NZ Defence Force contingent headed for large joint military exercise with one drone
Photo:
RNZ/ Phil Pennington
The army is heading for an international exercise where drones will be tested, taking a single drone of its own.
Australia and the US
are expected to test autonomous weapons
as well as a vital new missile system - one that has already upset China - at the Talisman Sabre exercise, starting late next week.
As the first 150 out of 680 New Zealand Defence Force personnel going to the exercise got on the Navy ship
Canterbury
in Wellington, on Thursday, its commanders reiterated their goal to provide the government with a more lethal combat force.
"We are very mindful that the role of the Defence Force right now is more critical than it has been for several decades," Brigadier Jason Dyhrberg told reporters.
"Therefore, it is important that we make sure we provide the government with a lethal, agile, effective combat force that can protect and preserve New Zealand interests, both domestically and abroad."
Yet constraints were still obvious, with the government's $12 billion
defence capability plan
arriving too late to make a difference.
"It's too early to put that into resource right now," Dyhrberg said.
"Those capabilities will be in the pipeline in the coming years."
That meant little on the drone front, with the motorised infantry combat team taking along just one drone.
"This will be employed in a surveillance and target acquisition role by the Joint Fires Team," the NZDF told RNZ.
Talisman was a proving ground for drones
in 2023
, which have been transforming warfare in Ukraine.
Lieutenant Colonel Caleb Berry said drones would be introduced at all levels of the NZDF, but it would take time.
"The Defence Force is on a capability journey with drones," Berry said.
"We identify that there is a need, but we're still going through that journey at the moment."
One of three NH90 helicopters Defence is taking to Talisman Sabre in Australia.
Photo:
RNZ/ Phil Pennington
Asked if the NZDF was taking anything more lethal now, compared to Talisman 2023, Dyhrberg said, "They're largely the same capabilities."
He added quickly: "But in the defence capability plan, the minister has made it quite clear about making the defence force more lethal.
"That will include more lethal fires as well. What there will be is still to be determined."
"Joint fires" refers to digital targeting for shooting at targets synchronised at lightning speed across multiple forces and "domains" (land, sea, air, space).
The US and Australia have made strides towards this since 2021,
when the Australian Defence Force said
it was "now plug and play" and "fully integrated".
It not only coordinates the target, but recommends what weapon to shoot at it and how.
Australian Army gunner Akbar Joeharris monitors an Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System inside a command post Bushmaster vehicle during a previous Exercise Talisman Sabre.
Photo:
Supplied/ Australian Defence Force
Joint fire networks are a central part of the Pentagon's priority ongoing project to build a mega-network of sensors and shooters called CJADC2 (Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control).
Leading US contractor Lockheed Martin helped provide a joint fires network to exercises in Alaska and took part in Talisman Sabre in 2023.
For Talisman 2025, the NZDF is taking more than twice as many people as in 2023, at a time when it had
described itself as "hollowed out"
and suffering high turnover.
Also its stop-start Network Enabled Army project has so far put new digital communications systems into seven Bushmaster vehicles - out of 43 total - and those were driven on to the
HMNZS Canterbury
on Thursday.
NZ Army Bushmaster 5.5 armoured vehicles.
Photo:
Supplied/ NZ Defence Force
"We don't have drones as part of this combat team, but we do have the ability to communicate both digitally and via voice with the Australians at all levels," said Berry.
Talisman would also give them the chance to see the missile capability of their partners, he added.
Talisman and other major military exercises,
such as Rimpac
that the navy went to last year, align with the US's CJADC2 goals to build what the Pentagon calls "kill chains" that are ever faster. At a California exercise NZDF went to in March, the chain was down to just seconds over long distances, US media reports have said.
NZDF told RNZ a key goal over the three-week Talisman exercise was to integrate its capabilities with Australian and US "command relationships including command and control".
Dyhrberg added, "We always maintain sovereignty over our own forces in terms of doing command and control."
They had stepped up for 2025 by sending the motorised combat team of Light Armoured Vehicles (LAVs) and Bushmasters, and aimed to build up further to contributing a battalion-size group for Talisman 2027, he said.
Talisman, the largest bilateral Australia-US military exercise, comes at an interesting time for the allies' relationship.
At the weekend, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told Canberra it should lift its defence spending to 3.5 percent of GDP "as soon as possible", from 2 percent now.
This is about the same proportion as America spends on defence.
He conveyed this at the Shangri-La dialogue summit, where New Zealand Minister of Defence Judith Collins
had spoken in defence of
Donald Trump's proposed Golden Dome missile defence system.
Hegseth
and Australia's Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, Richard Marles, "discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific", the Pentagon said.
But Prime Minister Anthony Albanese later said
Australia would decide
what defence capability it needed, with spending to fit that.
The Australian
reported this
as Albanese having "brushed off the request".
"We'll determine our defence policy,"
Albanese
said.
His government's current goal is to hit 2.4 percent by 2033, which would take the total spend to over $100 billion a year.
New Zealand
in April announced
its goal of doubling its defence spending to 2 percent by 2032, or over $10b a year.
Japan's
is only about 1.8 percent.
However, some analysts predict US defence spending will actually go down in the coming decade, to under 3 percent, though Hegseth has made much about having the first US-trillion-dollar defence budget this year (which has not been agreed to yet).
The share of the
spend that US states
get varies wildly, with Texas getting the biggest share, next Virginia and third California. More money has recently been going into Silicon Valley as the Pentagon signs contracts with various tech companies branching out into defence.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should Māori born overseas automatically be NZ citizens? Father fights for children classed as illegal overstayers
John Bryers Ruddock pictured with his children, who are 8, 9 and 12. Photo: John Bryers Ruddock / Supplied The descendant of a Treaty signatory, All Black and " the voice of New Zealand" is fighting for Māori to have automatic New Zealand citizenship. John Bryers Ruddock (Ngāpuhi), recently returned to Aotearoa to live with his three children - ages 8, 9 and 10. But, he was born in Australia and all three of his children were born in Hawaii. As a result, he was now navigating an expensive process to get his tamariki recognised as New Zealand citizens. Despite their whakapapa including a number of famous New Zealanders - their great grandfather was All Black Ron Bryers, their grandmother was celebrated singer Rhonda Bryers, known as "the voice of New Zealand" and their great great grandfather was an original signatory to Te Tiriti, the children were technically overstayers and unable to attend school. Bryers Ruddock told Checkpoint , he had asked for a Waitangi Tribunal hearing to discuss the issue and wanted to see some kind of intervention. He said having his children being labelled as overstayers was not something as a father he wanted to put them through. "It's red tape after red tape," he said. "It's been a costly process so far, I have to finalise the court orders, so still dealing with that, I've spent over $17,000 so far." Bryers Ruddock said he wanted the tribunal to look at his case and change the policy around citizenship for people of Māori descent who were born overseas. "I just feel, you know, my mum was an ambassador for this country and culture... it's something I want to do for our people." Bryers Ruddock said he had sent in an application for the children to get citizenship under Section 61 of the Immigration Act, which allowed Immigration NZ to issue visas in special circumstances, and was waiting for a sponsor to help him get either a student visa or residency. The treaty claim had been lodged by Hastings law firm Manaia Legal, he said. John Bryers Raddock and his three children recently moved to Wellington. Photo: John Bryers Ruddock / Supplied Minister of Internal Affairs, Brooke van Velden, said in a statement provided to Checkpoint, she was not looking to change the citizen act and said the requirements of citizenship applied to all applicants equally. "The outcomes depend on the information provided for each case not the ethnicity of the applicant." The minister had the discretion to grant citizenship to people who didn't meet requirements bur had exceptional circumstances. Van Velden's office said it had not yet received an application about Bryers Ruddock's children and they needed to go through the application process with internal affairs first. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pay equity: Five unions to take government to court over law changes
Pay equity protesters voice their opinions outside Parliament in May. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Five unions are taking the government to the High Court over changes to pay equity laws. The sudden and controversial changes cancelled existing claims from mostly female-dominated jobs and made it harder for new claims to succeed . Workplace Minister Brooke van Veldengave a figure of 33 current claims that would be stopped, as the legislation was put through under urgency in May. The Nurses Organisation, Tertiary Education Union, Educational Institute, Post-Primary Teachers' Association, and Public Service Association argued the new rules breached the Bill of Rights Act. "The legal challenge argues the coalition government's legislation breaches three fundamental rights: freedom from gender-based pay discrimination, the right to natural justice, and the right to fair legal process," the unions said in a joint statement. "The case gives workers who have been denied their right to challenge gender-based pay discrimination a chance to challenge the government in court. If successful, a Parliamentary Select Committee must consider the declaration of inconsistency and a Parliamentary debate must occur. The government is then required to formally respond." The claim would be formally lodged on 29 August at the High Court in Wellington following a rally by women whose pay equity claims had been cancelled, the unions said. A spokesperson for the office of Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told RNZ: "The Bill was considered for consistency with the Bill of Rights Act before introduction, and the Acting Attorney-General concluded the Bill appeared to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act". Public Service Association national Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government avoided proper scrutiny, bypassing consultation. "We are asking the High Court to declare that the government's actions are inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 because of the discrimination New Zealand women will face as a result of the government's action," she said. "The government silenced women but we know the High Court will listen to our claims. This is just the start of our campaign for pay equity for New Zealand women and we will be leaving no stone unturned to achieve pay equity. "The decision to cancel claims that were about to be heard by the Employment Relations Authority is inconsistent with the constitutional foundations of New Zealand which do not provide for the government to interfere with the judicial system in this way." Educational Institute national secretary Stephanie Mills said the government did not follow a democratic process. "The scrapping of the teachers claim without consultation and under urgency was a kick in the guts for our teacher members after years of blood, sweat and money getting the claim moving," she said. "We'd had five years of work on it with hundreds of interviews with members about their work, and it was a genuinely joint process with the Ministry of Education and their pay equity team." NZNO delegate and Plunket nurse Hannah Cook said nurses and care workers were devastated by the scrapping of their pay equity claims. "Plunket nurses were so close to finally having our hard work recognised. Nurses and care workers are the backbone of a caring society and the coalition government needs to value us. These changes don't just impact us. They impact our families, our livelihoods and our quality of life," she said. "The coalition government has shown it doesn't value us nurses and those of us in women dominated workforces. It is 2025 for goodness sake. We shouldn't still be paid less than those in male dominated occupations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pay equity: Five unions take government to court over law changes
Pay equity protesters voice their opinions outside Parliament in May. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Five unions are taking the government to the High Court over changes to pay equity laws. The sudden and controversial changes cancelled existing claims from mostly female-dominated jobs and made it harder for new claims to succeed . Workplace Minister Brooke van Veldengave a figure of 33 current claims that would be stopped, as the legislation was put through under urgency in May. The Nurses Organisation, Tertiary Education Union, Educational Institute, Post-Primary Teachers' Association, and Public Service Association argued the new rules breached the Bill of Rights Act. "The legal challenge argues the coalition government's legislation breaches three fundamental rights: freedom from gender-based pay discrimination, the right to natural justice, and the right to fair legal process," the unions said in a joint statement. "The case gives workers who have been denied their right to challenge gender-based pay discrimination a chance to challenge the government in court. If successful, a Parliamentary Select Committee must consider the declaration of inconsistency and a Parliamentary debate must occur. The government is then required to formally respond." The claim would be formally lodged on 29 August at the High Court in Wellington following a rally by women whose pay equity claims had been cancelled, the unions said. A spokesperson for the office of Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told RNZ: "The Bill was considered for consistency with the Bill of Rights Act before introduction, and the Acting Attorney-General concluded the Bill appeared to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act". Public Service Association national Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government avoided proper scrutiny, bypassing consultation. "We are asking the High Court to declare that the government's actions are inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 because of the discrimination New Zealand women will face as a result of the government's action," she said. "The government silenced women but we know the High Court will listen to our claims. This is just the start of our campaign for pay equity for New Zealand women and we will be leaving no stone unturned to achieve pay equity. "The decision to cancel claims that were about to be heard by the Employment Relations Authority is inconsistent with the constitutional foundations of New Zealand which do not provide for the government to interfere with the judicial system in this way." Educational Institute national secretary Stephanie Mills said the government did not follow a democratic process. "The scrapping of the teachers claim without consultation and under urgency was a kick in the guts for our teacher members after years of blood, sweat and money getting the claim moving," she said. "We'd had five years of work on it with hundreds of interviews with members about their work, and it was a genuinely joint process with the Ministry of Education and their pay equity team." NZNO delegate and Plunket nurse Hannah Cook said nurses and care workers were devastated by the scrapping of their pay equity claims. "Plunket nurses were so close to finally having our hard work recognised. Nurses and care workers are the backbone of a caring society and the coalition government needs to value us. These changes don't just impact us. They impact our families, our livelihoods and our quality of life," she said. "The coalition government has shown it doesn't value us nurses and those of us in women dominated workforces. It is 2025 for goodness sake. We shouldn't still be paid less than those in male dominated occupations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
