New Report Reveals The Grim Reality Of Heart Healthcare In New Zealand
Commissioned by The Heart of Aotearoa - Kia Manawanui Trust and prepared by the University of Otago, the ' Heart disease in Aotearoa: morbidity, mortality, and service delivery' report reveals a system plagued by chronic under-resourcing, critical workforce shortages, and deadly inequities.
Trust Chief Executive Ms Letitia Harding says the report lays bare a system that is failing at every level.
"Heart care in New Zealand isn't just stretched - it's on the verge of collapse.
"We are failing in all aspects, and it's costing New Zealanders their lives."
Key findings from the report include:
Life-threatening delays: Half of all heart attack patients aren't seen within internationally accepted timeframes.
Alarming workforce shortage: New Zealand has only a third of the cardiologists it should have.
Systemic inequality: Māori and Pacific people are hospitalised or die from heart disease more than a decade earlier, on average, than other New Zealanders.
The financial burden: Heart disease costs the country's health system and economy $13.8 billion per year
A postcode lottery for care: Regions with the highest death rates -Tairāwhiti, Lakes, Whanganui, and Taranaki - have the fewest cardiac specialists.
The deadliest conditions: Heart disease accounts for 20% of all deaths in New Zealand. The five heart conditions responsible for the majority are: heart failure, atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), subsequent myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy.
Trust Medical Director Dr Sarah Fairley, who is also a Wellington-based cardiologist, says the findings match what frontline clinicians see every day.
"From inside the system, I can tell you that this report reflects what we see every day: a workforce stretched beyond safe limits, patients slipping through the cracks, and no end in sight."
Ms Harding says this report should be a wake-up call for the Government.
The Heart of Aotearoa - Kia Manawanui Trust is calling for an urgent government response, including immediate investment in public hospital cardiac care infrastructure - beds and equipment - and a national strategy to recruit and retain cardiology staff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Tauranga cancer survivor urges bowel screening as almost half of kits not returned
When broken down by ethnicity, fewer than half of the kits sent to Māori, Pasifika and Asian people have been returned – 41.9%, 41.8% and 33.1%. Ferguson said she got upset hearing these statistics because there were 'so many people under the age of 60 that are screaming out to have those kits'. 'They know they have something wrong and they're just not being heard so therefore they're not getting screened because doctors are either saying 'you're too young' or 'it's something else'. 'That's wasted resources.' She said the scary thing with bowel cancer was someone could have it and have no symptoms. This was the case with Tauranga man Paul Blears, who said it was 'a hell of a shock' being diagnosed with bowel cancer after he used his screening kit. 'By doing that test, you are catching things early … which will avoid late-stage diagnosis,' Ferguson said. The National Bowel Screening Programme was introduced in the Health NZ Bay of Plenty region in May 2022. It was the last of the former 20 district health boards to introduce it after the programme started in July 2017. People are invited to join the programme at age 60 then sent a free home test kit every two years until age 74. The Government is gradually lowering the eligibility age to 58, to be in effect nationwide by March. The Health NZ data showed 103 cancers were detected between January 1, 2023, and May 26, 2025, and 78 surgeries were carried out to remove bowel cancer. Health NZ noted this may include people who had surgery who did not have their cancer detected via a screening kit, and that some patients may have had surgery in another district, or privately. Patients who chose chemotherapy treatment would not be recorded in surgery numbers, and others newly diagnosed may be waiting for surgery. Tauranga bowel cancer survivor Rachael Ferguson pictured in 2022. Photo / Andrew Warner Almost five years since her diagnosis, Ferguson said her scans and blood test results were 'great'. 'I feel great, which is the main thing,' said Ferguson, now aged 37. She gave birth to her son George in September 2022. 'He was such a good baby … he's really come into his own kind of personality now.' Ferguson said she had recently completed a reformer Pilates instructor course and would soon start teaching. She had also been doing paid partnerships on social media. With a background in early childhood education, she had done some relief teaching. 'After the diagnosis and also becoming a mum myself, I just felt like I was ready to leave that side of things. 'It's just been trying to find something else.' Bowel cancer is the second-highest cause of cancer death in New Zealand, killing about three Kiwis every day. One in 10 Kiwis diagnosed are under 50. New research by Bowel Cancer New Zealand showed one in four adults were unable to name a single symptom of bowel cancer, which Ferguson said was 'pretty concerning'. Bowel Cancer New Zealand chief executive Peter Huskinson said symptom awareness was the 'strongest line of defence', with screening currently limited to those aged 58 and older. 'Acting early, before symptoms become severe, can mean the difference between a treatable diagnosis at the GP and a late-stage emergency presentation. 'That free test in your mailbox doesn't just detect cancer – it can stop it before it starts,' he said. 'Don't leave it in a drawer. Put it by the loo and get it done.' Bowel cancer symptoms Bleeding from the bottom or in your poo A persistent change in bowel habits Ongoing, periodic or severe abdominal pain Unexplained weight loss or fatigue A lump or swelling in the abdomen Source: Bowel Cancer NZ Megan Wilson is a health and general news reporter for the Bay of Plenty Times and Rotorua Daily Post. She has been a journalist since 2021.
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Woman says she was left with collapsing nostril after being 'upsold' unnecessary surgery
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter of The otolaryngologist diagnosed a benign tumour inside her left nostril, which he said needed removal. Photo: 123rf A woman says her nose was "overserviced" by a surgeon who convinced her to undergo additional surgery she didn't need or want. Her nostril collapsed following the surgery and she says she was "extremely humiliated" by the doctor who refused to discuss the matter, saying he no longer wanted to treat her and telling her to leave his office. She told the Health and Disability Commissioner that the tests he undertook before surgery were not well informed and that he didn't give her enough information about the risks. According to an HDC decision released today, the woman met the otolaryngologist in August 2019. He diagnosed a benign tumour inside her left nostril, which he said needed removal. The surgeon said the woman wanted her nasal airway improved and that they had discussed additional surgery. But, her version was that he "convinced" her to undergo the surgery, despite the fact she didn't want her nasal airway improved and didn't initiate the conversation. She considered he had "upsold" her the treatment following the original purpose of her visit, to have the tumour removed. The surgeon said he had discussed the risk of additional surgery, and performed it in June 2020, undertaking procedures to address sinus issues, improve airflow, drainage and ventilation. Within two days, the woman raised concerns with the surgeon, telling him her left nostril collapsed when she inhaled deeply. He told her to continue rinsing it and to add a steroid spray to the rinse. After three weeks, she visited the surgeon and was advised that "the nose has settled down beautifully". There was no correspondence in clinical notes about the visit or that she had raised concerns about her collapsing nostril. Again, she outlined concerns about the nostril at a third post-operative appointment. She said the doctor then became defensive, agreeing that the left nostril was collapsing but said "that this was still a good outcome". His consultation notes show at that point, for the first time, the woman's complaint was documented. The surgeon noted near full healing, adding the tumour couldn't be ruled out, but he felt that the analysis was overly cautious and the nasal passage was entirely normal. He did touch on the issue of what intervention might be required to correct the collapse, discussing surgery. At that point, the decision said he acknowledged in his consultation letter that the patient had "certainly expressed dissatisfaction with a collapsing nostril with forced inspiration". The woman said there was then a heated disagreement and that she was advised by the doctor that he no longer wished to treat her and asked her to leave. She was, according to her recollection, "castigated" by the receptionist for her apparent rudeness, and left. She said she emailed the clinic with a complaint on the same day, telling the Health and Disability Commissioner that she had not received a response from the doctor or the clinic. The doctor said the woman's explanation of the final appointment was "wholly unacceptable" and that" something certainly didn't feel right about the way (she) engaged and what was being explained to her". He said the collapse was caused by forced breathing and that normal breathing post-surgery may take up to 12 months. He said the woman was "overly dramatic" and became upset when video images showed that the nasal cavity was not out of place. The surgeon said she was not interested in viewing the video footage or formatting a treatment plan going forward. He said he knew she could be "very unpleasant and aggressive" and, as he didn't wish to get into an argument with her, he "stood up and terminated the consultation". He told the commissioner he wrote a "full report" to her GP on the same day and advised her to seek the guidance of another ear, nose and throat surgeon. Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Vanessa Caldwell said the doctor breached part of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights as he did not provide the woman with a written acknowledgement of her complaint within five working days and missed an opportunity to resolve it. The doctor could have communicated clearly in writing, outlining the reasons why he did not accept the complaint and any proposed actions he intended to take, and any appeal procedure that he had in place. She was also critical of him for ending the doctor-patient relationship 'to avoid argument' saying it wasn't a sufficient enough reason to do so, nor was the woman making a complaint about him. "Consumers are entitled to ask further questions about the outcome of surgery and to make complaints under the Code." "Even if the relationship was deemed 'irretrievable', as (the doctor) submits, this should have been managed in a professional manner." Caldwell said the lack of information provided about the risk of a collapse was a mild departure from accepted practice and the doctor failed to explain why additional surgery was necessary. While she was unable to make a finding about the doctor's diagnosis due to a difference in clinical opinion, Caldwell said the woman "trusted" his judgement as an "expert". "In my view, this illustrates an imbalance of power within the doctor-patient relationship, where consumers may feel unable to challenge a doctor's recommendation or make decisions based on trust (as opposed to an informed choice based on knowledge about their health status and alternative treatment options). It was noted the doctor had however taken the matter "very seriously" and made changes to his practice, taking part in a consent development forum, data collection processes, formalised complaint procedures, a review of doctor-patient relationship guidelines and an increase in staff, including a plastic surgeon who specialises in nasal surgery. The doctor was told to apologise to the patient and undertake an audit of compliance with the complaints procedure. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Fundraising Drive On For Lifesaving Medical Equipment
Funds are being sought for medical equipment that can be the difference between life and death in Northland and Auckland. Northern Rescue is fundraising for ventilators and video laryngoscopes to be fitted in its fleet of rescue helicopters across Te Taitokerau and Tāmaki Makaurau. Six Hamilton T1 Ventilators valued at $53,000 each and ten video laryngoscopes worth $60,000 in total are needed. Two ventilators have so far been sponsored, however, funding is needed for the final four. In addition, five video laryngoscopes are needed at each of Northern Rescue's Auckland and Northland operations to be used in the organisation's rescue helicopters, Rapid Response Vehicles, the Whangārei ambulance and training rooms. Ross Aitken, Auckland-based Clinical Operations Manager and Critical Care Paramedic at Northern Rescue, says the video laryngoscopes have been in use for five years and like the ventilators, are nearing end of life. 'The video laryngoscopes are well used and it is important that our crews have reliable equipment to ensure that we are providing safe optimal care to the people of the Northern Region,' says Aitken. Video laryngoscopes are used in placing endotracheal tubes in patients who require assistance to manage their airway and ventilation. 'Northern Region has been using video laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting for a decade. During this time video laryngoscopy has become the standard of care when delivering prehospital anesthesia. 'These video laryngoscopes are then used in conjunction with ventilators, which are what allow our clinical teams to provided critical care to our sickest patients in the Northern Region,' says Aikten. Northern Rescue Helicopter Limited (NRHL) has already received a major boost to its life-saving operations thanks to generous donations from the Four Winds Foundation and Trillian Trust, each funding one Hamilton T1 ventilator. Fonterra has kindly made donation to help cover the cost of brackets needed to mount the ventilators. Paul Davis, Critical Care Paramedic and Deputy Clinical Operations Manager in Whangārei, says the current fleet of ventilators are also nearing the end of their operational life after nearly eight years of service and having supported hundreds of critically ill and injured patients. 'The fact is, as patient numbers and complexity increases, especially during interhospital transfers which is a substantial part of our workload, we need more advanced technology that the more modern ventilators provide. Advanced devices like the Hamilton T1 are essential for these high-acuity missions as they are designed for in-hospital and prehospital environments. That enables the delivery of ICU-level ventilator strategies in-flight, with improved battery performance, oxygen efficiency, and a user-friendly interface that enhances clinical safety. Patients requiring mechanical ventilation are among the most critically unwell ranging from those in respiratory failure due to chronic illness, to trauma patients with multiple severe injuries including head trauma. Davis says the ventilators enable our clinicians to stabilise patients and transport them safely and expediently to definitive care centres, with the mechanical ventilators used by NRHL clinicians hundreds of times a year (two to three times per week on average) Aitken and Davis say they are essential in minimising secondary complications during transport, which can arise from the progression of a patient's underlying condition.
