
Satellite Image Shows Tsunami Triggered by Massive Russian Earthquake
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The 8.8 Kamchatka earthquake in Russia has prompted a collaborative scientific effort to improve tsunami warning systems.
The massive earthquake off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula on July 30 triggered a tsunami that was successfully measured by a joint U.S.–French satellite, a technological first that is already being used to improve early warning systems
The event, which occurred amidst a series of powerful aftershocks, is helping scientists at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to validate and enhance their tsunami forecast models.
The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite, a collaborative effort between NASA and the French space agency CNES, captured the leading edge of the tsunami approximately 70 minutes after the initial 8.8 magnitude earthquake struck.
According to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the satellite recorded a wave height exceeding 1.5 feet in the open Pacific Ocean, east of Japan.
While a wave of that size might seem small, oceanographer Ben Hamlington of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory emphasized the potential danger: "What might only be a foot or two in the open ocean can become a 30-foot wave in shallower water at the coast."
Satellite map of the tsunami's leading edge (red), with the epicenter depicted by a red star.
Satellite map of the tsunami's leading edge (red), with the epicenter depicted by a red star.
NASA/JPL-Caltech
NASA's visualization showed the wave's height, shape and direction of travel—offering a multidimensional look at the tsunami.
The data captured by the satellite is a crucial breakthrough for disaster prediction.
"The power of SWOT's broad, paintbrush-like strokes over the ocean is in providing crucial real-world validation, unlocking new physics and marking a leap towards more accurate early warnings and safer futures," said Nadya Vinogradova Shiffer, NASA Earth lead and SWOT program scientist.
Aftershocks in the Region
The 8.8 magnitude quake, which struck at a depth of about 12 miles, has been followed by a series of powerful aftershocks. As Newsweek previously reported, dozens of aftershocks were recorded in the days following the initial event.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) warned that the likelihood of additional magnitude seven or larger earthquakes remains high.
A magnitude seven earthquake on Sunday near the peninsula triggered short-lived tsunami warnings for three Russian coastal areas. Newsweek's report on Wednesday noted that a recent 5.8 magnitude tremor had also struck the region.
A visualization of the tsunami's leading edge.
A visualization of the tsunami's leading edge.
NASA/JPL-Caltech
Improving Tsunami Forecasts
The primary purpose of the SWOT data is to help improve the accuracy of forecast models, a long-sought-after ambition. The NOAA Center for Tsunami Research, which sends out alerts to coastal communities, tested its model with SWOT's tsunami data.
The results were exciting, according to Vasily Titov, the center's chief scientist. He said that the results suggest that "SWOT data could significantly enhance operational tsunami forecasts—a capability sought since the 2004 Sumatra event."
The devastating 2004 Sumatra quake killed thousands, highlighting the critical need for more advanced and accurate early warning systems.
The ability of the SWOT satellite to capture and measure resulting tsunamis is a leap forward in protecting coastal communities around the world from future seismic events.
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about tsunamis? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Did you miss August's Sturgeon Moon peak? Here's what to expect tonight
August's full moon has peaked, but there is still time to see the full moon this month before it starts to wane. There are only four full moons left in 2025, so some people may want to try to catch every moon while they have the chance. But can you still see August's full moon? Luckily, the answer is yes. Although August's full moon, known as the Sturgeon Moon, has peaked, it will still appear full to people who missed it over the weekend. Here's everything you need to know about the Sturgeon Moon and the rest of the full moons in 2025. When was August's full moon? August's Sturgeon full moon peaked early Saturday morning, Aug. 9, at 3:54 a.m. ET. Can you still see July's full moon after its peak? Yes! The moon will look full to the naked eye for a couple of days before it starts the next phase and becomes a waning gibbous, according to NASA. Why is it called the Sturgeon Moon? The Sturgeon Moon's name comes from the sturgeon, a freshwater fish that was once abundant in the Great Lakes in North America around this time of year, according to Time and Date. Sturgeon can measure over 6 feet long and weigh around 200 pounds. The fish dates back 136 million years, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Native Americans living near the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain once caught the fish during late summer and it became a regular part of their diets. Today, there are about 29 species of sturgeon. What are some other names for the Sturgeon Moon? Other names for the Sturgeon Moon include the following, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac: Tips for seeing the moon this weekend The moon will be visible without any special tools, but those wanting to see more details on the surface of the moon can invest in stargazing binoculars and backyard telescopes. According to Time and Date, those wanting to see the moon and stars that night can try the following: When is the next full moon? The next full moon, known as the Harvest Moon, will occur on Sunday, Sept. 7. Here's when the other full moons in 2025 are expected: Contributing: Greta Cross and Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Interstellar Comet Breaks Speed Record
Researchers were staggered this week when the Hubble Space Telescope captured the image of an unexpected comet traveling at 130,000 miles per hour. The interstellar visitor may have been traveling through the Milky Way for billions of years. Solve the daily Crossword


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough
The naming of Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy as interim NASA administrator was as much of a surprise as was President Trump's withdrawal of his nomination of Jared Isaacman to the same post. So, how is Duffy doing, trying to bring the space agency out from its summer of discontent? Duffy has been spending a lot of his time boosting the Artemis program, designed to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send them to Mars. On the social media platform X, he posted that he 'spoke with the smart leaders of our mission directorates' and the consensus was 'America MUST dominate space and our critical moon mission, #ARTEMIS, must be as known & supported by America just as Apollo was!' He finished saying he was 'fired up and ready to launch.' Duffy repeated his advocacy of the Artemis program on the Fox News show Hannity. He noted that Artemis would proceed in three phases: a return to the moon, establishing a lunar base or outpost and crewed expeditions to Mars. Considering how well the Artemis program polls, Duffy is pursuing a sound political strategy. The trick is that the steps he laid out have to happen on a sensible schedule. Fortunately, Artemis II, the crewed trip around the moon, is slated to occur early in 2026. On the other hand, science journalist Robert Zimmerman gave Duffy the back of his hand for stating on Hannity that Artemis III, the next moon landing, is still a go for 2027. Considering the problems the SpaceX Starship has been having, few people believe that date is valid. However, SpaceX's Gwynne Shotwell has assured Duffy that it is. We'll see. According to Politico, Duffy has called for a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor to be deployed on the moon by 2030, to provide power for a lunar base. He has also called for the acceleration of commercial space stations that would replace the International Space Station when it ends its operational life. The new plan promises to be very disruptive. Duffy also had a meeting at the Kennedy Space Center with his Russian counterpart. Reuter's Joey Roulette said the meeting discussed ''cooperation on lunar programs' and 'joint exploration of deep space' as well as ISS cooperation,' according to Roscosmos. International Space Station cooperation is a natural topic of conversation between the head of NASA and the head of Roscosmos. The United States and Russia have been partners on the space station since early in the Clinton administration. The partnership exists in its own little universe, separate from the tensions between the two countries brought about by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Ars Technica reports that Bakanov brought up the possibility of using Russian hardware to deorbit the ISS in 2030. Clearly, he was attempting to take advantage of the feud between Trump and Elon Musk, whose SpaceX currently has the contract. Roscosmos would get a much-needed infusion of cash if it replaced SpaceX. However, the mention of cooperation on lunar programs and the joint exploration of deep space catches the eye. Russia has turned down participation in the Artemis program, preferring to be a partner on China's planned International Lunar Research Station. Russian participation in Artemis was likely dangled as an enticement for Putin to make peace in Ukraine on terms short of conquering the entire country. It would also serve as a way to separate Russia from China, something that has been a center of American foreign policy since the Nixon administration. Finally, Duffy has to deal with the NASA spending war that has developed between the Congress and the White House. A group of Democratic senators sent him a letter expressing their concerns not only about the planned cuts for the next fiscal year but plans to rescind some allocated money for the current fiscal year. They are also concerned about a planned buyout program that would cut 4,000 NASA civil servants. The Senate and House are concerned about NASA's plans to implement the spending plans in the 'big, beautiful bill.' They are demanding answers by Sept. 1. Duffy will need the diplomatic skills of a Henry Kissinger to reconcile the positions of the two branches over NASA funding. As able as he is, the situation cries out for a permanent NASA administrator, someone with the respect of both President Trump and the Congress. Otherwise, the chaos will just continue, hampering the space agency's ability to fulfill its mandate to explore space, for the betterment of the United States and all humankind. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' is America Going Back to the Moon ' He blogs at