May Day: Time for Unions to Navigate New Geopolitical Realities
Dr. Reneva Fourie
AS we commemorate May Day – the global day of workers' solidarity and struggle – we are reminded of the ongoing necessity to defend dignity, justice and equality.
The landscape of workers' organisation and struggle is evolving swiftly. Remote work is becoming the norm, and labour is increasingly casualised, unpredictable and dispersed as artificial intelligence (AI), automation, and digitisation reshape the global economy.
In this context, traditional mechanisms of worker protection, like collective bargaining, are being eroded. Meanwhile, wages and working conditions are deteriorating, with workers barely able to maintain a basic standard of living. The demand for a robust, innovative and unified trade union movement has never been more urgent.
In South Africa, however, where poverty and unemployment continue to be high, the situation is particularly acute. A revitalised and united labour movement is essential for confronting the systemic forces underpinning these challenges.
Yet, trade union density has declined significantly, with fewer than 30 per cent of workers now unionised. The once-powerful trade union movement is fragmented, with COSATU, FEDUSA, SAFTU and NACTU competing for a shrinking formal sector membership base.
Internal rivalries and representational battles have weakened the capacity of organised labour to respond collectively to rising inequality, growing worker precarity, and the challenges posed by rapid technological change.
Critically, none of the existing federations have articulated a sufficiently bold or comprehensive strategy to address the structural transformations associated with digitisation, platform work and algorithmic management.
However, South African history powerfully demonstrates the transformative potential of organised labour. During the 1980s, the trade union movement was central not only to improving shop-floor conditions but also to the broader struggle against apartheid.
It mobilised workers across racial and sectoral lines, linking economic grievances to political demands for democracy and human rights. In the transition to democracy, trade unions successfully negotiated some of the world's most progressive labour laws, including the Labour Relations Act and Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
They secured institutionalised worker representation through the establishment of the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC).
Today, there is a new struggle requiring courage, unity, and strategic dexterity. Capitalism has evolved under the influence of technology, and so must the labour movement. Far from emancipating humanity, contemporary technological innovations have been deployed to deepen exploitation: precarious gig work, freelancing under conditions of insecurity, zero-hour contracts, and pervasive digital surveillance have become widespread.
Rather than eradicating inequality, the so-called 'fourth industrial revolution' threatens to entrench it further.
Nevertheless, workers remain in the best position to navigate and challenge these new realities. It is workers who continue to sustain the traditional economy and produce, maintain and innovate the technologies driving the systems on which modern life depends.
Their creativity and knowledge generation underpin the economy's productive forces. Therefore, workers must not only defend their existing rights but must play a leading role in shaping the future of work itself.
This necessitates a shift in strategic orientation for trade unions. Beyond defensive struggles for better wages and working conditions, there is a pressing need to restructure the ownership and governance of production.
Such restructuring includes building and supporting worker cooperatives, advocating for workplace democracy, promoting public and common ownership of digital platforms, and securing rights to meaningful, dignified and secure work.
Trade unions must place broader social policies at the centre of their demands, including shorter working hours, comprehensive social security, universal healthcare, free and quality education, and affordable housing. They must demand a world where their work serves the whole of humanity, not just the ever more greedy few.
Importantly, the struggle for worker power cannot be confined within national boundaries. In a globalised economy where transnational corporations operate across multiple jurisdictions, international worker solidarity is no longer merely a matter of principle but a strategic necessity.
The algorithms that manage workers' productivity do not respect national borders, nor do the financial flows that extract value from their labour. Therefore, trade unions must forge international alliances, develop transnational strategies, and participate in global campaigns that contest corporate power worldwide.
South African trade unions face a critical responsibility in this regard. They must urgently overcome fragmentation and build a unified, inclusive movement that represents all segments of the working class. They must set aside narrow institutional rivalries and ideological contestation and embrace innovative forms of organisation, including establishing an overarching coordinating body.
New models such as platform cooperatives, digital unions, and sectoral bargaining frameworks for gig economy workers must be explored and adopted. Traditional strategies must be adapted to meet the needs of younger, digitally literate, and often highly mobile workforces who may not easily fit into older models of shop-floor organising.
Moreover, unions must reorient themselves towards proactive engagement with technological change. They must advocate for worker-driven innovation rather than merely reacting to technological displacement.
In this concept, workers actively participate in the design and implementation of new technologies, ensuring that the benefits of these innovations are shared fairly and that technological change is directed towards social good rather than corporate profit.
Every campaign for improved wages, working conditions, and labour rights today must be connected to a broader vision of a more equitable and sustainable society. Echoing Karl Marx's insight, the workers' movement must simultaneously address the immediate needs of the working class while carrying within it the seeds of a future beyond exploitation.
History shows that when workers come together and organise, they gain the power to improve their lives and impact the course of society. In a world reshaped by technology, inequality, and insecurity, South Africa requires a new generation of trade unionism – one that is bold, forward-looking, ready to defend, organise and empower workers across all sectors, and to humanise the economy in the age of AI and automation.
If workers unite in solidarity and vision, they will not only safeguard their livelihoods but also help to create a more just, inclusive and peaceful society for future generations.
* Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Cyril Ramaphosa's Ignorance: A Symptom of South Africa's Governance Challenges
SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya with President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Pretoria Military Sports Club. Image: Jacques Naude/African News Agency (ANA) Clyde N.S. Ramalaine South Africa's foreign policy is under siege, not from foreign powers, but from the fragmentation of its own State centre. The controversy over SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya's visit to Iran is more than a military misstep; it exposes fractures in governance, civil–military discipline, and institutional coherence. That a senior military officer could conduct politically charged diplomacy without the President's knowledge signals a State adrift, where factionalism, ideological signalling, and individual prerogatives dictate the nation's global posture. Maphwanya's visit lies at the intersection of foreign policy confusion, eroding civil–military discipline, and structural governance weaknesses. By bypassing diplomatic channels and publicly articulating solidarity with a sanctioned state, he blurred the line between military command and political advocacy. The episode raises fundamental questions: Who truly directs South Africa's foreign engagements? Does the President still control the levers of statecraft entrusted to him? In my assessment, General Rudzani Maphwanya's statements in Iran exceeded the bounds of military neutrality. And straddled overreach. By declaring that 'South Africa and Iran have common goals,' condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, criticising U.S. sanctions, and framing his visit as delivering a 'political message' at 'the best possible time,' he stepped directly into the political and ideological arena. These were not neutral observations or ceremonial remarks; they aligned with Iran's foreign policy positions and implicitly endorsed its strategic narratives. While some may argue he was 'merely articulating South African policy,' the timing, specificity, and ideological tenor suggest otherwise: this was a deliberate straddling of political space. In doing so, Maphwanya undermined the constitutional role of the Presidency and DIRCO, blurring the line between defence leadership and foreign policy-making, and raising urgent questions about civil-military discipline and the ability of the state centre to assert control over high-ranking officials acting on the international stage. Civil–Military Boundaries Shattered By convention, defence chiefs remain neutral, executing policy rather than shaping it. Maphwanya's public alignment with Iran undermined this principle, encroaching on the exclusive domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. Military neutrality safeguards against politicisation of the armed forces and ensures civilian oversight. The contradiction between Maphwanya's emphasis on neutrality in SA Soldier, Volume 32, No. 4 (2025), and his actions in Iran may suggest deliberate signalling. Domestically, it reassured the ANC's pro-Palestinian and nationalist base that senior military leadership aligns with ideological positions championed within party structures. Internationally, it signalled to Tehran that South Africa's military is willing to engage beyond formal diplomatic channels, potentially bypassing the Presidency and DIRCO. The general's confidence may reflect awareness of Minister Motshekga's backing, particularly her dismissive stance toward perceived American deference. By straddling the political space with ministerial support, Maphwanya tests the boundaries of presidential authority, raising questions about civilian control over the armed forces. This is not merely a lapse in protocol but a visible assertion of institutional autonomy, where senior officials act in alignment with factional or ideological allies rather than under the unified command of the Commander-in-Chief. When considered alongside Lt. General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner's July 6 statement, a pattern emerges: senior security officials asserting independent positions. Individually, each may seem isolated, but collectively, they indicate persistent strain on institutional discipline and oversight. This dynamic suggests the State centre—the Presidency and Cabinet—is increasingly challenged by high-ranking officials operating with their strategic calculus. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mixed Messaging and Diplomatic Risks Mixed messaging amplified the damage. Ramaphosa urged caution, Motshekga defended the visit, and the military chief effectively freelanced policy in Tehran. These contradictory signals create openings for external actors to exploit South Africa's internal dissonance. Iran is under sweeping US sanctions. Any appearance of military endorsement risks being interpreted as a strategic pivot, with billions in AGOA trade benefits hanging in the balance. Beyond economic stakes, the timing compounded the risk: the Israel–Hamas war sharpened global ideological divides, and Iran's accession to BRICS added symbolic weight to the visit. While some Global South states may applaud Pretoria's independent posture, symbolic gains come at the cost of trade, investment flows, and currency stability vital to South Africa's fragile economy. The Centre Not Holding At the heart of the crisis is the divergence between the Presidency and Defence Minister Angie Motshekga. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya described the visit as 'ill-advised,' emphasising Ramaphosa neither knew of nor sanctioned it, and reiterating that foreign policy is the sole domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. By contrast, Motshekga insisted 'all protocols were duly observed' and defended Maphwanya, dismissing concerns as undue deference to America. When Minister Motshekga asserts that 'all protocols were observed,' this implies that the President, DIRCO, and all relevant structures within the state's diplomatic apparatus were duly informed and that established procedures governing high-level international engagements were followed. This contradiction reveals more than bureaucratic tension. DIRCO's absence, the sidelining of South Africa's ambassador in Tehran, and the conflicting narratives suggest parallel centres of power within the state. Authority is fragmented, ministerial prerogatives clash with the Presidency, and accountability is obscured. There is, however, an alternative reading. Perhaps Ramaphosa and Motshekga are performing a calculated balancing act. The Presidency's rhetoric of caution appeals to Western partners concerned about sanctions and AGOA eligibility, while Motshekga's defiance speaks to the ANC's domestic base, where suspicion of Western pressure runs deep. Even if intentional, this 'good cop/bad cop' choreography carries real risks: the absence of coherent coordination allows foreign influence to seep in, institutions are undermined, and the Presidency appears weak at home and abroad. Institutional Tensions and Governance Failures Ramaphosa's claimed ignorance is a constitutional red flag. Either the reporting lines failed, or the trip was deliberately concealed. Both scenarios weaken civilian supremacy over the military, a cornerstone of democratic governance. Maphwanya's rhetoric, echoing partisan ANC positions on Israel and Palestine, threatens to drag the SANDF into factional politics. Unchecked, this sets a precedent for 'parallel diplomacy,' where provincial governments, municipalities, SOEs, and the military pursue independent foreign agendas. For a middle-power state, multiple competing voices erode credibility, trust, and negotiating leverage. South Africa risks becoming a cacophony of internal agendas broadcast to the world, with each actor signalling its alignment. Domestic Political Dilemmas The Democratic Alliance's call for a court-martial underscores a constitutional imperative: the military must remain neutral. Ramaphosa faces a dilemma. Disciplining Maphwanya would reaffirm civilian supremacy but risk alienating ANC hardliners and pro-Palestinian constituencies. Inaction normalises military autonomy and chips away at presidential authority, sending a signal that the chain of command can be disregarded without consequence. Strategic Incoherence and Policy Vacuums Beyond the immediate controversy, the episode exposes a broader malaise: South African foreign policy is a patchwork of ideological impulses, factional agendas, and reactive positioning, managed from a State centre increasingly unable to assert coherent authority. Policy vacuums invite unauthorised actors to step in. Maphwanya's initiative broadcast positions never sanctioned by the Presidency or DIRCO, creating inconsistent diplomatic signalling. Symbolic alignment with sanctioned states may appeal to ideological allies but risks alienating Western governments critical to trade, investment, and economic stability.


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
What you should know about Online Sports Betting sites
What you should know about Online Sports Betting sites With the massive rise of Online Sports betting Companies in South Africa, it's important for you to make an informed decision to avoid any potential scammers. Luckily has done the research for you and promotes only recommended and licensed brands where your money will be safe and your winnings will be paid, no question's asked! Betting Codes is a site that is built by South Africans, for South Africans. The review process that Betting Codes undergoes is. Is the brand licensed by a reputable regulator in South Africa? Will your winnings be paid on time with no question's asked? Is the software safe and secure? Is your information kept safe and secure according to the POPIA act? Pros and cons for each brand are provided by Betting Codes for your peace of mind and for you to make an informed decision Betting Codes ( serves as a premier guide for South African Sports Bettors, offering transparent and in-depth reviews of Online Sportsbooks. The platform is tailored to local needs, delivering objective insights on licensing, security, payment methods, promotions, and user experience—all grounded in thorough research and hands-on testing. Important to take note that Betting Codes only promotes licensed brands* in South Africa so that users do not fall into the trap of offshore illegal brands. Key Features & Offerings Comprehensive Reviews Betting Codes reviews Sports Betting platforms. Each review assesses aspects such as local availability, user support, game or event selection, and bonus structures. Sourcing & Trust Their review methodology includes actual account creation, deposits, gameplay and interaction with customer support. This ensures recommendations are based on real user experience, not just marketing. Final Thoughts on Betting Codes Betting Codes ( stands out as a credible, South African-focused authority for Sports Betting. With objective reviews, practical guidance, and real-world testing, it empowers bettors to make informed and confident choices. Before you decide to open an account at a South African Sportsbook, be sure to visit *South African law permits only persons over 18 to partake in Sports Betting. Note that only features Sports Betting companies that have a valid South African Sports Betting license. While sports betting and gambling are not the same thing, anyone who feels that they need help with a Sports Betting addiction, may contact the South African Responsible Gambling Foundation for help. Toll-free counselling line 0800 008 or WhatsApp Help to 076 675 0710.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
SASSA September 2025 payment dates confirmed for old age, disability, and child grants
SASSA confirms payment dates for grant in September 2025, ensuring financial support for South African citizens. Image: File The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) has confirmed the official payment schedule for September 2025, covering old age, disability, child support, and Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grants. According to the agency, beneficiaries can expect their grants on the following dates: Old Age Grant: Tuesday, September 2, 2025. Disability Grant: Wednesday, September 3, 2025. All other grants, including child support: Thursday, September 4, 2025. Sassa urged beneficiaries to plan carefully and not to rush to collection points on the first day to avoid long queues. The agency also highlighted the ongoing issue of unauthorized deductions from social grants, calling on beneficiaries to act quickly if they notice irregularities. 'Is money being deducted from your social grant without your permission? Report this to your nearest SASSA office as soon as possible,' the agency said. Disputes can also be lodged via SMS by sending an ID number and the name of the financial services provider to 34548. SASSA reiterated the legal protections in place, stressing that 'only one deduction is allowed per month, up to 10% of your grant, and only if a beneficiary has consented to such a deduction.' Meanwhile, the agency confirmed that COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress (SRD) payments for August 2025 will be made between August 27 and 30, 2025. Beneficiaries facing delays due to 'referred' status have been urged to verify their identity online. 'If referred status has been resolved, you will get paid from the next payment cycle and historic payments will be paid as per the schedule,' SASSA explained. IOL News