
Horrifying moment 'distracted' lorry ploughs into pedestrian after mounting pavement - as driver avoids a prison sentence
This is the terrifying moment a 'distracted' lorry driver ploughed into an innocent pedestrian after mounting the pavement.
The 67-year-old victim was sent flying after truck driver Glen Brady had become 'distracted by his sat nav'.
But, despite detectives believing that the incident on Biddulph Road, Congleton, could have killed her, Brady, 47, has avoided serving time in prison.
During a hearing at Crewe Magistrates' Court earlier this month, he pleaded guilty to dangerous driving and was handed a 24-week jail term, suspended for 12 months.
He also received an 18-month-long driving ban, and must complete an extended driving test.
PC James Shrimpton, of the force's roads and crime team, said that the innocent victim could have been killed by the horrifying collision.
Speaking after the sentence, PC Shrimpton said: 'I hope this case makes other motorists think very carefully about their actions behind the wheel and that they should be aware that when they get in a vehicle, they have the potential to cause real damage and even take a life.
'You have not only your life in your hands but other road users and this needs to be remembered every time you make that journey.'
Describing the victim as 'lucky' to have come away with such minor injuries, PC Shrimpton said that given 'the nature of Glen Brady's driving and the sheer size of the vehicle' there could have been 'much more serious, or even fatal injuries'.
PC Shrimpton also stressed the importance of drivers acting responsibly when using sat navs on the road, adding that while they are 'very helpful' for directions, they can also act as a great 'source of distraction', particularly in unfamiliar areas.
He added: 'If you find yourself lost or need to look over or reset your sat nav, it is always best to pull over in a safe location where you are not splitting your attention between the directions and the other road users and pedestrians around you.'
It comes as new RCA research released just last week showed that almost two-thirds of UK drivers surveyed said that they made mistakes on the road as a result of becoming distracted.
Meanwhile, the latest Government data shows that 940 people were killed or seriously injured in 2023 due to drivers being found to be distracted by something inside of their vehicle.
In contrast, up to 280 individuals were killed or seriously injured when a driver was distracted by something outside of the vehicle.
In September last year, two drivers were killed in a crash after a satnav audio directed one the wrong way down a slip road.
Tracey Haybittle, 58, died in hospital last year after her Volkswagen Tiguan was in a head-on crash with Amal Mohamed Ahmed's Peugeot 2008 in November.
The 38-year-old had 'mistakenly' driven the wrong way down the 'off' slip road of the A5 near the village of Little Brickhill, just south of Milton Keynes.
She died instantly at the scene. A female passenger who was critically injured survived the crash.
In a 'prevention of future deaths report' to TomTom, Apple, Google, and National Highways, assistant coroner for Milton Keynes, Sean Cummings, slammed satnavs for 'frequently' giving verbal commands that 'confuse' drivers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
The Documentary Podcast The tyre scandal
Every year the UK produces around 50 million tyres for disposal. They are supposed to be sent for recycling. Instead, big money is being made by diverting tyres to illegal and dangerous 'pyrolysis' plants where they are melted down to extract oil and steel. Together with a team of journalists from Source Material, a not-for-profit group specialising in climate and corruption, we follow the tyres from the UK to India using tracking devices. The team discovers just how large scale this largely illicit business has become. Earlier this year, a makeshift pyrolysis plant exploded near Mumbai, killing four people. It had been processing tyres from abroad. Reporter Paul Kenyon confronts a tyre trader in the north of England who admits to shipping his waste tyres to India for pyrolysis.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Diddy On Trial ‘Jane' questioned about sex drugs and underwear she ordered for ‘hotel nights'
Defence lawyer Teny Geragos continued her cross-examination of 'Jane' with more focus the messages between her and Sean 'Diddy' Combs. 'Jane' is the pseudonym being used to protect the identity of Diddy's ex-partner. She was asked about messages which suggest she was planning 'hotel nights' for her and Diddy, along with other men. Photos were also shown to the jury of 'Jane' and Diddy spending time together. Meanwhile the prosecution has asked for one of the jury members to be dismissed. Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty speaks to NPR music reporter Isabella Gomez-Sarmiento about the day in court. Sean 'Diddy' Combs is on trial in New York, facing federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering with conspiracy and transportation for prostitution. He denies all the charges. The Diddy on Trial podcast is here to investigate the rumours, confront the theories, and give you the answers that you need. We also want YOU to be part of the conversation. Have you any questions about the case? Heard a theory that doesn't sit right with you? Get in touch now via WhatsApp: 0330 123 555 1. Details of organisations in the UK offering information and support with some of the issues raised are available at Presenter: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty Series Producer: Laura Jones Sound Design: Mark Burrows Senior Digital Producer: Matthew Pintus Production Coordinator: Hattie Valentine Editor: Clare Fordham Commissioning Editor: Rhian Roberts Assistant Commissioner: Will Drysdale Commissioning Producer: Adam Eland Commissioning Assistant Producer: Rechmial Miller


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer
A firm linked to Michelle Mone must repay £122million for allegedly breaching a Covid PPE contract, a court heard yesterday. The bra tycoon had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration during the pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. Baroness Mone and the firm both deny any wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, plus an additional £8,648,691 for transporting and storing the items. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, with its lawyers claiming the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with contract discussions then going through one of the firm's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' negotiations, he said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he said Baroness Mone's communications were not part of this case, which was 'simply about compliance'. He added: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with almost £122million paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the firm it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage. Mr Stanley said 99.9999 per cent of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract. The DHSC claims the deal also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise them using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', and that of 140 gowns tested for sterility, 103 failed. He added that the DHSC 'was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs'. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject' after delivery. He said testing was done several months after the gowns were rejected, and that the samples were not 'representative of the whole population'. Mr Samek described the DHSC's claim as 'contrived and opportunistic', with PPE Medpro 'made the fall guy for a catalogue of failures... and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence during the five-week trial. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim.