End-of-life care in Wales 'at breaking point', says Marie Curie
People are living their final days "isolated, in pain and struggling to make ends meet" due to gaps in end-of-life care, a leading charity has said. Marie Curie said one in five hospital beds in Wales were occupied by people in the last year of their lives and "bold, radical" action was needed for services which were at "breaking point". One family said they had to fight to ensure their 85-year-old father could die peacefully at home rather than in a hospital ward. The Welsh government said it provided more than £16m a year to ensure people had access to the best possible end-of-life care.
While the charity said a hospital setting is the best possible place for many palliative care patients, many want to spend their final days at home or in the community. Gareth Miles, 85, spent 10 weeks on a ward his family felt did not meet the needs of an older man living with Parkinson's disease. His daughter Eiry Miles said: "There were very lovely staff working on the ward, they were very kind to us, but he [Mr Miles] was in the wrong place."When we realised that Dad's life was coming to an end, we wanted conversations with him, quiet conversations. We wanted to express our feelings, express our love for him."Despite a "great" social worker also recognising home was the best place for Mr Miles, the family said a lack of carers in the community meant he was unable to return.
"This situation clearly shows that there are not enough carers, that the profession is not funded sufficiently," added Ms Miles. With the help of Marie Curie , Mr Miles eventually returned to his family home in Carmarthenshire, which his family described as "priceless". Ms Miles added: "When Dad came home there was a change in him straight away, a peaceful feeling."When he laid on the bed at home, he just said 'oh, dyma braf' – 'this is nice' in Welsh - because it was just quiet and peaceful, there was birdsong outside and people he knew around him."Mr Miles died four days later in his home, exactly where he wanted to be.
Marie Curie said gaps in care meant "too many people are spending their final days isolated, in pain, and struggling to make ends meet". "End of life care in Wales is at breaking point," said Senior Policy Manager Natasha Davies."Services and staff are struggling to deliver the care people need, when and where they need it. There is an urgent need for change."The charity recognised while hospital was the best place for many palliative care patients, better community and out-of-hours care would allow people to be cared for in their homes."It also means having meaningful conversations with dying people about their care preferences, so their wishes are heard and respected," added Ms Davies.
The Welsh government said good palliative and end-of-life care could make a "huge difference" to helping people die with dignity. It said it provided more than £16m a year to make sure people had access to the best possible end-of-life care, including setting national standards and boosting community services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
You're organising your time wrong! Scientists reveal the secret to productivity - and why you should be taking LONGER breaks
Whether you work at home or in an office, it can be difficult to know the best way to organise your time. But help is at hand, as experts from DeskTime have revealed the secret to productivity. And the good news is that it involves taking more regular breaks than you're probably used to. According to their research, the most productive employees operate on a '75/33 work-to-rest-cycle'. This means they work for 75 minutes, and then rest for 33 minutes. This cycle is best suited to in-office work than fully-remote work, according to Artis Rozentals, CEO at DeskTime. 'Our latest productivity research shows we're returning to more balanced working habits,' he said. 'Knowing the prevalence of hybrid work, the new 75/33 ratio may be linked to working in-office again.' To understand the secret to a productive work day, the researchers analysed the working habits of 6,000 DeskTime users from January - December 2024. Their analysis found that the most productive users worked in 75-minute chunks of time, before taking a proper 33-minute rest. DeskTime has carried out the same study twice before in 2014 and 2021 - and found very different results. In 2014, the study found that the most productive people worked on average 52 minutes, followed by a 17-minute break. Seven years later, in 2021, the study found that a 112/26 work-to-rest-cycle was most productive. 'When DeskTime conducted the work/break ratio study back in 2021, we saw that working from home had immensely impacted workers' ability to draw a line between work and life,' Mr Rozentals said. Based on the findings, the CEO believes that workers are most productive in an office environment. 'Working from the office, we're naturally prone to taking more breaks – getting coffee, talking to co-workers, etc,' he added. 'While these interruptions may seem unproductive at first, they're vital for mental rejuvenation and contribute to employee wellbeing. 'Plus, it provides us with the necessary social dynamic of a workplace.' The study comes shortly after researchers at Canada's McGill University revealed what a normal day looks like for people across 58 countries. It found that 3.4 hours are spent making, cultivating and taking care of stuff every day, while 2.5 hours are spent on hygiene. 'We found that the single largest chunk of time is really focused on humans ourselves, a little more than nine hours,' explained the study's author, Eric Galbraith. 'Most of this—about 6.5 hours—is doing things that we enjoy, like hanging out, watching TV, socializing and doing sports.' Exposure to blue light from phones and computer screens 'makes it harder to fall asleep' Leading Optometrist, Dhruvin Patel is a specialist in the impact of blue light on eye health - that is light produced by phone and computer screens. Researchers say exposure to blue light could increase the risk of damage to eyesight and make it harder to fall asleep. Patel shared his tips for minimising the impact from blue light while working from home or using screens. 1. Work an arm's length from the screen Fully extend your arm and work from a distance - looking from your eyes to the end of your fingertips. Use this as a minimum distance to reduce the stress on your eyeballs. 2. 20/20/20 Simply put, every 20 minutes, look away from the screen for a minimum of 20 seconds at least 20 feet away. This will help to reset your visual systems and eye through any long periods of screen work. 3. Screen height Height and level of your working screen can have a big impact on eye strain. Research has shown that it is better for the screen to be located higher than the users' watching level - the middle point should be 5-6 inches below the straight line of the users' vision. This makes the space between upper and lower eyelid more open, often resulting in dryness of the eyes. 4. Lighting Position the computer screen to avoid glare, particularly from overhead lighting or windows. Use blinds or drapes on windows and replace the light bulbs in desk lamps with bulbs of lower wattage and intensity. If there is no way to minimise glare from light sources, consider using an anti glare filter. 5. Put a post-it note on your screen titled 'BLINK'. Normally, in a minute, we blink up to 20 times. This is controlled automatically by our central nervous systems so we're not conscious of blinking. While on screens, this is actually reduced to 3-5 times a minute meaning our tear films cannot be maintained and the eye does not remain lubricated. A post-it-note on your monitor saying 'Blink' should help you consciously make an effort to blink. It's simple but definitely works. 6) Consider your device Usually the biggest, newest phone is best, but not for your eyes. An iPhone X is 20 per cent brighter than an iPhone 6 and emits higher levels of blue light. This is the difference of a 100 per cent increase in harmful blue light exposure! 7. Remember to switch off I would suggest no digital devices or artificial lighting after sunset. If you're like most people, you're probably sending that last minute email or finishing your favourite show on Netflix before bed. Try reading a book or start that meditation that you promised yourself you will do in the new year. Dhruvin Patel says you shouldn't assume that 'night mode' or 'blue shade' on devices is enough to counter the impact of blue light. He said this 'has been proven to not aid sleep compared to a screen's normal output' and so even with it enabled you should still avoid the screen after sunset if at all possible. Patel founded a company called Ocushield that produces screen protectors to filter out blue light based on his research into the impact of the light source.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Beachgoers urged not to walk barefoot on sand or risk poisonous sting
Weever fish, one of the UK's few venomous fish, bury themselves in the sand and inject venom via their dorsal fin when disturbed, posing a risk to UK beachgoers. East Riding of Yorkshire Council is installing warning signs to advise against walking barefoot on beaches during weever season, which begins in June. The Wildlife Trust recommends wearing beach shoes while paddling in sandy waters to avoid stings. The British Marine Life Study Society describes the pain from a weever fish sting as excruciating, with intense pain, redness, and swelling occurring in the first two hours. The Wildlife Trust and NHS advise treating stings by immersing the affected area in hot water and removing any visible spines or tentacles, with painkillers and antihistamines also recommended; ensuring tetanus vaccination is up to date is also advised.
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Why should we have to downsize?': How boomers became the victim generation
We're looking for readers in different generations to talk about change within their families, such as a grandparent and grandchild's experiences of buying their first home. To get involved, email us at money@ Baby boomers have nothing to complain about. Bumper pensions. Free university education. House prices that have gone through the roof. Some of them even got to see The Beatles. This, at least, is the idea that's caught fire over the last 20 years, a period in which the debate about inequality in Britain has been reframed as a tug-of-war between generations. Boomers – the post-war cohort born between 1946 and 1965 – are blamed for hoarding wealth after winning the economic lottery. The losers are said to be Generation Z and millennials – born between 1980 and 2009 – who face sky-high mortgages and record-breaking rents, stagnating wages, massive student debt and outrageous student loan repayments, plus an unstable jobs market. There is a stigma attached to being a 'boomer', which has become shorthand for greedy, entitled and out of touch. Boomers have been accused of 'stealing their children's futures' by taking more than their fair share. Many believe they are unfairly victimised – pilloried for their wealth, and told to downsize out of their house to make way for younger families. But are they right to feel that way? 'Divisive and harmful tensions in society' A report by the House of Commons' Women and Equalities Committee in February confirmed what many older citizens have experienced first-hand. It found 'clear evidence' of ageist stereotyping across British media, with debates about intergenerational fairness tending to pit younger and older generations against each other in a 'perceived fight for limited resources'. The report went on: 'Older people are also frequently stereotyped as wealthy 'boomers' living comfortable lives in homes they own while younger generations struggle on low incomes, unable to afford to enter the housing market and struggling with high rents.' These 'narratives', the committee said, have fuelled 'divisive and harmful tensions in society'. This resentment doesn't come from nowhere. Recent figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that boomers are by far Britain's richest cohort. The average wealth of households aged 65 to 74 is £502,500 – more than 30 times that of Gen Zs aged 16 to 24, who typically have £15,200. Boomers' wealth is also 4.6 times greater than those aged 25 to 34, who are mainly younger millennials, with £109,800. This may not seem very surprising given older people have had a lifetime to accumulate savings, homes and pensions. 'There's an extremely strong life-cycle component to wealth,' says Simon Pittaway, a senior economist at The Resolution Foundation think tank. 'Most people start working lives with very little, build it up through peak working years then run it down in retirement. 'This has been the case for a long time. But we're seeing that profile getting starker.' The gap between the generations has grown since the financial crisis, which is often blamed on the boomers, who, the argument goes, were steering the ship at the time. A Resolution Foundation study found that between 2006-08 and 2018-20, median wealth among Britons in their 60s rose by 55pc in real terms, but median wealth for those in their 30s fell by 34pc. At the same time, the share of Britain's wealth held by the under-40s has fallen from 7.5pc in 2010 to 4pc today. It's statistics like these that mean boomers are often implored to give away their hoarded wealth, or downsize into smaller properties to make room for young families. 'Older people aren't hoarding – they're just afraid of change' John Griffiths, 80, insists his generation is in fact supremely generous – and shouldn't be discriminated against for having done well. 'It's a gimmick in the financial media to blame the boomers,' he says. 'It's not our fault property went up the way it did in the 60s and 70s. [The house price rises] drove most of us out of London.' Griffiths was born shortly after VE Day in May 1945, putting him right on the cusp of the boomer bracket. 'I tend to count myself as one of them,' he says. After training as a chemical engineer, he spent 20 years in the gas industry and the North Sea designing and building offshore oil facilities. He went on to found his own marine energy consultancy, advising clean energy firms and governments on how to best harness the power of waves and tides. He retired five years ago at the age of 75. His successful career has allowed him to pass on lump sums totalling £500,000 to his three children, who are in their 40s and 50s and have children themselves. A large part of his financial security derives from property wealth. The house in Wimbledon that he bought with his wife Valerie in 2006 for £545,000 is now worth £1.3m. Homeowners aged 60 and over hold more than half of the nation's owner-occupied housing wealth, totalling an estimated £2.89 trillion, according to estate agents Savills. Two thirds (67pc) of homeowners aged 65 and over have two or more spare rooms in their property, even as a shortage of affordable housing prevents young families from buying their first home. The Tony Blair Institute think tank has called for larger properties to be taxed more to encourage owners to downsize. But Griffiths believes pressuring older people to vacate their homes is unfair. 'It doesn't sit well with me. I don't think older people are hoarding. They stay where they are because they're afraid of change. 'Many don't have supportive families to help them, and are stuck where they are.' The rise of boomer bashing Dr Jennie Bristow, a reader in sociology at Canterbury Christ Church University, traces boomer bashing back to the collapse of traditional political frameworks at the end of the 20th century. 'From the 1990s, we started trying to explain societal problems that went beyond Left and Right,' she says. 'It's still playing out now in the culture wars.' It was a time when demographic anxieties were spreading across the Western world. Ageing populations mean relatively fewer younger workers supporting the swelling ranks of elderly pensioners through the welfare system. Old-versus-young became the salient faultline. 'The narrative that emerged was that the 2008 financial crisis was due to policy decisions, and also cultural individualism, that was personified by the baby boomer generation. These are the people who are hoarding wealth and will benefit from big pensions. 'For the Right, it's an argument for restructuring the welfare state. And for the Left, it's used as a reason for more welfare and less Thatcherite individualism. It brought those two opposites together.' Bristow believes anti-boomer sentiment peaked in 2010, the year that David Willetts, a former Tory MP turned public intellectual, published an influential book called 'The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Stole Their Children's Future'. She says the tendency to blame the boomers has turned into a 'frenzy' that ignores inequalities within generational cohorts. 'The boomers associated with the 1960s generation, born straight after the war, did reap a lot of the benefits of that time. There were a lot of possibilities, economic opportunities, and they ended up with good pensions. But not everyone was part of this. It was actually quite a narrow section of society. 'Younger boomers came of age in the far more pessimistic 1970s. Yes, people got grants for university, but only 7pc of the cohort went.' 'I get sick of boomers blaming young people' Richard Merry was born in 1955, putting him right in the middle of the boomer generation. After leaving school at 16, Merry joined the armed forces, eventually becoming a member of a special army unit that sent him all over the world during a 50-year career. He has worked hard to retire three years ago in relative comfort, but acknowledges that younger generations have a tougher ride in many ways. 'People just don't earn that sort of money any more,' the 69-year-old says. 'I get a little bit sick with the boomers saying that it's young people's own fault for not getting on the property ladder.' Merry bought a three-bedroom semi-detached house in south-east London for £77,000 in 1990. It is now worth over £1m. It was easily affordable on his salary of around £32,000, equivalent to £80,000 today. 'My children, both in their 30s, work incredibly hard and lead tough lives. You simply can't compare property prices and deposits now to what they were.' But it's not all plain sailing for his generation. Care costs, for instance, are 'crucifying' the boomers, he says. His own mother's old age care cost £320,000 over three years – money that would have gone to Merry and his sister. They had to sell their mother's home to pay for it. 'All the talk is that boomers are hoarding wealth, but we're going to be skinned alive when it comes to care costs.' On tax and earnings too, it hasn't been the easiest of rides. 'People at the bottom benefitted from increases in the minimum wage, but middle earners like me have had the stuffing kicked out of them.' Boomers have 'rigged the game in their favour' On the contrary, Angus Hanton, of the Intergenerational Foundation think tank, believes boomers have 'heavily rigged the game in their favour' over decades by repeatedly voting in governments that have given them a good deal. 'Boomers have fought tooth and nail to protect their interests,' he says. 'We can see that most starkly in how the tax system is structured – what's taxed heavily is earned income. Younger working people pay income tax at a high rate from a low level of earnings, plus National Insurance and student loan repayments, which is basically a tax. 'But unearned income is taxed very lightly – money in Isas and Sipps, and capital gains tax is half the rate of income tax.' Hanton, a boomer himself, rejects the idea that the focus on competing age groups squeezes out other factors from the conversation – like class, race or gender. 'Generational inequality is a really important lens and we shouldn't refuse to look through it just because there are other lenses available.' Evidence suggests that many younger people are looking at the world – and their claim on the material wealth of their elders – through this lens. Research by Moneyfarm, an investment platform, found that two in five millennials fear their parents were frittering away 'their' inheritance, while a fifth said their 'spendthrift' parents were selfish for failing to consider their children or grandchildren's economic wellbeing. Meanwhile, 61pc of Gen Z feel they have to work harder than their parents did, according to YouGov polling. The reality is that many young people will benefit indirectly from the economic success of their parents and grandparents. A much-cited report from estate agents Knight Frank found that millennials are set to become the 'richest generation in history', thanks to the steep rise in the value of property assets accumulated by the generations before them which will be passed on when they die. Yet Bristow points out that even if millennials as a group are in line for a huge windfall, the only ones who will actually benefit are those with well-off parents who rode the property wave. Boomers, too, all tend to be tarred with the same brush. 'You can look at it two ways, generationally,' she says. 'Not all older people are wealthy. So saying boomers have stolen their children's future doesn't stack up.'
