Conservation funding dries up, threatening Waikato bird-protection projects
Photo:
RNZ/Libby Kirkby-McLeod
Maryann Eason's Maungatautari farm homestead was on the edge of 'Bush to Burbs', a
project to protect bird spillover
from the Maungatautari Sanctuary Mountain.
"Hanging out in the magnolia tree was nine kaka and four bellbirds and two tuis, and there were fantails flying all around," she said of the birds she now saw on her property.
Eason had planted more than 800,000 trees on the farm and, with the neighbouring property-owner, worked on pest-trapping for the area to protect birds that leave the inland fenced sanctuary at Maungatautari.
'Bush to Burbs' was one of several projects between Pirongia and Maungatautari, which aimed to bring back endangered species and provide safe corridors for animals to travel the 45km between the two mountains.
Another project - Taiea te Taiao - also
helped private landowners
return a pest-free bird friendly habitat across the area.
Nardene Berry from Landcare Trust said some native birds wouldn't cross more than three kilometres of pastureland.
"What we are trying to do is create stepping stones for the birds to cross the landscape in a way that they can do so safely," she said.
The benefits weren't just for the birds.
"What people forget is that we are part of nature," Berry said. "Biodiversity is part of us and we are part of it, so having that in our backyards or close by on our farms is so vital for our wellbeing."
Tiaki Ormsby from Pirongia Te Aroaro o Kahu Restoration Society said the group's Matariki event was a good example of the benefits to people connecting with natural places. The group took whanau onto parts of Pironga to walk in the steps of their ancestors and find out about the ecology on the mountain.
"To be able to go back on our maunga in a safe way, it was quite magical," she said.
However, Berry said keeping these and other projects in Waikato would become harder.
Government funding had dried up and philanthropic investment in biodiversity had halved to only two percent over the last few years.
"Sometimes, projects can get started, and they get some funding to get going and there's stuff behind that, but to keep it going, that's the hard part," she said.
Go Eco was the environmental group behind the Bush to Burbs project and chief executive Jo Wrigley agreed funding was currently difficult.
She said there was a cycle of government funding that enabled projects, but didn't continue to help maintain them.
"Every government wants to see environmental projects scaled up, but the funding is not usually scaled up," she said.
An example was the billion-dollar 'Jobs For Nature' project, which the government stopped funding in June.
Jude Tisdall is a long-time volunteer for Waikato environmental groups in her area. She said some projects, like pest control in the Kaimai Range, occur on steep, dangerous country and really should be undertaken by professionals.
Jobs for Nature trained people to do that work, but she said many were young people who needed paid employment and,
when funding went, so did skilled workers
.
Pirongia Te Aroaro o Kahu Restoration Society helped with pest-trapping on Pirongia, where blue-wattled kōkako were returned in 2017.
Janet Leggett, who wrote many of the society's funding applications, said the group also had the vision to see kiwi back on the mountain, but finding funding had been become harder and harder.
"The pool is shrinking," she said. "Our major funding sources are the government-funding sources, but the Department of Conservation hasn't been able to fund us for the last two years."
The group received funding from Waikato Regional Council and other groups, such as Lotteries, but Leggett said they received less than half of what they applied for.
Not just new projects could be affected. Leggett feared the progress already been made to reduce pests could also be reversed.
"It's not going to take long for things to regress, and the possum and rat numbers to build up, and the birdlife to be affected," she said. "It's at a point now where it's really critical."
Wrigley said, as funding contracted, progress had to rely on other things.
"The work is ultimately kept going through relationships between whanau, hapu and communities," she said.
The vision for restoring nature in Waikato was big. These groups just hoped that austerity in the funding sector didn't set back the progress.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Tauranga returns 70 percent of impounded dogs to owners, 25 percent put down
Tauranga city was able to return 70 percent of impounded dogs to their owners. Photo: More than 15,000 labradors, spaniels, pugs and other dogs call Tauranga city home. And they are lucky to - the city's animal control statistics were a standout in the region. Figures provided to RNZ show over a five-month period, Tauranga city was able to return 70 percent of impounded dogs to their owners and euthanised only 25 percent. Every other area of Bay of Plenty had to put down around half of all impounded dogs - (50 percent in Rotorua, 42 percent in Western Bay, 52 percent in Kawerau and 74 percent in Ōpōtiki ). Brent Lincoln from Tauranga City Council was quick to acknowledge the types of dogs found in Tauranga compared to other areas made an impact on the figures, as did the amount of animal control staff the city could afford. "We have a dedicated animal services group within Tauranga, where some of the small councils their dog control might also be their parking wardens and their bylaws officers or something like that," he said. Kat Thompson, from local animal rescue group Vada's, praised Tauranga for having gone the extra mile in reuniting or rehoming the large majority of impounded dogs. "I feel like they have worked really, really hard to get where they have," she said. But she also said there were many factors affecting the figures and people should not draw unfair comparisons. "You've got to remember Ōpōtiki, and I work closely with Rotorua, they are very different types of dogs you are working with. You are working with a lot more gang dogs, you are working with a lot more aggressive dogs, that aren't up for rehoming," she said. Thompson said she felt every pound in the area was working really hard, but Tauranga had done more. Brent Lincoln said once a dog entered the Tauranga pound a combination of things had been put in place to get the best outcome for the animal. One of which was hand delivering a letter to owners. "We try and work with the owners quite closely once we have identified them, offering the options and giving them a bit of flexibility on how they can work together to get their dog out of the pound," he said. Lincoln said 90 percent of dogs entered the pound because they were found roaming the streets and that was when microchipping and registering a dog became vitally important. Companion Animals New Zealand's register manager Sarah Clement said people often misunderstood what a microchip was. The only information on the microchip was the microchip number. "A lot of people think that once their animal has a microchip the microchip holds all of their information, but registration is really key, [that microchip number] needs to be put on a database, so it can be linked with the guardian's details." There are two nationwide databases for pounds to search - Companion Animals and the councils'. Clement encouraged councils to access both and for pet guardians to keep their information up to date on both. "It's always a really heartbreaking thing when you find an animal, you scan it, yes it has a microchip, you try and call the owner, and their details aren't up to date." Lincoln said they recently discovered a dog in the Tauranga pound had actually been stolen months earlier from Auckland. The national registry was able to reunite the dog and owners - an outcome everyone wanted. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
What you might not know about insurance in a natural disaster
An old abandoned building on Fitzerald Avenue on the edge of Christchurch, on February 17, 2021, nearly 10 years after it was damaged in a 6.3 magnitude earthquake. Photo: AFP / Marty Melville id="4LW03NN_image_crop_138657" crop="16x10" layout="thumbnail"] The Natural Hazards Commission is warning homeowners they're only covered for partial land damage under the Crown-owned insurer. A recent survey shows more than half (56 percent) of insured New Zealand homeowners expect full insurance compensation for natural hazard land damage. The Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) - which used to be called the EQC - said the national scheme provided up to $300,000 for house damage and some limited cover for damage to land. NHC chief executive Tina Mitchell said the land cover was standalone and could not be topped up with private insurance. "Land cover is specifically designed as a contribution payment, not full cover. "The limits of cover available ensures every homeowner across the country gets access to some protection, and helps keep the scheme affordable as it is funded by homeowners," Mitchell said. She said people needed to understand there were limits to Crown-owned insurer scheme before a disaster occurred. "When you understand that your landcover is limited, you can take action. "We recommend learning about the risks to your property and seeking expert advice from builders or engineers about how to protect your land from damage. For example, strengthening retaining walls and considering how waterways might impact your property are good things to check regularly. "If you do think your house is in a risky zone, you may want to allow for possible recovery costs in your financial planning. The scheme is a good contribution, but it is not designed to cover all costs," Mitchell said. Aerial images showing the extent of flooding in Tasman 2025. Photo: Tim Cuff / POOL The commission's chief strategy officer Michala Beacham told Morning Report properties were only covered for land damage within eight metres of the home, or 60 metres of the land needed to access the home. "It is a horribly stressful time dealing with a natural hazard event, it effects people homes, families and livelihoods, and then having an unexpected cost on top of that is really, you know, not a good time for anyone. "So that's why we are just trying to help people understand beforehand." Beacham said settlements for land were based on the cost of repair - within eight metres of the home - or the value of the land damage, but said under legislation NHC paid whatever was less. "So if your cost of repair is greater than the value of the land then you are going to face a shortfall... A number of people do find themselves with less than they expected or less than they might otherwise need to make a repair," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 2
An image of Mr Ed from his younger days. Photo: supplied In part two, community sports organisations are crying out for more more volunteers after a 40% drop in people signing up since the pandemic. And finally, is this the longest standing classroom toy? Mr Ed of Piha Community Preschool has been taken around New Zealand and further afield for the last 15 years.