Why nightmares could make you age faster and die sooner
Adults who report weekly nightmares are more than three times likely to die before the age of 70 compared to those who rarely or never experience them, researchers found.
The study found nightmares to be a "stronger predictor of premature death" than smoking, obesity, poor diet, and low physical activity.
The scientists warned the findings should be treated as a "public health concern", but said people can reduce nightmares by managing stress.
The team, led by Dr Abidemi Otaiku of the UK Dementia Research Institute, and Imperial College London, analysed data from 2,429 children aged eight to 10 and 183,012 adults aged 26 to 86 over a period of 19 years.
The research, presented at the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Congress this month, found that nightmares disrupt both sleep quality and duration, which impairs the body's overnight cellular restoration and repair ability.
The combined impacts of chronic stress and disrupted sleep are likely to contribute to the accelerated ageing of our cells and bodies.
Dr Otaiku said, "Our sleeping brains cannot distinguish dreams from reality. That's why nightmares often wake us up sweating, gasping for breath, and with our hearts pounding - because our fight-or-flight response has been triggered. This stress reaction can be even more intense than anything we experience while awake."
He said: "Nightmares lead to prolonged elevations of cortisol, a stress hormone closely linked to faster cellular ageing. For those who frequently experience nightmares, this cumulative stress may significantly impact the ageing process."
He added: "Given how common and modifiable nightmares are, they should be taken far more seriously as a public health concern."
Researchers found that children and adults who had frequent nightmares also exhibited faster ageing. This accounted for approximately 40 per cent of those who had a higher risk of early death.
Dr Otaiku said this was the first study to show nightmares can predict faster biological ageing and earlier mortality, even after accounting for other health issues.
Even monthly nightmares were linked to faster ageing and increased mortality compared to those who had no nightmares. and the links were consistent across all ages, sexes, ethnicities, and mental health statuses.
"The good news is that nightmares can be prevented and treated," said Dr Otaiku.
Simple measures, such as maintaining good sleep hygiene, managing stress, seeking treatment for anxiety or depression and not watching scary films can be effective in reducing nightmares, he said.
The Independent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Marco Rubio says US halted visas for Gazans after Congress concerns over Hamas ties
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the decision to suspend visitor visas for Gazans, even those seeking medical treatment after being injured in Israel's war on the enclave, was made after inquiries from members of Congress. Mr Rubio told CBS on Sunday that the State Department was warned by lawmakers that some of the non-government organisations assisting Gazans with the visas had connections to Hamas. "We won't be in partnership with groups that have links or sympathy to Hamas," he said when asked about the abrupt decision to halt the visas. Mr Rubio was also asked about many of the children in Gaza who received visas to undergo urgent medical treatment. "A small number are issued with children, but they come with adults," he said, suggesting he had concerns about Palestinians who accompanied the injured children. He repeated his belief that evidence presented to the State Department prompted the decision to halt the visas on Saturday morning. "All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days," the State Department posted on X. Washington faced swift backlash after announcing the decision. Among the groups to criticise the American authorities was HEAL Palestine, a US registered non-profit group that aims to provide "urgent relief and long-term support to Palestinian children and families". It said it was "distressed by the State Department's decision". Another prominent organisation, the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, said the move "will have a devastating and irreversible impact on our ability to bring injured and critically ill children from Gaza to the United States for life-saving medical treatment". The group urged the US to reverse its decision. Shortly after Mr Rubio's interview with CBS, Jason Crow, a Democratic member of the House of Representatives, said claims that some NGOs had links to Hamas "concerning". " Hamas is a brutal terrorist organisation, they should not be travelling anywhere and if that's happening it should be stopped immediately," he added. Some speculated that the State Department's decision was motivated by criticism from Laura Loomer, a far-right activist with close ties to President Donald Trump. Ms Loomer decried the visa system and called on Washington to "shut this abomination down". She said Gazans who arrived in the US were "pro-Hamas ... affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood", without providing any evidence. She criticised HEAL Palestine specifically. "This is a medical treatment programme, not a refugee resettlement programme," HEAL Palestine's said in response. "Our mission gives children a renewed chance at life, whether through life-saving surgery or the ability to walk again ... US taxpayers do not fund this treatment." Israel's ongoing campaign in Gaza – which followed the 2023 attacks by Hamas-led fighters that resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 people and the capture of 240 hostages – has killed more than 61,900 people and injured about 155,800.
Gulf Today
11-08-2025
- Gulf Today
Ancient ritual that could help improve your sleep
Storm Newton, The Independent An ancient ritual involving the forceful blowing of a conch shell could offer a surprising, non-invasive treatment for a widespread sleep disorder, according to new research. Known as shankh blowing, the practice involves a deep inhalation followed by a powerful exhalation into the spiral-shaped shell of a sea snail. Researchers suggest this technique could significantly improve sleep for individuals suffering from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), potentially negating the need for cumbersome medical equipment. Obstructive sleep apnoea, which affects an estimated eight million people in the UK, occurs when the throat muscles relax and narrow during sleep, leading to symptoms such as loud snoring, choking noises, and frequent awakenings. The findings stem from a small trial conducted in India, involving 30 participants aged between 19 and 65, all diagnosed with OSA. For the trial, 16 people were provided with a traditional shankh used in yogic practices and trained in how to use it properly before taking it home, while the remaining 14 people were asked to carry out deep breathing exercises. Both groups were encouraged to practice for a minimum of 15 minutes five days a week. They were monitored during sleep and asked questions about sleep quality and how tired they felt during the day. After six months, the study found those who practised shankh blowing reported sleeping better and were 34 per cent less sleepy during the day. They also had higher levels of oxygen in the blood during the night and had four to five fewer apnoeas, where breathing stops during sleep, per hour on average. They also had higher levels of oxygen in their blood during the night. Dr Krishna K Sharma, of the Eternal Heart Care Centre and Research Institute in Jaipur, India, said: "The way the shankh is blown is quite distinctive. "It involves a deep inhalation followed by a forceful, sustained exhalation through tightly pursed lips. "This action creates strong vibrations and airflow resistance, which likely strengthens the muscles of the upper airway, including the throat and soft palate, areas that often collapse during sleep in people with OSA. "The shankh's unique spiralling structure may also contribute to specific acoustic and mechanical effects that further stimulate and tone these muscles." Continuous positive airway pressure (Cpap) machines are the first line of treatment for OSA. They involve patients wearing a mask that blows pressurised air into the nose and throat while they sleep. However, they can be uncomfortable. Speaking of Cpap, Dr Sharma said: "While effective, many patients find it uncomfortable and struggle to use it consistently." He suggests shankh blowing could be a "promising alternative". "Shankh blowing is a simple low-cost, breathing technique that could help improve sleep and reduce symptoms without the need for machines or medication," Dr Sharma said. Researchers are now planning a larger trial involving several hospitals. Dr Sharma added: "This next phase will allow us to validate and expand on our findings in a broader, more diverse population and assess how shankh blowing performs over longer periods. "We also want to study how this practice affects airway muscle tone, oxygen levels and sleep in greater detail. "We're particularly interested in comparing shankh blowing with standard treatments like Cpap, and in examining its potential help in more severe forms of OSA." Reacting to the findings, Professor Sophia Schiza, head of the ERS group on sleep disordered breathing, based at the University of Crete, Greece, said: "We know that OSA patients have poor quality of sleep, and higher risks of high blood pressure, strokes and heart disease. "A proportion of patients experience sleepiness during the day. "While Cpap and other treatments are available based on careful diagnosis of disease severity, there is still need for new treatments. "This is an intriguing study that shows the ancient practice of shankh blowing could potentially offer an OSA treatment for selected patients by targeting muscles training. 'A larger study will help provide more evidence for this intervention which could be of benefit as a treatment option or in combination with other treatments in selected OSA patients.'
Gulf Today
10-08-2025
- Gulf Today
Williams exposed all that's wrong with health insurance
Kathryn Anne Edwards, Tribune News Service Venus Williams returned to the professional tennis circuit in July with a win in the first round of the DC Open. (She lost in a late round.) In an interview on the court following the match, the 45-year-old made a somewhat surprising admission on why she decided to return to competitive tennis. 'I had to come back for the insurance because they informed me earlier this year I'm on COBRA," she said, referring to the federal law that allows individuals to temporarily continue their employer-sponsored health insurance after leaving a job by paying the premiums. Williams has made more than $40 million in prize money during her tennis career and has a net worth estimated to be almost $100 million. There's little worry she'd become uninsured due to lack of funds. Still, her comments get at the problem buried so deep into our system of health insurance that no policymaker has the nerve to touch it, which is that health and work shouldn't be linked. Although America's system of health insurance is built on employer-sponsored coverage, there's scant labour market or health justification for this arrangement. The strongest part of the system is the depth of entrenched interests, rather than, say, producing good health outcomes, controlling costs or providing coverage to as many people as possible. Yet, policymakers have made clear that rather than rock this boat, they'd prefer to wait for it to tip over on its own. Congress's lack of stewardship over health insurance dates back to its origins. The first such plan in the US was offered by Baylor University Hospital to Dallas public school teachers in 1929. The architect was a former teacher working in the hospital's administration who came up with a monthly subscription plan in exchange for future hospital stays. After adding more professions and hospitals, it became Blue Cross. The American Medical Association, seeing the success of the American Hospital Association's new experiment, began to offer non-hospital physicians plans, which became Blue Shield. Dropped into this swirling mix of loosely linked occupations, hospitals, doctors, and monthly payments for negotiated care was the multi-year wage freezes of World War II. Employer-paid plans were exempt from these freezes, the costs of plans were deemed to be a business expense, and the benefits were not counted as income. After the war, the Internal Revenue Service solidified the twice-over tax preference as part of the Internal Revenue Code. At no point did policymakers articulate a design to provide health insurance for Americans through their employers. Each successive Congress has instead inherited a system whose circumstantial origins were cemented into something permanent but not planned. The lack of planning is evident when considering the myriad miseries the system creates. Where to begin. First, health insurance is not only expensive for employers to provide, but employers are not equally financially capable of bearing the costs. As a result, larger firms get to provide better coverage than smaller firms, which are at a disadvantage to negotiate things such as insulin costs. On top of which, employees of small firms on average a pay higher share of the total premium as well as face a higher deductible than employees of large firms. Disparity in health-insurance offerings mars the labour market. Productivity is maximised when workers and firms are matched based on their human capital. But throw insurance into the mix, and employers can be boxed out when competing for workers based on their health offerings and workers can warp their job search and tenure based on which employers provide the best health plan. The latter is called job lock, and it's a good description of Williams' experience: Staying at a job mostly for the health insurance. It's a bad situation for workers and employers. Health insurance also mars compensation. There's evidence that workers who can be identified as adding to health costs, such as women of child-bearing age who may become pregnant or obese individuals, are paid less as a result. This is on top of the broader suppression of wage growth and labor demand experienced by all workers as a result of employer health costs. What's truly bad about this whole system is that tying health insurance to work creates coverage gaps that the government must fill. Indeed, the evolution of public health insurance has been about Congress trying to fill holes employers leave behind. And in these holes fall some of the most expensive people or situations to insure. Medicaid covers 35% of all disabled individuals in the US, 61% of all long-term care recipients, and 41% of all births while Medicare covers 80% of all deaths. As a macabre aside, the most expensive year of life is the last one, and end-of-life care is half of Medicare spending. In essence, employers are 'skimming the top,' insuring younger and higher income Americans and avoiding the oldest, poorest, chronically disabled, or dying. And the government sinks a fortune into supporting this system. The tax-preferred status of health insurance benefits that opts employers and employees out of income or payroll tax duties on those benefits totaled $384 billion in 2024. Although the Affordable Care Act added some regulations and mandates to employer benefits, most of the bill's thrust was to cover those left out of the employer market by subsidising the individual market and expanding Medicaid. It was a compromise policy. What's incredible about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is that it dismantles much of the ACA's wraparound coverage, already weakened by the Supreme Court decision that made Medicaid expansion optional. It's a rejection of the compromise that propped up the employer-sponsored system, a system so rife with problems that even a wealthy professional tennis legend will admit her career is a function of needing access to consistent health insurance. Either employer-sponsored health insurance is worth all the costs, inefficiencies, and problems, and Congress works around it, or it's an 80-year experiment with enough evidence of failure that it's time to move on to the next system. Sitting on the shore and waiting for the boat to sink isn't enough.
