
Your Mind Can Create Using The Same Process As AI
Woman sketching a business plan on a placard at a creative office
Four short months ago, when China launched DeepSeek, its new AI chatbot, the effect on the U.S. stock market was profound. Hardest hit was NVIDIA Corporation, the leading supplier of hardware and software for DeepSeek's entrenched American competitors— OpenAI's ChatGPT, Meta's Llama, and Anthropic's Claude. NVIDIA lost almost $600 billion in market capitalization and its share price plummeted 17%. As this Forbes article reports, DeepSeek also started a price war among its Chinese AI competitors: ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu and Alibaba.
What shook up all these constituencies was DeepSeek's revolutionary AI architecture with a secret sauce called Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) a vast simplification from the single giant neural network called Large Language Model (LLM) used by ChatGPT, Llama, and Claude.
Both MoE and LLM provide users with the ability to manage access to a huge corpus of digital information. But your mind is capable of doing the same with a huge corpus of human information. With or without AI, whenever you set about to generate, organize, and create information—whether as text or spoken—you must access a huge corpus of information in your brain. So in the spirt of National Creativity Day, this blog will provide you with a very simple four-step process to do that—and to become more effective when you create.
Fundamental to all the steps is an understanding of the basic concepts in Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman's bestselling book Thinking, Fast and Slow in which he explains that the human mind functions in two distinct phases.
If you start to develop your presentation, report, or email with Slow Thinking factors such as logic, sequence, and word choice (or, for that matter, the color, style, font, and design of your slides) while your Fast Thinking is bubbling up all those random ideas, the whole process descends into disarray.
The key then is to allow the Fast Thinking to run its course before attempting to impose a sequence with Slow Thinking. So, control your Fast Thinking with these four steps:
Now and only now are you ready to organize and sequence your content.
Who needs DeepSeek?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' Sign in to access your portfolio


TechCrunch
2 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
In Brief An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an 'instant decision' with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.'