logo
Plans for a Chinese Port Roil the Politics of a Former Soviet Nation

Plans for a Chinese Port Roil the Politics of a Former Soviet Nation

New York Times13-03-2025

For more than a year, pro-Western marchers in Georgia, a former Soviet republic that borders Russia, have been accusing their government of allowing Moscow to increasingly reassert its sway over their country.
But driving around this nation of 3.6 million people in the heart of the mountainous Caucasus region, the influence of another ambitious power becomes apparent. China has been stepping up its activities in the region in recent years, building infrastructure and expanding trade routes that it hopes will boost its economy.
In central Georgia, workers from China are erecting soaring viaducts and cutting dozens of tunnels through hard rock to build the first modern highway to link the east and west of the country. In the north, a 5.5-mile tunnel is being bored through the mountains by China Railway Tunnel Group to expand an existing highway to Russia.
To the west, preparations are underway for another Chinese company, China Communications Construction Company, to develop Georgia's first deep-sea port on the Black Sea as part of Beijing's Belt and Road infrastructure and trade initiative.
The port, as yet unnamed, is now at the center of a debate in Georgia and abroad about China's growing influence in the region and the Caucasus nation's pivot away from the West. Inflaming the situation is the fact that the project was stripped from a group of Georgian, European, and U.S. companies — the Anaklia Development Consortium — before eventually being promised to the Chinese company last May.
Salome Zourabichvili, the former Georgian president who emerged last year as a leading voice for the pro-Western opposition, said the move was like 'stabbing our relations with our American and European partners.'
In July, a State Department official said that awarding the port project to the Chinese company was 'incompatible' with wanting to join 'U.S. and E.U.-based international organizations.' In 2019, the United States had billed the port as something that could 'prevent Georgia from falling prey to Russian or Chinese economic influence.'Last week, Representative Joe Wilson, Republican of South Carolina, criticized the decision, saying it benefited China at the expense of American companies.
The Georgian government has said that the decision to hand the port to the Chinese company would ensure it was implemented 'at the highest level.'
'Chinese cargoes are of particular importance for the most effective operation of this port,' Irakli Kobakhidze, Georgia's prime minister, said shortly after the announcement.
And some analysts see the country's pivot away from the West as a rational choice given the geopolitics of the region.
'Georgia is trying to get more from China, the actor that is getting stronger in the region,' said Dimitri Moniava, head of the Center for Strategic Communications, a research group in Tbilisi, the Georgian capital.
Situated in the dilapidated former resort town of Anaklia, where packs of stray dogs now patrol the swampy grounds of abandoned hotels, the port is likely to transform international trade in the Caucasus and the broader region. For Georgia, the port would help develop the country as a regional transport hub.
For China, the port would become a gateway to the Caucasus, linking Asia with Europe across what it calls the 'middle corridor.' It would allow Chinese companies to ship their goods from China via railways in Central Asia and across the Caspian to Europe, skirting Russia, which has been the target of Western sanctions because of the war in Ukraine.
'Georgia is a key link for the middle corridor and Anaklia port could be the pivotal last nail,' Zhou Qian, China's ambassador to Georgia, said in an interview. 'Georgia's location is very, very important' for providing 'connectivity between Europe and Asia,' he said.
The Georgian government has said that the details of the deal are still being figured out, but that the Chinese company will own 49 percent of the port, with Georgia holding the rest as a majority stake. The Georgian government says it expects the Chinese construction company to invest $600 million in the first phase.
China Communications Construction Company did not respond to requests for comment.
Russia, which is still considered to be Georgia's main trading partner, could also be a major beneficiary of the project. Novorossiysk, the main Russian port on the Black Sea, has been hobbled by Western sanctions, and with the new Chinese-built routes, goods could flow into and out of Russia unimpeded across the Caucasus.
The port situation highlights how the rivalry between China and the United States is growing in the region, pulling in smaller countries like Georgia.
'On the one hand, you'll have China, which will be aligned with Russia, on the other you will have the West,' said Ram Ben Tzion, the chief executive of Publican, which analyzes the evasion of trade restrictions. 'This port is exactly at the crossroads of these two worlds.'
Projects like the Anaklia port have also become increasingly important for Chinese companies as economic growth slows in China, said Brad Parks, who studies Chinese lending and trade practices at the Center for Global Development, a think tank in Washington.
'It is really mostly about China dealing with its own economic weaknesses at home,' Mr. Parks said.
Anaklia Development Consortium had been doing dredging and other work as part of the port project when its contract was canceled in 2020.
Mamuka Khazaradze, the former head of the consortium, said he believed geopolitics was behind the decision by the governing Georgia Dream party to drop his company's contract. The party is run behind the scenes by Bidzina Ivanishvili, a reclusive oligarch with long ties to Russia. Mr. Khazaradze was elected as an opposition member of Parliament in October but, like other members of the opposition, has been boycotting the legislature.
Mr. Khazaradze said he had seen a hint of the shift over the port in 2017, when Mr. Ivanishvili summoned him for a meeting. 'He asked: 'What are Americans doing in the Black Sea?'' he said. 'He asked me to stop the project,' he said. 'It was the first sign that these guys were changing the direction of the country.'
Mr. Khazaradze said he had invested more than $40 million into the project and refused to pull out. The government then opened a criminal case into money laundering against him and his partner, and then canceled the port contract.
Anaklia Development Consortium fought back in a European arbitration court but last year lost the case, with the court saying the group had 'assumed the risk that the government would undermine the project.' Another case in the Netherlands is pending.
Representatives of the Georgian government did not respond to requests for comment. In the past the government said the Anaklia Development Consortium was dropped because it had insufficient funds to complete the project. (Mr. Khazaradze has denied that.)
Mr. Khazaradze then founded a political party called Lelo that has been organizing protests against the government, which won an election in October that has been contested by the country's highly fractured opposition.
Giorgi Gakharia, who was prime minister when the Anaklia Development Consortium contract was canceled, also said Mr. Khazaradze and his partners did not have enough money to complete the project.
'They simply couldn't fulfill their obligations," said Mr. Gakharia, who has since parted ways with Mr. Ivanishvili and is now siding with the opposition. In an interview, he said there had been no pressure from Mr. Ivanishvili to cancel the project.
For now, Anaklia remains derelict. A rusty yacht floats in the town's swampy marina, flanked by the rusty skeleton of what was going to be a Chinese-themed restaurant before it was abandoned a decade ago.
But trucks nearby are now hauling giant stones from across Georgia to use in the construction of a breakwater for the port. If all goes to plan, the site will be transformed in about six years into a bustling hub for up to 600,000 containers.
Jemal Kvartskhava, who oversees a few dozen men bringing stones to the site and building accommodation for an expected surge of workers, said he didn't really care who built the port as long as it becomes operational.
'This project is good,' said Mr. Kvartskhava, 28. 'It will bring new energy to the country.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Djokovic dragged into disqualification storm as tennis world erupts over 'shameful' act
Djokovic dragged into disqualification storm as tennis world erupts over 'shameful' act

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Djokovic dragged into disqualification storm as tennis world erupts over 'shameful' act

Tennis fans are crying foul over an incident involving Lorenzo Musetti at the French Open that has been compared to Novak Djokovic's infamous disqualification at the 2020 US Open. Musetti reached his first semi-final at Roland Garros with a 6-2 4-6 7-5 6-2 win over American Frances Tiafoe, but the victory was overshadowed by drama after he kicked a ball that hit a female line judge in the chest. The Italian took out the opening set but cut a frustrated figure in the second stanza and lashed out by kicking a ball towards the line judge between points. The female official was only standing about three metres away when the ball struck her in the chest, leaving Tiafoe stunned at the other end of the court. The American gestured towards the chair umpire to take action against Musetti, who was eventually issued a code violation over the incident. But many thought the Italian should have been disqualified, with Tiafoe making his feelings clear about the ruling after the match. "I mean, obviously he did that and nothing happened. I think that's comical, but it is what it is," the American said. "Nothing happened, so there's nothing really to talk about. Obviously it's not consistent, so it is what it is." The incident had more than a few similarities to the one at the 2020 US Open that saw Djokovic disqualified after he hit a ball that struck a female line judge in the throat. Unlike Djokovic though, Musetti avoided being defaulted, with angry fans taking to social media to accuse tennis officials of double standards. Djokovic accidentally hits a line judge — defaulted does the same, no action it were Novak, media would erupt, narratives would burn, and he'd be tennis' villain of the double standards aren't just real, they're loud.@DjokerNole #Djokovic — Shane (@Shanegupta22) June 3, 2025 I love Musetti, but if we're enforcing rules the same 4 everyone, this is 100% a default. That said, I don't believe he should be, just like Djokovic SHOULDN'T have in 2020, but he was, & this is a textbook example of a double standard. #RolandGarros — Rodney 🐊 (@RottenKnee23) June 3, 2025 No. And unfortunately as an Italian, as much as I like his tennis I am ashamed. I hope @atptour does something about it. As much as I don't love Djokovic, he got disqualified for something much less intentional — an exploded view (@anexplodedview) June 3, 2025 Perhaps what saved Musetti was the fact the line judge was not injured after being struck by the ball and continued to officiate for the rest of the match. In Djokovic's infamous case though, the official was in clear discomfort after the ball struck her throat and required fairly lengthy medical attention. Even still, the rule around disqualifications is far from clear. Musetti admitted that he feared being defaulted but was quick to apologise for what he described as an unfortunate accident. "Honestly, it was a really unlucky coincidence. I was a little bit, honestly, scared, because I really didn't want to harm (anybody), of course," he said. "So I immediately went to the line umpire, and I of course said, 'Sorry, I apologise to everyone. It was right to have a warning, but I think the umpire saw that there was no intention about that, and that's why probably (he) let me continue." Musetti didn't let the incident derail him as he regrouped from losing the second set to take the next two and extend his French Open record to 13-4. Two of those losses on the Roland Garros clay have come against former champion Novak Djokovic, with one against reigning champ, Carlos Alcaraz, who he meets in the semi-final. Alcaraz powered his way past American 12th seed Tommy Paul in a completely dominant win in their quarter-final. The Spanish World No.2 lost just five games in another one-sided 6-0 6-1 6-4 victory against Paul, who was unable to produce his best tennis with a heavily strapped right thigh. "I'm sorry you wanted to watch more tennis. I had to do my work," Alcaraz told the Court Philippe-Chatrier crowd. with agencies

20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation
20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation

When selecting investments, it is easy to get hung up on a particular metric, such as a dividend yield or a price ratio, but investors need to look deeper or they might miss opportunities. Inc. AMZN provides an example: Its stock has typically traded at a high price-to-earnings ratio. Investors tend to look at a stock's forward P/E ratio, which is the price divided by analysts' consensus estimate for earnings per share over the following 12 months. Over the past 10 years, Amazon's stock has traded at an average forward P/E of 79.5, while the S&P 500 SPX has traded at an average forward P/E of 18.7, according to FactSet. But Amazon's stock was up 855% for 10 years through Friday, while the S&P 500 returned 235% with dividends reinvested. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? My father-in-law has dementia and is moving in with us. Can we invoice him for a caregiver? 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? 20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation It turns out that for Amazon's management team, bottom-line earnings traditionally weren't a focus. The emphasis was on reinvesting most of the cash being generated to expand the business in multiple directions. So the Amazon story was about revenue growth, rather than EPS growth. And that brings us to Nvidia Corp. NVDA. Last week Laila Maidan looked into Nvidia's relatively high forward P/E and explained why the stock might still be considered a bargain for long-term investors, based on analysts' expectations for the company's revenue growth. Nvidia's stock traded at a forward P/E of 28.1 at Friday's close, while the S&P 500 traded at a weighted forward P/E of 21.4. It is not a surprise to see Nvidia trading at a P/E valuation that is 31% higher than that of the index. But based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, Nvidia is expected to increase its sales per share at a compound annual growth rate of 41.7% through 2026, versus an expected sales-per-share CAGR of 5.5% for the S&P 500. All such estimates in this article are adjusted by FactSet to match calendar years; about 20% of companies in the S&P 500 have fiscal reporting periods that don't match the calendar. For Nvidia, investors pay a premium for the higher expected growth rate. And that sets the stage for a stock screen. Which companies trading at low P/E multiples are also expected to increase revenue quickly? For this screen we are looking at revenue growth projections — specifically sales per share. We are using the per-share numbers because they reflect expected dilution to a company's share count if it issues new shares to help fund an acquisition. Merging with a competitor will obviously make revenue increase. But if the share count rises significantly, sales per share will be lower. The per-share numbers help investors to understand whether or not a company might have overpaid for an acquisition. Starting with the S&P 500, we narrowed the list to companies trading at forward P/E ratios of 14 or less — half Nvidia's valuation. Actually, we rounded down, so the list was confined to stocks trading at a forward P/E of less than 14.5. Then we sorted the list by expected sales-per-share CAGR from calendar 2024 through 2026, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 stocks in the S&P 500 with the highest expected sales-per-share CAGR through 2025 among those trading at a P/E of less than 14.5: Company Ticker Industry Forward P/E Expected sales-per-share CAGR from 2024 through 2026 Expand Energy Corp. EXE Integrated Oil 12.0 39.6% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI Computer Processing Hardware 14.1 31.9% EQT Corp. EQT Integrated Oil 13.6 26.0% Micron Technology Inc. MU Semiconductors 9.4 23.2% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA Integrated Oil 8.3 21.2% First Solar Inc. FSLR Solar Power Equipment 8.7 20.5% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH Hotels/ Resorts/ Cruiselines 7.9 15.9% Incyte Corp. INCY Pharmaceuticals 10.7 15.5% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX Computer Peripherals 12.4 15.0% Gen Digital Inc. GEN Software 11.1 13.0% DaVita Inc. DVA Medical/ Nursing Services 11.6 12.0% Oneok Inc. OKE Oil & Gas Pipelines 14.2 11.8% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH Managed Healthcare 11.7 11.8% Aptiv PLC APTV Electrical Products 9.0 10.9% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH Managed Healthcare 12.5 10.7% Elevance Health Inc. ELV Managed Healthcare 10.5 10.4% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL Computer Processing Hardware 11.4 10.2% American International Group Inc. AIG Multi-Line Insurance 12.2 10.2% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA Hospital/ Nursing Management 14.4 9.9% Ball Corp. BALL Containers/ Packaging 14.3 9.7% Source: FactSet You may need to scroll the table to see all of the data. It is a varied list. Super Micro Computer SMCI ranks second, with a 31.9% CAGR expected for sales per share through 2026. The stock soared last month after President Donald Trump announced investment agreements with Saudi Arabia to build data centers in the U.S., which lifted suppliers of related equipment. Read: Super Micro's stock keeps surging. Here's what might come next. It might surprise you to see UnitedHealth Group UNH on the list, in light of the company's numerous difficulties. These have included higher-than-expected costs in its Medicare Advantage business, reports of a government investigation into possible healthcare fraud and the departure of Chief Executive Andrew Witty. But with the stock having tumbled 40% this year through Friday, with dividends reinvested, analysts working for brokerage and research firms believe the worst is over, with 21 out of 29 analysts polled by FactSet rating UnitedHealth a buy or the equivalent. Only three of the analysts rate the stock a sell or the equivalent. Leaving the companies passing the screen in the same order, here is a summary of analysts' opinions about the stocks: Company Ticker Share buy ratings Share neutral ratings Share sell ratings May 30 price Consensus price target Implied 12-month upside potential Expand Energy Corp. EXE 90% 10% 0% $116.13 $128.45 11% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI 47% 41% 12% $40.02 $40.69 2% EQT Corp. EQT 72% 24% 4% $55.13 $60.63 10% Micron Technology Inc. MU 85% 12% 3% $94.46 $123.95 31% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA 83% 17% 0% $24.31 $33.41 37% First Solar Inc. FSLR 78% 20% 2% $158.08 $202.43 28% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH 72% 28% 0% $17.65 $23.65 34% Incyte Corp. INCY 45% 52% 3% $65.06 $73.95 14% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX 59% 36% 5% $117.94 $119.88 2% Gen Digital Inc. GEN 45% 55% 0% $28.48 $31.83 12% DaVita Inc. DVA 9% 83% 8% $136.26 $167.14 23% ONEOK Inc. OKE 67% 33% 0% $80.84 $106.75 32% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH 42% 47% 11% $305.04 $356.93 17% Aptiv PLC APTV 68% 23% 9% $66.81 $75.76 13% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH 73% 17% 10% $301.91 $376.05 25% Elevance Health Inc. ELV 75% 25% 0% $383.84 $491.94 28% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL 81% 19% 0% $111.27 $136.52 23% American International Group Inc. AIG 55% 45% 0% $84.64 $90.88 7% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA 59% 34% 7% $381.39 $387.95 2% Ball Corp. BALL 61% 33% 6% $53.58 $61.23 14% Source: FactSet Any stock screen has its limits and should only be used as a tool as part of your own research if you are selecting individual companies for investment. Click on the tickers for more about each company. Read: Tomi Kilgore's detailed guide to the information available on the MarketWatch quote page 'You never know what might happen': How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? Strategists forecast a sizzling summer for small-cap stocks 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I'm afraid to ask her': My stepmother won't show me my father's will. What now?

Santa Ono rejected to lead University of Florida after GOP backlash
Santa Ono rejected to lead University of Florida after GOP backlash

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Santa Ono rejected to lead University of Florida after GOP backlash

June 3 (UPI) -- Dr. Santa Ono, the former president at the University of Michigan, was rejected Tuesday as the next president at the University of Florida amid backlash from Republicans over his earlier support of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Tuesday's decision by the 17-member Board of Governors comes one week after UF's Board of Trustees unanimously approved Ono as the finalist. Ono was on track to become one of the highest paid public university presidents in the country. He was due to sign a five-year contract with a base salary of $1.5 million and incentives to earn as much as $15 million over the life of the deal. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed the 2023 bill banning DEI initiatives in public colleges, delivered a lukewarm response when Ono became the presidential pick, saying Ono's statements made him "cringe." Other Republicans, including Sen. Rick Scott and Reps. Byron Donalds and Greg Steube expressed outrage. "The UF Board of Trustees has made a grave mistake," Steube wrote in a post last week. "Dr. Ono gave it his best 'college try' walking back his woke past, claiming he's now 'evolved.' But I'm not sold. This role is too important to gamble on convenient conversions." Republican state Rep. Jimmy Patronis also questioned the presidential search committee's decision to make Ono the sole finalist. "UF sets the benchmark for education nationwide. There's too much smoke with Santa Ono. We need a leader, not a DEI acolyte. Leave the Ann Arbor thinking in Ann Arbor," Patronis wrote on X. During questioning for the role, Ono stated he believed DEI programs do more harm than good. He said he closed the University of Michigan's DEI offices in March and vowed DEI would not return to Florida's campus, if he were president. "The fact is some of my past remarks about DEI do not reflect what I believe, and that evolution did not take place overnight and it was shaped over a year and a half of thinking, discussions, listening to faculty, staff and students and their thoughts on the DEI program," Ono said. Ono, who was criticized for allowing an encampment of pro-Palestinian protesters to remain at the University of Michigan for a month, vowed last week during questioning to fight anti-Semitism at the University of Florida. "Let me be very clear: based on my experience, I believe that anti-Semitism is not just one form of hatred among many," Ono said. "It is a uniquely virulent and persistent threat, especially on college campuses today."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store