UN plastic pollution treaty talks floundering
The negotiations, which opened on Tuesday, have four working days left to strike a legally-binding instrument that would tackle the growing problem choking the environment.
But in a blunt mid-way assessment, the talks chair warned the 184 countries gathered at the United Nations in Geneva that progress so far was well off track.
Some countries called for areas where countries are far from agreement to ditched completely for the sake of expediency.
Others slammed the brinkmanship and said insistence on consensus could not be used as justification for sinking the more ambitious elements of the treaty.
"Progress made has not been sufficient," Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told delegates in a frank summary as country delegations gathered in the assembly hall to take stock.
"We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed.
"August 14 is not just a deadline for our work: it is a date by which we must deliver."
- 'Little progress' -
Countries have reconvened at the UN in Geneva after the failure of the supposedly fifth and final round of talks in Busan, South Korea in 2024.
After four days of talks, the draft text has ballooned from 22 to 35 pages -- with the number of brackets in the text going up near five-fold to almost 1,500 as countries insert conflicting ideas.
Vayas Valdivieso said states had had two and a half years to make such proposals.
"Some articles still have unresolved issues and show little progress towards reaching a common understanding," he lamented.
Kuwait spoke up for the so-called Like-Minded Group -- a nebulous cluster of mostly oil-producing nations which rejects production limits and wants to focus on treating waste.
Kuwait said the scope of the treaty had not been given "an equal and fair chance for discussion".
"Let us agree on what we can agree... consensus must be the basis of all our decisions."
But Uruguay insisted that doggedly clinging to consensus "cannot be used as a justification to not achieve our objectives".
The talks process is mandated to look at the full life cycle of plastic, from production to pollution.
Eirik Lindebjerg, global plastics adviser for the World Wide Fund for Nature, told AFP that Kuwait's proposal was "another attempt to make it a waste management agreement", and to stifle talks reducing the amount of plastic and phasing out the most harmful elements.
Saudi Arabia, speaking for the Arab Group, said the responsible way ahead was to start considering what bits of the text "may not make it to the final outcome due to irreconcilable divergence"
"We cannot do everything everywhere all at once," Riyadh said, adding: "Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good."
- 'Profits from poisoning' -
Panama's negotiator Juan Monterrey Gomez slammed those countries wanting to stop the treaty from encompassing the entire life cycle of plastic.
He said microplastics "are in our blood, in our lungs and in the first cry of a new-born child. Our bodies of living proof of a system that profits from poisoning us".
He said it was a lie that "recycling alone will save us... we cannot recycle our way out of this crisis... when the poison is inside us".
Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items.
Plastic production is set to triple by 2060.
rjm/giv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
Judge delays ruling on "Alligator Alcatraz" as environmental groups push for shutdown
The fate of "Alligator Alcatraz," a controversial immigrant detention center deep in the Florida Everglades, remains uncertain after a federal judge said Wednesday she needs more time to decide whether the facility should be shut down for good. Environmentalists and the Miccosukee Tribe are urging U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams to issue a preliminary injunction halting operations and construction at the site, arguing it threatens sensitive wetlands and endangered wildlife. But Williams said she will not rule until the end of a temporary construction freeze, which expires Aug. 21. Attorneys for the federal government and the state of Florida have not commented publicly since the proceedings began four days ago. Construction of the makeshift immigrant detention center could be halted indefinitely as the court considers whether the hasty development on protected wetlands violates federal environmental laws. Last week, Williams ordered a two-week pause on additional construction while witnesses testify. The temporary order does not include any restrictions on law enforcement or immigration enforcement activity at the site. The first phase of "Alligator Alcatraz" opened in July atop a lightly used, single-runway training airport. Fewer than 1,000 detainees were being held there as of last week, but the facility is designed to eventually hold up to 3,000. President Donald Trump toured the facility last month and suggested it could be a model for future lockups nationwide as his administration races to expand the infrastructure necessary for increasing deportations. Inside the compound's large white tents, rows of bunkbeds are surrounded by chain-link cages. People held there say worms turn up in the food, toilets don't flush and flood floors with fecal waste, while mosquitoes and other insects are everywhere. At times, the air conditioners abruptly shut off in the sweltering heat. Detainees are said to go days without showering or getting prescription medicine, and can only speak to lawyers and loved ones by phone. The detention center has an estimated annual cost of $450 million, according to a public database. Gov. Ron DeSantis has said the remote Everglades location was intended as a deterrent to escape, much like the island prison in California that inspired its nickname. Williams last week said the detention facility was, at a minimum, a joint partnership between the state and federal government. Plaintiffs presented witnesses Wednesday and Thursday who testified that the facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects. Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe say the project threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals, undermining billions of dollars in Everglades restoration efforts. Attorneys for the state and federal governments argue that although the facility holds federal detainees, its construction and operation are entirely under the state of Florida, meaning federal environmental review requirements do not apply. They also asked the court to dismiss or transfer the injunction request, claiming the lawsuit was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Williams has not ruled on that request. Witnesses for the plaintiffs testified that at least 20 acres of asphalt have been added to the site since the Florida Division of Emergency Management began construction. They warned that additional paving could increase water runoff into nearby wetlands, spread harmful chemicals into the Everglades, and reduce habitat for endangered Florida panthers. Marcel Bozas, director of the Miccosukee Tribe's fish and wildlife department, said tribe members rely on hunting and fishing for subsistence and cultural practices. He warned that sustained human activity could drive away game animals and protected species. David Kerner, head of the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, testified that Washington does not dictate where Florida detains immigrants. He said the Everglades facility was built to ease overcrowding at other detention centers. Kerner couldn't say how many of the "Alligator Alcatraz" detainees have been charged with violent crimes or whether any other sites besides the middle of the Everglades were considered for possible detention centers. The detention center is also the target of a separate lawsuit. Over the weekend, a federal judge gave the state until late September to respond to a request for class-action status in civil rights litigation. That lawsuit alleges constitutional violations, claiming detainees are barred from meeting lawyers, are being held without charges, and have had bond hearings canceled by a federal immigration court. The legal battles come as DeSantis' administration appears to be moving forward with plans for a second immigration detention center at a Florida National Guard training site in north Florida.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Israel hasn't prosecuted a single suspect for Oct. 7 attack
Advertisement Israel has killed many of the senior Hamas figures from Gaza who were seen as masterminds of the attack. But some in the country worry that the extensive delays in prosecuting the suspects in custody will allow some perpetrators to escape justice. Palestinians and rights groups have other concerns. They say Israel has systematically violated the detainees' rights by holding them without charge or trial in harsh conditions, with limited access to legal counsel. Sweeping gag orders keep most details of their cases under wraps, and for most of these detainees, there is no trace of them in any public records. The way Israel detains those prisoners 'effectively erases these individuals from public awareness and strips them of fundamental rights,' said Nadine Abu Arafeh, a lawyer who has represented detainees from Gaza in other cases in Israeli courts. 'Families in Gaza live with questions: Are their loved ones alive?' Advertisement Israel's Justice Ministry declined to comment. The delays in moving the Oct. 7 cases forward are at least partly because of the chaotic way that law enforcement agents, stretched beyond capacity, collected evidence right after the attack, according to Moran Gez, a former senior prosecutor who oversaw cases of detainees suspected of involvement in the attack, and Yulia Malinovsky, an opposition lawmaker briefed on the issue. The regular criminal justice system was ill-suited to handle the sheer volume of evidence and the compromised state of some of it, they said. Gez said she retired to open up a private practice. Israel has extensively documented the atrocities of Oct. 7, in some cases based on footage recorded by the attackers themselves. Several thousand Palestinian militants from Gaza took part in the assault, according to the Israeli military. They stormed more than a dozen communities, a music festival attended by thousands of people, and several military bases in southern Israel. They killed about 1,200 people and took roughly 250 hostages back to Gaza, in an attack that, according to the United Nations, involved war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. Amid upheaval and shock across Israel in the aftermath, investigators skipped many steps in the collection of evidence, according to Gez and Malinovsky. Some bodies were swiftly buried before forensic examination. The volume of killings made it nearly impossible for ballistic experts to trace bullets to specific weapons. Survivors who witnessed the events often did not immediately report their experiences to legal authorities, and they quickly scattered across the country before authorities could contact them, Gez said. Advertisement Simcha Rothman, a lawmaker from Israel's governing coalition, blamed state prosecutors for failing to find ways to adapt legal proceedings to the unusual scale and nature of the attack. Other considerations may have contributed to the delay in prosecutions. Israeli security agencies objected to having the cases of attack suspects move forward earlier in the Gaza war, according to Rothman. But they have since dropped that objection, he said in an interview. Malinovsky said she believes that senior Israeli officials feared that pursuing the cases could intensify public scrutiny of the failures by the government and military or undermine negotiations to exchange Palestinian detainees for Israeli hostages. 'They don't want that discourse,' she said of the government. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the reasons for the delay in prosecutions. The prison service and Justice Ministry would not provide any information on the detainees. Lawmakers in Israel recently took a first step toward putting some of those suspected of direct involvement on trial. The Knesset, or parliament, passed an initial vote in late May to establish a dedicated tribunal to try suspects in the attack. But the bill requires several more votes, and it will likely be months before the first detainees go to court. Rothman and Malinovsky were co-authors of the bill, which was meant to bypass legal hurdles to prosecutions by establishing a special tribunal of 15 judges with some capacity to override the ordinary criminal system. The bill proposes charging participants in the attack with offenses of genocide, which are punishable by death under Israeli law. Advertisement All of the roughly 2,700 Palestinian detainees who were rounded up in Gaza over the course of the war are designated as 'unlawful combatants,' which, according to Israeli law, means they can be held without charge or trial. Under the terms of a cease-fire earlier this year, Israel released about 1,000 of the 'unlawful combatants' to Gaza, in addition to women and minors detained in Gaza throughout the war. If negotiations between Israel and Hamas over a new cease-fire progress to a deal, some of the remaining detainees could potentially be exchanged for the remaining hostages in Gaza. The lengthy detention of so many people without trial 'risks becoming a life sentence without the usual protections of the criminal process,' said Monica Hakimi, a Columbia Law School professor and an expert on international law. At least 48 of these Palestinian detainees have died in custody, according to data from the military and prison service provided in response to freedom of information requests filed by Physicians for Human Rights — Israel, a rights group. In late July, Israeli lawmakers extended emergency provisions that allow the ongoing detentions of prisoners suspected of involvement in the attack in detention awaiting prosecution through January 2026, an indication that they may not face charges for at least six more months. 'This is a problem,' Rothman told lawmakers before the extensions. 'It's a malfunction.' This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland warns its companies that no, they can't dodge Trump's tariffs by routing goods through the tiny neighboring country of Liechtenstein
Switzerland and Liechtenstein have long shared an economic market, but President Donald Trump has imposed a steep tariff on Swiss goods compared to its Liechtensteiner neighbors. The Swiss government has clarified that Swiss businesses will be unable to reroute their products through the neighboring principality. The Trump administration recently implemented a 40% tariff on transshipments, or the movement of goods to an intermediate destination ostensibly with lower levies, to disincentivize this behavior. The Swiss government is telling its domestic companies that they have not, in fact, found a clever way to skirt President Donald Trump's tariffs by routing goods through the tiny neighborhood country of Liechtenstein. Switzerland and Liechtenstein share a 102-year-old customs treaty allowing the 25km-long principality to share the Swiss economic area. But that agreement, which makes it nearly impossible to measure trade between the two closely linked countries, does not mean they are tariffed similarly. While U.S. tariffs on Swiss exports swelled to 39% in Trump's latest round of tariffs, levies on goods from Liechtenstein are only 15%. The Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has said Swiss firms cannot pass off goods as Liechtensteiner by routing them through the principality because they would still be recognized as Swiss in origin. 'Such circumvention via Liechtenstein is fundamentally impossible. The United States applies its non-preferential rules of origin when levying additional tariffs,' a SECO spokesperson told Fortune in a translated email statement. 'For a product to be considered 'Liechtenstein origin,' it must either be entirely manufactured in Liechtenstein or [have] undergone sufficient processing.' Liechtenstein head of government Brigitte Haas said last week there's concern, though improbable, of Swiss companies looking to Liechtenstein for ways to dodge import taxes, but the risks are high. 'There's a fear that there might be some circumvention, but those are subject to a 40% tariff,' Haas said in an interview with Swiss outlet SRF. 'I hardly think anyone would want to go through that.' Trump's transshipment crackdown Last month, the White House imposed a 40% penalty tax on 'transshipments,' or the movement of goods to an intermediate destination, meant to disincentivize this particular behavior. The Trump administration is aware that countries with lower reciprocal tariff rates than its neighbors are incentivized to reroute their products, according to Robert Lawrence, Albert L. Williams Professor of International Trade and Investment at the Harvard Kennedy School. For years, China has used Mexico and Vietnam, among other countries, as transshipment bases prior to exporting goods to the U.S., according to a Brookings Institute report from June. These transshipments are having meaningful impacts: As China's trade surplus with the U.S. decreases, it has been completely offset by the increase in its trade surplus with other trading partners, the report found. While the transshipment penalty was meant to address China, Lawrence told Fortune, it would apply to any country engaging in the behavior—despite some experts arguing the order lacks key details that would help enforce it. 'It was really important with the response to China,' Lawrence said. 'But there's always this incentive to arbitrage between countries who are close to one another but have differentiated tariff treatment.' High stakes in Switzerland With Switzerland and the U.S. failing to come to a trade agreement before the Aug. 1 deadline, Swiss companies now fear Trump's steep tariffs could roil domestic businesses, particularly in the industrial machinery, cheese, and chocolate industries. While Switzerland may rely on the U.S. as a key importer, the U.S. may be able to find suitable alternatives elsewhere, Lawrence said, putting the onus on Swiss companies to absorb the cost of tariffs in order to keep prices competitive in the U.S. market. Liechtenstein could likewise suffer, according to head of government Haas, who said last week that although the principality has stopped trade negotiations with the U.S. and accepted the 15%, Switzerland's economic health could waver and impact Liechtenstein, which counts Switzerland as its domestic market. Haas also said many Liechtensteiner products don't list Liechtenstein as their certified place of origin, leaving uncertainty about how explicit the U.S. was in outlining the reciprocal tariffs for the principality. U.S. consumers could meanwhile begin to feel the impacts of these steep reciprocal tariffs, responding differently to the alternatives available from other countries, should Swiss imports no longer be as readily available or affordable. For example, according to Lawrence, U.S. consumers may now buy more Cadbury chocolate from the UK—where tariffs sit at 10%—despite not finding the product as appealing as Swiss chocolates, but because it's theoretically cheaper and more abundant. But these ramifications are about more than just chocolate. 'There's going to be a lot of inefficiency,' Lawrence said. 'Americans are going to buy inferior products.' This story was originally featured on Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
