
New book unfurls the rich life of Inji Efflatoun beyond her time in prison
On the night of June 19, 1959, Inji Efflatoun stood alone on a Cairo street, attempting to hail a taxi. As a car finally pulled over, a group of men rushed her, seizing and forcing her into the vehicle. It was a sting. After months of living in hiding, disguising herself as a fellaha and flitting from house to house, the Egyptian painter and political activist had finally been arrested. Efflatoun's arrest marked a pivotal point. It signalled not only the beginning of her four-year imprisonment but a powerful new chapter in her artistic and political legacy. At Al Qanater Women's Prison, Efflatoun produced some of her most renown works – paintings that captured the resilience of the incarcerated women and the brutal intimacy of confinement. She also recorded her famous memoirs on to cassettes, which were later transcribed and shaped her posthumous image. Though she recalled, in evocative detail, several phases of her life, it is her time behind bars that remains most closely associated with her name. But, as a new book reveals, Efflatoun's legacy and life was too expansive to be confined to a prison cell. The Life and Work of Inji Efflatoun is a project by the Barjeel Art Foundation, co-published with Skira. It is edited by Sultan Sooud Al Qassemi and Suheyla Takesh, who are the foundation's founder and director respectively. The book presents, for the first time, an English translation of Efflatoun's memoir. The memoir elucidates several of her key moments. They begin with her early life in the Shura neighbourhood of Cairo and her time at the Sacred Heart School. They touch upon her early mentorship by Kamel el-Telmissany, from whom she learnt that painting meant 'an honest expression of society and self'. She speaks about her involvement in political groups advocating for women's rights and anti-colonialism. She expresses her heartbreak after the death of her husband Hamdi Aboul Ela, a prosecutor who shared Efflatoun's political ideals and who probably died from injuries sustained during his arrest and torture. She narrates details of her arrest, and how she managed to smuggle paintings out of prison. In short, the memoir describes a person who relentlessly defied confinement, whether the bubble of aristocracy, the constraints of gender norms or the physical walls of a prison. It portrays someone as fierce in her art as she was in her politics. For Efflatoun, painting and activism were not separate pursuits but shadows cast by the same flame. The memoir is translated from Arabic by Ahmed Gobba and Avery Gonzales, both former students of Al Qassemi at Yale University. He credits them with initiating the project. 'The book started when Ahmed wrote his final paper on Inji after he discovered that her family was from the same province of his grandfather,' Al Qassemi says. 'But her family were the landowners, and his family were the workers. And so there was this interesting relationship that was happening.' Gobba then proposed translating Efflatoun's memoir into English, and began working with Gonzales. 'Initially we were only going to publish the diary,' Al Qassemi says. The memoir is substantial, taking up a third of the 320-page book, and it is easy to see why it became popular when it was first published in 1993, four years after her death. 'Inji's life is fascinating,' Al Qassemi says. 'She came from an elite background and ended up forsaking all that privilege, choosing to be an activist, to stand up for the rights of the less privileged. She related to people who she fought for. There is no surprise that her book became quite popular, and that she's more known than other artists of her generation.' 'It started as a smaller project,' Takesh adds. 'Then we thought to commission one or two new essays on Inji's life and work to complement the memoir. One thing led to another, we kept discovering people's research, and eventually we ended up with nine new essays.' The essays explore the many facets of Efflatoun's extraordinary life. They examine her fearless activism and how her art served as both a personal outlet and a political expression – often reflecting the intensity of her struggles and convictions. Several essays consider her prescient sensibilities, as well as her active engagement with international networks of solidarity. The essays also touch upon her ties with the Soviet Union and her affinity with Mexican artists, particularly David Alfaro Siqueiros. Her exhibitions are portrayed not just as artistic milestones, but as acts of diplomacy that extended her reach far beyond Egypt. Efflatoun's personal life also finds its way into these essays. They trace the transformative nature of her marriage to Hamdi, a union that deeply impacted her, even as it ended in tragedy. Equally moving is her determined effort to learn Arabic – having been educated in French – which is framed as emblematic of her drive to connect with the fabric of everyday Egyptian life. 'We are also republishing three existing texts,' Takesh says. 'Two of them have been translated from Arabic. One of those is actually authored by Inji herself in 1972 as part of her participation in a conference in Tunis. The paper is about Egyptian modernist art, and she speaks about other people's work such as Mahmoud Said and Mohamed Nagy. She also situated her own practice within that constellation.' The book also features an essay by American artist Betty LaDuke, originally published in 1989. Written after LaDuke visited Efflatoun in her Cairo studio in the late 1980s, the piece presents a broad stroke of the artist's life before culminating with an interview that offers a rare, first-hand account of Efflatoun in her later years. Beyond the essay, LaDuke played a key role in shaping the book's visual narrative, contributing significantly to its rich collection of images. The Life and Work of Inji Efflatoun, in fact, draws from several private collections and institutional archives to present a vivid visual record of the artist's life, featuring her paintings as well as rare archival photographs. It is, quite possibly, the most comprehensive publication of Efflatoun's work to date, with high-resolution images that bring out the intricate details and textures of her paintings. As a whole, the book seeks to do justice to a painter who has too often – and unfairly – been reduced to her years in prison. 'One thing we did is expand on the two-dimensionality of Inji,' Al Qassemi says. 'Everything about Inji was about her arrest and time in jail. There were all these missing parts of her life. 'She spent four and a half years in jail, but she lived for many decades more than that. That's why we called the book The Life and Work of Inji Efflatoun. We actually go into parts of her life that have been completely neglected before.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
a day ago
- The National
Who is Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack on Jewish group?
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the attack on a pro-Israel gathering in Colorado, has told police that he would do it again. He has been charged with a federal hate crime and first-degree assault, among other crimes. Who is Mohamed Sabry Soliman? Mr Soliman, 45, is originally from Egypt. In 2022, he arrived in California on a non-immigrant visa that expired in February 2023, according to CBS News. He had been living in Colorado Springs. An online CV under Mr Soliman's name said he was employed by a Denver-area healthcare company working in accounting and inventory control, with prior employers listed as companies in Egypt. Under education, the resume listed Al Azhar University in Cairo. Speaking to the Associated Press, neighbours said Mr Soliman had five children. According to court documents, Mr Soliman said he waited for his daughter to graduate before carrying out the attack. Tricia McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a post on X that Mr Soliman 'is illegally in our country'. She said that Mr Soliman sought asylum in September 2022, but did not share details about the status of his claim. Who was the target of the attack? The alleged target of the attack was a group of people gathered in central Boulder calling for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza. About 60 people are still believed to be held by Hamas and other militant groups in the enclave after being kidnapped in October 2023 during attacks on southern Israel; only about a third of them are believed to still be alive. Witnesses say Mr Soliman, armed with a makeshift flame-thrower and shouting "free Palestine", attacked the peaceful demonstration. In video circulating online, Mr Soliman can be heard shouting at bystanders: 'How many children have you killed?' and 'end Zionists'. Authorities have said that Mr Soliman prepared for the attack for a year, and that given the opportunity, he would do it again. Law enforcement found more than a dozen unlit Molotov cocktails near where Mr Soliman was arrested. Mr Soliman told investigators he constructed the home-made incendiary devices after doing research on YouTube and buying the ingredients, according to court documents. He is being held on a $10 million bond and was due to appear in court on Monday.

The National
a day ago
- The National
Police charge suspect who yelled 'free Palestine' while attacking pro-Israel group in Colorado
The man suspected of using a "makeshift flame-thrower" and other incendiary weapons to attack a group of people in Colorado as they gathered to raise awareness of hostages in Gaza faces at least eight criminal charges, including one for first-degree murder, although authorities have not said if anyone died from their injuries. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, yelled 'free Palestine' during Sunday's attack in the Rocky Mountain city of Boulder, said Mark Michalek, the special agent in charge of the FBI 's Denver field office. Eight people were injured, ranging in age from 52 to 88. The injuries were consistent with reports of people being set on fire, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn said, adding that injuries ranged from serious to minor. Mr Soliman was arrested and taken to hospital for treatment, but authorities didn't elaborate on his injuries. Other preliminary charges include first-degree murder and using explosives or an incendiary device while committing a felony. In a video circulating on social media, Mr Soliman can be seen, shirtless, waving two bottles filled with liquid near the site of the attack. He repeatedly shouts 'how many children have you killed' and 'end Zionists' as people attend to the injured lying on the ground nearby. Following the attack, the FBI immediately described the violence as a 'targeted terror attack', although local police have been more cautious in ascribing a motive. Mr Soliman is an Egyptian national, government officials confirmed to CBS News. In 2022, he arrived in California on a non-immigrant visa that expired in February 2023 and had recently been living in Colorado Springs. Tricia McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a post on X that Mr Soliman "is illegally in our country". The White House said President Donald Trump had been briefed on the incident. "Acts of Terrorism will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law. This is yet another example of why we must keep our Borders SECURE, and deport Illegal, Anti-American Radicals from our Homeland," Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Demonstrators with a volunteer group called Run for Their Lives, which organises run and walk events to call for the release of the hostages who remain in Gaza, had gathered at the Pearl Street pedestrian mall, a four-block area in downtown Boulder frequented by tourists and students. The attack came at the beginning of the Jewish holiday of Shavuot. The incident was immediately condemned by US officials as well as world leaders. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement yesterday saying the "attack was aimed against peaceful people who wished to express their solidarity with the hostages held by Hamas, simply because they were Jews". The UAE also condemned the attack in the "strongest terms", with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs affirming the country's "permanent rejection of all forms of violence and terrorism targeting innocent people". The Anti-Defamation League said the attack was a result of anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist incitement. "We're witnessing a global campaign of intimidation and terror deliberately directed against the Jewish people," ADL chief executive and national director Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement. Law enforcement authorities in the US struggle with a sharp rise in anti-Semitic violence. It comes about a week after a man was arrested over the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staff members in Washington. He shouted 'free Palestine' as he was led away by police. This is not the first time Boulder has been the site of extreme violence: in 2021, a gunman opened fire in a grocery store, killing 10 people. Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa, originally from Syria, was sentenced to life in prison for murder after a jury rejected his attempt to avoid prison time by pleading not guilty by reason of insanity.

Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
Libya: Barriers to Justice
Libya's fragmented justice sector is marred by serious due process violations and laws that violate international norms. The judiciary is unwilling and unable to meaningfully investigate serious crimes. Violations of the magnitude and persistence documented in Libya reflect the chronic shortcomings of Libya's judicial institutions. Tackling structural institutional dysfunction, including within the judiciary, is a prerequisite to overcoming impunity. Libya should pursue comprehensive reform, respect fair trial standards and due process rights, assume control over all detention facilities, release all those held arbitrarily, end military trial of civilians, and arrest and surrender suspects wanted by the International Criminal Court. Libya's fragmented justice sector is suppressing fundamental freedoms and obstructing accountability for abuses, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Libyan authorities should urgently pursue sweeping judicial overhaul, reform repressive legislation, and arrest and surrender suspects on its territory wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The 39-page report, ' Injustice By Design: Need for Comprehensive Justice Reform in Libya,' documents how outdated and repressive legislation, lack of fair trial rights, and rampant due process violations urgently need reform. Unsafe conditions for judicial staff, abusive military trials of civilians, and inhumane conditions in prisons compound abuses and entrench impunity. 'By failing to address long-standing judicial reform needs, Libyan authorities are turning their back on justice and letting impunity prevail,' said Hanan Salah, associate Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. 'Recent deadly militia clashes in the capital, Tripoli, and the lack of adequate justice mechanisms to address abuses and violations should be a wake-up call for urgent reform.' Libya's tumultuous political transition remains stalled as two rival entities compete for control of territory and resources amid rising repression and armed confrontations. The Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU) together with affiliated armed groups and security agencies control most of western Libya, while the Libyan Arab Armed Forces, their affiliated security apparatuses, and an administrative entity control eastern and southern Libya. The Presidential Council operates out of Tripoli and is backed by armed groups. Recent violence and the discovery of a new mass grave underscore the need for judicial accountability, Human Rights Watch said. Heavy fighting between armed groups and quasi-state forces in the Libyan capital between May 12-14, 2025, resulted in civilian casualties and the destruction of homes and cars. After the clashes, GNU authorities said they discovered 53 unidentified bodies in a hospital morgue and a previously unknown unmarked grave site containing at least nine unidentified bodies of men and women. Human Rights Watch found that Libya's justice sector is marked by fragmentation and deep political polarization. The judiciary is unwilling and unable to conduct meaningful investigations into serious violations and international crimes. Key judicial institutions, including the Ministry of Justice, the Supreme Judicial Council, the Supreme Court, and the Prosecutor General's Office, are in deep conflict. A newly established Supreme Constitutional Court in Benghazi may compete with the Supreme Court in Tripoli, risking a constitutional crisis and conflicting rulings. Libya's penal code and related legislation are outdated, do not address international crimes, and require comprehensive reform to bring them in line with its international human rights obligations. Domestic legislation includes repressive and abusive provisions from the era of former leader Muammar Gaddafi, including laws providing for the death penalty, lashings, and amputation of limbs. Many laws issued since 2011 limit freedoms and contravene international law. Fair trial and due process rights are not respected in Libya. Military courts in the east and west continue to prosecute civilians under the guise of 'terrorism' related crimes. Lawyers face barriers to meeting with clients, a lack of notice around hearing schedules, and a lack of access to court documents. Video hearings are increasingly common and undermine detainees' rights when used exclusively. Both Libyans and non-Libyans are routinely held in long-term arbitrary detention. Armed groups and quasi-state forces control detention facilities notorious for inhumane conditions for migrants, asylum seekers, and Libyan nationals alike. They do not always comply with release orders and court summonses of detainees. Torture, ill-treatment, and overcrowding are rampant and well-documented. Legal professionals, defendants, and witnesses in Libya have faced attacks, intimidation, and harassment as the authorities do not provide them with adequate physical protection. The United Nations Security Council referred the situation in Libya to the ICC prosecutor in 2011 and the Office of the Prosecutor opened an investigation into serious international crimes committed in Libya since February 15, 2011. Eight people subject to public ICC arrest warrants remain at large. Libyan authorities should cooperate with the ICC, including by promptly arresting and surrendering to the court everyone on Libyan territory subject to ICC arrest warrants, such as Saif al-Islam Gaddafi and Osama Elmasry Njeem, both wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. In November 2023, the ICC prosecutor announced that his office planned 'to complete investigative activities' in the Libya situation by the end of 2025. On May 12, 2025, the Libyan government submitted a declaration to the ICC accepting the court's jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed in Libya from 2011 to the end of 2027. The Office of the Prosecutor should reassess the time frame for completion to ensure the adequate delivery of its mandate. The office should also engage with Libyan authorities to strengthen the domestic criminal justice system by addressing structural deficiencies, Human Rights Watch said. International law requires states to provide a fair hearing before a legally constituted, competent, independent, and impartial judicial body, a trial without undue delay, and a right to appeal to a higher judicial body. Defendants must be granted full access to a lawyer, adequate time to prepare their defense, and the ability to challenge evidence and arguments against them. Detention is subject to strict due process and authorities must promptly charge or release a person, promptly present them before a judge to rule on the legality of detention, and provide regular opportunities to challenge the lawfulness of detention. Trying civilians in military courts is incompatible with the right to a fair trial under international human rights law. Libyan authorities should repeal all laws that violate international law and Libya's Constitutional Declaration. They should lay the groundwork for comprehensive legislative reform in consultation with legal scholars and domestic and international civic groups, amend the penal code to criminalize grave international crimes, ensure fair trial standards and due process rights, assume genuine control over all detention facilities, ensure humane treatment of detainees, release all those held in arbitrary detention, and end military trials of civilians. 'Violations of the magnitude and persistence we are documenting in Libya do not occur in a vacuum, but rather reflect the chronic shortcomings of Libya's judicial institutions,' Salah said. 'Tackling the structural institutional dysfunction, including within the judiciary, is a prerequisite to overcoming impunity.' Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Human Rights Watch (HRW).