Putin says he hopes to meet Trump, White House presses peace deal
Putin's announcement came on the eve of a White House deadline for Moscow to show progress toward ending the 3-year-old war in Ukraine or suffer additional economic sanctions.
The US was still expected to impose those sanctions Friday on Russia, according to a White House official who was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The same official said a US-Russian summit would not happen if Putin does not agree to meet with Zelensky. The official did not specify whether the condition was for Zelensky to be present at the possible US-Russia summit or at a subsequent meeting.
Speaking of possible direct talks with Zelensky, Putin said he has mentioned several times that he was not against it, adding: "It's a possibility, but certain conditions need to be created" for it to happen.
The Kremlin has previously said that Putin and Zelensky should meet only when an agreement negotiated by their delegations is close.
ADVERTISEMENT
Although Putin said the United Arab Emirates was one possible venue, no location or other details had been determined Thursday morning, according to the White House official.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan shake hands during their meeting at the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow, Russia. (Source: Associated Press)
Ukraine fears being sidelined by direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow, and Zelensky said he had phone conversations with several European leaders Thursday amid a flurry of diplomatic activity. European countries have pledged to back Ukraine for as long as it takes to defeat Russia's invasion.
Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, earlier brushed aside the possibility of Zelensky joining the summit, something the White House said Trump was ready to consider. Putin has spurned Zelensky's previous offers of a meeting to clinch a breakthrough.
"We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive," Ushakov said, adding that US special envoy Steve Witkoff's suggestion of a meeting including Ukraine's leader "was not specifically discussed".
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, right, shake hands during their meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia. (Source: Associated Press)
Putin made the announcement in the Kremlin about a possible meeting with Trump after meeting with Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the UAE.
ADVERTISEMENT
Asked who initiated the possible talks with the American president, Putin said that didn't matter and "both sides expressed an interest".
Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund who met with Witkoff on Wednesday, said a Trump-Putin meeting would allow Moscow to "clearly convey its position," and he hoped a summit would include discussions on mutually beneficial economic issues, including joint investments in areas such as rare earth elements.
The meeting would be the first US-Russia summit since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone toward Trump's effort to end the war, although there's no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including a cold weekend on the way, Israel reveals a new plan in Gaza, and what not do when driving over a rail crossing. (Source: 1News)
Months of US-led efforts have yielded no progress on stopping Russia's invasion of its neighbour. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides and more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations.
Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin previously has offered no concessions and said he will accept a settlement only on his terms.
At the start of his second term, Trump was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom he has long shown admiration, and even echoed some of his talking points on the war. But he recently has expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, criticizing the Kremlin leader for his unyielding stance on US-led peace efforts, and has threatened Moscow with new sanctions.
ADVERTISEMENT
Zelensky seeks European involvement
Zelensky said European countries must also be involved in finding a solution to the war on their own continent.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky attends a press conference during his visit to Vienna (Source: Associated Press)
"Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war," he added.
A ceasefire and long-term security guarantees are priorities in potential negotiation with Russia, he said on social media.
Securing a truce, deciding a format for a summit and providing assurances for Ukraine's future protection from invasion — a consideration that must involve the US and Europe — are crucial aspects to address, Zelensky said.
He noted that Russian strikes on civilians have not eased despite Trump publicly urging Putin to relent.
ADVERTISEMENT
A Russian attack Wednesday in the central Dnipro region killed four people and wounded eight others, he said.
Poll shows support for continuing the fight waning in Ukraine
A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a peace settlement. In the survey, conducted in early July, about seven in 10 Ukrainians said their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible.
The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups.
The findings were based on samples of 1000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access.
In Kyiv, opinions on the usefulness of a Trump-Putin meeting were divided.
"Negotiations are necessary, and we all really want the war to end… because this war will only end with negotiations," resident Ruslan Prindun said.
But Volodymyr Tasak said it was "unlikely" that anything good would come from US-Russia talks and that Zelensky was "being squeezed out".
Lyudmila Kostrova said in downtown Kyiv that Putin was simply trying to avoid US sanctions by agreeing to meet with Trump. "Putin is not interested in ending the war now," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Money raised from the new ‘green fee' will go exclusively to environmental projects
The sum adds substantially to Hawaii's annual budget for 'green infrastructure', which in 2021 amounted to 1% of the state's economy. According to a recent assessment led by Jack Kittinger, senior vice-president for Conservation International's Centre for Regenerative Economies, that leaves the state short by about US$560m per year. 'The deficit that we have in conservation financing is why our environmental quality continues to decline,' he says. According to Green, it was the Maui fires that inspired the state legislature to act. The Governor had repeatedly proposed such legislation in prior years without success. 'Those fires profoundly awakened our state to the reality that we have to have a mechanism to mitigate risk and prepare for future potential disasters,' Green says. The bill goes into effect on January 1, 2026. It's already adding to a conversation about sustainable tourism management that's spreading both across the US and, more broadly, around the world. As part of President Donald Trump's signature bill passed on July 4, national parks too will begin charging tourism fees - albeit only for foreign visitors - to fund conservation initiatives no longer covered by federal budgets. And in destinations as disparate as Venice and Bhutan, new rules either introduce or raise the cost of tourism taxes. The aim is to turn tourism spending into a tool for conservation, despite its own environmental cost. 'As time goes by,' Green says, 'people will appreciate how well we're able to maintain Hawaii's beaches and natural wonders. We want to protect those for future generations.' First on the Agenda Ten million tourists visit Hawaii each year, putting a tremendous burden on the state's ecosystem. Trails and vegetation become more trampled, beaches become littered, and the influx of people puts a greater strain on water and sewage resources. Even before the first green-fee tax bill is passed along to guests, Green is making a list of projects he'd like to tackle with the proceeds, such as securing roads threatened by ocean surge and fortifying crumbling bluffs. The investments aim to preserve tourism sites and quality of life for locals while also creating jobs, with legislators from each island weighing in on the priorities. If the projects succeed, the green fee could expand; if not, it may be scrapped within the year. Kauai, Hawaii, United States. Photo / Unsplash On Kauai's Nepali coast, there's already an example of small changes making big impacts. Parking was eliminated at a beach park that was once plagued by tourism impacts. By creating a remote lot with a pay-to-ride shuttle service, once-trampled areas such as taro patches began to regrow, and the initiative created local jobs and improved satisfaction for tourists and locals alike-serving as a model for broader statewide efforts. As a sign of how serious Green is about addressing the state's environmental problems, he's phasing out the Hawaii Tourism Authority, the agency that, since 1998, has led policy and marketing efforts. Not long after the new green fee bill passed, Green asked for and received the resignations of the entire board of directors. In the agency's place will be the Destination Stewardship Organisation, a new non-profit managing tourism with an emphasis on community values, sustainability and control, rather than treating it as a commodity. Not everybody is on board Some tourists are referring to the new levy as a 'surf tax' due to the prominence of budget-conscious surfers on Hawaii's legendary breaks. However, the overwhelming consensus is that neither tourists nor hotels are truly sweating on the increased fee. 'The visitor industry relies on Hawaii's natural environment, and we aren't doing enough to protect it,' says Carl Bonham, a professor of economics at the University of Hawaii. 'This bill had significant support from the hotel industry, because the money is being reinvested in something that's going to protect the tourism industry,' he adds. The fees could add to a landscape in which tourists increasingly feel ripped off. Online message boards already show plenty of consumer frustration over untangling the fine print around the state's many required permits, reservations and fees. Malia Hill, director of policy for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, warns that all this could hurt the destination's appeal and dampen visitor spending with restaurants and tour operators. 'I don't think enough thought was given to how it will affect the economy,' she says. Green argues that locals won't be affected on a large scale. 'It'll have a very, very minimal impact on local people,' he says. 'When we had Covid, we had a period of time where we had US$120 tests per person, and people still came in very large numbers.' A model for other states? There's precedent for Hawaii's green fee around the world-just not in the US. Bhutan has long charged a 'Sustainable Development Fee' of US$65 per day - and continues to attract travellers after raising it to US$200 in 2022. Palau's US$100 'Pristine Paradise Environmental Fee' has similarly funded its protected marine areas while maintaining steady tourism since 2018. The revenue from these fees in Bhutan and Palau also directly supports sustainability projects like tree planting, reef protection, and national park up-keep. In Bhutan and Palau, high fees keep mass tourism from taking root in delicate places that can draw fewer but high-paying travellers. Many more destinations have been upping their fees, or adding new ones, in recent years. Venice, which in 2024 implemented a day-tripper tax of up to about US$12 to address overtourism, is more like Hawaii in the size and scale of its tourism industry. A year into its programme, there's been no reported decline in visitor interest, while the fees are ensuring that local residents don't bear the full cost of tourism. The revenue is helping to fund everything from waste management to cultural programmes. And Greece has created a similar programme too; in January 2024 the country introduced the Climate Crisis Resilience Fee to replace its old hotel tax system, which charges travellers up to €10 per night. The Maldives, Bali, and even New Zealand have also passed legislation to introduce new climate-focused tourism levies in recent years. Green believes that Hawaii's new green fee will serve as an example for other states -though he's less clear on what benchmarks the state must hit to prove that the new fee is making an impact. 'I have had some interest from two or three governors,' he says. 'It's probably different for everyone, but I expect other places that have challenges with the climate, especially those with long shorelines or fire hazards, to do some version of this.'
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Vance calls out Democrats over Epstein files, reignites push for transparency
By Alejandra Jaramillo , CNN US Vice President JD Vance speaks at the US military's Pituffik Space Base in Greenland on March 28, 2025. The visit is viewed by Copenhagen and Nuuk as a provocation amid President Donald Trump's bid to annex the strategically-placed, resource-rich Danish territory. (Photo by Jim WATSON / POOL / AFP) Photo: JIM WATSON Vice President JD Vance pushed back against criticism of the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files , accusing Democrats of political opportunism and failing to act when they held power in an interview released on Sunday. "President Trump has demanded full transparency from this. And yet somehow the Democrats are attacking him and not the Biden administration, which did nothing for four years," Vance told Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," defending the administration's approach to the unreleased documents. "I laugh at the Democrats who are now all of a sudden, so interested in the Epstein files . For four years Joe Biden, the Democrats did absolutely nothing about this story," Vance added. "We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of connections with left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires," he claimed, adding that Democratic political leaders "went to Epstein Island all the time." Vance did not give more details or provide evidence of that allegation. Vance's comments come amid renewed public pressure to unseal documents related to the Epstein case after the Justice Department announced in a memo last month that there was no evidence the accused sex trafficker kept a "client list" or that he was murdered. After the Fox News interview aired, clips of Vance's remarks gained traction across social media, with users across the political spectrum posting: "Release the Epstein files!" The vice president reiterated that full disclosure remains a goal of the administration. "The president has said very clearly, because we've had other meetings about that, is that he wants us to be fully transparent," Vance said. "So we're working to compile the thousands and thousands of documents that are out there for full transparency," he said. The Justice Department told two federal judges Friday it wants to release grand jury exhibits in Epstein case, in addition to transcripts, with "appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information." However, it's unclear how much information in the grand jury transcripts and evidence is already not in the public sphere. Vance also denied that the Epstein files were the subject of a meeting previously reported by CNN, held at the White House last week between Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, the vice president and others. "We did meet at the White House," Vance said. "We have a great FBI director and a great Department of Justice lead, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and we met to talk about how to ensure we have justice for the American people." "We actually didn't talk about the Epstein issue," Vance added. Vance and his office denied on Wednesday that a meeting on Epstein was taking place, as CNN previously reported, but a source familiar with the logistics of the meeting said the attendees discussed a number of topics, including the Epstein case and potential next steps. Trump administration officials are weighing whether to publish an audio recording and transcript of Blanche's recent conversation with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, CNN previously reported. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee last week issued a dozen subpoenas to the Justice Department and high-profile Democratic and Republican figures for files and information related to Epstein. - CNN
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
In a Trump-Putin summit, Ukraine fears losing say over its future
Zelenskyy himself invited such comparisons in a speech to his people hours after Trump raised the spectre of deciding Ukraine's fate in a one-on-one meeting in Alaska, territory that was once part of the Russian empire. While Putin has made clear that he regards Ukraine as rightful Russian territory dating back to the days of Peter the Great, the Russian leader has not called for the reversal of the US$7.2 million sale of Alaska to the US in 1867, during a period of financial distress for the empire. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Zelenskyy said, noting that the Ukrainian constitution prohibits such a deal. Then, in what sounded like a direct warning to Trump, he added: 'Any solutions that are against us, any solutions that are without Ukraine, are simultaneously solutions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead solutions.' Zelenskyy is the one with the most on the line in the summit. After his bitter Oval Office encounter with Trump in February, which ended in Trump's declaration that 'you don't have the cards right now', he has every reason to fear that Trump is at best an unreliable partner. At worst, Trump is susceptible to being flattered and played by Putin, for whom he has often expressed admiration. However, there are also considerable political risks for Trump. Those would be especially acute if he is viewed as forcing millions of Ukrainians into territorial concessions, with few compensating guarantees that Putin would not, after taking a breather of a few years, seize the rest of the country. 'President Trump still seems to be going into this conversation as if Putin is negotiating as a partner or friend,' said Tressa Guenov, the director for programmes and operations at the Scowcroft Centre for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. 'That will continue to make these discussions difficult if Ukraine isn't involved.' Trump's personal envoy, Steve Witkoff, raised the possibility of a meeting of Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin, and in the past week, it looked like that might be a precondition for the session in Alaska. But Trump waved away the notion when asked about it by reporters. A senior Administration official said yesterday that the President remained open to a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy, but that the meeting between Trump and Putin was set to go ahead as scheduled. Yet the gap in how Trump approaches these negotiations and how the America's allies in Europe approach them became all the more vivid at the weekend. After a meeting of European national security advisers and Ukrainian officials with Vice- President JD Vance, who is on a visit to Britain, leaders of the European Union's executive branch and nations including France, Britain, Italy and Germany called in a statement for 'active diplomacy, support to Ukraine, and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war'. They added that any agreement needed to include 'robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity', phrases Trump has avoided. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' the leaders said. Trump has long sought a direct meeting with Putin, declaring publicly that a problem like Ukraine could only be resolved with a meeting between the two top leaders. He also said last week that he expects to see President Xi Jinping of China before the end of the year. And he seems reluctant to impose more tariffs or sanctions ahead of those meetings. In fact, his deadline for Putin to declare a ceasefire or face crushing 'secondary sanctions' melted away on Friday without a mention from Trump, other than that people should wait for his meeting with Putin. The fact that Trump is even meeting with Putin represents a small victory for the Russian President, Guenov said. 'Trump still has given Putin the benefit of the doubt, and that dynamic is one Putin will attempt to exploit even beyond this meeting,' she added. While Trump has insisted that an understanding between himself and the Russian President is crucial to a broader peace, Putin, Guenov said, would certainly welcome any land concessions Trump is willing to grant. Already the President has signalled that is where these talks are headed. Trump suggested that a peace deal between the two countries could include 'some swapping of territories', signalling that the US may join Russia in trying to compel Ukraine to permanently cede some of its land — the suggestion flatly rejected by Zelenskyy. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' said Trump, leaving unclear who the 'we' in that statement was. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both, but we'll be talking about that either later, or tomorrow.' Russian officials have demanded that Ukraine cede the four regions that Moscow claimed to have 'annexed' from Ukraine in late 2022, even as some of that land remains under Ukrainian control. And Russia is seeking a formal declaration that the Crimean Peninsula is once again its territory. Yalta, where the meeting of three great powers was held 80 years ago, is a resort city on the southern coast of Crimea. Until late last week, it appeared likely that the meeting between Trump and Putin would be held on the traditional neutral grounds of the old Cold War, perhaps in Geneva or Vienna. Putin's willingness to venture into American territory was striking, not least because his arrival in the US will signal the end of his political and legal isolation from the country. In the past few months, Trump has terminated efforts at the Justice Department and the State Department to collect evidence of war crimes committed by Russia during its invasion of Ukraine. Inviting Putin to meet in the United States seemed to extinguish any threat that the US would provide evidence to the prosecution. 'It's bewildering how we could bring in somebody the International Criminal Court has classified as a war criminal,' said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, the president of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute, who has tracked many of the Russian violations. But he emphasised that Putin is entering the meeting with Trump in an extraordinarily weak position economically, and that it would benefit US negotiators to realise how few cards Russia holds. 'The mystical illusion of power that Putin creates is as real as the Wizard of Oz,' Sonnenfeld said. 'The Russian economy has been imploding. Trump doesn't seem to realise that.' Sonnenfeld cautioned Trump against any deal in which Ukraine would give up rights to the Donbas region, particularly given the agreement that the Trump Administration negotiated for the US to share in future revenues from Ukraine's mineral reserves through a joint investment fund. 'Giving up the Donbas would be disastrous,' he said. 'That is where a lot of these valuable minerals are.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: David E. Sanger and Luke Broadwater ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
