
Canada's recognition of Palestinian state will likely have minimal impact without U.S. support, analysts say
Prime Minister Mark Carney made the announcement on Wednesday, saying that Canada intends to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly. He said this is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to important reforms, including president Mahmoud Abbas's promise to hold general elections in 2026, in which Hamas could not take part, and the demilitarization of the Palestinian state.
The announcement marks a change for Canada, which has long supported a two-state solution, but has maintained, like many of its allies, that such recognition would follow peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine.
Explainer: What does Canada's recognition of a Palestinian state mean in practice?
Carney's policy shift on Palestinian statehood met with cautious hope, criticism by Canadians
Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University, called it a 'major decision' and said it marks a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy.
'I think it obviously reflects frustration with the Netanyahu government and it's very much being driven by the humanitarian situation on the ground in Gaza,' he said, adding that other countries have expressed similar frustration.
With the prospect of peace talks seemingly distant, Canada has joined France, which has said it will also recognize a Palestinian state, and Britain, which will also recognize Palestine if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire.
Prof. Hampson said Canada's intention is 'part of a pressure tactic on Israel' that is shared with a new political axis between Ottawa, London and Paris. He said that while Israel has responded to international pressure in some ways – such as deploying air drops of aid and relaxing some restrictions on food entering Gaza – 'as far as Mr. Netanyahu is concerned, there's only one key ally that matters, and that's the United States.'
Thomas Juneau, a professor at the University of Ottawa and a Middle East expert, said he supports Canada's decision to recognize Palestinian statehood, but he was surprised by the timing given the trade negotiations with the United States.
Trade deal aside, Prof. Juneau said Mr. Carney's decision comes at a time when there's 'growing frustration in the international community with Israel's continuation of the war in the Gaza Strip.'
'On its own, Canada has no influence on this conflict, and this is not criticism of this or any other government. We're too far and we're too small. France on its own has no influence, or the U.K. on its own. Where other members of the international community, i.e. pretty much anybody except the U.S., can have some impact, limited but real impact, is if they act all together.'
He said that if more states recognize Palestine, it will have a limited but cumulative impact.
On Thursday, Portugal signalled it is also considering the recognition of a Palestinian state.
Prof. Juneau said with France, Britain and Canada making such announcements, they are creating an opening for other countries to follow suit. However, like Prof. Hampson, he stressed the importance of the U.S.
'One thing that we've known for years, but that has been very clear since October, 2023, is that there's only one country that can have influence on Israel and it's the U.S.'
However, Prof. Juneau said that if there is progress to be made on a peace process – and while very few are optimistic about that happening in the near future – then collective action by Western countries and others in the region does matter.
'On its own, this has no impact. The reason why it is a positive step is that as part of a broader strategy to move toward peace, to create the conditions to be able to relaunch a peace process, it is one useful step among many others.'
On Tuesday, ahead of Mr. Carney's announcement, nearly 200 former ambassadors and senior diplomats signed a letter urging him to recognize a Palestinian state. Among the signatories was Jon Allen, who served as ambassador to Israel from 2006 to 2010.
Mr. Allen said Mr. Carney's intention to recognize the state of Palestine is 'symbolically and historically and substantively important,' saying that one significant message it sends is to Palestinians that the West continues to support a two-state solution.
'Now, is recognition going to do something on its own? No, it's not, but it's sending an important signal.'
He said what's most troubling is that Israel's actions in the West Bank and Gaza risk making the two-state solution impossible – and that's why the recognition is important now. 'And even without the United States, sending a signal, recognizing Palestine, is sending a signal to Israel, to the United States, to the world, and to Palestinians, most importantly, that the two-state solution is important. We believe in it and we're going to keep trying to work toward it.'
'I am one that continues to strongly believe that it's possible, but if Israel were to continue to act as it is, it would disappear. And so countries are saying to Israel and Palestine, 'we still believe in that.''
Mr. Allen said he doesn't see it as a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy because Ottawa has long supported a two-state solution.
'This is, one could say, one more step in an effort to try and preserve what we want and hope for these two peoples, which is two states.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
3 minutes ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Trump escalates trade war, raising tariffs to 35 per cent
Watch U.S. President Trump's increased tariffs on Canadian imports have rallied leaders north of the border, reviving calls for retaliation. Rachel Aiello reports.


CTV News
3 minutes ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Breaking down what CUSMA protects from tariffs
Watch CUSMA has been touted as an escape hatch from some of Trump's tariffs but how much will it shield businesses and consumers? Genevieve Beauchemin explains.


CBC
4 minutes ago
- CBC
Trump didn't chicken out. So what's Canada's next move?
Social Sharing Canada has now learned that the derisive acronym TACO — often slapped on U.S. President Donald Trump — is inaccurate and needs to be tweaked to something more like "Trump (Almost) Always Chickens Out." Despite putting decidedly lower tariffs than he'd threatened on dozens of countries around the globe and giving Mexico a 90-day reprieve from his threat to raise its tariff rate, Trump singled out Canada for an increase. While there's no way that Canada can characterize what happened as a win, there's plenty of evidence that it's not a reason for Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to panic and do something that jeopardizes what really matters for the Canadian economy: tariff-free access to the U.S. for the vast majority of exports. The key evidence backing this perspective comes in the economic number-crunching showing the actual impact of Trump's tariffs on the whole of Canada's exports to the U.S, what's called the effective tariff rate. Think of it as an average, weighted by the value of Canadian goods going across the border. Different economists have slightly different estimates, but even with the increase Trump announced Thursday night, there's consensus the effective tariff rate for Canada is down in the single digits, noticeably lower than the rate for any other major trading partner. That's because despite Trump's bluster, he's allowing the vast majority of Canada's exports into the country with zero tariff under the terms of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). WATCH | Canada's talks with Trump administration will continue, says minister of US trade: 'The doors aren't closed' LeBlanc says on Canada-U.S. trade deal 3 hours ago Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, tells CBC News that despite an overnight hike in tariffs on some Canadian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump, Ottawa is still negotiating with Washington and that LeBlanc expects talks to continue next week. LeBlanc was speaking outside the Canadian embassy in Washington, D.C. Experts and business leaders say Canada's trade negotiators and federal government need to be laser focused on maintaining that tariff-free access through CUSMA, especially since the deal is soon up for review. Goldy Hyder, president and CEO of the Business Council of Canada, says a bigger issue than Trump's incremental increase of the tariffs is the way Canada is struggling to "find a way forward" in its negotiations with the U.S. 'The conversation that we should be having' "I am hoping this is an opportunity to reassess and to some extent reset where we are and where we need to get to for the longer haul," Hyder told CBC's Katie Simpson in an interview Friday. While Hyder says he has empathy for Carney's government as it tries to navigate the uncharted waters of dealing with Trump 2.0 on trade, he's questioning whether its negotiating strategy has been aimed at the correct target. Canada must assess what it needs to do "to get into the conversation that we should be having, which is first and foremost: how are we going to review and renew the USMCA?" Hyder said, using the U.S. government's preferred acronym for the trade deal. The text of CUSMA calls for a formal review starting in July 2026, but consultations between the three countries are expected to begin this fall. As Trump levies blanket tariffs on nearly every other major trading partner, observers are increasingly pointing to the big tariff exemptions Canada is getting from CUSMA as a major competitive advantage. That creates a rather hefty source of motivation for the Carney government to make solidifying CUSMA the long-term goal of its talks with the Trump administration. The eternal question: Trump's real motivation for the tariffs On the other side of the border, there's a view that a significant driving force behind Trump's tariff tactics with Canada is gaining leverage in those CUSMA renewal talks. Although Department of Justice lawyers have been arguing in court that stopping the flow of fentanyl from Canada — as minimal as it is — justifies the tariffs, trade policy expert Inu Manak of the Council for Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., says she believes there's no way that's really what's motivating Trump. "I do think a lot of this has to do with some sort of renegotiation of parts of the CUSMA deal that the Trump administration is not happy with," Manak told CBC News Network on Friday. Although Trump hit Canada with a tariff increase, Manak isn't criticizing Canada's negotiating tactics. "There's no really good way to go about doing this," she said. "We've seen variation in approaches and no matter what, everyone seems to be getting hit with tariffs." WATCH | Breaking down the winners and loser in Trump's tariff gambit: Win, lose or tariff? Playing Trump's trade deal game 20 hours ago CUSMA and its tariff-free access must remain the focus for Canada, says John Manley, a former Liberal deputy prime minister, now chair of chair of Jefferies Securities, a global investment banking firm. "The big game is the 93 per cent of Canadian goods that cross the border currently tariff-free under USMCA," Manley told CBC News. "That is what we need to protect." To retaliate or not? Even if the CUSMA renegotiation is what matters most in the long term for Canada, the Carney government also has to think about what its immediate next steps should be. Perhaps the most immediate question along those lines for Ottawa is whether to retaliate or not. Brian Clow, who served as former prime minister Justin Trudeau's deputy chief of staff and led his "war room" on Canada-U.S. trade relations, describes himself as a fan of retaliation, but is not advocating for Carney to fire back at Trump in this instance. "I do think [Carney and his team] need to stop and consider whether to further retaliate right now, given Canada is standing on its own, and the rest of the world is not standing with us," Clow said Friday in an interview with CBC News. WATCH | Should Carney hit back? Here's what a former PMO insider thinks: Canada is the only country in the world to be hit immediately by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Brian Clow, former deputy chief of staff for Justin Trudeau, says part of the reason Canada is being singled out is because it was one of only two countries to stand up to Trump — and 'the world made a mistake' by not retaliating. Carney's government also needs to think about what it can do about the tariffs that are actually having the biggest impact on Canada right now: the sectoral tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum and 25 per cent on the non-U.S. content of assembled automobiles. "Maybe there's one more step towards the American ask that we can take — that we can live with — that can close this deal," Clow said. The signals from Carney's team suggest the plan is to keep on keeping on. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, said Friday that he and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump's point man on tariffs, agreed to speak by phone next week and arrange for a meeting later in August. "We'll continue to talk to the Americans," LeBlanc told reporters in Washington. "The United States will continue to be our neighbour, continue to be our most important economic and security partner." Both LeBlanc in his scrum and Carney in his statement acknowledged the need for the government to help the steel, aluminum and auto sectors. Getting carve-outs or reductions of those tariffs will no doubt be an objective as the talks with Team Trump progress.