Kennedy plans overhaul of key health panel guiding insurer coverage: Report
If carried out, the mass dismissal would mark Kennedy's latest attempt to reshape US public health policy, particularly around vaccines and preventive medicine, Reuters reported. A long-time vaccine skeptic, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in June and replaced them with just seven appointees — some of whom share his skepticism.The potential gutting of the USPSTF has drawn criticism from more than 100 health organizations, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. In a letter to Congressional health committees earlier this month, they urged lawmakers 'to protect the integrity' of the task force.'The recommendations of the USPSTF are a cornerstone of preventive care,' the letter stated. 'Undermining its independence could jeopardize the health of millions of Americans.'Though the USPSTF operates independently, its members are appointed by the HHS secretary without Senate confirmation and receive support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The group's authority was reaffirmed in June when the US Supreme Court upheld the task force's constitutional standing and its role in shaping preventive care mandates.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump talks tough on drug prices but his demands have softened
President Donald Trump appears to be easing up on his push to force drugmakers to cut their prices for U.S. patients, even as he ramps up the rhetoric he is deploying against the companies. The president on Thursday afternoon posted letters to his Truth Social platform that the White House had sent to 17 large pharmaceutical and biotech companies, saying they each have until late September to cut certain U.S. prices, or else the administration will 'deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families." Drug stocks fell in response. The S&P 500 Pharmaceuticals industry group index was down 2.7% Thursday, while the S&P 500 was down 0.4%. Still, the new demands Trump made on Thursday appear to require far less from the companies than had been implied by an executive order on drug pricing the president signed two months ago. In May, the White House resurfaced a proposal from the first Trump administration that would peg prices paid for prescription medicines in the U.S. to the lowest prices paid in other wealthy countries, the so-called most-favored-nation price. An executive order signed May 12 ordered federal agencies to determine most-favored-nation prices for drugs. It laid out penalties if the companies didn't make 'significant progress" toward lowering U.S. pricing to those levels. The order suggested that the most-favored-nation prices would apply to all U.S. drugs, regardless of whether they were paid for by the federal government or private payers, and whether the drugs were new or had been on the market for years. The new letters posted Thursday make narrower demands. Trump told drugmakers they must lower the prices of drugs already on the market to most-favored-nation rates only for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans paid for jointly by state governments and the federal government. Medicaid already pays a steeply discounted rate for drugs under pre-existing programs. For all other payers, including Medicare and commercial plans, Trump says the most-favored-nation rates should only apply to newly launched medicines. 'I think Trump is, in some ways, softening his tone on most favored nation," Raymond James healthcare policy analyst Chris Meekins told Barron's. 'Originally, he said the U.S. will get the best price that any other nation gets for all products. Now he's carving out specific categories." Meekins said that the new approach is potentially more realistic. 'Attempting to try to make sure the U.S. gets better prices on future products is something companies can work with the administration to try to do going forward," he said. Details about the plan remain scarce. The drug industry lobby group PhRMA, in a statement, criticized the effort. 'Importing foreign price controls would undermine American leadership, hurting patients and workers," said PhRMA senior vice president Alex Schriver in a statement. 'At a time when China is threatening to overtake the U.S. in biopharmaceutical leadership, we need to ensure America continues to be the most attractive place in the world to develop innovative medicines." Trump sent the letters to top executives at AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and other companies. In the letters to Pfizer and Regeneron, he crossed out the surnames of the companies' CEOs, Albert Bourla and Leonard Schleifer, and wrote in their first names by hand. Write to Josh Nathan-Kazis at
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Will US students be forced to run a mile, do pull-ups and sit-ups? Trump's next move drops big hint
AP The physical fitness test was introduced by former President Dwight Eisenhower in 1956 US President Donald Trump Thursday announced he re-establishing the presidential fitness test, a way of assessing the fitness level of American students. Trump was joined by professional athletes as he signed an executive order that will expand on his council on sports, fitness and nutrition, including by reviving the Presidential Fitness Test in public schools.'This is a wonderful tradition, and we're bringing it back,' Trump said of the fitness test that began in 1966 but was phased out during the Obama administration. 'We're officially restoring the Presidential Fitness Test and the Presidential Fitness Award – and it's going to be a very big thing,' Trump said in remarks from the White House. 'It was a big deal,' the president said of the competition the test fostered in schools. Members of the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition, including professional golfers Bryson DeChambeau and Annika Sorenstam, Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker, former New York Giants linebacker Lawrence Taylor and former WWE wrestler Paul 'Triple H' Levesque, who is the son-in-law of Education Secretary Linda McMahon, joined Trump at the signing ceremony. ALSO READ: Social Security eyes massive reform in US: New policy could hit 3.4 million Americans this month The physical fitness test was introduced by former President Dwight Eisenhower in 1956. It required students to perform situps, pullups or pushups, a sit-and-reach test and a one-mile run until it was altered in 2012. According to the Harvard Health blog, the aim of the test was to 'assess cardiovascular fitness, upper-body and core strength, endurance, flexibility, and agility'. ALSO READ: Stimulus payments August 2025: These US states will receive financial benefit. Do you qualify? But the presidential fitness test didn't make students healthier. A 2025 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that from 2007 to 2023, trends had 'significantly worsened' for 'child mortality; chronic physical, developmental and mental health conditions; obesity; sleep health; early puberty; limitations in activity; and physical and emotional symptoms', reports The House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had announced the executive order was incoming earlier Wednesday and said it was part of Trump's efforts to reward 'excellence in physical education' and 'MAKE AMERICA FIT AGAIN!' ALSO READ: As Covid surge sparks alarm in US, Trump admin's big step worries local governments. What you need to know Under the tenure of Barrack Obama, the test 'moved away from recognizing athletic performance to providing a barometer on student's health.' Obama's Presidential Youth Fitness Program continued though Trump's first term and the Biden on Wednesday also said his sports council would assist with issues pertaining to college athletics and women's sports.'It's a mess, what happened. What they're doing with college football, and the fans are upset about it,' he said, lamenting that college football athletes are being 'traded around like playing cards.'
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Breast milk or formula feeding? Gynaecologist shares pros and cons to explain which is better for the child
Immediately after birth, a newborn receives optimal nutrition from the mother's breast milk, which is rich in essential nutrients and antibodies. However, due to convenience or lack of awareness, many new mothers choose to rely on formula feeding instead. Is breastfeeding the best way of nourishment for a newborn?(Shutterstock) In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr Niti Kautish, director and HOD, obstetrician and gynaecologist, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, said, 'New mothers often face the dilemma of whether to breastfeed traditionally or opt for the convenience of formula feeding. This uncertainty often stems from discomfort, hesitation, and a lack of adequate knowledge.' Also read | Breastfeeding 101: Best practices, benefits and overcoming challenges Here's what you need to know about the pros and cons of breast milk and formula feeding: 1. Nutrition: Breast milk is tailored by nature with a perfect balance of nutrients, enzymes, hormones, and antibodies, whereas formula milk is industrially produced to mimic breast milk. 2. Ease of digestion: Breast milk is easily digested, reducing the risk of constipation, gas, or colic in infants. Formula milk is heavier and takes longer to digest, which may lead to digestive discomfort in some babies. 3. Emotional bonding: Breastfeeding encourages skin-to-skin contact and emotional bonding between mother and baby. Formula feeding allows other caregivers to participate in feeding, but may not provide the same level of bonding. 4. Cost Breast milk is free and always available without the need for external preparation. Formula milk is expensive and requires bottles, sterilisation, and clean water for safe preparation. Also read | Breastfeeding tips to boost your milk supply: Simple diet hacks every new mom should know Know the pros and cons of formula feeding.(Shutterstock) 5. Preparation and flexibility Breast milk needs no preparation but may involve challenges like public feeding or pumping. Formula milk offers flexibility and allows feeding by others at any time, which some mothers find more convenient. 6. Composition The composition of breast milk naturally changes according to the baby's age, time of day, and feeding stage. Formula milk has a fixed composition and does not adapt to the baby's changing needs. Although different compositions of formula feed are available, customised to age. 7. Postpartum weight loss Breastfeeding helps the uterus contract, supports postpartum weight loss, and reduces the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Formula feeding does not provide any physical health benefits to the mother. 8. Conditions to know There are a few conditions where your doctor might recommend formula feeding over breast milk. This comprises a baby's health-related issues, such as a severe congenital lactose intolerance, a few inborn errors of metabolism or when the mother is on some anticancer drugs or is HIV positive with a high viral load. At such times, supportive family involvement and spreading informed awareness about both choices play a vital role in helping mothers make confident decisions. Also read | Ultimate nutrition guide for breastfeeding mothers: Dietician shares 24 tips for a healthy lactation period Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
