Glamorous Pan Am back from the dead, and it's coming to Australia
As of the 'inaugural' flight last week, however, he has changed his tune. Having announced a partnership with AVi8 Air Capital – a merchant bank and consultancy firm which specialises in the aviation industry – Carter is now talking of timetabled services and distant horizons.
'Pan Am remains a cherished name in aviation,' he comments. 'Through this collaboration, we aim to assess a sustainable, forward-thinking approach to reintroducing scheduled commercial service under the Pan Am name; one that not only honours [the airline's] legacy – but also makes the Pan Am experience more accessible.'
If Carter is able to accomplish this not inconsiderable feat, he will have succeeded where several others have failed. Because this month's re-emergence of the 'blue meatball' logo is not the first attempt to restore Pan Am to the present tense. It is actually the fifth rekindling of the airline's embers since the original fire burned out in 1991.
There was the low-cost carrier which flew from the US to the Caribbean between 1996 and 1998. There was a short-haul operator, based at Portsmouth in New Hampshire, which offered flights in the American north-east between 1998 and 2004, and a sister company which had another go at repolishing the holy grail, from the same base, between 2004 and 2008. All of them had the Pan Am name. As did Pan Am American Airways Incorporated, which picked up the baton in 2010, running cargo planes out of Brownsville in Texas, with the promise of passenger services to come. It collapsed in 2012, in a haze of scandal.
While each of these failed projects had their issues, they all, ultimately, struggled to compete with the weight and the mystique of a beloved brand. Because, for more than half a century, Pan Am was the biggest – and most shimmering – fish in the global pond.
The airline first emerged in Florida in 1927, as the brainchild of Henry Arnold, Carl Spaatz and John Jouett – three US Army Air Corps officers who began offering flights between Key West and Havana. But it began to bloom in the 1930s, under the astute leadership of Juan Trippe, an American entrepreneur who understood that the future of travel had wings.
Loading
That decade saw Pan Am lead the way with its Clipper planes – doughty flying boats that, come 1931, were whistling their way down to South America. Within eight years, Europe was in focus. On March 30, 1939, Harold Gray piloted the first ever transatlantic flight with passengers; a Pan Am service aboard the Yankee Clipper which made the oceanic crossing from Baltimore to Lisbon – via a refuelling pause at Horta, on the island of Faial in the Azores – in a total flying time of 24 hours, 39 minutes.
By the dawn of the Jet Age in the early 1950s, Pan Am was the US flag-carrier in all but name, flinging itself into the new arena of international travel with flair, finesse and a reputation for luxury. Its state-of-the-art hub, trademarked as 'Worldport', was inaugurated as JFK's Terminal 3 in 1960, its futuristic 'flying-saucer' design suggesting trips to space as much as to Paris.
Ten years later, it was playing host to the jumbo jet. Pan Am was a key player in the advent of the Boeing 747. Its desire for bigger, better, faster and more – and, specifically, its placing an order for 25 of these revolutionary giants in April 1966 – kickstarted the production line in Seattle. The first commercial flight of a 747 was a Pan Am endeavour – from JFK to Heathrow, on January 22, 1970.
It was all so fabulous that you might wonder how so feted an airline could have ceased to exist. But behind the roar of engines and the clink of champagne glasses, Pan Am was starting to flounder. It had risen via its protected status – granted an effective monopoly as America's international airline by the US government. The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 pulled down that ring-fencing, leaving Pan Am blinking uncertainly at issues it had never had to face.
Suddenly, it had American rivals in foreign skies, but no domestic network to help keep it competitive. The acquisition of Florida-based National Airlines in 1980, for an eye-watering $US437 million (about $US1.5 billion [$A2.3 billion] today), was a bid to redress this imbalance – but only loaded the company with a debt that would prove to be its undoing.
In the end, there were two fatal blows. The Gulf War of August 1990 to February 1991 would stamp on a suffocating Pan Am's throat, sending oil prices soaring just as demand for air travel fell sharply with a nervous public; the airline would file for bankruptcy on January 8, 1991, seven weeks before the guns fell silent in Operation Desert Storm.
In truth, though, Pan Am had not recovered from the Lockerbie Disaster. The bombing of Flight 103 on December 21, 1988 sent 270 people to their graves, tragedy crashing down onto the shocked Scottish town in the week before Christmas. The image of Clipper Maid of the Seas, its broken cockpit disembodied on Tundergarth Hill, would become as inerasably linked to the airline as any sepia photograph of first-class fizz and 1960s style.
Loading
Maybe, just maybe, this latest comeback will be for good. In the meantime, Pan Am's newest reincarnation will offer another sophisticated adventure next year – a grand jaunt out of San Francisco, slated for take-off in April 2026, with landings in Japan, Cambodia, Singapore, Australia (in Sydney), New Zealand and Fiji. The cost – a mooted $US94,495 – will not be to everyone's tastes, or pockets. But perhaps you cannot put a price on history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
10 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Qantas puts bigger planes on flights to Trump's America
Qantas is adding seats on flights to and from the United States to meet growing demand from American travellers, defying the downturn plaguing travel agents who say that Donald Trump's immigration policies are deterring visitors to the US. The Australian carrier has reinstated an Airbus A380 service from Sydney to Dallas/Fort Worth and said it would fly daily – instead of five times a week – between Sydney and New York via Auckland in time for the FIFA World Cup, which the US is co-hosting in June next year.

9 News
11 hours ago
- 9 News
Australia's AUKUS boost as politicians on both sides send message to Trump
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here BREAKING RBA hands down third rate cut of year Politicians from both major parties in the United States are urging the Trump administration to maintain the three-way AUKUS security partnership designed to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines. It is a promising sign for Australia, which has made moves to shore up the alliance in recent weeks. The Trump administration is currently reviewing the AUKUS pact between the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom. (AP) Two weeks ago, the Department of Defence announced it would review AUKUS, the 4-year-old pact signed by Joe Biden with Australia and the U.K. The announcement means the Republican administration is looking closely at a partnership that many believe is critical to the US strategy to push back China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. The review is expected to be completed in the fall. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison appeared at a congressional hearing in Washington DC last month, where he warned of the threat China poses in the Indo-Pacific region. Australia has now received support from important figures on both sides of American politics. 'AUKUS is essential to strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific and advancing the undersea capabilities that will be central to ensuring peace and stability," Republican Representative John Moolenaar of Michigan and Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois wrote in a July 22 letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles and his UK counterpart John Healey in Sydney last month after the announcement of the 50-year treaty between the two countries. (Steven Siewert) Moolenaar chairs the House of Representatives panel on China and Krishnamoorthi is its top Democrat. The review comes as the Trump administration works to rebalance its global security concerns while struggling with a hollowed-out industrial base that has hamstrung US capabilities to build enough warships. The review is being led by Elbridge Colby, a Pentagon official, who has expressed scepticism about the partnership. 'If we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great. But if we can't, that becomes a very difficult problem," Colby said during his confirmation hearing in March. 'This is getting back to restoring our defence industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies." As part of the $US269 billion ($412 billion) AUKUS partnership, the United States will sell three to five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, with the first delivery scheduled as soon as 2032. The USA and the UK would help Australia design and build another three to five attack submarines to form an eight-boat force for Australia. A March report by the Congressional Research Service warned that the lack of American shipbuilding capacities, including workforce shortage and insufficient supply chains, is jeopardising the much-celebrated partnership. If the USA should sell the vessels to Australia, the US Navy would have a shortage of attack submarines for two decades, the report said. Some worry the United States will not have enough submarines for themselves if they continue with the AUKUS pact. (AP) The Navy has been ordering two boats per year in the last decade, but American shipyards have been only producing 1.2 Virginia-class subs a year since 2022, the report said. 'The delivery pace is not where it needs to be" to make good on the first pillar of AUKUS, Admiral Daryl Caudle, nominee for the Chief of Naval Operations, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. Australia has invested $US1 billion in the US submarine industrial base, with another $US1 billion to be paid before the end of this year. It has agreed to contribute a total of $US3 billion to uplift the US submarine base, and it has sent both industry personnel to train at U.S. shipyards and naval personnel for submarine training in the United States. As part of the AUKUS deal, the United States will supply Australia with submarines. (AP) "Australia was clear that we would make a proportionate contribution to the United States industrial base,' an Australian defence spokesperson said in July. 'Australia's contribution is about accelerating US production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia's future Virginia-class submarines.' The three nations have also jointly tested communication capabilities with underwater autonomous systems, Australia's defence ministry said on July 23. Per the partnership, the countries will co-develop other advanced technologies, from undersea to hypersonic capabilities. At the recent Aspen Security Forum, former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, also the Australian ambassador to the United States, said his country is committed to increasing defense spending to support its first nuclear-powered sub program, which would also provide 'massively expensive full maintenance repair facilities" for the US. Indo-Pacific fleet based in Western Australia. Rudd expressed confidence that the two governments 'will work our way through this stuff.' Bruce Jones, senior fellow with the Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy and Technology, told The Associated Press that the partnership, by positioning subs in Western Australia, is helping arm the undersea space that is 'really crucial to American deterrence and defence options in the Western Pacific.' 'The right answer is not to be content with the current pace of submarine building. It's to increase the pace," Jones said. Jennifer Parker, who has served more than 20 years with the Royal Australian Navy and founded Barrier Strategic Advisory, said it should not be a zero-sum game. 'You might sell one submarine to Australia, so you have one less submarine on paper. But in terms of the access, you have the theater of choice from operating from Australia, from being able to maintain your submarines from Australia," Parker said. 'This is not a deal that just benefits Australia." Jennifer Parker has spoken of the benefits of AUKUS to the United States. (Dominic Lorrimer) Defence policy is one of the few areas where Republican lawmakers have pushed back against the Trump administration, but their resolve is being tested with the Pentagon's review of AUKUS. So far, they have joined their Democratic colleagues in voicing support for the partnership. They said the US submarine industry is rebounding with congressional appropriations totaling $US10 billion since 2018 to ensure the US will have enough ships to allow for sales to Australia. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia told the AP that support for AUKUS is strong and bipartisan, 'certainly on the Armed Services Committee.' "There is a little bit of mystification about the analysis done at the Pentagon,' Kaine said, adding that 'maybe (what) the analysis will say is: We believe this is a good thing.' CONTACT US


The Advertiser
12 hours ago
- The Advertiser
South Korea, US to hold summit on security, economy
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump will hold their first summit on August 25 in Washington to discuss strengthening the bilateral alliance and economic security partnership. Lee, who was elected president in a snap election in June, has made it a top priority to help his export-dependent country navigate the dramatic changes in the global trading environment triggered by Trump's tariff policies. "The two leaders will discuss ways to develop the US-South Korea alliance into a comprehensive strategic alliance of the future in response to the changing international security and economic environment," presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung told a briefing. Based on the tariff deal reached last month, the leaders will seek to push forward a partnership in the manufacturing sector, including in semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as critical minerals and technology, Kang said. Trump announced on July 30 the countries had reached a trade deal that would subject South Korean goods to 15 per cent import duties, lowering the tariff he had initially set against one of America's top trading partners. In return, Trump has said South Korea will announce investment plans at the upcoming summit and that Seoul had committed to making $US350 billion of investments to be "selected" by him. South Korean officials have offered differing details, however, and topics left unresolved by the deal - which has yet to be committed to writing - provide scope for more disputes between the allies. Trump may use the summit to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said. Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the roughly 28,500 American troops based there as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War. The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Trump administration wanted Seoul to boost defence spending to 3.8 per cent of GDP, up from 2.6 per cent last year, and to increase its $US1 billion-plus contribution toward the troops. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump will hold their first summit on August 25 in Washington to discuss strengthening the bilateral alliance and economic security partnership. Lee, who was elected president in a snap election in June, has made it a top priority to help his export-dependent country navigate the dramatic changes in the global trading environment triggered by Trump's tariff policies. "The two leaders will discuss ways to develop the US-South Korea alliance into a comprehensive strategic alliance of the future in response to the changing international security and economic environment," presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung told a briefing. Based on the tariff deal reached last month, the leaders will seek to push forward a partnership in the manufacturing sector, including in semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as critical minerals and technology, Kang said. Trump announced on July 30 the countries had reached a trade deal that would subject South Korean goods to 15 per cent import duties, lowering the tariff he had initially set against one of America's top trading partners. In return, Trump has said South Korea will announce investment plans at the upcoming summit and that Seoul had committed to making $US350 billion of investments to be "selected" by him. South Korean officials have offered differing details, however, and topics left unresolved by the deal - which has yet to be committed to writing - provide scope for more disputes between the allies. Trump may use the summit to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said. Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the roughly 28,500 American troops based there as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War. The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Trump administration wanted Seoul to boost defence spending to 3.8 per cent of GDP, up from 2.6 per cent last year, and to increase its $US1 billion-plus contribution toward the troops. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump will hold their first summit on August 25 in Washington to discuss strengthening the bilateral alliance and economic security partnership. Lee, who was elected president in a snap election in June, has made it a top priority to help his export-dependent country navigate the dramatic changes in the global trading environment triggered by Trump's tariff policies. "The two leaders will discuss ways to develop the US-South Korea alliance into a comprehensive strategic alliance of the future in response to the changing international security and economic environment," presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung told a briefing. Based on the tariff deal reached last month, the leaders will seek to push forward a partnership in the manufacturing sector, including in semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as critical minerals and technology, Kang said. Trump announced on July 30 the countries had reached a trade deal that would subject South Korean goods to 15 per cent import duties, lowering the tariff he had initially set against one of America's top trading partners. In return, Trump has said South Korea will announce investment plans at the upcoming summit and that Seoul had committed to making $US350 billion of investments to be "selected" by him. South Korean officials have offered differing details, however, and topics left unresolved by the deal - which has yet to be committed to writing - provide scope for more disputes between the allies. Trump may use the summit to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said. Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the roughly 28,500 American troops based there as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War. The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Trump administration wanted Seoul to boost defence spending to 3.8 per cent of GDP, up from 2.6 per cent last year, and to increase its $US1 billion-plus contribution toward the troops. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump will hold their first summit on August 25 in Washington to discuss strengthening the bilateral alliance and economic security partnership. Lee, who was elected president in a snap election in June, has made it a top priority to help his export-dependent country navigate the dramatic changes in the global trading environment triggered by Trump's tariff policies. "The two leaders will discuss ways to develop the US-South Korea alliance into a comprehensive strategic alliance of the future in response to the changing international security and economic environment," presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung told a briefing. Based on the tariff deal reached last month, the leaders will seek to push forward a partnership in the manufacturing sector, including in semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as critical minerals and technology, Kang said. Trump announced on July 30 the countries had reached a trade deal that would subject South Korean goods to 15 per cent import duties, lowering the tariff he had initially set against one of America's top trading partners. In return, Trump has said South Korea will announce investment plans at the upcoming summit and that Seoul had committed to making $US350 billion of investments to be "selected" by him. South Korean officials have offered differing details, however, and topics left unresolved by the deal - which has yet to be committed to writing - provide scope for more disputes between the allies. Trump may use the summit to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said. Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the roughly 28,500 American troops based there as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War. The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Trump administration wanted Seoul to boost defence spending to 3.8 per cent of GDP, up from 2.6 per cent last year, and to increase its $US1 billion-plus contribution toward the troops.