
Dylan Caporn: Proof east coast GST leeches have nothing to cry about
WA's State Budget has become home to somewhat of an annual tradition — the GST stoush.
East coasters look on as WA celebrates another budget surplus, fuelled by iron ore royalties and the treasurer issues a Gandalf-like warning to those States with envious eyes.
'It is again important to point out that despite the irrational and absurd commentary from many over east, WA will still only receive 75 per cent of our population share of GST this year,' Rita Saffioti told Parliament on Thursday.
Later, she went further: 'If you don't support a successful WA, the whole nation is penalised.'
Buried in the Budget papers was a significant rebuttal to those east coast whingers arguing against WA receiving a top up to the 75 cent floor.
'Every State, not just Western Australia, has benefited from high iron ore prices . . . the other States can now expect to receive about $30 billion extra GST over 2020-21 to 2028-29,' the Budget said.
'The three largest iron ore miners paid $17 billion to the Commonwealth in company tax in 2023-24 on its Western Australian operations, while the cost of the no-worse-off guarantee was only $5 billion that year.'
Put simply, WA works so you don't have to.
There are sobering numbers for other jurisdictions in the document, with every Tasmanian costing the Commonwealth Budget $12,130 each — compared to WA's per capita contribution of more than $13,000 per person.
Based on that figure, West Australians should have a vote in this month's Tasmanian elections.
As of next financial year, Australia's leech — Victoria — will earn more from the GST than it sends to the national pool, getting $1.06 for each dollar it contributes.
A system which compensates Australia's second most populous State — one crippled by Government debt projections — is clearly not working.
Victoria's boost has come as a change in the GST methodology to include pandemic-era business support and health expenses, meaning those States which spent more are going to get more in grants.
'This method change does not acknowledge the different policy approaches of States when responding to COVID-19, and penalises States that took actions that prevented the spread of COVID-19 in the community,' the Budget stated.
It's further proof that it's going to take WA and WA alone to stand up for ourselves on this question of fiscal dignity.
But as the second term Albanese Government looks for something to occupy itself with, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has decided after two decades of limp, stagnant policy ambitions in Canberra, he will grab onto the third rail of Australian politics — tax reform.
In front of the Press Club last week, Chalmers said he had an appetite to be 'bold and ambitious', and did not shoot down changes to the GST model ahead of a reform round table in August.
As other States seek to reap the rewards from WA's efforts, our Government must have a seat at the table. Only a West Aussie can truly fight for our fair share.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Online watchdog eSafety Commission urges YouTube for social media ban
YouTube should be included in a looming social media ban for children, the eSafety commissioner has warned, despite the platform being carved out of the world-first laws. In a speech to the national Press Club on Tuesday, online safety head Julie Inman Grant will say seven in 10 children between 10 and 15-years-old have encountered harmful content on the internet such as hateful material, violent videos and promotion of eating disorders. Inman Grant will say research from the eSafety Commission found YouTube was the most cited platform where children had exposure to harmful content, with almost 40 per cent saying they saw dangerous material there. YouTube will be exempted from a world-first ban on social media for children under 16 when it comes into effect from December, while sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be off limits. The eSafety commissioner said the social media laws needed to be consistent. 'It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media. By far, the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube,' she told ABC Radio on Tuesday ahead of the address. 'When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube.' Inman Grant said she was surprised the video-sharing site was not included in the federal government ban, but indicated her role was to enforce the legislation. She said it was critical the social media ban be able to work effectively . 'We can have a lot of success with this world-leading law. The rest of the world is going to be watching. There's a lot at stake,' she said. 'This is all about placing the onus back on the platforms, where it should be, and making sure that they're are not allowing under-16s from having an account. 'The time has come for them to take more responsibility and this is what the legislation will encourage them to do.' 'AI has created much peril' Under the ban, social media platforms would be fined up to $50 million if the measures are not enforced. The eSafety commissioner will also use the speech to the National Press Club to warn about AI chatbots being used by young people online. Inman Grant said children as young as 10 were being 'captivated' by the AI chatbots, with many of the online tools also being sexualised. 'Schools reported to us these children had been directed by their AI companions to engage in explicit and harmful sexual acts,' she will say in the speech. 'Just as AI has brought us so much promise, it has also created much peril. And these harms aren't just hypothetical, they are taking hold right now.'

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Ex-TV news anchor Stephanie Hockridge convicted in massive scheme to fraudulently obtain COVID relief funds
Stephanie Hockridge, a former Phoenix news anchor-turned-fintech entrepreneur, has been convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in a federal case involving hundreds of millions of dollars in COVID relief funds. A jury in the Northern District of Texas found Hockridge guilty on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She was acquitted on four additional counts of wire fraud. Sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 10. Hockridge's conviction was announced on Friday. According to federal prosecutors and investigative reports, Hockridge and her husband, Nathan Reis, fraudulently obtained over $300,000 in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans for themselves, including one application that falsely claimed he was a veteran and an African American. The couple's Scottsdale-based fintech firm, Blueacorn, which they co-founded in 2020, processed over $12.5 billion in PPP loans — with somewhere between $250 million and $300 million going to the company's ownership, including Hockridge. Blueacorn received over $1 billion in taxpayer-funded processing fees for facilitating PPP loans but spent less than 1% ($8.6 million) on fraud prevention and only $13.7 million on eligibility verification, according to a congressional investigation. The PPP was an $800 billion federal loan initiative launched in 2020 to help small businesses keep workers employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was part of a broader effort — including grants, tax credits and emergency loans — aimed at stabilizing the US economy and preventing mass business closures and layoffs. Investigators alleged that the couple used the proceeds to enrich themselves personally. Congress said it obtained a video created by Reis and Hockridge showing off large amounts of cash in a bar on Dec. 21, 2021. According to public records, Reis relocated to San Juan, Puerto Rico, which has no capital gains tax, following his work at Blueacorn. An Oct. 8, 2021, video obtained by congressional staffers which was geolocated to San Juan showed Hockridge and Reis on the balcony of a luxury beachfront apartment. According to a congressional report, Blueacorn routinely failed to properly vet applicants and charged illegal 'success fees' to borrowers — violating Small Business Administration rules. The congressional report detailed how Blueacorn's leadership instructed staff to prioritize speed over accuracy. Internal messages showed reviewers were told to 'push through' questionable applications, ignore red flags, and skip identity checks unless fraud was 'extremely obvious.' Some staff processed hundreds of loans with no training — sometimes within 30 seconds each. The subcommittee also uncovered the existence of a 'VIPPP' program that allowed high-dollar clients to bypass standard review protocols. Founders dismissed smaller loan applicants with phrases like 'delete them,' 'who f–king cares' and 'they go elsewhere.' Hockridge, 42, was once a familiar face in Arizona households. She spent seven years as an anchor at KNXV-TV, the ABC affiliate in Phoenix, and had previously worked as a reporter for CBS News Radio in London. She was nominated for an Emmy and named 'Favorite Newscaster' by Arizona Foothills Magazine. Reis is scheduled to stand trial in August 2025 on related charges. Prosecutors allege he played a lead role in directing the company's operations and handling its financial distributions. Hockridge's conviction marks one of the highest-profile PPP fraud cases to date involving a public figure. Fraud related to COVID-19 relief programs was unprecedented in US history, with losses estimated in the hundreds of billions — possibly up to $1 trillion. The PPP, Economic Injury Disaster Loans and unemployment insurance programs were especially vulnerable — with watchdogs reporting widespread misuse, insider abuse and systemic failures in fraud prevention. The Post has sought comment from Hockridge and Reis. Originally published as Ex-TV news anchor Stephanie Hockridge convicted in massive scheme to fraudulently obtain Covid relief funds


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Online watchdog urges YouTube for social media ban
YouTube should be included in a looming social media ban for children, the eSafety commissioner has warned, despite the platform being carved out of the world-first laws. In a speech to the national Press Club on Tuesday, online safety head Julie Inman Grant will say seven in 10 children between 10 and 15-years-old have encountered harmful content on the internet such as hateful material, violent videos and promotion of eating disorders. Ms Inman Grant will say research from the eSafety Commission found YouTube was the most cited platform where children had exposure to harmful content, with almost 40 per cent saying they saw dangerous material there. YouTube will be exempted from a world-first ban on social media for children under 16 when it comes into effect from December, while sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be off limits. The eSafety commissioner said the social media laws needed to be consistent. "It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media. By far, the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube," she told ABC Radio on Tuesday ahead of the address. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube." Ms Inman Grant said she was surprised the video-sharing site was not included in the federal government ban, but indicated her role was to enforce the legislation. She said it was critical the social media ban be able to work effectively . "We can have a lot of success with this world-leading law. The rest of the world is going to be watching. There's a lot at stake," she said. "This is all about placing the onus back on the platforms, where it should be, and making sure that they're are not allowing under-16s from having an account. "The time has come for them to take more responsibility and this is what the legislation will encourage them to do." Under the ban, social media platforms would be fined up to $50 million if the measures are not enforced. The eSafety commissioner will also use the speech to the National Press Club to warn about AI chatbots being used by young people online. Ms Inman Grant said children as young as 10 were being "captivated" by the AI chatbots, with many of the online tools also being sexualised. "Schools reported to us these children had been directed by their AI companions to engage in explicit and harmful sexual acts," she will say in the speech. "Just as AI has brought us so much promise, it has also created much peril. And these harms aren't just hypothetical, they are taking hold right now." YouTube should be included in a looming social media ban for children, the eSafety commissioner has warned, despite the platform being carved out of the world-first laws. In a speech to the national Press Club on Tuesday, online safety head Julie Inman Grant will say seven in 10 children between 10 and 15-years-old have encountered harmful content on the internet such as hateful material, violent videos and promotion of eating disorders. Ms Inman Grant will say research from the eSafety Commission found YouTube was the most cited platform where children had exposure to harmful content, with almost 40 per cent saying they saw dangerous material there. YouTube will be exempted from a world-first ban on social media for children under 16 when it comes into effect from December, while sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be off limits. The eSafety commissioner said the social media laws needed to be consistent. "It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media. By far, the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube," she told ABC Radio on Tuesday ahead of the address. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube." Ms Inman Grant said she was surprised the video-sharing site was not included in the federal government ban, but indicated her role was to enforce the legislation. She said it was critical the social media ban be able to work effectively . "We can have a lot of success with this world-leading law. The rest of the world is going to be watching. There's a lot at stake," she said. "This is all about placing the onus back on the platforms, where it should be, and making sure that they're are not allowing under-16s from having an account. "The time has come for them to take more responsibility and this is what the legislation will encourage them to do." Under the ban, social media platforms would be fined up to $50 million if the measures are not enforced. The eSafety commissioner will also use the speech to the National Press Club to warn about AI chatbots being used by young people online. Ms Inman Grant said children as young as 10 were being "captivated" by the AI chatbots, with many of the online tools also being sexualised. "Schools reported to us these children had been directed by their AI companions to engage in explicit and harmful sexual acts," she will say in the speech. "Just as AI has brought us so much promise, it has also created much peril. And these harms aren't just hypothetical, they are taking hold right now." YouTube should be included in a looming social media ban for children, the eSafety commissioner has warned, despite the platform being carved out of the world-first laws. In a speech to the national Press Club on Tuesday, online safety head Julie Inman Grant will say seven in 10 children between 10 and 15-years-old have encountered harmful content on the internet such as hateful material, violent videos and promotion of eating disorders. Ms Inman Grant will say research from the eSafety Commission found YouTube was the most cited platform where children had exposure to harmful content, with almost 40 per cent saying they saw dangerous material there. YouTube will be exempted from a world-first ban on social media for children under 16 when it comes into effect from December, while sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be off limits. The eSafety commissioner said the social media laws needed to be consistent. "It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media. By far, the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube," she told ABC Radio on Tuesday ahead of the address. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube." Ms Inman Grant said she was surprised the video-sharing site was not included in the federal government ban, but indicated her role was to enforce the legislation. She said it was critical the social media ban be able to work effectively . "We can have a lot of success with this world-leading law. The rest of the world is going to be watching. There's a lot at stake," she said. "This is all about placing the onus back on the platforms, where it should be, and making sure that they're are not allowing under-16s from having an account. "The time has come for them to take more responsibility and this is what the legislation will encourage them to do." Under the ban, social media platforms would be fined up to $50 million if the measures are not enforced. The eSafety commissioner will also use the speech to the National Press Club to warn about AI chatbots being used by young people online. Ms Inman Grant said children as young as 10 were being "captivated" by the AI chatbots, with many of the online tools also being sexualised. "Schools reported to us these children had been directed by their AI companions to engage in explicit and harmful sexual acts," she will say in the speech. "Just as AI has brought us so much promise, it has also created much peril. And these harms aren't just hypothetical, they are taking hold right now." YouTube should be included in a looming social media ban for children, the eSafety commissioner has warned, despite the platform being carved out of the world-first laws. In a speech to the national Press Club on Tuesday, online safety head Julie Inman Grant will say seven in 10 children between 10 and 15-years-old have encountered harmful content on the internet such as hateful material, violent videos and promotion of eating disorders. Ms Inman Grant will say research from the eSafety Commission found YouTube was the most cited platform where children had exposure to harmful content, with almost 40 per cent saying they saw dangerous material there. YouTube will be exempted from a world-first ban on social media for children under 16 when it comes into effect from December, while sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be off limits. The eSafety commissioner said the social media laws needed to be consistent. "It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media. By far, the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube," she told ABC Radio on Tuesday ahead of the address. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube." Ms Inman Grant said she was surprised the video-sharing site was not included in the federal government ban, but indicated her role was to enforce the legislation. She said it was critical the social media ban be able to work effectively . "We can have a lot of success with this world-leading law. The rest of the world is going to be watching. There's a lot at stake," she said. "This is all about placing the onus back on the platforms, where it should be, and making sure that they're are not allowing under-16s from having an account. "The time has come for them to take more responsibility and this is what the legislation will encourage them to do." Under the ban, social media platforms would be fined up to $50 million if the measures are not enforced. The eSafety commissioner will also use the speech to the National Press Club to warn about AI chatbots being used by young people online. Ms Inman Grant said children as young as 10 were being "captivated" by the AI chatbots, with many of the online tools also being sexualised. "Schools reported to us these children had been directed by their AI companions to engage in explicit and harmful sexual acts," she will say in the speech. "Just as AI has brought us so much promise, it has also created much peril. And these harms aren't just hypothetical, they are taking hold right now."