logo
Bavaria approves first three cannabis clubs after German legalisation

Bavaria approves first three cannabis clubs after German legalisation

Local Germany25-04-2025

Bavaria's first three cannabis clubs got the official go-ahead from the state's regulatory authorities.
In the districts of Rosenheim, Bad Kissingen and Freising, three non-commercial associations may begin growing cannabis and distributing it to members for recreational use, as is permitted under Germany's cannabis legalisation act, which was
enacted on April 1st last year
.
The legalisation of cannabis use in Germany remains controversial, and perhaps nowhere more so than in the socially conservative 'Free State' of Bavaria. Soon after legalisation passed at the federal level, Bavaria exercised its state authority to
ban cannabis use at beer gardens, public festivals
, and other public spaces. Members of the state's Christian Social Union (CSU) party campaigned against legalisation, and have since vowed to try and repeal it.
READ ALSO:
One year on - What does the future hold for Germany's cannabis legalisation law?
Begrudging approval
The Bavarian Ministry of Health (LGL)
told
BR24
that the three cannabis clubs had been approved 'due to unavoidable legal constraints'. But other comments by the head of the LGL suggest the ministry was not happy to do so.
Bavaria's Health Minister Judith Gerlach (CSU) has reportedly emphasised that a cultivation permit does not give the clubs permission to distribute cannabis immediately. She says that the LGL will still need to review security measures in the clubs, and mentioned 'close controls' by the state authority after the clubs have begun cultivation.
Gerlach added that the permits being granted does not change the state's goal to see "the legalisation of cannabis for consumption purposes withdrawn by the new federal government".
Conservative leadership in Bavaria led the charge on pressuring the incoming federal government to repeal cannabis legalisation, but was unable to get the policy into the coalition agreement between the Union parties (CDU/CSU) and the Social Democrats. Instead, the government has scheduled an evaluation of the policy for later this year.
EXPLAINED:
What Germany's new coalition pact means for foreign residents
A portion of cannabis is handed to a member of the Green Leaf Society cannabis club. The Berlin-based club's first harvest was delivered to members in January. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Sebastian Gollnow
Cannabis clubs held back by bureaucratic obstacles
As well as permitting the possession of cannabis and cultivation for personal use at home, the cannabis bill included provisions for the establishment of cannabis clubs. Since July last year, special clubs can be set up for growing and selling cannabis to members, who need to be adults over 18.
But the power of regulation over these clubs was largely given to Germany's state governments, which means that the rules for applying for a business permit and setting up a club vary across regions - and some states seem to have given would-be club operators the run around.
Advertisement
Regional media outlet
BR24
reports that, as of April 1st, not a single cannabis club was approved in Bavaria even though the LGL had received 37 applications for a permit. Of those applications, one had been rejected and eight had been withdrawn.
Now, more than nine months after cannabis clubs were given permission to launch at the federal level, the first
three have been approved in the southern state.
READ ALSO:
Is Germany ready for the arrival of cannabis clubs?
The case for and against legalisation
Advocates for legalisation of recreational cannabis use often cite research that points to the drug's medical or therapeutic applications, as well as research that it is less harmful than alcohol. The broad general argument is that by legalising and regulating cannabis, the state makes its use safer for adults who would use it anyway, while simultaneously tapping into a new source for tax revenue.
Arguing against legalisation, conservative leaders such as Gerlach have repeatedly suggested that allowing cannabis use is 'wrong' and works against state efforts toward 'the protection of health and young people'.
Findings from the German Survey on Smoking Behavior (DEBRA study) have so far found no immediate shifts in consumption behavior following legalisation.
Advertisement
According to the crime statistics for Bavaria, the number of drug-related criminal cases have decreased since legalisation, with cannabis-related cases dropping more than 50 percent. Of course, the decrease is mostly explained by the fact that people are not being prosecuted for what is now legal cannabis use.
Since legalisation there has been a notable increase in medical cannabis imports into Germany.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will more police in Germany be equipped with Tasers?
Will more police in Germany be equipped with Tasers?

Local Germany

time9 hours ago

  • Local Germany

Will more police in Germany be equipped with Tasers?

Germany's Interior Minister, Alexander Dobrindt (CSU), has spoken up in favour of equipping federal police with Tasers, citing an increased risk of physical violence to police officers in Germany. His comments have been welcomed by police union representatives who advocate for Tasers as a necessary protection for police officers. But the use of Tasers in law-enforcement is controversial and in some cases it has been lethal. Will police officers be issued with Tasers immediately? In an interview with t-online , Minister Dobrindt announced that a legal framework would be put in place this year, which would make it possible for federal police to carry Tasers. He also said that the federal government would provide the funding. 'We will do everything we can to ensure that our federal police officers can respond appropriately in any situation in the future,' he said. According to reporting by , many police officers in Germany already carry Tasers. Originally reserved for the exclusive use of special police units (SEKs) and customs officials, the devices have been introduced for patrol duty in Rhineland-Palatinate, North Rhine-Westphalia, Brandenburg, Bavaria, Schleswig-Holstein, Bremen, and Saarland in recent years. Advertisement Since 2023, pilot projects have also been underway in Berlin, Hamburg, Hesse, and with the federal police. Do German police need more protection? Minister Dobrindt's comments come against the backdrop of an increase in attacks on police officers, especially with knives. According to a report published by the BKA (Germany's Federal Criminal Police,) a total of 46,218 violent crimes against police officers were recorded in 2023 – an increase of 8 percent on the previous year and the sharpest recorded rise since 2017. A total of 105,708 police officers were threatened or attacked in Germany in 2023. "We must better protect our police officers," Dobrindt said according to media reports. "The Taser closes a dangerous gap between batons and service weapons," Who supports the use of Tasers? Representatives of the police have spoken out in favour of the plan. Andreas Roßkopf, chairman of the Germany's largest police union ( Gewerkschaft Polizei ) told the Rheinische Post that Tasers have a de-escalating effect. 'The tests show that even the threat of using them often calms heated situations,' Roßkopf said. Marcus Haider, a district chairman for another major German police union ( Deutsche Polizeigewerkschaft) described the advantages of Tasers over batons or firearms in a recent article . He noted that batons can only be used at a very close range, which puts officers at risk of injury. On the other hand, the use of firearms can often have lethal consequences. Police statistics show that Tasers are often fired at people suffering from mental health problems. According to the BKA report, roughly 20 percent of people shot by the police with Tasers in Germany in 2023 were subsequently transported to psychiatric institutions. READ ALSO: Germany mass stabbing suspect has 'psychological illness', police say What are the problems with Taser use? The interior minister's comments have drawn criticism from the Social Democrats (SPD), who are currently in the federal coalition with Dobrindt's CDU party. Advertisement Lower Saxony's Interior Minister Daniela Behrens (SPD) told the Süddeutsche Zeitung that arming the police further was not necessarily the best solution to tackling social problems. Members of the Left party have also raised concerns. 'This is not a measure to de-escalate the situation, but another step toward arming the police,' said Clara Bünger of the Left party. She also highlighted their potential risks adding, 'If the manufacturer's test subjects have to sign liability waivers due to possible fatal consequences, then we should ask ourselves whether such a device really belongs in the hands of police forces.' Despite police unions' advocacy of Tasers as a less-lethal alterative to firearms, their use has led to fatalities in Germany and elsewhere. According to the human rights organization Amnesty International, there have been at least ten deaths in Germany since 2021 in connection with the use of Tasers. Tasers fire two wire-connected darts from a short distance. Designed to deliver a strong electric pulse when they hit the skin, causing complete paralysis of the muscles for a few seconds, their use can have serious health consequences if used against people with heart diseases or cardiovascular problems. READ ALSO: German police under scrutiny following the killing of a young black man

Trump Suspends US-to-China Export Licenses for Nuclear Giants
Trump Suspends US-to-China Export Licenses for Nuclear Giants

Int'l Business Times

timea day ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Suspends US-to-China Export Licenses for Nuclear Giants

Trade tensions between the US and China are heating up again, despite a 90-day pause on 100 percent-plus tariffs agreed on 12 May 2025. Now, the Trump administration has taken a sharp new turn by suspending licences for nuclear exports to China. This move could hit major nuclear and energy firms hard. Here's what it means for the industry—and what could come next. US Blocks Nuclear Trade with China In early June, the US Department of Commerce issued orders halting the approval of export licences for nuclear materials and components headed to China. The suspension affects items ranging from reactor parts to precision tools used in the energy sector. According to Yahoo Finance , the licence freeze is part of a broader strategy to weaken China's access to critical technology during the ongoing tariff standoff. A US official hinted at the plan earlier, stating that Washington was reviewing exports deemed 'strategically important' to Beijing. 'In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licences or imposed additional requirements while this review is ongoing,' said a department spokesperson. Nuclear Heavyweights in the Firing Line Industry giants Westinghouse and Emerson are expected to feel the impact. Westinghouse, which powers over 400 nuclear reactors worldwide, could face stalled exports of vital nuclear technologies. Emerson, a key provider of industrial measurement tools, also risks disruption to its supply chain. While neither company has commented publicly, analysts warn the export freeze could hit revenue hard. Other firms are also under pressure. GE Aerospace, which supplies hydraulic fluids and jet engines to China's state-owned aircraft maker COMAC, may face export challenges if restrictions broaden. The knock-on effect is rippling through energy sectors too. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners and Dallas-based Energy Transfer could lose hundreds of millions, according to Power Technology . Two insiders confirmed that both nuclear and energy businesses have already begun feeling the financial strain. What Comes Next? The US Department of Commerce has yet to outline its long-term plan for nuclear exports. However, President Trump is set to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in London on Monday, 9 June 2025. The face-to-face follows a long phone call between the leaders on Thursday, 5 June. Although the UK will host the talks, British officials confirmed they will not take part. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests. We welcome these talks,' said a UK government spokesperson. It remains unclear whether nuclear exports will be discussed directly. Observers expect the agenda to include China's access to US technology, rare earth exports, and the escalating economic friction. Industry Braces for Fallout As tensions grow, nuclear firms are left waiting for clarity. Many now face delays, lost revenue, and uncertain futures. Experts warn that if the licence freeze continues, it could reshape global supply chains and dent the US's influence in the nuclear sector. For now, the world watches as diplomacy and trade collide—while one of the most powerful industries hangs in the balance. Originally published on IBTimes UK

Boston Mayor Compares ICE to Neo-Nazi Group: 'There Are Other Groups That Routinely Wear Masks'
Boston Mayor Compares ICE to Neo-Nazi Group: 'There Are Other Groups That Routinely Wear Masks'

Int'l Business Times

time4 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Boston Mayor Compares ICE to Neo-Nazi Group: 'There Are Other Groups That Routinely Wear Masks'

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu compared immigration agents to members of NSC 131, a New England-based neo-Nazi group. "I don't know of any police department that routinely wears masks," Wu said Wednesday. "We know that there are other groups that routinely wear masks, NSC 131 routinely wears masks," she added, referencing Nationalist Social Club-131, a neo-Nazi organization founded in Massachusetts in 2019. Wu, a vocal critic of President Donald Trump and his administration, made her comments in response to criticism from Leah Foley, the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts. Foley, a Trump appointee confirmed in January, accused the Boston mayor of spreading "false narratives" about federal agents. The dispute stemmed from Wu's remarks, made last week, about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, which she said had "terrified" her constituents. Wu previously told WBUR people were being "snatched off the street by secret police who are wearing masks, who can offer no justification for why certain people are being taken and then detained." Foley labeled Wu's comments "reckless and inflammatory," and defended ICE agents' masks, asserting they and their families were being "threatened, doxxed, and assaulted" in social media posts. When asked to respond to Foley's comments, Wu pointed out that Boston police work "without wearing masks, displaying their badges publicly, with body cameras that document the interactions that take place with full transparency, because we have nothing to hide," according to the Boston Globe, before comparing ICE agents to the neo-Nazi group members. "We see what's happening with our own eyes. A land ruled by fear is not the land of the free," Wu wrote in a Bluesky post Thursday, accompanied by the Boston Globe article referencing Foley's comments. Federal officials held a press conference earlier this week to tout their monthlong operation that resulted in the arrests of nearly 1,500 undocumented Americans, according to marking one of the largest ICE operations ever. Originally published on Latin Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store