'100% Communist Lunatic': Trump Hits Out At Zohran Mamdani After New York Primary Win
Last Updated:
Donald Trump hit out at the leaders supporting the 33-year-old democratic socialist, including Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and Senator Chuck Schumer.
US President Donald Trump has weighed in on the victory of Indian-origin socialist Zohran Mamdani in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary election, calling him a '100 per cent communist lunatic" and accused the Democratic Party of having 'crossed the line."
In a post on Truth Social, the US President hit out at the leaders supporting the 33-year-old democratic socialist, including Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and Senator Chuck Schumer, after former New York governor Andrew Cuomo conceded the election.
'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous," Trump said.
He also mocked Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, calling him 'Cryin' Chuck" for supporting Mamdani. 'Even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!" Trump said in the post.
In another post, Trump suggested Democrats should nominate Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett for President and give Cabinet roles to 'AOC+3." He added, 'With Mamdani as our future Communist Mayor, the country is really screwed."
The son of Indian‑born filmmaker Mira Nair and Indian‑Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani, Zohran Mamdani declared victory Tuesday night after Andrew Cuomo conceded. With 93 per cent of the votes counted, Mamdani led with 43.5 per cent, while Cuomo trailed at 36.4 per cent. Cuomo praised Mamdani's campaign, calling it 'smart, good, and impactful."
If Mamdani wins the final race, he will become New York's first Muslim mayor.
The son of Indian-origin immigrants, he is backed by the Democratic Socialists of America party — the kind of niche, leftist affiliation that many Democratic leaders believe their party needs to shed. His win has deepened divisions within the Democratic Party, with two union leaders stepping down from the party's leadership board.
Mamdani has represented Astoria, Queens, in the New York State Assembly since 2021. His mayoral platform includes plans for city-run grocery stores, free buses, and rent freezes—all to be funded by a proposed $10 billion tax increase on wealthy residents and corporations.
Who Is Zohran Mamdani?
Zohran Kwame Mamdani is the son of Indian-origin immigrant parents: his mother is the Padma Bhushan awardee Mira Nair, who has Punjabi roots from Delhi and grew up in Odisha; while his father is the academic Mahmood Mamdani, who is Ugandan and traces his roots to Gujarat.
Mamdani, who took New York City by storm with his campaign and an enthusiastic endorsement from another internet favourite, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, was declared victorious in the Democratic mayoral primary late on Tuesday (June 24).
'In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it's done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honoured to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City," Mamdani said in a post on X.
Mamdani was born in Kampala, Uganda, on October 18, 1991, and raised in New York City. He moved to New York with his parents when he was seven. His mother Mira Nair has won applause for films like 'Monsoon Wedding' and 'Salaam Bombay!'.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
donald trump
Location :
Washington D.C., United States of America (USA)
First Published:
June 26, 2025, 07:38 IST
News world '100% Communist Lunatic': Trump Hits Out At Zohran Mamdani After New York Primary Win
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From Emergency to now, how censorship became a competitive sport
When the Emergency was declared in 1975, the Hindi newspaper Vir Pratap, like most Indian media, had an editorial problem. First, they tried to leave the editorial space blank. The government said that it was not permissible. Nor were they allowed to fill it with inspirational quotes, even from icons like Mahatma Gandhi or Rabindranath Tagore. This was not a time the government wanted anyone to reiterate Tagore's 'Where the mind is without fear'. 'They said you cannot leave the editorial blank. You have to fill it up,' says Chander Mohan, who, along with his daughter Jyotsna, authored the book Pratap: A Defiant Newspaper. 'That's when my father started writing his life history.' His father, Virendra, had quite a checkered history when it came to speaking truth to power. Accused of making bombs, he had been imprisoned with Bhagat Singh. The Urdu newspaper Pratap had been launched by his father, Mahashay Krishan, in 1919 in Lahore two weeks before the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. Two days after its launch, the British shut it down for a full year. 'The paper was blunt and we were frequently shut down; the editors, my father and grandfather, were imprisoned and fines were imposed repeatedly,' recalls Mohan. As long as the British were ruling India, the narrative was straightforward: Good guy desi Davids taking on bad guy sahib Goliaths. After Independence, it got murkier. The good guys and bad guys now looked the same. The boundaries of freedom of expression felt less clear in free India. The Emergency was lifted in 1977, but the issues of censorship have morphed into a shape-shifting monster. Now, everyone competes in taking offence and banning books and films they deem offensive, the most famous example being the then Congress government's preemptive strike on Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses. That set off the 'Big Ban' Theory of everything. Satanic Verses recently returned to Indian bookstores, but that doesn't mean freedom of expression is in fine fettle. The battles, as Alice said in Wonderland, are getting 'curiouser and curiouser'. For example, the Central Board of Film Certification stalled the Malayalam film Janaki vs State of Kerala because it feels a woman who has been assaulted should not be given the name of someone revered as a Goddess. The irony is that Sita from the Ramayana is also a survivor, someone who was kidnapped and endured an Agnipariksha to boot. Instead of acknowledging the parallels the CBFC wants to draw a Lakshmanrekha as if to seal off all possible names of Sita, and one presumes, every other God and Goddess in the pantheon, from possible fictional contamination. That's a slippery slope. Can an out-and-out villain never be named Ram or Lakshmi henceforth? Would a modern-day CBFC take filmmaker Satyajit Ray and novelist Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay to task because Durga in Pather Panchali steals a necklace? And how could a Durga be shown dying anyway? Sometimes names are chosen to make a point. Salman Rushdie deliberately named a bad-tempered bulldog in The Moor's Last Sigh as Jaw-Jaw after Jawaharlal. It upset the Congress, but little came of it. All of this harkens back to an old controversy about Deepa Mehta's 1996 film Fire, where angry protesters felt she had deliberately named the lesbian characters Radha and Sita in order to take an unsubtle dig at Hinduism. Now, taking offence and demanding censorship has become a competitive sport across the political spectrum. Most people protesting books have never read them. It's just a shortcut to political fame. And it does not require a state of Emergency because it's always open season, whether it's for a stand-up comic like Kunal Kamra or an Instagram influencer like Sharmishta Panoli. Even an apology and a deleted post are not remorseful enough. The issue is not really what they said. It is the political dividends to be gained by making an example of them. On the other hand, everyone knows that in an age of e-books and VPNs, a ban is hardly a hurdle for a book from reaching readers. And more Indians are now aware of a Malayalam film called Janaki v State of Kerala than ever before, thanks to the CBFC controversy. Meanwhile, the censorship story has an odd new avatar. According to media reports, the CBFC directed the makers of the new film Sitaare Zameen Par to include an inspirational quote from the Prime Minister in its opening disclaimer. 'Let us all build a society where no dream or goal is impossible,' says the Prime Minister. 'Only then will we be able to build a truly inclusive and developed India.' It's a fine sentiment and a laudable aspiration. It's just that at one time, censorship was about what one could or could not say. The new twist is that the censor board can now also tell one what one must say. Roy is a novelist and the author of Don't Let Him Know
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Donald Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday (June 26, 2025) as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday (June 24, 2025) and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Mr. Trump decides to strike Iran again. Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorised the attacks. Iran-Israel conflict LIVE updates 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said on Tuesday (June 24, 2025) that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday (June 27, 2025). CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday (June 26, 2025). Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Mr. Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorised to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday (June 25, 2025), Ms. Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Ms. Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Mr. Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. Most Republicans have staunchly defended Mr. Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Mr. Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for US involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Mr. Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Mr. Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear programme'.
The Print
26 minutes ago
- The Print
Amid thaw in ties, Indian envoy to Spain likely to be appointed next High Commissioner to Canada
Patnaik has over three decades of experience as a diplomat, serving at India's missions in Beijing, Dhaka, Vienna and Geneva. He was formerly India's ambassador to Morocco and Cambodia, as well as deputy high commissioner at its mission in London. He was also a director-general of the Indian Council for Cultural Relations. A person familiar with the matter said that the process for Patnaik's 'likely' appointment has begun following the bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi with his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney last week on the margins of the G7 summit in Alberta. New Delhi: Dinesh K. Patnaik, India's Ambassador to Spain is set to become New Delhi's next high commissioner to Canada, ThePrint has learnt. The process to appoint high commissioners between New Delhi and Ottawa has begun and is likely to be completed 'soon'. Modi and Carney during their meeting on 18 June called for the 'early return of high commissioners to each other's capitals,' as part of 'calibrated' and 'constructive steps' to 'restore stability' to the relationship. The first meeting between the two leaders has led to a thaw in ties, following Ottawa's allegations of Indian government officials being linked to the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Nijjar, an Indian designated terrorist, was killed outside a gurdwara in Surrey, British Columbia on 18 June, 2023. The allegations, raised personally by former Canadian Prime Justin Trudeau in September 2023 on the floor of the House of Commons, torpedoed ties. Within a month, India had called for the removal of 41 Canadian diplomats from Ottawa's missions in the South Asian nation to restore 'parity', while both countries expelled a diplomat each, citing their role as 'spies'. In October 2024, ties deteriorated further, with India withdrawing its high commissioner from Ottawa, Sanjay Kumar Verma, along with five other diplomats, following a request from the Canadian government to waive their immunity. New Delhi further expelled six Canadian diplomats including Acting High Commissioner Stewart Wheeler and Deputy High Commissioner Patrick Hébert. This diplomatic downgrading of ties with a G7 member indicated the chill between New Delhi and Ottawa. Carney's assumption of leadership of the Liberal Party from Trudeau earlier this year led to a hope that ties could be reset. The former Governor of the Bank of England led the Liberal Party to victory in Canadian federal elections in April 2025. With Carney in power, India had been mulling the restoration of ties, with the appointment of a high commissioner to Ottawa, as reported by ThePrint earlier. However, at the time Carney was appointing his cabinet, which was finally unveiled in May 2025. For India, a number of challenges in its relationship with Canada remains, including what it believes is the space given to Sikh separatists in the North American country as well as the transnational organised crime gangs, which operate within its borders. Carney carved out the irritants in ties—the Nijjar killing and transnational crime—from the political level through an agreement with Modi to resume cooperation between law enforcement agencies of both countries. The positive meeting between Modi and Carney set the stage for the step-by-step restoration of ties, starting with the appointment of high commissioners. The two leaders also discussed the resumption of negotiations for an Early Progress Trade Agreement (EPTA), which was called off by Ottawa in September 2023. For Carney, India has emerged as an important partner country, particularly with the return of President Donald J. Trump to the White House. The American President has taken aim at Canada, famously urging the country to become the '51st state' of the US. Ottawa relies heavily on its trade with the US, which accounts for over 70 percent of its total trade. While in recent years it has signed a trade deal with the European Union (EU), there is a push to further diversify its economic engagement. On the security front, Carney is also seeking to diversify its reliance on the US, with a promised $2 billion investment in new defence procurement within the next year. A few days earlier, Canada and the EU signed a new defence and security partnership. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Carney is repairing what Trudeau left damaged. India and Canada are now on a path to reset ties
