Experts warn US action against Chinese students could undermine science and innovation
US policy targeting Chinese students raises concerns over impact on research and technology. (AI Image)
The US government recently announced plans to revoke visas for certain Chinese college students, citing national security concerns tied to affiliations with the Chinese Communist Party or studies in sensitive fields.
The announcement, made by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, is part of a broader Trump administration effort to address what officials describe as risks posed by some foreign students to US research and industry.
Currently, around 277,000 students from China attend US colleges, second only to India in international enrollment figures. These students play a critical role in the US scientific community, contributing to cutting-edge research in laboratories and universities across the country.
Concerns about national security and scientific progress
While the FBI and other federal authorities have long investigated cases involving professors and students suspected of espionage or technology theft, experts caution that the recent visa revocation plan may be overly broad and counterproductive. Greg Milonovich, a former FBI agent who managed counterintelligence programs related to higher education, told The New York Times that 'the overall number of People's Republic of China students that actually pose some type of national security risk is relatively low compared to the number of students that will continue to support and further US research.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Start Here - 2025 Top Trend Local network access control
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
'
Milonovich noted that some students arrive with existing ties to Chinese intelligence or government agencies, while others may be recruited during their studies. He emphasized, however, that 'we need this continued pipeline of intellect and skill' to maintain US leadership in science and technology.
Legal experts warn of damaging effects
Peter Zeidenberg, a lawyer who has defended professors accused of economic espionage, described the administration's approach as 'self-defeating and self-destructive,' according to The New York Times.
Zeidenberg pointed out that Chinese students are 'some of the smartest, most talented scientists in America' and fill vital roles in research labs. He questioned how many US labs would operate effectively without their contributions.
A complex history of espionage concerns
Concerns over espionage and theft of trade secrets by individuals linked to China date back decades. A 1998 congressional report warned that the FBI had insufficient resources to monitor the growing number of Chinese visitors—including students, diplomats, and business representatives—potentially involved in intelligence operations.
In 2018, the Justice Department launched the China Initiative to target trade secret theft and espionage, focusing largely on university professors. However, some cases failed to secure convictions, and critics accused the government of racial profiling. The Biden administration ended the initiative in 2022 but continues to investigate potential crimes.
Striking a balance for US research
With the Trump administration's increased immigration enforcement demands pulling FBI resources away from counterintelligence, officials worry about the ability to effectively distinguish genuine security threats from legitimate students and researchers.
Experts quoted by The New York Times warn that while national security is paramount, harsh visa policies risk driving away talent vital to America's scientific innovation and global leadership.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Targeted terror attack': FBI Director after many feared injured in Boulder, Colorado; suspect held
Acting swiftly on plaint calls about someone with a weapon who was 'setting people on fire' in Boulder, Colorado— police here have apprehended a male suspect after the attack is said to have left many people injured. The attack took place in the vicinity of a walk to remember the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza. Boulder Police Chief Stephen Redfearn was quoted by Reuters as stating that the initial information was 'very prelimnary'. The police chief said that multiple injuries were reported from the spot 'ranging from very serious to more minor'. Redfearn further said that he is yet to identify the alleged attacker as the latter has been taken to the hospital. We are aware of and fully investigating a targeted terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. Our agents and local law enforcement are on the scene already, and we will share updates as more information becomes available. @FBI — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) June 1, 2025 FBI Director Kash Patel reacting to the incident stated it to be a 'targeted terror attack' while stating that agents were at the scene. The incident comes amid heightened tensions in the United States over Israel's war in Gaza, which has spurred both a an increase in antisemitic hate crime as well as moves by conservative supporters of Israel led by President Donald Trump to branded pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India eyes retaliation as US rejects WTO notice
The US has rejected India's May 9 notice at the World Trade Organization that proposed retaliatory action against Washington imposing steep import tariffs on steel and aluminium and said its actions were not safeguard measures, which is why it would not hold any discussion with New Delhi on the matter, people in the know said on Sunday. Under the current circumstances, India may retaliate by proportionately suspending concessions given to American imports (for example almonds and walnuts) and levy higher customs duties on metals coming from the US, said the people cited above, requesting anonymity. The Indian notice was against the US's February 10 decision to impose 25% levies on all imports of steel and aluminium effective from March 12. Now, the matter has been aggravated further as the Trump administration on May 30 doubled tariffs on the metals to 50% effective from June 4, citing national security. Against the US measure to hike import duties on steel and aluminium to safeguard American metal industries, India on May 9 formally notified WTO that it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' granted to the US 'after the expiration of 30 days from the date of this notification', which would be June 8. Reacting to India's notice, the United States on May 22 informed WTO that India's proposed retaliation was not consistent with the multilateral trade rules. Washington said the US tariffs on metals were 'not safeguard' measures. 'Accordingly, there is no basis for India's proposal to suspend concessions or other obligations under Article 8.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards with respect to these measures,' it said in its latest communication to WTO. On grounds that the tariffs are not safeguard measures, the US also declined to discuss and resolve the dispute with India, leaving the ball in New Delhi's court. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the American communication to the multilateral body added. While India's commerce ministry did not respond to a query on this matter, people in the know said India may retaliate unless the US agrees to a preferential treatment for India on these metals under the ongoing talks for an early deal (first tranche) within the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both countries are making efforts to conclude an early harvest deal by this month and a negotiating team from the US is expected to visit India this week, they said. Experts said high tariffs on steel and aluminium by the US are of critical importance to India. 'For India, the consequences are direct. In FY25, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' said Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) founder and former Indian Trade Service officer Ajay Srivastava. 'India has already issued a formal notice at the WTO signalling its intention to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response to the earlier steel tariffs. With (President Donald) Trump now doubling the tariffs, it remains to be seen whether India will carry out the retaliation, by increasing tariffs on certain US exports within a month,' he added. Hindustan Times reported on May 14 about India proposing to levy retaliatory import duties on American goods proportionately in response to the United States' imposing safeguard tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium. 'The safeguard measures would affect US$ 7.6 billion imports into the United States of the relevant products originating in India, on which the duty collection would be US$ 1.91 billion. Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States,' India's May 9 notice to WTO said. The US, however, maintained at WTO that its tariffs on steel and aluminium are based on national security considerations and not 'safeguard measures' as claimed by India. 'Such disputes at WTO are common and routine. Without an effective appellate body at the multilateral forum, disputes have no real significance,' one of the persons mentioned above said. The second person said this is a vexed issue. The previous Joe Biden administration in 2018 had imposed a 25% tariff on certain steel and a 10% levy on aluminium items on grounds of national security. That was retaliated to by India in June 2019 when it imposed customs duties on 28 US products such as almonds and walnuts, besides filing a complaint at WTO. Later, the two sides, however, decided to resolve the dispute amicably through mutually agreed solutions (MAS). Under the agreement in June 2023, the US agreed to grant market access to steel and aluminium products under the exclusion process of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act 1962 and India agreed to remove the additional duty (retaliatory tariffs) on certain American products. MAS is a mechanism under WTO where its members can resolve disputes amicably without going through the formal process of a settlement mechanism.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Protecting Shivalik ecosystem: SC-constituted committee to probe forest law violations in Mohali
1 2 Mohali: The Central Empowered Committee (CEC), constituted by the Supreme Court , is set to investigate alleged violations of forest and wildlife laws that have recently come to light in the forest areas of Mohali, with a focus on protecting the fragile Shivalik ecosystem. Sources said the CEC will visit Karoran, Nada, Masol, and adjoining villages in Mohali district on Monday. The visit follows a formal complaint highlighting widespread irregularities in forest management and potential breaches of environmental regulations in the region. The sources said the committee will assess the extent of ecological damage, particularly to forest land and wildlife habitats, and evaluate the actions taken by government departments in response to the alleged violations. Based on its findings, the CEC is expected to recommend corrective measures to ensure enforcement of conservation laws. The villages under scrutiny fall within areas protected under the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900, and the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Despite restrictions, reports of illegal hill-cutting and encroachments have allegedly persisted for years, leading to the degradation of ecologically sensitive zones in the Shivalik hills. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Soluções de energia de confiança para Data Centers de IA Siemens Energy Learn More Undo Environmental activists and residents allege that the forest department, district administration, the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (Gmada), and panchayati raj institutions failed to curb these violations. Many have pointed to the alleged involvement of an influential land mafia operating with impunity in the region. The Shivalik forests, part of the outer Himalayas, are known for their rich biodiversity and are home to several endangered species listed in the IUCN Red List. The ecological value of this landscape has been extensively documented, including in the publication Biodiversity in Shivaliks by Neelima Jairath of the Punjab State Council for Science & Technology. Adding context to the gravity of the issue, sources recall that a few years ago, when government officials attempted to reclaim encroached land using state machinery, they reportedly became targets of vigilance inquiries, allegedly influenced by those with vested interests in the land deals. The CEC, originally formed in 2002 (and reconstituted in 2008), functions under the SC's directives to monitor violations of forest and wildlife laws and report to the ministry of environment, forest and climate change. The committee traces its origins to a landmark SC judgment delivered on Dec 12, 1996, which broadened the definition of 'forest' to include any land exhibiting forest-like characteristics, irrespective of ownership.
