 'in the area of Tehran.' Israel's paramedic services said 34 people were wounded in the barrage on the Tel Aviv area, including a woman who was critically injured after being trapped under rubble. In Ramat Gan, east of Tel Aviv, an AP journalist saw burned-out cars and at least three damaged houses, including one where the front was nearly entirely torn away. U.S. ground-based air defense systems in the region were helping to shoot down Iranian missiles, said a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the measures. Strikes raise fears of all-out war Israel's ongoing airstrikes and Iran's retaliation raised concerns about all-out war between the countries and propelled the region, already on edge , into even greater upheaval. Countries in the region condemned Israel's attack, while leaders around the globe called for immediate deescalation from both sides. Israel had long threatened such a strike, and successive American administrations sought to prevent it, fearing it would ignite a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear program. But a confluence of developments triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack — plus the reelection of U.S. President Donald Trump — created the conditions that allowed Israel to finally follow through on its threats. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the U.S. was informed in advance of the attack. On Thursday, Iran was censured by the U.N.'s atomic watchdog for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The crossfire between Israel and Iran disrupted East-West travel through the Mideast, a key global aviation route, but Jordan's state-run Petra news agent said the country would reopen its airspace to civilian aircraft at 7:30 a.m. Saturday, signaling it believes there is no immediate danger. Above-ground section of Natanz facility destroyed Among the key sites Israel attacked was Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. It also appeared to strike a second, smaller nuclear enrichment facility in Fordo, about 100 kilometers (60 miles) southeast of Tehran, according to an Iranian news outlet close to the government that reported hearing explosions nearby. Israel said it also struck a nuclear research facility in Isfahan, and said it destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. Iran confirmed the strike at Isfahan. U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed. The main centrifuge facility underground did not appear to have been hit, but the loss of power could have damaged the infrastructure there, he said. Netanyahu said the attack had been months in the making and was planned for April before being postponed. Israel's Mossad spy agency positioned explosive drones and precision weapons inside Iran ahead of time, and used them to target Iranian air defenses and missile launchers near Tehran, according to two security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. It was not possible to independently corroborate those claims. Over the past year, Israel has been targeting Iran's air defenses, hitting a radar system for a Russian-made air defense battery in April 2024 and surface-to-air missile sites and missile manufacturing facilities in October. The first wave of strikes gave Israel 'significant freedom of movement' in Iran's skies, clearing the way for further attacks, according to an Israeli military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss details of the attack with the media. The official said Israel is prepared for an operation that could last up to two weeks, but that there was no firm timeline. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders: one who oversaw the entire armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri; one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard , Gen. Hossein Salami; and the head of the Guard's ballistic missile program, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Trump urged Iran on Friday to reach a deal with the U.S. on its nuclear program, warning on his Truth Social platform that Israel's attacks 'will only get worse.' 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left,' he wrote. ___ Lidman and Frankel reported from Jerusalem. Associated Press reporter Natalie Melzer contributed from Nahariya, Israel and Nasser Karimi from Tehran. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Equity Markets Fall, Oil Jumps Intraday Amid Israel-Iran Conflict
US benchmark equity indexes were lower intraday, while oil prices soared amid renewed tensions in th
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Look at history': the economic threat if Israel-Iran conflict escalates
The assassination of the head of Iran's armed forces has raised fears of another wave of rising crude oil jumped by as much as 13pc to more than $78 a barrel on Friday morning after Israel killed military chief Mohammad Bagheri and conducted a 'pre-emptive strike' against the regime's nuclear jump was the biggest increase since the early days of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, vowing that the battle will continue for as long as it takes. 'We can't leave these threats for the next generation. If we don't act now, there won't be a next generation,' Netanyahu said on Friday. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is likely to be watching the conflict closely as higher oil prices are felt well beyond the petrol forecourts. Experts warn that if the conflict continues, a fresh wave of tax rises in the autumn are now all but inevitable. Iran is the third-largest oil producer within the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) cartel, behind only Saudi Arabia and Iraq, with output of 3m barrels per day accounting for 3pc of global supply. Callum Macpherson, at Investec, a banking group, notes that concerns about the impact of conflict in the Middle East on oil prices are not new. After all, the assassination of Hezbollah's veteran leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah by Israel last October led to a similar spike in oil prices, before concerns eased back and prices fell again. But Macpherson says things may be different this time. 'The market is concerned by comments from Netanyahu that suggest there could be a more protracted campaign than has been the case before,' he notes, adding that Iran is still a big contributor to global supply. 'If Iranian supply were to be significantly disrupted, that could have a big impact on oil prices.' While this is unlikely on its own, the big concern if the conflict escalates is Tehran's ability to block the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route in the Middle East. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, warned on Friday that Israel 'should expect severe punishment' for the 20pc of global supply is shipped through the narrow strait. Macpherson says if Hormuz was blocked, prices would surge. He added: 'Let's look at history. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, there were fears over Russian oil supply that sent Brent up to around $140 a barrel. This is an example of an historic precedent of the market's reaction to the potential for a severe supply disruption.' David Oxley, at Capital Economics, says traders remain nervous about what comes next, with any big escalation likely to trigger a surge in prices. 'We're into a world where traders are pricing in the potential for major disruption,' he says. 'And as we've seen in instances like this you could easily get $20, $30, $40 added to the price very quickly.' Macpherson says the implications could be far and wide. 'This doesn't just impact oil markets, but gas markets too,' he says, noting that a significant amount of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar is also shipped through the narrow strait at the edge of the Persian Gulf. Britain buys some of its gas from Qatar, although its purchases of LNG have fallen dramatically from recent highs. 'That feeds through directly into the inflation basket, through the cost of heating,' says Macpherson. 'And if gas prices go up, there is upward pressure on electricity too. If the situation is prolonged, this could feed through to the cost of manufactured goods, wherever they come from in the world leading to broader implications for inflation.' The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that a 10pc rise in oil prices adds 0.4 percentage points to global inflation and drag down growth by 0.15pc. Consumers will start noticing price rises in the coming days and weeks as they fill up their cars. Oxley, at Capital Economics, estimates that every $10 increase in oil adds 7p at the petrol pump, taking money out of people's pockets. There are also implications for the cost of borrowing. While policymakers at the Bank of England tend to look through one-off price spikes, the prospect of higher-for-longer inflation will be hard to ignore. Traders slightly reduced their bets of two more rate cuts this year to 3.75pc as news of the killing of Bagheri broke. But some fear that the impact of higher oil prices could even force Threadneedle Street to reverse course. Gervais Williams, of Premier Miton, an investment manager, told the BBC: 'It is likely that interest rate cuts will be less, or possibly even interest rate rises to come.' He warns that 'a lot of economic uncertainty ... will lead to a government shortfall, unfortunately, versus their spending review recently. I think that will lead to potentially ... additional UK tax rises later this year'. The combination of weak growth and higher borrowing costs is toxic for the public finances. Analysis cited by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) of 20 years of data from 1984 suggests that a 10pc rise in oil price reduces UK output by around 0.5pc, although the UK is now far less reliant on oil and gas than it was in the past as the economy pivots towards services. In 2010, the OBR said a permanent 20pc rise in the real oil price would reduce GDP by around half a percent. Lower growth means less money to fund the spending boost for the NHS that Reeves lauded this week. Higher oil prices also makes it more likely that she will have to maintain fuel duty cuts for another year at a cost of £3bn. She has to fund that by cutting spending or taxing something else. JP Morgan and Capital Economics both believe that higher borrowing costs and a weaker economy will force Reeves to raise taxes by more than £20bn in the autumn. Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, argues that there may be a silver lining for a Chancellor looking for political cover for another tax raid. 'A sustained rise in oil prices will raise inflation in the second half of the year making it harder for the Bank of England to cut rates,' says French. 'But for the Treasury the challenges are more nuanced. Any hit to growth will make the fiscal challenges more acute, albeit politically it becomes easier to blame external conditions for tough fiscal choices in the autumn.' Of course, there are factors pulling in the opposite direction, including a decision by Opec in March to pump more than 2m barrels of oil back into the market over the next 18 months. Oxley at Capital Economics says this should provide some relief, with faster supply increases in May and June suggesting 'more supply is likely to be forthcoming' in the coming months. However, he warns the outlook remains bleak. 'To the extent to which oil prices remain elevated, this adds to inflationary pressures and headwinds for the economy,' adds Oxley. 'That's the last thing Reeves wants. She was hoping that growth could help the fiscal situation look better. But any volatility or uncertainty will be the opposite of that. 'But at least she is by no means alone. The world depends on oil. So this isn't necessarily just a problem for Rachel Reeves.' That is likely to offer little comfort for a Chancellor already under fire for her political choices, or the households who will bear the brunt of what looks like another inevitable tax raid. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data