
Republicans plot a strategy to fend off Democratic onslaught against Trump megabill
Republicans start on the back foot, with recent surveys showing the bill is unpopular, even with pro-Trump cohorts. Still, GOP leaders say they have a plan to turn things around and make the legislation Trump signed into law last week part of an offensive push to protect their House and Senate majorities.
Meanwhile, Democrats are gearing up for a political onslaught aimed at unseating Republicans who voted for it. The House Democrats' campaign arm has already launched a digital ad buy on Meta across 35 GOP-held competitive districts slamming lawmakers for voting to harm rural hospitals. Part of Democrats' strategy is to highlight that many Republicans who threatened to vote down the bill because of steep Medicaid cuts ended up voting for it anyway.
'The so-called moderate House Republicans have shamelessly lied for months — hiding behind meaningless letters and performative tweets — claiming they'd protect Medicaid, food assistance and energy jobs,' said Justin Chermol, a spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. 'But their vote is the only thing that matters, and they'll pay the price next year.'
Republicans say they have a strategy to avoid a repeat of the midterms in 2018, when Democrats attacked them for Trump's original tax cuts, which they argued disproportionately benefited the wealthy, and for seeking to cut health care for the working class by unsuccessfully trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Democrats went on to take back the House majority.
This time around, Republicans say they will campaign on individual pieces of the bill that poll well and ignore the provisions that are less popular. GOP leaders and strategists are encouraging their candidates to lean into the 'wins' of Trump's agenda: tax cuts on overtime and tips, child care subsidies and work requirements for able-bodied adults.
'Last time, we ceded ground to Democrats,' a senior aide to Republican leadership told NBC News. 'We won't do that again.'
Republicans also argue that some working-class people will begin to feel savings from two particular provisions of the bill, tax cuts on tips and overtime pay, when they take effect next summer, just ahead of the midterm elections.
But most of the tax provisions are extensions of the current rates, meaning most voters will see little change in their tax bills — another challenge for Republicans in selling the bill.
Pressed about how candidates will defend cuts to Medicaid, a high-ranking GOP strategist who is close to Trump said they won't focus on it, instead touting 'the money in the pockets of working-class Americans and their increased safety' from other provisions in the bill.
Republicans see bill as the 'defining issue of 2026'
Republican leaders are expected to hit the road, including in swing districts, in the coming months to sell the bill. In the meantime, they plan to flood local airwaves promoting the legislation, according to a senior GOP source familiar with the plans. And the National Republican Congressional Committee plans its own spate of attack ads accusing Democrats of supporting a tax hike for having voted against the bill, which extends tax cuts Trump enacted in 2017, the source added.
In a new memo obtained by NBC News, the NRCC encourages Republicans to accuse Democrats of voting to 'block tax cuts' and 'leave the border wide open,' referring to roughly $150 billion in the bill for immigration enforcement.
'House Republicans will be relentless in making this vote the defining issue of 2026, and we will use every tool to show voters that Republicans stood with them while House Democrats sold them out,' NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement.
Meanwhile, the National Republican Senatorial Committee recently circulated internal polling instructing candidates to message aggressively on tax cuts. The only mention of Medicaid in the three-page document touts the popularity of work requirements and frames the nearly $1 trillion in cuts as 'reforms' to keep benefits from undocumented immigrants.
The calculation among many Republicans in battleground states and districts who voted for the bill is that the Democratic warnings about massive cuts to Medicaid will fall flat with voters — not only because the cuts were tailored to target 'waste, fraud and abuse,' but also because the changes aren't set to kick in until after the 2026 midterms.
Still, it's a risky gamble, and many vulnerable Republicans are privately bracing for potential political blowback in their districts. The bill is projected to lead to 11.8 million fewer people having insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Perhaps the biggest driving force behind their 'yes' votes was not wanting to defy Trump. He had threatened to back primary challengers to two Republicans, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who opposed the bill. (Tillis ended up deciding not to seek re-election.)
'Seventy-seven million Americans voted to give Donald Trump a platform to make positive changes for the United States; 1.7 million Wisconsinites voted for Donald Trump,' said Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., who is expected to face a competitive re-election race next year. 'This is a mandate by the American people, and we're fulfilling this mandate.'
When he was pressed about whether Republicans are just falling in line because of Trump, Van Orden pushed back: 'The president of the United States didn't give us an assignment. We're not a bunch of little b------ around here, OK? I'm a member of Congress that represents almost 800,000 Wisconsinites.'
The Democratic group House Majority Forward is working on ads to attack vulnerable Republicans for the vote — including Van Orden, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Tom Barrett of Michigan, who all narrowly won their 2024 races.
Democrats plan to target wobbly Republicans
In the run-up to the vote, politically vulnerable Reps. David Valadao, R-Calif., and Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Va., led sternly worded letters signed by more than a dozen of their colleagues slamming steep cuts to Medicaid and clean energy tax credits.
But when it came time to vote, nearly all of them folded under pressure from Trump and ended up supporting provisions that they loudly criticized — and that could have major impacts on their constituents. Most of those lawmakers are targets of the DCCC's new ad campaign.
Two weeks ago, Valadao led a group of 16 Republicans in writing a letter vowing to oppose the Senate bill's aggressive Medicaid cuts.
'Protecting Medicaid is essential for the vulnerable constituents we were elected to represent,' they wrote. 'Therefore, we cannot support a final bill that threatens access to coverage or jeopardizes the stability of our hospitals and providers.'
All 16 of them voted for the bill Thursday.
Valadao, who represents a swing district with a large share of Medicaid recipients, warned five days before the final vote that Republicans must undo the Medicaid changes in the Senate bill — 'otherwise, I will vote no.'
His office didn't respond to messages seeking comment on his vote.
In a statement, Kiggans said that 'no legislation of this size is perfect—but there's no question that this bill includes major priorities I've been fighting for on behalf of Coastal Virginia.'
Valadao was among the group of lawmakers who visited the White House before the vote last week. During the meeting, Trump and Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, walked them through how the bill's changes to Medicaid will be implemented.
Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, who had been one of the loudest Republicans calling to protect Medicaid, walked away from the meeting arguing they have time to change the law back if they later determine it will be too harmful, since the biggest changes don't take effect for several years.
Asked by NBC News whether it was risky to bank on the prospect of Congress' reversing key components of the bill, Van Drew said: 'No, I think that it's possible. The point being that it is being done slowly.'
Another moderate GOP lawmaker who had been on the fence, granted anonymity to discuss internal party deliberations, said what ultimately made them feel comfortable voting for it is that many of the Medicaid changes, like the provider tax, won't take effect until after the midterm elections.
Under the bill, the new work requirements for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will kick in latest by the start of 2027, while new restrictions on state provider taxes — which trigger federal payments that are a major source of revenue for rural hospitals — will start in 2028.
Last month, an overlapping group of 13 House Republicans, led by Kiggans, wrote a letter calling for saving clean energy funding and tax credits, saying they were 'deeply concerned by several provisions' in the emerging package. They warned that 'project cancellations will continue to snowball' without protecting the incentives that caused the investments.
Twelve of the 13 Republicans voted for the bill — every signer except Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania.
Along with Valadao and Kiggans, Republicans who signed both letters include Juan Ciscomani of Arizona, Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania, Mike Lawler and Andrew Garbarino of New York, Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa, Young Kim of California and Don Bacon of Nebraska. (Bacon announced last week that he will retire.)
Meanwhile, some Republicans have already started to lean into parts of the bill.
Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who openly acknowledged the bill's Medicaid changes will 'take away health care from working people,' is holding an event Tuesday morning to celebrate the inclusion of his bipartisan effort to expand federal compensation for nuclear waste victims.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Is ICE the first ominous harbinger of a Trump ‘secret police'?
The Iceman Cometh, the 1939 drama by American writer Eugene O'Neill, has at various times been described by reviewers as set in a stark, ruthless world and a play that 'blisters with intensity'. In the eyes of some, such observations could just as easily apply to today's America, a country where under the presidency of Donald Trump there is an almost palpable sense of unease and potency. Today's America, too, is a country where that phrase 'The Iceman Cometh' has taken on an all too real and equally menacing connotation. For the ICE men of today's America – agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – have become the calling card of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Alhough ICE now occupies a 'noble' place in Trump's hierarchy of law enforcement, its detractors view it very differently. A modern day 'Gestapo', or 'domestic stormtroopers for the MAGA agenda', say some. 'Trump's de facto private army – his security state within the state and a threat to democracy', say others. What's certainly in no doubt is that Trump has propelled ICE into America's best-funded law enforcement agency. As the Financial Times' US national editor Edward Luce recently highlighted, Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' (BBB), signed into law by the president on July 4, lifted ICE's budget to an estimated $37.5 billion a year, a sum higher than Italy's entire defence budget and just below Canada's. Writing a message of 'THANK YOU' to the ICE workforce over the Independence Day holiday, Trump made clear that the BBB spending commitment would give the agency 'ALL of the Funding and Resources that ICE needs to carry out the Largest Mass Deportation Operation in History'. A demonstrator waves an American-Mexican flag near National Guard members and federal agents blocking protestors during an ICE immigration raid at a nearby licensed cannabis farm on July 10 £37.5 billion annually The money set aside for ICE is eye-watering. The $37.5bn a year for operations aside, the spending bill includes a $170bn package for Trump's border and immigration crackdown, which includes $45bn for new detention facilities including hiring thousands more officers and agents. In the eyes of Trump, ICE officers can do no wrong. 'The toughest people you'll ever meet,' he insists. His gushing reverence for ICE is also reflected in what Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, described as 'well-deserved bonuses'. Trump officials have said they'll provide $10,000 annual bonuses for ICE personnel as well as Border Patrol agents, along with $10,000 for new hires. As Nick Miroff, staff writer at The Atlantic magazine who covers immigration issues recently pointed out, as far as Trump sees it, the '20,000 ICE employees are the unflinching men and women who will restore order. They're the Untouchables in his [Trump's] MAGA crime drama'. So just what is ICE, what exactly does it do and, perhaps more significantly, to what extent are fears over its growing power and perceived threat to democracy justified? Established in 2003, ICE is one of the agencies under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) created in 2002 in the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks. Initially, the DHS's focus was counter-terrorism. But soon the presence of certain foreign groups began to be framed as a national security issue. DHS encompasses two law enforcement directorates: Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). Read more Tears and trauma: David Pratt in Ukraine DAVID PRATT ON THE WORLD: Whatever happens in Brazil's resentful and rancorous election, the result will have major repercussions for us all David Pratt in Ukraine: It's hard to comprehend this level of destruction David Pratt: Kremlin's protestations have a hollow ring as atrocities mount up ERO is charged with enforcing US immigration laws and has 6,100 deportation officers. HSI has about 6,500 special agents who conduct transnational criminal investigations and do not usually participate in domestic immigration operations. ICE was also created alongside Customs and Border Protection (CBP). CBP controls the borders, while ICE operates inside the country – and it's this operation across America that has become the focus of controversy According to the agency's own website, ICE, along with its ERO officials, is tasked with identifying, arresting, detaining and removing immigrants without authorisation in the US. Back during his 2024 presidential campaign when outlining his vision for deportations of undocumented migrants, Trump said he would focus on expelling those with criminal records. But since entering office this has rapidly widened to include anyone without legal status, ICE officers, often masked and not wearing uniforms or displaying badges, have now been arresting people outside courtroom hearings, during traffic stops, in workplace sweeps, and even from hospitals. The agency's aggressive tactics are striking terror throughout America's immigrant communities, especially in Democrat-run cities. National Guard members and a federal agent block people protesting an ICE immigration raid at a nearby licensed cannabis farm on July 10, 2025 near Camarillo, California Deportation efforts JUST these past weeks, Trump ordered ICE to step up its arrests and deportation efforts in Democratic strongholds, doubling down on a politicised anti-immigration drive after major protests against ICE in Los Angeles. 'We must expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'These, and other such Cities, are the core of the Democrat Power Center,' Trump claimed, citing debunked right-wing conspiracy theories that undocumented immigrants are voting in US elections in significant numbers. With every week that passes ICE operations are gathering momentum. For its part, the administration says its moves –which include hundreds of deportation flights, the expansion of third-country removals, and Trump's invocation of the seldom-used 1798 Alien Enemies Act – are necessary to stem unauthorised immigration to the United States. The law is a wartime authority that gives the president sweeping powers to detain or deport non-citizens with little or no due process and ICE has become its enforcers, much to the disquiet of many Democrat politicians, human rights activists, and ordinary citizens. ICE is now arresting four times as many non-criminals as those with criminal convictions each week, according to David Bier of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank who was cited by the Financial Times. The number of immigrants in detention with no criminal charges or convictions jumped 1,300% from January to mid-June, he wrote in an analysis. Numbers matter here, for ICE is under tremendous pressure to make more arrests to meet quotas set by senior White House aide Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump's immigration crackdown. Miller set an aggressive quota of 3,000 arrests per day in late May, and the efforts to meet that goal have pushed ICE officers into more communities and businesses. But not everyone within the ranks of ICE is happy with this and other aspects of the policy. According to The Atlantic magazine's immigration writer Nic Miroff, who has interviewed many current and former ICE agents who spoke on condition of anonymity, many described 'a workforce on edge, vilified by broad swathes of the public and bullied by Trump officials demanding more and more'. Some ICE employees, according to Miroff, 'believe that the shift in priorities is driven by a political preoccupation with deportation numbers rather than keeping communities safe'. With deportations becoming a top domestic priority for the Trump administration, some Homeland Security Investigation officers, along with those from the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, have been put on immigration enforcement duties. It's a shift in duties many do not agree with. One veteran HSI agent complained to Miroff that his division, which usually focuses on cartel drug-trafficking operations, has had agents moved to immigration enforcement arrests as part of ICE operations. 'No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation. It's infuriating,' the agent told Miroff, adding he is thinking of quitting rather than having to continue 'arresting gardeners'. Targeted by agents But complain as some ICE agents do, many Americans currently reserve their sympathies for those being targeted by the agents. Stories emerging from detention facilities where those arrested by ICE are being held are only adding to that sympathy as well as a sense of outrage. Earlier this month, Trump held a tour of one facility that's been dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz'. Its name is a reference to both the local reptile population and the former maximum-security Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary in San Francisco Bay, California. Constructed in a little over eight days and meant to accommodate up to 3,000 detainees, since then accounts and reports from the facility point to appalling conditions. They suggest, too, that the design of the site is flawed and will compromise the safety of people being held there. Stories relayed to the Miami Herald by the wives of detainees housed in the makeshift Florida detention centre for migrants in the Everglades made for grim reading about the conditions detainees endure. 'Toilets that didn't flush. Temperatures that went from freezing to sweltering. Giant bugs. And little or no access to showers or toothbrushes, much less confidential calls with attorneys,' were among some of the accounts detailed by the Miami Herald. The newspaper also told of lights being left on inside the facility 24 hours a day, with detainees saying there are no clocks and there is scant sunlight coming through the heavy-duty tents, making it difficult for them to know whether it is day or night. Currently, ICE is holding nearly 60,000 people in custody, the highest number ever, even though funding until the latest boost was available for only 41,000 detention beds. This means that processing centres are packed with people sleeping on floors in short-term holding cells. Worrying as such reports are, it's the growth of ICE, its increasingly politicised role, and the fact that it appears beyond accountability that concerns many Americans. Earlier this year, ICE's in-house watchdog was scrapped and, for the time being, America's lower courts are hamstrung in their efforts to reign it in. As the FT's Edward Luce recently observed, given that the Supreme Court last year gave Trump sweeping immunity from 'official' acts he takes as president… 'that makes ICE Trump's de facto private army – his security state within the state'. Although ICE is ostensibly still bound by constitutional limits, the way it has been operating bears the hallmarks of a secret police force in the making, insist some experts on authoritarian regimes. Lee Morgenbesser is an associate professor with the School of Government and International Relations at Griffith University, Brisbane, and fellow with the Australian Research Council. Having studied historical and contemporary secret police forces, Morgenbesser says they typically meet five criteria. First, they're a police force targeting political opponents and dissidents. Second, they're not controlled by other security agencies and answer directly to the dictator. Third, the identity of their members and their operations are secret. Fourth, they specialise in political intelligence and surveillance operations. And finally, they carry out arbitrary searches, arrests, interrogations, indefinite detentions, disappearances, and torture. 'Meets criteria' In a recent article in the online platform The Conversation and using these criteria to assess how close ICE is to becoming a secret police force, Morgenbesser concludes that 'overall, the evidence shows ICE meets most of the criteria'. While ICE has yet to target political opponents, which Morgenbesser defines narrowly as members of the Democratic Party, and it is not directly controlled by Trump, he maintains that ICE's 'current structure provides him with plausible deniability'. In short, he says that while ICE is 'far from resembling history's most feared secret police forces, there have so far been few constraints on how it operates'. 'When combined with a potential shift towards targeting US citizens for dissent and disobedience, ICE is fast becoming a key piece in the repressive apparatus of American authoritarianism,' Morgenbesser warns. As ICE makes its presence felt in a growing number of American communities, the controversy over its role is likewise certain to escalate. While a majority of Americans support deporting violent criminals, they also back allowing migrants who came to the country as children, or who arrived many years ago, to stay. Americans polled by The Economist and YouGov in mid-June showed that only 42% viewed ICE favourably, an eight percentage-point drop from February and the start of Trump's term. For now, the ICE men continue to cometh and America, a nation of immigrants, faces an altogether different reckoning over its future democratic credentials.


Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why John Swinney needs to pander to Donald Trump just like Keir Starmer
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... How political leaders should deal with Donald Trump will be the subject of much head-scratching in the corridors of power worldwide. But it basically comes down to this: fake smiles and bonhomie, accompanied by bucket-loads of overly lavish praise. At least in public. Too much in private and he'll probably think you're weak. Better to operate on his level and try to cut some kind of deal. He might even see you as a kindred spirit. Perish the thought. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The US President's many character flaws are well known, and his refusal to accept the result of the 2020 US election, his incitement of the angry mob that attacked the US Capitol, and his refusal to rule out taking Greenland from Nato ally Denmark by force demonstrate an alarming attitude towards democracy. READ MORE: Why UK needs to pander to Trump but should not necessarily believe him There is much at stake for Scotland's businesses in his dealings with politicians like John Swinney (Picture: Joe Raedle) | Getty Images Trump's attitude changing over Ukraine? Furthermore, his imposition of swingeing new tariffs on most countries could also be viewed as economic warfare against the democratic world at a time when it is trying to help Ukraine defend itself against Russian despot Vladimir Putin's actual warfare. However Trump's attitude towards that conflict is hopefully changing to one more supportive of Kyiv, and the most important role of other Western leaders is to encourage him to do more to help defeat Putin and less to damage their economies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After Trump treated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky disgracefully in the White House, John Swinney suggested his UK state visit should be cancelled. He may have had right on his side, but it was a diplomatic mistake. Keir Starmer is obviously no Trump fan but he has been doing everything he can to placate Trump for the simple reason that it is in the national interest. Swinney needs to swallow his pride and do much the same in the interests of Scottish businesses struggling to cope with Trump's tariffs. Given his mother was Scottish and he likes to call this country 'home', we might be able to get special treatment.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Blackout blinds and midnight grocery runs: Inside the reclusive lives of Trump shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks' parents
Behind the blackout blinds lining every window and cameras covering all angles of the modest brick home in Bethel Park, Pa. live the couple who may hold the answer to why Thomas Matthew Crooks, opened fire at President Trump at the Butler campaign rally, striking his ear and killing Corey Comperatore on July 13, 2024. But his parents, Matthew and Mary Crooks, have remained stubbornly silent and hunkered down since the shooting one year ago, and still refusing to speak about their son and his horrific act when Daily Mail knocked on their door this week. Since Crooks assassination attempt, his family are barely seen by neighbors with many assuming they had moved from the leafy area. His sister Katherine, 24, a janitor, has been spotted leaving her apartment less than a mile from her parents' home. But her parents have essentially become recluses, the only sign that the home is still lived in is the vehicle on the driveway moving, though neighbors can't recall the last time this happened. Crooks father even resorted to buying groceries at 3am in a bid to avoid prying eyes, not keeping to a regular routine. Both he and his wife, who is visually impaired, had previously worked as social workers since 2002. But Daily Mail can reveal that their son's high profile assassination attempt has resulted in neither renewing their licenses, which expired in February of this year. One neighbor told Daily Mail they assumed the family had moved, adding: 'We haven't seen anyone coming or going for quite a while. 'Most of us thought they had moved on or are still keeping to themselves.' His family's silence is just one of the puzzle pieces surrounding the attack, with the FBI still unable to point to a solid motive for the seemingly mild-mannered student to shoot Trump. Federal profilers have speculated that Crooks may simply have wanted to commit a mass shooting and found a convenient target for his dark fantasy in the timing and geographical proximity of Trump's rally which was held just 40 miles from where he lived with his parents. In April, Crooks searched websites for information on major depressive disorder and depressive crisis treatment. He left no manifesto or explanation for the shooting. According to CNN, Crooks' parents had attempted to reach their son when they could not find him earlier that day, but he did not respond. They then called law enforcement to tell them that their son was missing. It is not known whether they were aware that he was armed. Since the attack investigators have focused on Crooks' online activity in the months and days leading up to it in a bid to gain some sense of his state of mind. Intriguingly it has emerged that he searched online for information on Michigan mass-shooter Ethan Crumbley and his parents. Crooks left home on the day of the rally armed with an AR-15 style rifle that was bought legally by his father in 2013 and transferred to him in 2023. He was an enthusiastic member of Clairton Sportsmen's Club which he visited the day before the incident to practice on the rifle range which offers high powered rifle benches with targets up to 187 yards - roughly the distance crooks was from Trump when he shot him. Immediately after the attack the FBI removed 14 firearms from the small family home as well as explosives, a second cellphone, a laptop and a hard drive. In addition to the arsenal recovered from his home investigators recovered rudimentary explosive devices from Crooks' car, a bulletproof vest, additional magazines – bought both online and the previous day from Allegheny Arms & Gun Works – and a drone. Another mystery is why the FBI allowed his body to be released so swiftly after the shooting. While Crooks body was cremated just 10 days after the shooting, it is unclear exactly what the family have done with his remains. There is no plaque or obvious burial spot at the family's plot of land in Mount Royal Cemetery, Glenshaw, which is home to three generations of Crooks. His great grandfather, great grandmother, grandparents and uncle are all buried in the same area, along with other members of the family dating back to 1929. Crooks was 'neutralized' by a Secret Service sniper 26 seconds after he first shot. By then he had already fired eight bullets. He hit Trump, 78, in a grazing shot to his right ear, struck retired fire chief Comperatore, 50, in the head, killing him. He grievously wounded audience members James Copenhaver, 74, and David Dutch, 57, who suffered 'life altering' injuries as a result of the attack. It comes as the Secret Service suspended six agents over failures during the attack, nearly a year later. Myosoty Perez was one of six agents suspended for between 10 and 42 days following the July 13, 2024 attack in Butler. She was sent to the location of the rally ahead of time and was specifically tasked with helping to secure the surrounds, the New York Post revealed. Another agent who helped to coordinate security for the rally was also reportedly suspended, along with four people from the Pittsburgh field office. The final suspension was reportedly an agent on the counter-sniper team. A US Secret Service report released just days before the 2024 election confirmed that 'multiple operational and communications gaps preceded the July 13 attempted assassination.' The Secret Service also described some of the gaps as 'deficiency of established command and control, lapses in communication, and a lack of diligence by agency personnel,' while also noting that 'the accountability process [was] underway.' Dan Bongino - who now serves as Deputy Director of the FBI and formerly spent 11 years as a Secret Service agent - said last year that Butler was a 'apocalyptic security failure' and called for a full house-cleaning of the upper leadership ranks in the Secret Services D.C. headquarters. But in the aftermath, the agency was hounded with questions about security failures and Director Kimberly Cheatle was forced to resign. Now it has emerged that six agents have since been suspended for their actions that day, ABC News confirmed. Those who were suspended ranged from supervisors to line agents, and they all had the right to appeal their suspensions, which ranged from 10 to 42 days without pay or benefits, according to CBS News. 'We are laser focused on fixing the root cause of the problem,' Matt Quinn, the Secret Service deputy director told CBS. All of the agents have now been suspended according to federally-mandated procedures, Quinn said. He also noted that the Secret Service has introduced a new fleet of military-grade drones and set up new mobile command posts that allow agents to communicate over radio directly with local law enforcement - which was widely seen as one of the major issues with the Secret Service's response to the shooting. Witnesses have explained that having multiple command stations during the July event led to confusion and a scattered response. Dan Bongino (pictured with Trump) - who now serves as Deputy Director of the FBI and formerly spent 11 years as a Secret Service agent - said last year that Butler was a 'apocalyptic security failure' A damning 180-page report released by a House of Representatives task force in December even concluded that the shooting was 'preventable and should not have happened.' It noted that Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe testified that the agency had been operating under the assumption that local law enforcement was going to secure the AGR complex, from where Crooks fired off eight shots. The report also included a firsthand account from a Butler cop who spotted Crooks and yelled out that he has a gun - though there is no evidence to suggest the message reached the Secret Service security detail surrounding Trump before Crooks began firing. It concluded that federal, state and local law enforcement officers 'could have engaged Thomas Matthew Crooks at several pivotal moments' as his behavior became increasingly suspicious.'