
Centre clears elevation of Justice Atul S Chandurkar of Bombay HC as Supreme Court judge
The Centre Thursday notified the elevation of Justice Atul Sharachchandra Chandurkar of the Bombay High Court as a judge of the Supreme Court. Justice Chandurkar will serve his tenure as a Supreme Court judge until April 6, 2030, when he will reach the retirement age of 65. This came after the Supreme Court Collegium led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai on May 26 recommended the appointment of Justice Chandurkar, present seniormost puisne judge of the Bombay High Court, along with that of Chief Justices of Karnataka and Gauhati High Courts, N V Anjaria and Vijay Bishnoi, respectively.
The Collegium made the recommendation two days after Justice Abhay S Oka of the Supreme Court, who belonged to the Bombay HC, retired on May 24. Justice Chandurkar will supersede the Chief Justices of Kerala and Madras High Courts, Nitin Jamdar and K R Shriram, respectively, both belonging to the Bombay High Court.
While Justice Jamdar was appointed as Bombay HC judge on January 23, 2012, Justice Shriram became HC judge on June 21, 2013, the same day as Justice Chandurkar. However, Justice Shriram was administered oath before Justice Chandurkar on the said day and featured ahead of him on the seniority list. Born on April 7, 1965, Justice Chandurkar completed his schooling at St Vincent's High School in Pune.
After graduating from Ness Wadia College, Pune, he obtained a law degree from ILS Law College, Pune. Thereafter, he started practising as an advocate on July 21, 1988 and worked in the chambers of senior advocate B N Naik, who later became the judge of the HC. Justice Chandurkar shifted to Nagpur in 1992 and practised before various courts and also authored two books on the Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, and the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
He was elevated as an additional judge of the Bombay HC in June 2013. He also served as an administrative judge (seniormost) at the Nagpur bench of the Bombay HC. In June 2024, a Justice Chandurkar-led division bench of the Bombay HC dismissed a plea by nine students of a college in Chembur challenging the dress code that banned hijabs, among other religious identifiers. The judge held that instructions issued by the college did not suffer from infirmity to violate fundamental rights to freedom of expression and of practising religion.
In September 2024, Justice Chandurkar gave a deciding opinion after the split verdict on pleas challenging amended IT rules that empower the government to identify 'fake news' on social media platforms through a Fact Check Unit (FCU).
Justice Chandurkar agreed with the opinion of Justice Gautam S Patel, who was part of the division bench that delivered the split verdict and struck down the amended rules as 'unconstitutional' and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (a) and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. In October 2024, a bench presided over by Justice Chandurkar stayed the Maharashtra government's decision to take back over 116 acres of prime land parcel in the Charkop area in Kandivali (West) allotted for industrial purposes. In March this year, a Justice Chandurkar-led bench dismissed a plea by a Dalit PhD student challenging his suspension by the Tata Institute of Social Science (TISS) over 'repetitive misconduct and anti-national activities'.
Earlier this month, Justice Chandurkar sought to know from the Maharashtra government when heritage status would be granted to the residence of Hindutva ideologue VD Savarkar, Savarkar Sadan, situated at Shivaji Park area of Central Mumbai and ordered that till June 13, the status of the property should not be changed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
31 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC allows Trump to revoke legal status for 500,000 migrants
Washington, May 30 (UNI) US President Donald Trump's administration can temporarily revoke the legal status of over 500,000 migrants living in the US, the US Supreme Court ruled on Friday. The ruling put on hold a previous federal judge's order stopping the administration from ending the "parole" immigration programme, established by former President Joe Biden. The programme protected immigrants fleeing economic and political turmoil in their home countries, media reported. The new order puts roughly 530,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela at risk of being deported, BBC reported. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, two of the court's three liberal justices, dissented. The parole programme allows immigrants temporary status to work and live in the US for two years because of "urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit", according to the US government. The Trump administration had filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court after a federal judge in Massachusetts blocked the administration from ending the programme, also known as CHNV humanitarian parole. The White House "celebrated" the opportunity to deport 500,000 "invaders", White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller local media. "The Supreme Court justly stepped in". In her dissent, Justice Jackson wrote that the court's order would "have the lives of half a million migrants unravel all around us before the courts decide their legal claims". On the day he took office, Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security to get rid of parole programmes. Then, in March, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the end of CHNV humanitarian parole. Several immigrants rights groups and migrants from the programme sued the Trump administration over the decision, arguing they could "face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death" if deported back to their home countries. The ruling comes after the Supreme Court earlier this month allowed Trump officials to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) - a separate programme - for some 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants living and working in the US. Humanitarian parole programmes have been used for decades to allow immigrants fleeing war and other tumultuous conditions in their home countries to come to the US, including Cubans in the 1960s following the revolution. The Biden administration also established a parole programme in 2022 for Ukrainians fleeing after Russia's invasion. UNI XC GNK


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sanjay Raut demands resignation of Eknath Shinde over SC strictures on twin tunnel tender
NASHIK: Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut demanded the resignation of deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde , who is the minister for public works (public enterprises), over Supreme Court strictures on the MMRDA tender process. Raut, who was in Jalgaon on Saturday, said, "If Prime Minister Narendra Modi stands against corrupt practices, he should immediately call for the resignation of Eknath Shinde over the issue." The Supreme Court passed strictures on the tender related to the Thane Ghodbunder Bhayandar twin tunnel. Raut alleged, 'There was a direct appreciation of Rs 3,000 crore in the Rs 14,000 crore contract for the twin tunnel. L&T Company challenged the tender in the Supreme Court, which passed strictures." Raut claimed that chief minister Devendra Fadnavis was also unwilling to take action against corruption in the state. "After the Supreme Court's strictures, all that Fadnavis said was that he would not tolerate corruption in the bureaucracy. How has Fadnavis failed to see the corruption in this case and failed to take any action against it," he said. Raut also commented on NCP SP chief Sharad Pawar joining the BJP camp, saying that those with Pawar were confident that he would not join communal forces. 'Pawar has been the torchbearer of Shahu, Phule, and Ambedkar ideologies, and all those who are with Sharad Pawar are confident that he will never join hands with such forces,' said Raut.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Experts to farmers: Punjab's draft agri policy gets universal thumbs up
Even as the state government continues to delay the adoption of its Punjab Agriculture Policy-2023, experts across disciplines have hailed the draft as an excellent document with some limitations that can be removed at the time of implementation. Experts said that the 200-page document offers a comprehensive roadmap for reviving the state's ailing farm sector. They praised the draft policy for its depth, innovation, and forward-thinking recommendations. They described it as a potential game-changer — if implemented with commitment and urgency. From scientists to economists and farmer leaders, voices from across the agricultural spectrum have urged the government to act swiftly on the policy. Gurdev Singh Khush, a renowned Indian-American plant geneticist and rice breeder who is known as the 'Father of Super Rice', in written communication to the committee members, said that he enjoyed the draft thoroughly. 'The chapter on the good old agriculture of the past brought back memories of my childhood. The section on Green Revolution captures how it transformed Indian agriculture. Making Punjab's farming healthier, profitable, and globally competitive should be a cherished goal. The concept of Natural Growing Areas is insightful. Marketing is rightly emphasised, and institutions like AMRII and IAMS are essential. The chapter on ecosystem and climate change is well-balanced. The alarming water and energy scenario calls for urgent implementation of the policy's recommendations. I found the document immensely informative — truly an Encyclopedia of Punjab Agriculture. It reflects months of dedicated work,' said Khush, who has won World Food Prize (1996), Japan Prize, Wolf Prize, and Golden Sickle Awards. Prof Ranjit Singh Ghuman, a renowned agricultural economist and a member of high-powered committee established by the Supreme Court to address the grievances of farmers, said that despite three policy drafts on Agriculture over the past decade, Punjab still lacks an official agriculture policy. The first draft of 58 pages was submitted in March 2013 but was never adopted. The second draft of 21 pages submitted in 2018 met with the same fate. An 11-member committee headed by Sukhpal Singh submitted a comprehensive draft on October 13, 2023. 'While building on earlier efforts, this version includes more detailed and innovative recommendations. It must be implemented,' Ghuman said, adding that the limitations should be addressed, and the policy must align with industrial strategy to tackle rising unemployment and declining agri-sector jobs, while factoring in processing, cooperatives, and market linkages. BKU (Ugrahan) president Joginder Singh Ugrahan also hailed the draft policy and said that the Punjab government should implement it at the earliest. Darshan Pal Singh, president of Krantikari Kisan Union, said that the majority of the recommendations in the 2023 Agricultural Policy are pro-Punjab and pro-farmer. 'It should be implemented to address the ongoing agrarian crisis in the state. Along with BKU (Dakaunda) and BKU (Ugrahan), we have demanded that the government adopt this policy. In my opinion, it is a much-needed step forward,' he said.