Nvidia earnings to reveal hit from US export curbs on China
May 27 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab investors will look for definitive answers on how much U.S. chip curbs on China will cost the company when it reports results on Wednesday, even as a pullback in other regulations is expected to open up new markets.
In a fresh effort to stymie Beijing's access to cutting-edge technology, the Trump administration last month put export limits on Nvidia's H20 chip - a move the company said would result in $5.5 billion in charges.
CEO Jensen Huang, who pegged the market for AI chips in China at roughly $50 billion next year, said last week Nvidia had walked away from $15 billion of sales in the country after the curbs.
Nvidia does not break out sales for the H20, the only AI chip it was allowed to sell to China, a market which accounted for 13% of its revenue last year.
"The primary question around results and guidance is can Nvidia lift sales enough to offset the loss of H20 or China business," Wedbush analysts said ahead of the earnings report.
While sources have told Reuters that company is planning to launch a new AI chipset for China based on Nvidia's latest generation Blackwell architecture, the uncertainty of losing its China business has dented its stock.
The stock has already been under pressure from concerns about mounting AI infrastructure costs. It was down 2% this year, a far cry from their nearly three-fold gain last year.
"China will probably be the biggest swing factor for Nvidia's quarter," said D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria.
The company is expected to report that first-quarter revenue surged 66.2% to $43.28 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Susquehanna analysts estimated the restrictions impacted the last three weeks of the April quarter, costing Nvidia about $1 billion in sales.
For the rest of the year, lost revenue could amount to as much as $4.5 billion per quarter, they said. Wedbush estimated the quarterly hit at $3 billion to $4 billion.
Adjusted gross margin is expected to drop more than 11 percentage points to 67.7%. The write-downs related to H20 shipments could translate to a gross margin hit of up to 12.5%, Wedbush said.
Nvidia CEO Huang recently called U.S. semiconductor curbs on China "a failure," saying they have only pushed Chinese rivals such as Huawei to speed up development of homegrown chips.
Washington, however, has said it is going to a Biden-era export curb called the AI diffusion rule that sought to curb exports of sophisticated AI chips by dividing the world into three tiers, with China blocked entirely.
This easing could open up new geographies of growth for Nvidia including the Middle East, though analysts say the region's revenue contribution in the near term will be small.
As part of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade deals with some Gulf countries, Nvidia has said it would sell hundreds of thousands of AI chips to Saudi Arabia, including 18,000 of its latest "Blackwell" chips to a startup owned by the country's sovereign wealth fund.
After months of worries that investment in AI from large cloud providers was stalling, Nvidia investors have found confidence in pledges from companies including Alphabet's Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab to keep spending.
Still, the quarters of blowout beats may be over for the company. In its last fiscal year, Nvidia beat Wall Street's quarterly revenue estimates by 4.9% on average. It delivered quarterly sales that was 12.5% above estimates in the fiscal year preceding that.
"I don't think investors expectations are very high as we go into it (results)," said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer of Spear Invest, which holds Nvidia shares in an actively managed exchange-traded fund.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
32 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Court blocks Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers law
The ruling from a three-judge panel at the New York-based Court of International Trade came after several lawsuits arguing Mr Trump has exceeded his authority, left US trade policy dependent on his whims and unleashed economic chaos. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. The Trump administration is expected to appeal. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the levies, the centrepiece of Mr Trump's trade policy. Tariffs must typically be approved by Congress, but Mr Trump says he has the power to act because the country's trade deficits amount to a national emergency. He imposed tariffs on most of the countries in the world at one point, sending markets reeling. The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years (Evan Vucci/AP) The plaintiffs argue that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPPA) does not authorise the use of tariffs. Even if it did, they say, the trade deficit does not meet the law's requirement that an emergency be triggered only by an 'unusual and extraordinary threat'. The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years. Mr Trump imposed tariffs on most of the countries in the world in an effort to reverse America's massive and longstanding trade deficits. He earlier plastered levies on imports from Canada, China and Mexico to combat the illegal flow of immigrants and the synthetic opioids across the US border. His administration argues that courts approved then-president Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in 1971, and that only Congress, and not the courts, can determine the 'political' question of whether the president's rationale for declaring an emergency complies with the law. Mr Trump's Liberation Day tariffs shook global financial markets and led many economists to downgrade the outlook for US economic growth. So far, though, the tariffs appear to have had little impact on the world's largest economy.
Western Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Court blocks Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers law
The ruling from a three-judge panel at the New York-based Court of International Trade came after several lawsuits arguing Mr Trump has exceeded his authority, left US trade policy dependent on his whims and unleashed economic chaos. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. The Trump administration is expected to appeal. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the levies, the centrepiece of Mr Trump's trade policy. Tariffs must typically be approved by Congress, but Mr Trump says he has the power to act because the country's trade deficits amount to a national emergency. He imposed tariffs on most of the countries in the world at one point, sending markets reeling. The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years (Evan Vucci/AP) The plaintiffs argue that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPPA) does not authorise the use of tariffs. Even if it did, they say, the trade deficit does not meet the law's requirement that an emergency be triggered only by an 'unusual and extraordinary threat'. The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years. Mr Trump imposed tariffs on most of the countries in the world in an effort to reverse America's massive and longstanding trade deficits. He earlier plastered levies on imports from Canada, China and Mexico to combat the illegal flow of immigrants and the synthetic opioids across the US border. His administration argues that courts approved then-president Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in 1971, and that only Congress, and not the courts, can determine the 'political' question of whether the president's rationale for declaring an emergency complies with the law. Mr Trump's Liberation Day tariffs shook global financial markets and led many economists to downgrade the outlook for US economic growth. So far, though, the tariffs appear to have had little impact on the world's largest economy.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'We will begin revoking visas': US confirms hardline stance on one nationality
The US government has further outlined its hardline stance on the students, with visas to be revoked for those linked to the Communist Party or studying in key sectors The United States is poised to ramp up its scrutiny on Chinese students, with Senator Marco Rubio confirming plans to cancel visas for individuals linked to the Chinese Communist Party or pursuing studies in sensitive sectors. Posting on his X (formerly Twitter) account, the influential Republican senator lifted the lid on the US administration's latest strategy to clamp down on foreign influence within crucial academic and technology realms. In his statement, Rubio declared: "The U.S. will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields." This bold step indicates a significant turn in American policy towards educational ties with China, focusing particularly on exchanges deemed as potential national security threats, reports the Express. Though details of the policy are still forthcoming, it is anticipated to have a laser focus on individuals engaged in high-stakes areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and progressive engineering; disciplines regularly highlighted in intelligence assessments as key arenas of competitive edge against China. Amidst rising tension over fears of espionage and intellectual property theft by foreign entities ensconced in US academic institutions, this policy ushers in a heightened era of vigilance. Just yesterday, Rubio dropped a bombshell, announcing an immediate halt on all student visa applications from the globe, putting British nationals in the mix and throwing countless aspirations into chaos. The official remarked: "Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consular sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M, and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued septel, which we anticipate in the coming days," as reported by Politico. Concerned experts like Aaron Reichlin-Melnick from the American Immigration Council have voiced their worries, pointing to significant financial ramifications: "Trump's decision to suspend student visa interviews threatens nearly $44 billion in economic contributions and over 370,000 jobs across the United States, according to NAFSA. If the United States stops taking foreign students, the economic impact would be catastrophic," as conveyed by Express US.
