Navigating SA's 2025 grain outlook: a delicate balance between abundant harvests and rising food costs
Rising input costs for fertilisers, seeds, and machinery add financial strain on farmers, which may lead to higher consumer prices, affecting vulnerable populations. Additionally, global market dynamics, including changes in trade policies and commodity prices, further complicate the situation.
Image: Karen Sandison/ Independent Newspapers
As South Africa approaches the 2025 agricultural season, the outlook for staples like maize, wheat, and soybeans is complex and critical for food security and consumer prices. Although strong harvests are expected, unpredictable climatic conditions such as droughts and excessive rainfall pose risks to crop yields.
Rising input costs for fertilisers, seeds, and machinery add financial strain on farmers, which may lead to higher consumer prices, affecting vulnerable populations. Additionally, global market dynamics, including changes in trade policies and commodity prices, further complicate the situation.
While there is optimism about harvest yields, these interconnected factors create uncertainty for agricultural stability and food prices.
Stakeholders—including policymakers, farmers, and consumers—must remain adaptable to address the challenges ahead and ensure food security.Maize: A Double-Edged SwordThe Crop Estimates Committee (CEC) forecasts a commercial maize crop of 14.664 million tons for 2025, indicating a 0.72% increase from previous estimates and a 14.12% rise from 2024. This growth is primarily due to favourable weather conditions and an expansion in farming areas.
However, the potential benefits of this bumper crop may be diminished by rising production costs. Escalating prices for fertilisers and fuel, driven by global supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions, are significantly increasing input costs for farmers.
For consumers, especially those in low-income households, maize meal—a staple food—has become less affordable, with prices steadily climbing over the past year.
This situation raises concerns about food security for many families.Wheat and Soybeans: Promising Yet VulnerableThe wheat harvest for 2025 is projected at 2.3 million tons, a 26% increase year-over-year, driven by improved yields and consistent planting areas.
Similarly, soybeans are expected to yield 2.3 million tons, benefiting from better yields and a stable planting area.
These gains are crucial for both human consumption and animal feed, impacting food inflation and livestock production costs.
Despite these optimistic projections, the agricultural sector remains vulnerable to climatic fluctuations.
The El Niño phenomenon, which has caused prolonged heat stress and adverse rainfall, continues to pose a threat to crop yields and food security.Implications for Food Security and Consumer PricesIncreased production of staple crops like maize can play a significant role in addressing food price pressures, but it is essential to recognize that the benefits of such production are not always guaranteed.
For example, while higher yields can lead to an abundant supply, this abundance does not automatically translate to lower prices for consumers or increased profitability for farmers.
In the context of South Africa, several factors intertwine to influence maize prices. Global competition plays a crucial role, as farmers must compete with imported maize, which can fluctuate significantly in price due to international market conditions.
Additionally, local challenges such as exchange rate fluctuations can further complicate the pricing landscape. When the South African rand weakens, the cost of imported goods increases, putting additional pressure on local producers to maintain their price points while also managing rising production costs.
The anticipated decline in maize prices that may result from increased production can pose challenges for farmers. While consumers may benefit from lower prices, farmers could see their profit margins shrink, leading to potential issues regarding the sustainability of local agriculture. Farmers may struggle to cover their costs, invest in their operations, or make a reasonable living if prices fall too low, which could discourage long-term investment in farming activities.
For consumers, particularly those living in rural areas or low-income urban settings, the rising cost of staple foods like maize meal is a pressing concern.
Food security is a critical issue, and when prices rise, it can push necessities out of reach for many families. In 2022, approximately 25.8% of the population experienced food insecurity, a figure that was likely exacerbated by ongoing economic pressures and rising inflation rates. As these economic challenges persist, families are often forced to make difficult choices between purchasing food, paying for utilities, or other essential expenses.
Policy RecommendationsTo navigate these challenges, a multifaceted approach is essential:Support for Farmers: Implementing subsidies for fertilisers and fuel, as well as providing access to blended finance packages, can help mitigate rising production costs and support farmers' profitability.
Strategic Trade Policies: Enhancing trade agreements and resolving regional trade frictions can secure export markets and stabilise prices, benefiting both producers and consumers.Consumer Protection: Monitoring price trends and implementing short-term interventions, such as zero-rated VAT on basic foodstuffs, can help protect vulnerable households from escalating food costs.
Investment in Agricultural Innovation: Encouraging the adoption of drought-resistant GMO seeds and precision agriculture can improve yields and reduce environmental impact, ensuring long-term food security.
The 2025 grain outlook for South Africa presents a paradox: abundant harvests shadowed by rising costs and climatic uncertainties.
While increased production offers hope, it is not a panacea for the challenges facing food security and consumer prices. A balanced approach, combining support for farmers, strategic policies, and consumer protection, is crucial to ensure that the benefits of a bumper harvest reach all South Africans.
Dr Thulasizwe Mkhabela is an Honorary Research Fellow with the African Centre for Food Security and the University of KwaZulu-Natal
Image: LinkedIn
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Mr Price Group raises final dividend 12. 7% after market share gains in volatile consumer market
Mr Price Home store at Canal Walk, Century City. The group gained market share and sales in its 2025 financial year, with the faster sales momentum of the second half continuing into the first quarter of the 2026 financial year. Image: Ian Landsberg/ Independent Newspapers Mr Price Group increased its final dividend a creditable 12.7% to 593.5 cents a share after the value fashion retailer managed to raise its operating profit margin through lower markdowns, increased sales, and market share gains, after a muted first half. Total revenue increased by 7.9% to R40.9 billion, and the group gained 50 basis percentage points (bps) of market share, as measured by the Retail Liaison Committee. The gross margin expanded 80 bps to 40.5%, and operating profit reached a record level of R5.8bn, with the operating margin increasing 20 bps to 14.2%. Headline earnings a share increased 10.7% to 1 424 cents, respectively, after a stronger second half. This was despite the weaker month of February for the retail sector and the shift of school holidays and Easter to April, after the financial year-end, from March. 'The first half was challenging for the retail sector but improved in the second half. We are very satisfied to have gained similar levels of market share in both periods, reflecting the value we were able to provide our customers despite very different economic conditions,' CEO Mark Blair said in a statement on Friday. He said the sales momentum through the second half was supported by strong comparable store sales growth and gross profit margin gains across all trading segments. Revenue exceeded R40bn for the first time. Group retail sales of R39.4bn increased 7.8%, and comparable store sales increased 3.4%. In the second half, retail sales and comparable store sales accelerated to 9.9% and 5.7%, respectively. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Other revenue increased 6.6% to R1.3bn. Group store sales increased 7.8%, and online sales by 7.9%. Momentum improved in the second half across both sales channels, with sales growing 9.5% and 11.5%, respectively. Group unit sales increased 3.6% (4.9% in the second half), and retail selling price (RSP) inflation came to 3.7%. The group opened 184 new stores across its 15 trading chains, expanding its total store footprint to 3,030 stores. Interest rate cuts supported an improving credit environment in the second half, reflected in the group approval rate increasing to 20.3% and peaking at 23.8% in March 2025. Credit approvals would continue to be cautiously managed, the group directors said. Total expenses increased 10%, which included average space growth of 4.3%. The group's expenses to retail sales and other revenue ratio of 27.9% was within targeted range. On the outlook, Blair said a competitive and low-growth economy required the government reform agenda to be accelerated to create higher levels of employment and stimulate economic activity. He said the consumer environment in South Africa remains volatile. In the short term, consumer relief was supported by low inflation, lower petrol prices, and interest rate cuts, which collectively increased disposable income. Real wage growth experienced some recovery. However, the sustainability of an improving consumer environment in the medium term could be challenging due to the uncertainty from the global and domestic economies. He said Mr Price Apparel was the most shopped retailer in South Africa according to MAPS. Group retail sales in the first quarter of the 2026 financial year had increased 11.6%, with all trading divisions gaining market share in April 2025. 'Focus remains on extracting maximum value through profitable market share from our 15 trading chains and investment into strategic enablement projects, predominantly in the technology and supply chain functions,' said Blair. About 200 new stores would be opened in the 2026 financial year. Three acquisitions in recent years had delivered a combined operating profit of R1.2bn in the 2025 financial year and continue to be earnings accretive. BUSINESS REPORT Visit:
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Why a medical report isn't enough for disability insurance claims
Discover the critical differences between employer medical boarding processes and disability insurance criteria as highlighted by the National Financial Ombud Scheme of South Africa. Learn how these distinctions can impact your disability claims. Image: Motshwari Mofokeng/Independent Newspapers A medical report does not automatically qualify an employee for disability insurance, according to the National Financial Ombud Scheme of South Africa (NFO). It said, while medical reports serve as key evidence, the employer's medical boarding policy may differ significantly from the criteria used by insurers to determine eligibility for disability benefits. The (NFO) describes itself as a single, one-stop, dispute resolution service made up of four former longstanding industry ombud schemes: the Ombudsman for Short-Term Insurance, the Ombudsman for Long-term Insurance; the Credit Ombud and Ombudsman for Banking Services. Services are provided free of charge. According to the NFO, medical evidence forms part of a broader application process that assesses the nature and extent of the disability, as well as the individual's ability to perform their duties, whether in their current occupation or an alternative role. The NFO says it regularly receives complaints from employees who have been dismissed due to incapacity or medically boarded by their employer, but later find their disability claims denied. 'The employee and the employer operate under the assumption that if the employer's doctor has declared the employee disabled for work, the insurer would pay his disability benefit. This is not correct. 'The employer's boarding or incapacity process and an application for disability benefits from an insurer in terms of the policy contract are two distinct processes,' says Denise Gabriels, lead ombud of the Life Insurance Division at the NFO. Gabriels highlighted two cases where employees were medically boarded but had their disability claims declined. In one instance, a Code 14 truck driver suffered vision loss in his right eye, undergoing multiple medical procedures. When he applied for income disability benefits through the group scheme's insurer, his claim was declined as it did not meet the policy's medical criteria. One year later, while still receiving specialist treatment, his employment was terminated due to ill health. His employer did not assist him with the claim process, instead advising him to appeal the insurer's decision. Under the policy terms, the driver needed to be classified as disabled under the Own Occupation clause, which meant he had to be unable to perform duties specific to his job. However, given his profession, the policy automatically referenced Any Occupation, meaning he had to prove that he was unable to perform any other role in the open labour market. Although the insurer acknowledged his inability to drive a heavy-duty truck, they deemed him capable of performing other tasks, including driving a light motor vehicle. His appeal was denied because he could still undertake alternative employment. Meanwhile, his employer terminated his services before the claim was finalised, without considering redeployment to a different role. The NFO stepped in, questioning whether it was reasonable to expect a 57-year-old truck driver with impaired vision to re-enter the labour market. Following further discussions, the insurer reconsidered and approved his claim. 'The NFO asked the insurer to reconsider its decision based on fairness and equity. Following further consideration, the insurer agreed to pay the claim. 'In deciding on disability claims, insurers have a responsibility to be fair and unbiased. The insurer should consider the individual's specific circumstances and attributes when assessing the risk,' Gabriels says. In another case, an underground load driver was medically declared unfit for his job due to a respiratory condition by an Occupational Medical Practitioner (OMP). When his claim for disability benefits was denied, he lodged a complaint with the NFO. His employer had found him unfit for underground work, could not offer an alternative position, and terminated his employment. However, the insurer noted that his respiratory pathology was mild, and while he was deemed unfit for underground tasks, no medical restrictions prevented him from operating the load driver vehicle. Following treatment, his condition improved, and he was no longer on chronic medication. His claim was declined as he did not meet the policy's strict criteria requiring a continuous, permanent, and total inability to work in his own occupation or a suitable alternative. The insurer considered a follow-up assessment that showed his medical condition was stable, his respiratory examination was normal, and his daily function was unaffected. Despite this, the OMP still declared him permanently incapacitated from underground work. His employer, unable to offer surface work, terminated his employment. The NFO ultimately ruled in favour of the insurer, concluding that while he was medically boarded, his medical evidence did not support total disability in terms of the policy. 'The availability of work within the mine and or in the open labour market is not a relevant factor in determining whether a person is disabled in terms of the policy. In this instance, the medical evidence did not support that the complainant was permanently unfit to work as a Load Driver or take up a suitable alternative occupation. 'The NFO could not assist this complainant, and the complaint was therefore dismissed,' Gabriels explained. These cases underscore the critical distinction between employer medical boarding processes and insurance policy criteria. Employees must understand that being medically boarded does not guarantee disability benefits under an insurance policy, she says. Gabriels says insurers assess claims based on contract definitions, which may differ from medical assessments. Alternative employment opportunities may influence claim decisions, even if the individual is unable to perform their current job. Employees should carefully review their policy terms and seek guidance if their claim is denied. With growing concerns over disability claims, the role of ombud schemes like the NFO remains vital in ensuring fairness and accountability in the insurance sector, she says. PERSONAL FINANCE
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Mr Price hits milestone with 3,000 stores despite anaemic economic outlook
Mr Price Home store at Canal Walk, Century City Image: Ian Landsberg/Independent Newspapers JSE-listed Mr Price Group demonstrated the resilience of its fashion-value business model, posting a 7.9% increase in total revenue to R40.9 billion for its 2025 financial year. In its results statement issued on Friday, Mr Price said it reached a milestone of now having just more than 3,000 stores during the full year, as it opened 184 new stores across its 15 trading chains. Weighted average trading space increased 4.3%. However, Global economic uncertainty has cast a shadow when it comes to growth prospects in 2025, as potential US tariffs threaten markets worldwide, it said. 'The South African economy has not been spared from this impact and its forecast gross domestic product growth has been revised downwards from the previously bullish outlook at the end of 2024,' the group noted. It added that South African consumers have received some short-term relief through lower inflation, decreasing fuel prices, and interest rate cuts totalling 1 percentage point, all of which contributed to increased disposable income, Mr Price said. It added that, while real wage growth is showing signs of recovery, the sustainability of these improvements remains questionable given both global and domestic economic uncertainties. Despite these challenges, Mr Price remains focused on its fashion-value merchandise strategy, which continues to resonate with its growing customer base. The retailer maintains its position as South Africa's most shopped clothing store according to MAPS data, reinforcing its commitment to being the "customer's value champion" even in volatile times. The retailer gained 0.5 percentage points of market share according to Retailers' Liaison Committee data, while expanding its gross margin by 0.80 percentage points to 40.5%. The group achieved a record operating profit of R5.8bn, with its operating margin increasing 20 basis points to 14.2%. Basic and headline earnings per share grew 11.0% and 10.7% cents respectively. Its second half performance was particularly strong, with diluted headline earnings per share growing 12.1%, it said. This came despite February's weaker retail performance and the shift of school holidays and Easter from March to April, Mr Price noted. Mr Price attributed the improved performance to better sales momentum and lower markdowns following a more subdued first half in the retail sector. Group CEO Mark Blair said that, while the first half presented challenges for retailers, conditions improved in the second half. "We are very satisfied to have gained similar levels of market share in both periods, reflecting the value we were able to provide our customers despite very different economic conditions," he said. Blair added that growth in sales momentum through the second half was supported by strong comparable store sales growth and gross profit margin gains across all trading segments. The board declared a final dividend of 593.5 cents per share, up 12.7%. IOL
