Turkey's Double Game Uncovered: How Ankara Betrayed Russia While Wooing The West
New Delhi: Turkey has played a dangerous double game. This time, not only with India but with Russia as well. Ankara secretly armed Ukraine with deadly Bayraktar TB2 drones, which Kyiv used to destroy at least 40 Russian fighter jets last week, even while publicly maintaining ties with the Kremlin.
This military support came at a time when Turkey was giving Russian tourists and companies a safe haven by defying Western sanctions. But behind the scenes, it was also cozying up to the United States and the NATO.
Analysts believe the drone supply was Turkey's way of winning points with Washington, even if it meant putting a knife in Putin's back.
Drone Diplomacy or Deception?
The Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 has become one of the world's most lethal combat drones. It is sleek in design and deadly in execution and can carry out both precision strikes and surveillance.
Ukraine received 72 drones between 2019 and 2022. Turkey allegedly sent eight more units after the war began.
These drones have allowed Ukraine to carry out devastating attacks deep inside Russian territory and damage or destroy more than 40 Russian military aircraft.
Why is Turkey Doing This?
Experts suggest Turkey's real motive lies not in helping Ukraine win the war but in pleasing the United States and NATO. As a NATO member, Turkey constantly faces pressure from the West to cut ties with Moscow.
Supplying drones gave it a way to appear loyal to the alliance, even while pretending to be neutral in the Russia-Ukraine war.
Ironically, this is the same Turkey that has opposed Western sanctions against Russia, kept its airspace open to Russian tourists and allowed Russian businesses to relocate to Turkish soil.
Russia Feels Betrayed
For Moscow, the drone revelation is nothing short of a betrayal. Kremlin officials have reportedly called it a 'stab in the back'. Russia now sees Turkey's diplomatic double-speak as a strategic threat.
President Putin, who had maintained a working relationship with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan despite geopolitical differences, is said to be furious over Ankara's duplicity.
Meanwhile, Turkey is attempting to position itself as a mediator in the global arena, claiming it wants peace while arming one side in a war.
Trust Lost on All Fronts
This latest episode has also damaged Turkey's standing with India. New Delhi has long suspected Ankara of siding with Pakistan on Kashmir, and this fresh betrayal of Russia, a close Indian defense ally, only adds to the mistrust.
In trying to play all sides, Muslim world 'leader', Western ally and 'neutral' peace broker, Turkey may end up losing the trust of all. As global tensions rise, Ankara's balancing act is looking less like diplomacy and more like deception.
Despite overt ties with Russia, Turkey's covert support to Ukraine has exposed a major fault line in global diplomacy. For India and Russia, this may serve as a warning that Erdogan's Turkey is no longer a reliable partner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
'Near consensus': Hegseth says Nato close to deal on 5% defence spending
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said Nato allies are nearing consensus on a new defence spending target of 5% of GDP, a longstanding demand from President Donald Trump to member states read more Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, and Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte deliver statements ahead of a meeting of Nato defence ministers at Nato headquarters in Brussels, on Thursday. AP US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said Nato allies are nearing consensus on a new defence spending target of 5% of GDP, a longstanding demand from President Donald Trump to member states. Trump has for months said he wants Nato allies to boost investment in defence to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. No country is yet at 5%, not even the US, but Hegseth said there was progress on agreeing to the target. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking after a meeting with Nato defence ministers in Brussels, Hegseth said, 'I think it is, it is worth taking a moment to note the historic nature of what just occurred in there, which is not an end state, there's still more to go. But considering 2% was the goal that President Trump set out in his first term, President Trump said other countries need to carry the burden, pay the fair share, and a lot of people thought that was impossible, it couldn't happen, and here we are: countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment for Nato.' He, however, said there are a few countries that are not quite there yet but expressed the desire to get them there. 'I won't name any names. It's amongst friends in that room. We'll get them there. But from France to Germany to the Baltics to the Nordic countries to Poland to Greece to Hungary, to so many more, the commitment is there 5% on defence spending. When you consider the threats that we face, the urgency in the world, it's critical,' he added. 'Capability targets' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte confirmed ministers agreed on 'capability targets' to strengthen military readiness. These targets involve priority acquisitions like long-range missiles, drones, and air defence systems, as well as logistics tools to enhance rapid deployment. 'All these investments have to be financed,' AP quoted Rutte as saying. Earlier in the days as he arrived for the Nato meeting, Hegseth said that all Nato members must commit to spending 5% of their GDP on defence by the upcoming summit of Nato leaders scheduled for June 24–25. According to diplomats, European allies recognise that increasing defence spending is essential to securing continued US support for the continent's security. They believe enabling President Trump to claim a victory on his 5% demand is key to maintaining American engagement, especially during the Hague summit, reported Reuters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'That will be a considerable extra investment,' Rutte told reporters. He expressed confidence that at the Hague summit, 'we will decide on a much higher spending target for all the nations in Nato.' In an effort to reach Trump's 5% target, Rutte has proposed that alliance members increase direct defence spending to 3.5% of GDP and allocate an additional 1.5% to broader security-related initiatives, Reuters reported. Hegseth expressed support for that plan on Thursday. 'You got to spend to have hard power,' Reuters quoted Hegseth as saying. 'This alliance, we believe, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities, that combination constitutes a real commitment.' Spain not on board However, not all member states are aligned. Spain, for instance, has expressed hesitation about adopting the 5% target. 'We think that this 2% is enough to meet the responsibilities we have committed to,' Reuters quoted Spanish Defence Minister Margarita Robles as saying on Thursday. 'What is important is that each country is able to meet the objectives it has set itself,' Robles added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nato's investment plan Negotiations over Nato's new investment plan are expected to continue up to the summit's eve. Meanwhile, Rutte said allies are set to agree Thursday on 'historic' new capability targets —defining troop numbers, weapons, and ammunition contributions — to better balance defence efforts across Europe, Canada, and the US. Germany will need 50,000–60,000 additional active troops under the proposed targets, according to German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius. Disagreements remain over the timeline for meeting the 5% spending goal. Rutte has suggested 2032, a deadline some Eastern European countries say is too slow, while others see it as too ambitious. Estonia wants the target reached within five years. 'We don't have time for 10 years, we don't have time even for seven years,' said Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur. Sweden is pushing for 2030. Debate also continues over what counts as 'defense-related' spending, with possible inclusion of cybersecurity and certain infrastructure projects. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
‘India-Pakistan conflict was stopped with Trump's personal participation': Kremlin after Putin call
Trump on Wednesday (June 4) held a telephonic conversation with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during which the two leaders also discussed the India-Pakistan conflict, among other issues read more Kremlin appears to have endorsed US President Donald Trump's claim of helping reach a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following a four-day military conflict last month. Trump on Wednesday (June 4) held a telephonic conversation with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during which the two leaders also discussed the India-Pakistan conflict among other issues. In a press statement issued after the talks, the Kremlin acknowledged Trump's 'personal involvement' in helping halt the military standoff between the two South Asian neighbours. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump,' said the statement. Trump's ceasefire claim The US president has on several occasions claimed he helped broker the truce between India and Pakistan on May 10. He made the latest claim during a press conference with Tesla CEO Elon Musk earlier this week, saying, 'We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster, and I want to thank the leaders of India and Pakistan, and I want to thank my people. Also, we talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons. They're great leaders in those countries, and they understood and they agreed, and that all stopped.' Trump's comments come merely a week after he made the same claim during South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to the White House, where he said he 'settled' the tensions between India and Pakistan through trade. India's rebuttal However, New Delhi has swiftly rejected the claims made by the Trump administration. India maintains that the request for ceasefire was initiated by the Pakistani side on May 10. Indian opposition lawmaker Shashi Tharoor, who is currently leading a delegation to Washington DC as part of the Operation Sindoor outreach programme, on Thursday dismissed Trump's claim. 'We have enormous respect for the American Presidency and the American President (Donald Trump). All we can say for ourselves is that we have never particularly wanted to ask anyone to mediate," Tharoor said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tharoor further highlighted that India was anyway ready to cease its Operation Sindoor once Pakistan stopped its aggression and hence required no persuasion. 'The moment Pakistan stops, we are prepared to stop. So if they, in turn, then told the Pakistanis, you better stop because the Indians are willing to stop, and that was what they did, then that's a wonderful gesture on their part with Pakistan, but only Pakistan, and they can tell us exactly what happened. With us, all we can say is that we know, in our conversations, some of these things didn't come up,' Tharoor added.
India Gazette
30 minutes ago
- India Gazette
EU must tell Pakistan to end terror cycle: Former Union Minister MJ Akbar
Brussels [Belgium], June 5 (ANI): Former Union Minister MJ Akbar urged the European Union to reject mediation efforts and take a firm stand against Pakistan's long-standing support for terrorism. He said, 'The principal message that we conveyed was that all talk of mediation is irrelevant. The only thing that the EU should do is to tell Pakistan in no uncertain terms that it must end the cycle of barbarism of violence and terrorism that it began on the 22nd of October, 1947, and which continues till this Europe cannot stand up against fascist ethnic cleansing violence, then who will? and if our European friends do not recognise the danger, then it will hurt is the global war against terrorism and particularly against Pakistan-sponsored fascist terrorism.' Akbar stressed that Europe must recognize the threat posed by Pakistan-sponsored terrorism and act decisively to uphold global peace and security. As part of the all-party delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, which toured the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, and Belgium, Akbar voiced strong concerns about global inaction and hypocrisy on terrorism. He questioned the international community's double standards, highlighting the disparity in responses to terrorism based on geographical location and the nationality of victims. He emphasised that while India's actions against terrorism are met with calls for restraint, other countries are held to different standards. 'Are there two laws in this world? One for America and the West, and another for India?' he asked. 'After 9/11, the US went 12,000 kilometres to seek justice in Afghanistan and Pakistan. They held Pakistan accountable -- General Musharraf admitted it. But when India takes action just 500 kilometres away to fight terror, we are asked to show restraint.' Akbar stressed that Indian lives are equally precious and deserving of justice, questioning whether the international community's silence stems from a perceived difference in value between Indian and Western lives. 'Are the tears of an Indian widow less painful than those of an American widow? Is an Indian life less precious?' he questioned, urging the international community to shed its silence. He clarified that India is not seeking revenge but justice. 'We are here as friends, not in hostility. We share Europe's values -- democracy, freedom, and nationhood. Yet many still sit on the fence,' he said. 'We now ask the hard questions and expect answers.' The all-party Indian parliamentary delegation, led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, engaged with the Indian diaspora in Brussels and sharply criticised Pakistan for its continued support for terrorism. The delegation includes BJP MPs Daggubati Purandeswari and Samik Bhattacharya, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, Congress MPs Ghulam Ali Khatana and Amar Singh, former Union Minister MJ Akbar, and former Ambassador Pankaj Saran. This visit is part of India's broader diplomatic campaign to highlight the impact of cross-border terrorism and advocate for justice for its victims. (ANI)
