Milton Keynes police officers get bravery awards over knife attack
Two police officers who tackled a knifeman who was attacking a family have been honoured with bravery awards.PC Sophie McDiarmid and Sgt Chris Smith responded to a call that said a man was threatening members of the public on Savoy Crescent in central Milton Keynes at about 21:30 GMT on 3 February 2024.As the pair were on their way, it was declared a firearms incident, but the two officers only carried a taser and it was ineffective, so they had to physically restrain him.The officers have been recognised with a Thames Valley Police Federation 2025 Bravery Award, which they will officially receive this Thursday.
When they got there, PC McDiarmid recalled: "We saw the man physically lunging at a group of people and with the knife, towards a young child."Chris said 'pull up short, I'm going to run at him'. Both of us jumped out of the car and heard a piercing scream from a woman."They ran towards the man and Sgt Smith used his taser twice, but it had limited effect.With the help of two members of the public, they then tackled the man physically.He was arrested and PC McDiarmid provided medical care to the knifeman.She said: "I was concerned he could have a stab wound as he was going in and out of consciousness and wasn't making any sense."The 19-year-old knifeman was jailed for 11 years.
'Well deserved'
PC McDiarmid said they had had to react quickly without thinking of the consequences, and she was "shocked" to receive the award."If you start thinking, you'll hesitate, which means you're not going to deal with what you need to deal with," she said."Initially I just thought we were in the right place at the right time and did what every other officer would have done."But when you start talking with people, especially non-police friends, they're like, 'Are you OK? You've just run at someone who'd got a knife'."Sgt Smith said that having "stopped a family of three, enjoying a night out, from being murdered was reward enough".Their local Police Federation chairwoman Aileen O'Connor added the pair were "incredibly brave" and "very deserving" of the awards.The Police Federation is a professional association that represents officers up to the rank of chief inspector.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
I would normally stand with our police, but they've made it almost impossible
Does your heart bleed for our poor put-upon police, as they warn that their service is in 'crisis'? Or hearing of their plight, do you feel like giving them a shake? In a slight variation on the annual moan-fest that is the Police Federation conference, senior representatives of the service have penned a joint article listing their many woes. With dismal absence of originality, they complain of 'crushed' morale and thinning blue lines, as underpaid, overworked officers jack it all for early retirement to the Costas. As the Spending Review looms, behold the usual desperate attempt to guilt trip ministers into ponying up more cash. Those of us who grew up with kindly constables coming to school to talk about 'stranger danger' and the Green Cross Code yearn for the heroes of our youth. They were the human barrier between good and evil, fighting the good fight against robbers and child snatchers. How we used to look up to them and take comfort from their solid, reassuring presence on our streets. Wouldn't it be nice to experience such pure, uncomplicated feelings of admiration about the police today? The trouble is they just keep letting us down, behaving in ways that are spineless and foolish, and going after all the wrong people in all wrong ways. Modern training appears to prohibit any exercise of discretion or common sense, in favour of moronic tick box responses and rainbow coloured cars. I am reminded of this every Friday morning, when swarms of officers descend on the Embankment in central London in search of the odd trucker who might not have the right paperwork. With the luxury of crime free streets and unlimited resources this dreary weekly exercise might be worthwhile, but as dope heads, muggers and petty thieves do their worst all around, it is a very curious priority. Of course there are still good guys who are horrified by the systematic misallocation of resources. They cringe at the pursuit of totally inconsequential 'hate crimes' and even more ridiculous 'non hate crime incidents'. Still valiantly trying to catch real criminals, they were appalled by the diminishment of their roles during the pandemic, when they were forced to police petty lockdown breaches. Old pros have no difficulty understanding that flimsy complaints about unpleasant Tweets rarely require a siren-wailing response, and that having black or brown skin should never provide an exemption from the law. Tragically, these stalwarts can no longer rely on either the support or sound judgement of their bosses, who have a nasty habit of punishing bravery and initiative. Just ask poor Stg Martyn Blake, who put his life on the line in pursuit of a man with previous convictions and gangland associations – and found himself charged with murder. Having been cleared by the courts, he now faces an investigation for 'gross misconduct.' Then there's PC Lorne Castle, sacked by Dorset Police for failing to treat a knife-wielding teenager with sufficient 'respect.' The way these decent officers and others are make split second decisions in life threatening situations are treated beggars belief. Then again, some plods deserve everything they get. Witness the grotesque cowardice of the officers who allegedly tasered a confused one-legged nonagenarian after he refused orders to put down a butter knife. In that single inexplicable act, these cruel clowns brought their entire profession into disrepute. Remember all this, as they beg the Government for bigger budgets. Sorry, but I'm struggling to find my violin.
NBC News
3 days ago
- NBC News
Former federal inmate pardoned by Trump tapped as Bureau of Prisons deputy director
A former federal inmate who was pardoned by President Donald Trump in his first term for drug trafficking crimes more than two decades ago has been tapped as deputy director of the federal Bureau of Prisons, according to bureau spokesperson Kristie Breshears. Joshua J. Smith, a Tennessee businessman who founded an inmate advocacy and rehabilitation nonprofit foundation, the Fourth Purpose, will be second in command in the bureau. The BOP has never had a formerly incarcerated inmate work as an employee at any level, according to a senior bureau official. 'Josh brings to this role something our agency has never had before at this level, a perspective shaped by lived experience, proven innovation and national impact,' Director William K. Marshall III said in a memo to staff Thursday. 'His firsthand understanding of our facilities — of the tension, the risk and the importance of trust — makes him uniquely positioned to advocate for the resources and reforms front-line staff need to do their jobs safely and effectively,' added Marshall, a former prison commissioner in West Virginia whom Trump selected as BOP director in April. Smith declined to comment when reached by phone Thursday. Trump granted a full pardon to Smith, who had been convicted of conspiracy to possess drugs with intent to distribute. Indictments were filed in 1997 for marijuana- and cocaine-related charges, and the court docket shows he pleaded guilty. The court recommended he go to the Federal Correctional Institution Manchester in Kentucky and boot camp for a 60-month sentence. He was also set to have five years supervised release, substance abuse treatment and a $12,500 fine. The bureau, in recent years, has been roiled by accusations of cronyism and corruption, widespread staffing shortages, and violence and misconduc t in prisons. Its leadership must manage a massive $8 billion-plus budget, more than 143,000 federal inmates across 122 prisons, and a workforce of more than 35,000 as the Justice Department's largest employer. In deciding to pardon Smith, the White House said in 2021 that, after his release from prison in 2003, he 'dedicated his life to his faith and to his community,' founded Fourth Purpose and 'mentored incarcerated individuals and taught business classes to those in prison — including at the prison where he was incarcerated.' Smith's pardon request was supported by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican. According to his online biography, Smith said he was raised by a single mother in government housing, was convicted of 10 felonies by the time he was 16 and entered prison at 21. While in prison, he said, he learned about Christianity and God and was mentored by white-collar criminals. He said he started a multimillion-dollar company that hired ex-offenders before becoming more active in prison reform. 'Today is a day of redemption that I attribute to God's grace,' Smith said after he was pardoned, adding that 'there are a lot of Josh Smiths in prisons across our country, and I am going to help as many as possible find a new purpose.' Smith's pardon was one of 74 that Trump granted on his last day in office during his first term, when he also pardoned former chief strategist and longtime ally Steve Bannon, who was indicted on wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges, and hip-hop star Lil Wayne, who pleaded guilty to weapons charges.
The Herald Scotland
4 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
