logo
HMRC's 4-word warning to Brits who can now claim Winter Fuel Payment this year

HMRC's 4-word warning to Brits who can now claim Winter Fuel Payment this year

Daily Mirror11 hours ago

Following Labour's dramatic U-Turn on Winter Fuel Payment eligibility, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has issued a four-word warning for Brits being contacted about the benefit
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has issued a stark warning following major changes to the Winter Fuel Benefit.
In a major U-turn, nine million pensioners will now receive the benefit, which is designed to help with soaring energy bills during the winter months. Worth £200, or £300 for households with someone aged over 80, the Winter Fuel Benefit was controversially limited last year to state pensioners who are in receipt of means-tested benefits including Pension Credit, Universal Credit and Housing Benefit. As previously reported, in Scotland, the Winter Fuel Payment has been replaced by the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment.

However, Chancellor Rachel Reeves unveiled in the House of Commons earlier this week (June 11) that huge changes to the benefit have been pushed through. Now, Winter Fuel Payments in England and Wales will be automatically awarded to all households where someone is over state pension age.

However, those earning more than £35,000 a year will have to pay back the benefit, which will be automatically recovered by HMRC through PAYE or through self-assessment return. You can opt out of receiving the payment if your income is over £35,000 - with details on this still waiting to be confirmed.
Taking to X (formerly Twitter) HMRC warned Brits to 'watch out for scams' and protect their money after criminals have taken advantage of the government's shakeup. "Some customers are being contacted by scammers about claiming the Winter Fuel Payment," it wrote.
"We'll never contact you by text to claim this money or send personal information. You don't need to do anything. Payments will be made automatically."
On its website, HMRC has created a checklist to help Brits decipher if a 'suspicious contact' is a scam as opposed to a genuine phone call, text message or email. While HMRC does send text messages to some of its customers, you might be a victim of a scam if your correspondence:

Rushes you
Is threatening
Is unexpected
Asks for personal information like bank details
Tells you to transfer money
Offers a refund, tax rebate or grant
Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money
WHATSAPP GROUP: Get money news and top deals straight to your phone by joining our Money WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
NEWSLETTER: Or sign up to the Mirror's Money newsletter here for all the best advice and shopping deals straight to your inbox.

Winter Fuel Payments will still be issued per household, but the income eligibility is based per person. For example, if you have two people living together and one earns £30,000 a year and the other earns £40,000, one person would keep their share of the Winter Fuel Payment but the other would pay it back.
Again, these payments will be automatically made - so Brits don't need to apply or contact HMRC to receive the benefit. Most people normally get their Winter Fuel Payment from November every year. Your eligibility is based on your age by the end of the qualifying week.
Do you have a story to share? Email us at yourmirror@mirror.co.uk for a chance to be featured.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review
Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review

Britons are bracing themselves for tax rises later this year as they fear Rachel Reeves ' Spending Review cash splash is otherwise unaffordable, anew poll suggests. Two thirds of voters (67 per cent) believe that the Chancellor's plans set out last week mean she will either hit them in the pocket or increase borrowing. And the YouGov poll shows that fewer than one-in-eight (12 per cent) believe that the plans, which will see billions more thrown at the NHS and nuclear power, are affordable with things as they are. The Treasury is already said to be drawing up tax rise options for the Autumn as economists warn Ms Reeves' plans no longer add up. Dividends and bank profits are among the areas being mooted for drumming up revenue to balance the books. The Chancellor declined to rule out tax rises again yesterday, amid fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could deal another hammer blow to the prospects for growth. The poll found that almost half of voters (49 per cent) believe Ms Reeves is doing a bad job. However her rating has improved from -41 to -33 compared to after the Spring Statement in March. The proportion of voters who feel that the economy will get worse over the next year also fell from 65 per cent to 54 per cent. Voters backed more money for the NHS, school building repairs and building more social housing. But in a blow to Ed Miliband only half say nuclear power is a priority, and fewer want money spend on AI, science and technology or building more railways. Ms Reeves insists her spending plans for the next three years are 'fully' funded. But critics have claimed the stalling economy, together with pressures on defence and a Labour revolt on benefits mean she is writing cheques with 'fantasy' money. The issues could crystalise at the Budget in the Autumn, when many believe the independent OBR will downgrade growth forecasts. GDP shrank by 0.3 per cent in April, although it has grown over the past quarter. The IFS think-tank has warned that tax rises look 'almost inevitable', ridiculing the government's claim to have identified billions of pounds in 'efficiencies' during a 'zero-based' overhaul of costs. According to the Sunday Times, a list of potential tax increases drawn up in the Treasury includes raising the bank surcharge. That is a levy on profits on top of the 25 per cent corporation tax rate. It was cut from 8 per cent to 3 per cent under the Tories, with suggestions it could return to 5 or 6 per cent. Another apparent option is increasing tax on dividends, often taken by company directors instead of wages. Currently the highest rate stands at 39 per cent - lower than the 45 per cent top rate of income tax. Removing a tax-free £500 dividend allowance would bring in hundreds of millions of pounds for the Treasury, but could punish small investors. Challenged on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that 'lots of experts' were already saying she would need to put taxes up, Ms Reeves said: 'Well we're a strong economy with strong foundations and we have weathered other shocks... 'We are still the only country to have secured a deal with the United States, and in addition we've got trade deals with India and the EU, so we are working hard as a government to strengthen our economy, to grow our economy in a way that creates good jobs here in Britain, paying decent wages, to put more money in peoples' pockets.' Options are always drawn up within the Treasury ahead of fiscal events, and not necessarily implemented.

Petrol price alert: How the Israel-Iran conflict will impact the motorist and UK economy
Petrol price alert: How the Israel-Iran conflict will impact the motorist and UK economy

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Petrol price alert: How the Israel-Iran conflict will impact the motorist and UK economy

'That's the end of the cheapest petrol prices in the UK for four years' – Tony Redondo, Cosmos Currency Exchange Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Motorists have been warned of an imminent hike in prices at the pump as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies. Experts also point to the knock-on effect that rising oil prices could have on the wider UK economy amid concerns that inflation may spike again. It comes as the Bank of England this week announces its latest decision on interest rates with a hold widely anticipated. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Following a 7 per cent surge on Friday, the price of a barrel of Brent crude edged higher on Monday, at around $74, which could have a direct effect on petrol prices in the UK. That would spark the end of a period of falling prices for motorists, with a litre of unleaded currently selling for below 130p on many forecourts - the cheapest petrol prices in Britain for four years. UK motorists have seen some of the lowest prices for petrol and diesel in four years. Oil price hikes have followed intensive Israeli aerial attacks that have extended targets beyond military installations to hit oil refineries and government buildings. In response, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has struck a hard line, vowing that further rounds of strikes would be 'more forceful, severe, precise and destructive than previous ones'. Tony Redondo, founder at Cosmos Currency Exchange, warned of an end to the relative downturn of the price of fuel at the pump for Brits. He said: 'Global oil prices are up, hitting their highest price in almost five months after Israel struck Iran, dramatically escalating tensions in the Middle East and raising worries about disrupted oil supplies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That's the end of the cheapest petrol prices in the UK for four years. Gold has been up to a one-month high as the markets swing to risk aversion mode. Stock markets will sell off. These are all predictable knee-jerk reactions.' Policymakers meet at the Bank of England this week to decide on the next move on interest rates. Prem Raja, head of trading floor at Currencies 4 You, added: 'Markets are reacting with a classic risk-off tone. Investors are seeking safe havens, and oil prices are rising with supply disruptions feared, potentially ending the UK's run of low petrol prices.' Ironically, the strong oil price has been helping to support the wider stock market, with the UK's benchmark FTSE-100 index proving remarkably resilient amid gains for energy companies and defence contractors. Shares in Footsie heavyweights BP and Shell were bolstered by the higher oil price. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said the latest Middle East conflict remained a 'fluid situation' with the potential for markets to experience sudden jolts if the tensions escalate further. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Global oil prices jumped last week after Israel attacked Iran, raising concerns about major disruptions to supply,' he noted. 'Despite a weekend of violence between the two countries, investors showed no signs of panicking, judging by movements in financial markets on Monday. 'The gold price is often a measure of investor sentiment, going up when people are worried and going down when they're optimistic. The precious metal slipped 0.6 per cent to $3,432 per ounce which indicates that investors remain alert to ongoing geopolitical tensions but they're not reaching for their tin hats.' Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said there were worries that the attacks from Iran and Israel could ignite a wider conflict, destabilising the Middle East and affecting oil supplies. 'There's an intense focus on the Strait of Hormuz, described as an 'oil artery' in the region,' she added. 'Around a fifth of global oil supplies flow through this narrow channel and an escalation could disrupt distribution Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Israel has already been targeting Iran's energy facilities, including Iran's South Pars gas field. Although gas prices have also edged up slightly, the biggest moves have been seen with crude prices which are up around 12 per cent since hostilities erupted and could head higher if the Strait is targeted. 'The worsening situation is set to be the focus of the G7 meeting of leaders of wealthy nations in Alberta, Canada. While hopes that Trump will sign more deals seem to be keeping trade optimism a bit higher, many countries remain in a queue and the cost to the global economy is mounting.' Interest rates UK interest rates are predicted to stay at 4.25 per cent on Thursday at the latest meeting of the central bank's monetary policy committee (MPC) after inflation jumped in April. The MPC has voted to cut rates at every other meeting since it started easing borrowing costs last August, from a peak of 5.25 per cent. This has been possible while the rate of inflation has been steadily falling from the high of 11.1 per cent in October 2022, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, inflation jumped to its highest level for more than a year in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Consumer prices index (CPI) inflation hit 3.5 per cent in April, up from 2.6 per cent in March. Since releasing the data, the ONS said that an error in vehicle tax data collected meant the April figure should have been 3.4 per cent. Riz Malik, director at R3 Wealth, fears the escalating conflict in the Middle East could affect the UK's economy.

Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts
Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts

New Statesman​

timean hour ago

  • New Statesman​

Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts

Photo by Jordan Pettitt - WPA Pool / Getty Images After the celebration, the hangover. Rachel Reeves' £300bn Spending Review gave Labour MPs plenty to cheer but reality soon intruded. GDP was revealed to have shrunk by 0.3 per cent in April (as Donald Trump's tariffs and higher taxes depressed growth). Israel and Iran's escalating conflict has only further darkened the global outlook. How, in this climate, will Reeves' largesse be paid for? Higher taxes are one answer (the Treasury is already compiling potential revenue raisers ahead of this autumn's Budget); the other is more cuts. When Keir Starmer last month U-turned on winter fuel payments and indicated his intent to abolish the two-child benefit limit, some inside Labour questioned whether the government's welfare bill would ever emerge. But the answer will become clear this week with legislation due to be published on Wednesday ahead of a vote next month. No 10 maintains that there is not just a fiscal case but a moral case for the bill. 'Winter fuel was a policy that was forced on us in a difficult situation at the start,' an aide told me. 'Welfare reform is an argument that we want to make about how to protect the most vulnerable and how to help people into work.' Starmer himself is moved to passion on this question, telling the cabinet earlier this year that there is 'nothing progressive' about a system in which one in eight young people are not in employment, education or training, and one in ten working-age people are claiming at least one type of health or disability benefit (with spending projected to rise from £48.5bn in 2023-24 to £75.7bn in 2029-30). But he faces the biggest revolt of his premiership to date. Forty-two Labour MPs have signed a public letter describing the £5bn cuts – which would see 370,000 current Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants and 430,000 future ones lose an average of £4,500 – as 'impossible to support'. More than 100 have signed a private letter to the Chief Whip ('none of us are consistent rebels,' they emphasise), warning that they too are unable to endorse the proposals. Here is why a government with a Commons majority of 165 seats has been forced to contemplate the possibility of defeat (with Downing Street also primed for ministerial resignations). The Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall – who faces the defining test of her political career – has sought to contain the rebellion by offering an 'olive branch' to critics. Those who no longer qualify for PIP would continue to receive payments for 13 weeks (rather than the standard four) and those with lifelong conditions or fewer than 12 months to live would automatically receive a higher rate of Universal Credit and be exempt from reassessments. By the end of the parliament, No 10 points out, there will still be an extra 750,000 people receiving PIP. Yet most MPs remain unmoved. 'The hang-tough position dressed up as concessions won't wash,' one soft-left figure told me. 'MPs know how this stuff works and can't be fobbed off.' Many privately warn that only a change in the assessment criteria would persuade them to support the bill. At present individuals who need help dressing, washing and feeding themselves would no longer receive PIP. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe What lies ahead is nothing less than a battle over Labour's founding purpose. For some – as cabinet ministers often like to put it, 'the clue is in the name' – this is the party of work, not welfare. Others riposte that Labour's duty is precisely to support those unable to support themselves. Kendall's task is to convince rebels that her bill does. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Impunity is fuelling Israel's spiralling aggression] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store