logo
May Day: Time for Unions to Navigate New Geopolitical Realities

May Day: Time for Unions to Navigate New Geopolitical Realities

IOL News01-05-2025

Members of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) hold placards and shout slogans in support of a nationwide demonstration in Durban, South Africa, on February 13, 2019 against high unemployment and government policies that are deepening poverty.
Dr. Reneva Fourie
AS we commemorate May Day – the global day of workers' solidarity and struggle – we are reminded of the ongoing necessity to defend dignity, justice and equality.
The landscape of workers' organisation and struggle is evolving swiftly. Remote work is becoming the norm, and labour is increasingly casualised, unpredictable and dispersed as artificial intelligence (AI), automation, and digitisation reshape the global economy.
In this context, traditional mechanisms of worker protection, like collective bargaining, are being eroded. Meanwhile, wages and working conditions are deteriorating, with workers barely able to maintain a basic standard of living. The demand for a robust, innovative and unified trade union movement has never been more urgent.
In South Africa, however, where poverty and unemployment continue to be high, the situation is particularly acute. A revitalised and united labour movement is essential for confronting the systemic forces underpinning these challenges.
Yet, trade union density has declined significantly, with fewer than 30 per cent of workers now unionised. The once-powerful trade union movement is fragmented, with COSATU, FEDUSA, SAFTU and NACTU competing for a shrinking formal sector membership base.
Internal rivalries and representational battles have weakened the capacity of organised labour to respond collectively to rising inequality, growing worker precarity, and the challenges posed by rapid technological change.
Critically, none of the existing federations have articulated a sufficiently bold or comprehensive strategy to address the structural transformations associated with digitisation, platform work and algorithmic management.
However, South African history powerfully demonstrates the transformative potential of organised labour. During the 1980s, the trade union movement was central not only to improving shop-floor conditions but also to the broader struggle against apartheid.
It mobilised workers across racial and sectoral lines, linking economic grievances to political demands for democracy and human rights. In the transition to democracy, trade unions successfully negotiated some of the world's most progressive labour laws, including the Labour Relations Act and Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
They secured institutionalised worker representation through the establishment of the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC).
Today, there is a new struggle requiring courage, unity, and strategic dexterity. Capitalism has evolved under the influence of technology, and so must the labour movement. Far from emancipating humanity, contemporary technological innovations have been deployed to deepen exploitation: precarious gig work, freelancing under conditions of insecurity, zero-hour contracts, and pervasive digital surveillance have become widespread.
Rather than eradicating inequality, the so-called 'fourth industrial revolution' threatens to entrench it further.
Nevertheless, workers remain in the best position to navigate and challenge these new realities. It is workers who continue to sustain the traditional economy and produce, maintain and innovate the technologies driving the systems on which modern life depends.
Their creativity and knowledge generation underpin the economy's productive forces. Therefore, workers must not only defend their existing rights but must play a leading role in shaping the future of work itself.
This necessitates a shift in strategic orientation for trade unions. Beyond defensive struggles for better wages and working conditions, there is a pressing need to restructure the ownership and governance of production.
Such restructuring includes building and supporting worker cooperatives, advocating for workplace democracy, promoting public and common ownership of digital platforms, and securing rights to meaningful, dignified and secure work.
Trade unions must place broader social policies at the centre of their demands, including shorter working hours, comprehensive social security, universal healthcare, free and quality education, and affordable housing. They must demand a world where their work serves the whole of humanity, not just the ever more greedy few.
Importantly, the struggle for worker power cannot be confined within national boundaries. In a globalised economy where transnational corporations operate across multiple jurisdictions, international worker solidarity is no longer merely a matter of principle but a strategic necessity.
The algorithms that manage workers' productivity do not respect national borders, nor do the financial flows that extract value from their labour. Therefore, trade unions must forge international alliances, develop transnational strategies, and participate in global campaigns that contest corporate power worldwide.
South African trade unions face a critical responsibility in this regard. They must urgently overcome fragmentation and build a unified, inclusive movement that represents all segments of the working class. They must set aside narrow institutional rivalries and ideological contestation and embrace innovative forms of organisation, including establishing an overarching coordinating body.
New models such as platform cooperatives, digital unions, and sectoral bargaining frameworks for gig economy workers must be explored and adopted. Traditional strategies must be adapted to meet the needs of younger, digitally literate, and often highly mobile workforces who may not easily fit into older models of shop-floor organising.
Moreover, unions must reorient themselves towards proactive engagement with technological change. They must advocate for worker-driven innovation rather than merely reacting to technological displacement.
In this concept, workers actively participate in the design and implementation of new technologies, ensuring that the benefits of these innovations are shared fairly and that technological change is directed towards social good rather than corporate profit.
Every campaign for improved wages, working conditions, and labour rights today must be connected to a broader vision of a more equitable and sustainable society. Echoing Karl Marx's insight, the workers' movement must simultaneously address the immediate needs of the working class while carrying within it the seeds of a future beyond exploitation.
History shows that when workers come together and organise, they gain the power to improve their lives and impact the course of society. In a world reshaped by technology, inequality, and insecurity, South Africa requires a new generation of trade unionism – one that is bold, forward-looking, ready to defend, organise and empower workers across all sectors, and to humanise the economy in the age of AI and automation.
If workers unite in solidarity and vision, they will not only safeguard their livelihoods but also help to create a more just, inclusive and peaceful society for future generations.
* Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SA loses as its entrepreneurs move companies to Estonia
SA loses as its entrepreneurs move companies to Estonia

Daily Maverick

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Maverick

SA loses as its entrepreneurs move companies to Estonia

The Baltic country's e-Residency programme offers access to a highly efficient digital-first business environment with alluring prospects for local tech companies. Imagine being a very small country (a landmass about the size of Gauteng) with 1.3 million residents and a declining population rate, no significant natural resources except some shale gas, and a previously hostile neighbour in the form of the Soviet Union, which fell in 1991. That's Estonia, whose strategy to increase its tax base has involved establishing an e-residency programme to lure foreign businesses in return for exporting its world-leading digital government services. For a growing number of South African tech entrepreneurs, the key to unlocking global markets, EU-based investment and a bureaucracy-free future doesn't lie in Sandton or Stellenbosch – it's in Tallinn. Estonia's fabled e-Residency programme, once a curiosity for digital nomads and crypto-optimists, has found a surprising following in South Africa's start-up scene, and 436 of Mzansi's finest are already enrolled. But although the Baltic republic promises digital freedom and access to European capital, the decision to incorporate one's company offshore isn't as simple as clicking 'register' for the government's e-Residency programme. 'E-residency is just an access to our digital ecosystem,' says Katrin Vaga, a former journalist who heads PR for the programme. 'It's not tax residency, it's not a golden visa; it's not even about physically moving to Estonia. It simply gives entrepreneurs a secure way to operate in our digital-first business environment.' This digital infrastructure, built over two decades, allows foreign founders to register and run a European company entirely online – and in English. For software developers, marketing consultants and other knowledge workers, it's a frictionless gateway to EU business. 'It's a 15-minute process,' Vaga explains. 'From application to launching a company. It's all remote, all online, all verified with a secure digital ID.' One standout feature is Estonia's 0% corporate tax on reinvested profits. 'It's built for start-ups,' she says. 'If you're reinvesting into growth, you don't pay corporate tax until you distribute dividends.' Next stop, EU funding Access to European venture capital is the big draw. 'If you want to raise funding from European sources, it derisks the project to be based in the EU,' says Dr Armid Azadeh, founder of the Namibian medtech solution company OnCall. '[Venture capital funders] are more comfortable when the intellectual property is domiciled in a jurisdiction they understand and trust.' This isn't just about Estonia. It's about a broader initiative by African start-ups to move their intellectual property (IP) offshore to investor-friendly territories – from Mauritius to the Netherlands – so that global funders will take them seriously. Renier Kriel, foun­der of The Founder Collab and a stalwart of the local start-up scene, says all South African company founders who have to raise venture capital want to take their IP offshore because funders are typically 'not comfortable for IP to stay in South Africa'. The trend is driven less by tax arbitrage and more by South Africa's cumbersome exchange controls and employment legislation. 'Moving money out of South Africa is a major pain,' Kriel says. 'You need approval. It slows down everything.' Add to this labour regulations that, though protective of workers, can be punitive for start-ups. 'The cost of 'mishiring' is massive,' Kriel adds. 'We need specific reform for hi-tech or early-stage businesses. The current laws create less employment because of the cost of hiring.' The combination of local friction and global opportunity makes Estonia's promise deeply appealing. 'You get to tailor your lifestyle,' says one Estonian e-Resident entrepreneur quoted in Vaga's documentation. 'I pay more taxes than I maybe would have back home, but I have a bigger market and more ­business opportunity. And I save so much time that ­actually I still win.' But Estonian e-residency isn't a silver bullet. 'It doesn't make sense for everyone,' Vaga cautions. 'If you're bootstrapped, already have reliable banking, or you want a physical shop in Europe, it's probably not for you.' How Estonia stacks up Estonia is now part of an elite club of favoured offshoring destinations, each with distinct strengths and pitfalls. London offers prestige, investor networks and familiarity. But it also comes with high operational costs, post-Brexit trade frictions and looming tax changes for non-domiciled founders. Delaware is ideal for US expansion and venture capital fundraising, thanks to flexible corporate laws and low state-level taxes. But the complexity of US federal tax and substance rules can trip up founders. Amsterdam provides full EU access, a deep talent pool and vibrant start-up culture, but it is costlier than Estonia and requires a more involved set-up process. Mauritius remains a go-to for African-facing businesses with its 3% effective tax rate and strong treaty network – though it requires real substance (offices, local directors) to stay compliant. Estonia, through its e-residency programme, wins on speed, cost and digital ease. 'You can run a company entirely remotely from anywhere,' says Vaga. 'And your encrypted digital signature is accepted across the EU.' That said, it's not perfect. 'Banking can still be a hurdle,' she concedes. South Africa risks losing more than tax revenue when founders go offshore. It loses jobs, IP and long-term innovation. 'If we want to compete with Mauritius or Estonia, we need to reform exchange controls and court major investors – show them we can be a real partner in building wealth,' says Kriel. 'Cut the red tape, combine the SDL [skills development levy], UIF, PAYE and income tax into one simplified system. If we want to compete with the places [venture capital funders] like, we need to make it easier to build here.' For the right type of business, mostly digital, lean and global in mindset, Estonia offers a near-frictionless way to plug into the EU economy. The e-Residency programme isn't for everyone. But for the increasing number of South African entrepreneurs stuck between red tape locally and global opportunity, it might just be the digital lifeline they've been waiting for. 'It's not about escaping,' says Vaga. 'It's about enabling.' DM

Africa Food Show: Tapping into the potential of the continent's food and beverage market
Africa Food Show: Tapping into the potential of the continent's food and beverage market

The Citizen

time30 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Africa Food Show: Tapping into the potential of the continent's food and beverage market

Out of the 350 exhibitors at the Africa Food Show 2025, approximately 50% are South African. The inaugural African Food Show will be hosted in Cape Town this week. Picture: Supplied With the African Development Bank estimating that the African food and beverage market is set to reach $1 trillion by 2030, the inaugural Africa Food Show, taking place in Cape Town this week, is tapping into this emerging market. Set to be hosted at the Cape Town International Convention Centre (CTICC), the Africa Food Show is expected to bring together over 350 exhibitors and 6,000 visitors from more than 25 countries. 'Out of the 350 exhibitors at the Africa Food Show 2025, approximately 50% are South African. The remaining exhibitors are international participants from over 30 countries,' Events manager at dmg events, Margaret Peters tells The Citizen. Peters says the balanced representation of exhibitors highlights the show's dual focus. 'Showcasing South Africa's vibrant food and beverage sector while also fostering global trade and collaboration.' The two-day food and beverage gathering is part of the globally recognised Gulfood series, which includes the world's largest food and beverage exhibition in Dubai. 'This association lends the event significant credibility and draws international attention. The show is also backed by dmg events and the Dubai World Trade Centre, both experienced in organizing large-scale global expos,' shares Peters. The show will take place from June 10 to 12. ALSO READ: Cape Town is on the up, here's why Cape Town's appeal Cape Town's global appeal as a film destination is driving a significant economic upswing in the city's hospitality industry. According to the City's Film Permits Office, from November 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, film crews booked more than 59,000 beds in Cape Town, spending nearly R148 million. The Cape Town CBD is a well-managed CBD, with several partners working together to ensure it is safe, clean, and a welcoming environment in which to visit and conduct business. This is one of the main reasons organisers of the Africa Food Show decided to host their inaugural event on the continent in the Western Cape city. 'Its global appeal, bolstered by a strong tourism sector and vibrant hospitality industry, makes it an attractive destination for both business and leisure travellers,' says Peters. 'Additionally, the city's alignment with themes of innovation and sustainability complements our Africa Food Summit, which focuses on climate-smart and healthy food solutions.' ALSO READ: For all the tea in… Mzansi Industry focused The Africa Food Show is primarily targeted at companies, brands, and industry professionals rather than the general public. Its focus is on creating a platform for business-to-business (B2B) engagement, where food and beverage manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, and retailers can connect, showcase innovations, and explore trade opportunities. 'That said, while the core audience is industry-focused, events like this often include public-access days or consumer-focused segments, especially to promote local products or culinary experiences,' says Peters. NOW READ: Beer lovers and cannabis connoisseurs to gather in Gauteng's biggest cities this weekend

EFF's Julius Malema is ‘quietly' singing ‘Hallelujah hosanna' over Trump-Musk fallout
EFF's Julius Malema is ‘quietly' singing ‘Hallelujah hosanna' over Trump-Musk fallout

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

EFF's Julius Malema is ‘quietly' singing ‘Hallelujah hosanna' over Trump-Musk fallout

EFF leader Julius Malema is 'quietly enjoying' the dramatic fallout between US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, the two figures who have long criticised him over his outspoken rhetoric, radical political views, including the controversial "Kill the Boer" chant. The two had previously accused Malema of inciting violence against white farmers. The red berets have denounced the claim. The latest split between the former allies who were once bound by political interests appears to align with Malema's long-standing opposition to both. Trump, in a televised Oval Office tirade, said he was "very disappointed" in Musk after the tech billionaire criticised his spending bill. Musk fired back on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Trump of ingratitude, claiming credit for his 2024 win, and even referencing unverified claims linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. The feud has political and economic fallout. Tesla shares dropped, Musk threatened to withdraw from a major US space programme, and Trump also hinted at pulling Musk's government contracts. The clash comes amid rising tensions between the US and South Africa. Tensions between the two countries have intensified since Trump's second term. Last month, during a high-level meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa and the Trump administration in Washington, aimed at mending diplomatic relations between the two countries, Malema took centre stage. Trump played clips of Malema singing the 'Kill the boer' chant, which he argued incites violence against white farmers, but the red berets rubbished the claim. Trump called for Malema's arrest and denounced South Africa's land reform as 'land seizure.' IOL News previously reported that Malema has vowed to continue singing the controversial song despite strong criticism from Trump. The US also cut HIV/AIDS funding and granted refugee status to 49 white South Africans, claiming racial discrimination, which Pretoria has vehemently rejected. With Musk born in South Africa and now publicly clashing with Trump, Malema 'may' see this as more than political theatre, which is possibly a moment of vindication. Speaking with IOL News, Professor Theo Neethling, from the University of Free State's Department of Political Studies and Governance, said the fallout between Trump and Musk was 'long predictable.' 'The Trump-Musk fallout was long predictable, and even if the EFF delights in it, the fact remains that the United States conducts diplomatic relations with the South African government, not with the EFF…,' he said. 'The EFF is a relatively small party, as President Ramaphosa pointed out to Trump, and it is not relevant in South Africa's international relations.' Neethling emphasised that diplomatic relations are maintained between the US government and South African government, not with political outliers. 'The Trump administration also conducts its relations with the South African government, and what carries much more weight in the US than Elon Musk are the views and roles of top Republican voices like JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. They will be decisive in the future US-South Africa relations.' Commenting on the developments of Trump and Musk clashing, Neethling said Malema will continue 'loudly in his rhetoric of African self-reliance,' but South Africa's Government of National Unity (GNU) understands the importance of maintaining relations with the US, which is the largest economy in the world. 'Around 600 American companies invest and do business here in South Africa and contribute to job creation,' he told IOL News. 'The Minister of Finance (Enoch Godongwana) also rightly pointed out recently that if the US does not want to do business with a country, it places that country on the periphery of international trade and investment.' According to Neethling, the Trump and Musk fallout will have no impact on future US and South Africa relations. 'Again, top Republican voices like JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz are what matter, as well as those of senior officials in the White House.' Meanwhile, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego also expressed his views on the Trump and Musk fallout, adding that Malema is probably 'enjoying' seeing the two clash. 'I think Julius Malema is really enjoying, is really reveling at what is happening because it absorbs him in a way to say, look, two liars are now fighting. You know, they say, do not disturb. Napoleon Bonaparte once said, don't disturb your enemy when he's making a mistake.' Mashego said he believes that Malema is currently not in any mood to disturb what he called 'enemies' as they make mistakes. 'I hope he doesn't tweet. I hope he just watches the show. He just enjoys reading Elon Musk and Donald Trump's Truth Social tweets. So that, you know, I think it's a marvel…' He added, 'think EFF, I think Julius Malema, he now knows that the person who's been whispering into Donald Trump's eye is no longer in the picture, which means the rhetoric from the part of the White House towards him is going to be limited because Trump doesn't have an original opinion.' 'All that he's saying is a megaphone. He's just saying what other people want him to say. So I think this is really the end of the Que de Bois charade that Donald Trump used to stage. And it's the end of that whole obsession by Donald Trump with Elon Musk, because going forward, with the Que de Bois, because going forward, whatever Elon Musk says relating to South Africa, I think one of the people is going to really try to ridicule it will be Donald Trump.' 'So they have two fools, two buffoons, really ridiculing each other,' Mashego added. He described the fallout between Trump and Trump as a Christmas for the EFF. 'Well, I don't think it really gives Malema a chance to push his message of self-reliance because self-reliance needs not be pushed through rhetoric. It needs to be pushed through doing.' IOL News has sent questions to the EFF, requesting their input on the latest development between Trump and Musk, and will be updated once received. [email protected] IOL Politics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store