Opinion - Why Trump's unpredictable tariffs are so devastating for small businesses
Small U.S. businesses that trade with China have over the years been largely overlooked, including by Presidents Biden and Trump, Congress and the media. Additional tariffs up to 135 percent on goods imported from China pose an existential threat to these businesses, which sustain jobs and pay taxes in every state in the country.
It's time to recognize these businesses' contributions and take steps to save them and others engaged in this trade.
Most disheartening for these folks is that when they attempt to educate their congressional representatives they are lectured about how bad China is, about how most of the tariffs have been reduced to 30 percent for 90 days, and about how they will be made whole when President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is passed with tax relief for all.
In fact, none of these things will help these businesses avoid disaster. However, they did receive a temporary reprieve this week when a specialized court in New York ruled that many of the tariffs are illegal, suspending their imposition. And even then, hours later, an appeals court overruled the lower court, allowing the tariffs to continue — for now.
Some of the plaintiffs in the cases are small, owner-operated businesses that claim the president lacks authority to impose such sweeping, draconian policies without the consent of Congress. The administration will appeal any ruling that suspends tariffs, creating yet more uncertainty for companies engaged in international trade.
The effect of U.S. trade policy on small businesses is often illogical. Two examples are illustrative.
The first: A family business in Minnesota makes loudspeakers, employing older workers who are probably not employable elsewhere in the local economy. The owner imports parts from China, but most of the product's value is local. The tariffs he pays substantially increase his customers' prices. Meanwhile, loudspeakers from a competitor in Asia can be imported at a much lower tariff rate, effectively making his product uncompetitive. He has applied for an exemption from the tariffs based on unfair and illogical treatment, but the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency has not budged.
A second example: A small business makes leather furniture in North Carolina. The leather is sourced from a supplier in China that is willing to do the dirty work of dealing with animal hides and has the skill to cut the material to exacting specifications. None of this work is done in the U.S., nor is it likely to be done here in the future. There is no one to protect in the U.S., no jobs to be lost to cheaper foreign workers. The blunt instrument tariffs are increased by a ridiculous amount one day, only to be slashed the next. Sure, lower is better, but even at 30 percentm prices will increase, and business will suffer and may disappear. The business owner has been to Capitol Hill for a hearing but never got to read his statement. He is his own lobbyist because he can't afford to pay for one. He feels powerless and angry — at Trump and Biden, at Democrats and Republicans.
Americans who import goods from China are damaged by such one-size-fits-all tariffs. Many of the imports are consumer products with Made in China labels, but there are other small companies that import intermediate goods and combine them with U.S intellectual property, and items manufactured here that form final goods sold in the U.S., other international markets and sometimes back to China. These U.S. micro multinationals are important innovators and local job creators. But mindless, excessive tariffs put them at grave risk.
Then there are small businesses that sell American food and other products to Chinese buyers. They sell pig sperm, fresh fruit, candy, ice cream, hydraulic fluid for wind turbines, high-end cuts of beef, used commercial aircraft parts, wine, seatbelts and many other things. Their existence is threatened by high retaliatory tariffs on the Chinese side, cutting them off from a market of over a billion consumers, negating what in many cases has been years of developing relationships and creating supply chains even while other Americans gave up on China as too complicated or politically toxic. The people-to-people diplomacy through business can often be more meaningful than the rare phone calls between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping.
What to do? Start by acknowledging the economic contributions made by small businesses. Of the estimated 2.6 million jobs dependent on China trade, many are generated by entrepreneurial small firms. For every direct job created, others are generated to support the imports and exports. Elected officials need to listen and thoughtfully respond to their small-business constituents. They must recognize the contradiction of praising the importance of the almost mythical small businessperson while ignoring their pleas for tariff exemptions and other assistance.
Then tell Trump's Department of Government Efficiency to leave alone any government programs that help small businesses engage in international trade, such as the Small Business Administration, the Export-Import Bank and the International Trade Administration of the Commerce Department. Businesses involved in trade tend to be more profitable, grow faster and fail less frequently — that is, unless their government pulls the rug out from under them.
Douglas Barry teaches at The George Washington University and is the author of 'Smart Rabbits: Small American Businesspeople, Trade Wars and the Future of the U.S.-China Relationship.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
22 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Closing Bell Movers: Credo Technology jumps 11% on earnings
In the opening hour of the evening session, U.S. equity futures are down a margins 0.1% across the major indices – S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Dow Industrials. In commodities, WTI Crude Oil futures ticked up about 20c above $63 per barrel following comments from President Trump that Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium. In precious metals, Gold and Silver are both breaking out higher above $3,410 and $34.00 per ounce respectively after two weeks of more contained rangebound action. Confident Investing Starts Here: Stocks had opened the week on the back foot amid concerns of escalation in U.S.-China trade negotiations but reversed to the upside mid-day and finished the session strong near the highs on solid volume in the final hour. Energy and Tech led the S&P 500 sector, while Industrials lagged – even though steelmakers Nucor (NUE) and Steel Dynamics (STLD) were the best performing stocks in the index on the announcement that U.S. will increase steel tariffs to 50% from 25%. Macro focus for investors this week falls on the jobs data, with JOLTS report from U.S. Labor Bureau on deck for tomorrow, followed by ADP employment on Wednesday, weekly claims on Thursday, and non-farm payrolls for May on Friday. Check out this evening's top movers from around Wall Street, compiled by The Fly. HIGHER AFTER EARNINGS – Credo Technology (CRDO) up 10.8% ALSO HIGHER – ALSO LOWER –


New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Poland Just Sent an Ominous Signal to the World
It wasn't a particularly memorable photograph. The image, which briefly circulated around the internet a few weeks ago, showed President Trump in the Oval Office beside Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist candidate in Poland's presidential election. Mr. Nawrocki looked, frankly, a little star-struck — like a tourist who had managed to snap a picture with a celebrity. We could find no footage of a conversation, no record of an exchange. Just a photo of two men awkwardly giving thumbs-ups. In hindsight, it was more important than it looked. On Sunday MAGA won in Poland. After voters rejected Trumpist candidates in recent elections in Canada, Australia and Romania — enough to suggest an international anti-Trump bump — Polish voters went the other way. Mr. Nawrocki, a conservative historian and a former boxer, narrowly defeated Rafal Trzaskowski, the liberal mayor of Warsaw, who was backed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk in a runoff election. Just two short years after electing Mr. Tusk, Poland has once again swung right. Like the U.S. election in 2024, it was a bruising reminder that populism is resilient and sticky, and that liberal democracy has yet to find a reliable formula to defeat it. For Poland's liberals, everything was on the line. In 2023 Mr. Tusk's centrist party, Civic Platform, managed to unseat the far-right Law and Justice Party in parliamentary elections — but only just, in a coalition. Mr. Tusk promised to 'chase away the darkness,' and Poland was cited as an example of a democratic comeback. The reality was more ambivalent: Law and Justice had won the most votes for any single party, and still had its ally Andrzej Duda as president. A party that had openly violated the constitution, subordinated the supreme court and turned the media into a tool of propaganda remained deeply embedded in Poland's political architecture, a permanent challenge to liberal rule. The Tusk government had to govern under the looming threat of Mr. Duda's presidential vetoes as it attempted to reverse the effects of eight years of populist government. It had some successes: It started to restore the independence of the judiciary, which unlocked billions in postpandemic E.U. funds. But many promises went unfulfilled, including liberalizing an abortion law, a key pillar of voter support. Even sympathetic voters grew frustrated. In foreign policy, the stakes were existential. Poland, which shares a long land border with Ukraine, is on NATO's frontier with Russia. The Tusk government increased domestic military spending to almost 5 percent of G.D.P. — the largest proportion of any NATO member, and over and above what Mr. Trump has insisted allies should be spending. It secured nuclear power technology from the United States and realigned its diplomacy toward Brussels. After almost a decade of acrimonious relations with the European Union, Mr. Tusk sought to cast Poland as a reliable European partner once more, summed up in another photo that made the rounds in May, in which Mr. Tusk was in Kyiv with Volodymyr Zelensky, the President of Ukraine, and the leaders of Britain, France and Germany. Poland looked like part of the spine of a new Europe. Now the last two years in Poland, like Joe Biden's four years as president after Mr. Trump's first term in the United States, seem like little more than a liberal intermezzo in which some institutions were restored and some democratic norms reasserted. But voters' deep dissatisfaction and polarization had not simply disappeared; what looked like a restoration was just a narrow opening — and one that may be closing now. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Salary Needed To Take Home $100K in the Midwest
Those who reside in the Midwest need to earn a substantial amount of money if they want to take home $100,000. Discover More: See Next: A recent GOBankingRates study examined the income necessary to bring home a $100,000 salary in every state. When we isolate the Midwestern states, the necessary salary is at least $130,000 and as much as $144,000. Take a look at the salary you'd need to make to take home $100,000 in the Midwest. Salary needed for $100K: $141,010 Tax burden: 29.1% Learn More: For You: Salary needed for $100K: $137,071 Tax burden: 27.1% Be Aware: Salary needed for $100K: $138,009 Tax burden: 27.6% Salary needed for $100K: $141,777 Tax burden: 29.5% Salary needed for $100K: $139,313 Tax burden: 28.2% Explore Next: Salary needed for $100K: $143,539 Tax burden: 30.3% Salary needed for $100K: $139,130 Tax burden: 28.1% Salary needed for $100K: $141,359 Tax burden: 29.3% Trending Now: Salary needed for $100K: $133,033 Tax burden: 24.8% Salary needed for $100K: $136,911 Tax burden: 27.0% Salary needed for $100K: $130,999 Tax burden: 23.7% Learn More: Salary needed for $100K: $141,338 Tax burden: 29.3% Methodology: To generate the income for what it takes to bring home a $100,000 salary by state, GOBankingRates surveyed income taxes at both the federal and state level (including FICA). Income tax estimates were created by using an in-house calculator for a person who was filing their taxes as a single person and using the standard deduction (with 2024 tax brackets). Once the three income taxes were calculated as an annual amount, GOBankingRates found each state's (4) total annual income taxes paid and (5) total income tax burden. All data was collected on and is up to date as of March 12, 2025. More From GOBankingRates Surprising Items People Are Stocking Up On Before Tariff Pains Hit: Is It Smart? Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on Here's the Salary Needed To Take Home $100K in the Midwest Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data